WOW! FBI charges STORY site with Obsenity! - Page 7 - GoFuckYourself.com

Mr.Fiction · 10-09-2005, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I guarantee you if this issue was put to a nationwide vote the people defending this site would be countable compareable to the hundreds of millions that would be against it.

A majority would probably throw you in jail for running a porn site. So go turn yourself in.

You support the right to fictional child murder and yet you are attacking those who support the right to other fictional free speech?

How can you support fictional child murder if you say this has to do with "having kids"?

Wouldn't you be more worried about fictional killing of kids than fictional abuse?

300 anti-free speech porn producers!

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Yes this is the United States and its not a free for all country. We have rules and laws and there are lines in the sands that can be drawn by the majority.

I guarantee you if this issue was put to a nationwide vote the people defending this site would be countable compareable to the hundreds of millions that would be against it.

Start with John Stuart Mill's 'On Liberty'. Educate yourself as to the implications of the actions you're so fervently advocating. Then come back and give us a more knowledgeable opinion on this topic.

"In this essay Mill also warns of a second danger to liberty, which democracies are prone to, namely, the tyranny of the majority. In a representative democracy, if you can control the majority (and get them to vote for, and elect, your candidates) then you can control everyone (because your candidates, once "democratically elected", will pass whatever laws are needed for this, as was done by Hitler's agents in the 1930s in Nazi Germany and seems to be happening today in the U.S.A.)."

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/jsmill.htm

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

Start with John Stuart Mill's 'On Liberty'. Educate yourself as to the implications of the actions you're so fervently advocating. Then come back and give us a more knowledgeable opinion on this topic.

"In this essay Mill also warns of a second danger to liberty, which democracies are prone to, namely, the tyranny of the majority. In a representative democracy, if you can control the majority (and get them to vote for, and elect, your candidates) then you can control everyone (because your candidates, once "democratically elected", will pass whatever laws are needed for this, as was done by Hitler's agents in the 1930s in Nazi Germany and seems to be happening today in the U.S.A.)."

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/jsmill.htm

Someone post a poll for both arrests. I'm curious to see how everyone here would vote.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Someone post a poll for both arrests. I'm curious to see how everyone here would vote.

It doesn't matter how everyone would vote. Everyone in this country gets to do their own thing as long as they're not hurting anyone else, no matter how unpopular it is with the moral majority. That's the whole point. Are you really this thick?

SureFire · 10-09-2005, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction

But you think it's ok to have movies where babies are killed on your cable?

Think about it.

If I saw any show abusing a baby in a sexual way, yes; they have no sexual feelings which is child abuse.

I know where to draw the line, do you? I dare you or anyone to post a gallery of babies being finger fucked or write a fantasy to your partner accounts.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SureFire

If I saw any show abusing a baby in a sexual way, yes; they have no sexual feelings which is child abuse.

I know where to draw the line, do you? I dare you or anyone to post a gallery of babies being finger fucked or write a fantasy to your partner accounts.

you're too fucking stupid to deserve any other reply than this one

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

It doesn't matter how everyone would vote. Everyone in this country gets to do their own thing as long as they're not hurting anyone else, no matter how unpopular it is with the moral majority. That's the whole point. Are you really this thick?

I don't know where you live dig, but in most states in the US, if in your own house you possess CP, heroin, bomb making substances, loaded weapons left where a child could access them, etc. you are subject to arrest and jail time.

So the argument that everyone gets to do there own thing isn't valid, so if anyone is thick bro, it ain't me.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I don't know where you live dig, but in most states in the US, if in your own house you possess CP, heroin, bomb making substances, loaded weapons left where a child could access them, etc. you are subject to arrest and jail time.

So the argument that everyone gets to do there own thing isn't valid, so if anyone is thick bro, it ain't me.

Funny how you're comparing a loaded weapon, Heroin and a bomb to a text file.

Something in this set doesn't belong. Can you tell which one?

directfiesta · 10-09-2005, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

you're too fucking stupid to deserve any other reply than this one

I agree. Probably a kid that cant see the difference between " actual pictuires" and " stories"...
I am happy I don't have to stay in this business much longuer.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

Funny how you're comparing a loaded weapon, Heroin and a bomb to a text file.

Something in this set doesn't belong. Can you tell which one?

Tell it to the judge . . .

I think below indicates how you can't do anything you want in the privacy of your home.

In September, when news reports of the site began to surface, Wilson insisted that because the site actually is hosted in Amsterdam, he was not violating any laws in Polk County.

"Nice try," Brad Copley, a prosecutor with the State Attorney's Office, who specializes in obscenity and sex crime cases, said Friday night. "He's in charge of the Web site. He lives here. He's operating from his house. It doesn't matter where his server is."

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I don't know where you live dig, but in most states in the US, if in your own house you possess CP, heroin, bomb making substances, loaded weapons left where a child could access them, etc. you are subject to arrest and jail time.

So the argument that everyone gets to do there own thing isn't valid, so if anyone is thick bro, it ain't me.

So a story is CP? The pixels are sentient beings who were molested and abused?

How can it be child abuse when there's no child involved? Anyway, the point isn't about protecting stories of sex with children. It's about protecting the right of the individual in this society to say what he wants whenever he wants as long as he isn't actually harming someone. It's why the ACLU protects Nazi marchers just as strongly as they protect the most extreme liberal groups. When you say we have freedom of speech, you don't get to pick and choose which speech is ok. Either it's all ok or you have to let the government pick and choose who can say what, where they'll say it and when it can be said. That is totalitarianism. You're not as intelligent as I thought you were, that's for sure, but surely you're intelligent enough to do a little reading on the subject instead of just saying "Pedos are bad" over and over again.

Fletch XXX · 10-09-2005, 10:32 PM

Bomb making substances.

bottle

rag

gas

amazon sells books on how to make bombs that is put out by the United States Military.

looks like we are all subject to arrest at any time.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Tell it to the judge . . .

I think below indicates how you can't do anything you want in the privacy of your home.

In September, when news reports of the site began to surface, Wilson insisted that because the site actually is hosted in Amsterdam, he was not violating any laws in Polk County.

"Nice try," Brad Copley, a prosecutor with the State Attorney's Office, who specializes in obscenity and sex crime cases, said Friday night. "He's in charge of the Web site. He lives here. He's operating from his house. It doesn't matter where his server is."

Tell it to the judge huh? Now *I* should be arrested too eh? You think people should be arrested for sitting in their own house, by themselves, reading about stuff of which you don't approve.

You're just not worth this many keystrokes. Good night.

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE · 10-09-2005, 10:33 PM

this thread has spun out of control

..

-------------Bottom Line = Support free speech even when you disagree with it

Brujah · 10-09-2005, 10:33 PM

Some great arguments on both sides in this thread, but you know.. it's almost a waste of time because the conditioned emotional response is blinding. My last post in this thread will be some notes about ACLU/Nambla/Amazon in response when confronted about selling NAMBLA on it's site, and similiar books.

***

The ACLU, defending NAMBLA, argues the lawsuit is the same as if someone was killed due to the permissive attitude of sex, drugs and rock music, and then sued Rolling Stone magazine for creating a climate in which the murder was possible.

Amazon has stated it does not endorse "Understanding Boys and Boylovers," but insists "people have the right to choose their own reading material."

Law-enforcement agencies say they cannot do much about "written words," emphasizing they deal mostly with trafficking in child pornography. The FBI and local agencies have been trying for years to find NAMBLA in violation of laws against the sexual exploitation of children, and a U.S. Senate committee concluded NAMBLA did not engage in criminal activity.

***

So a new day is dawning. How far will it go ? I guess we're finding out.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

I agree. Probably a kid that cant see the difference between " actual pictuires" and " stories"...
I am happy I don't have to stay in this business much longuer.

Pictures of CP and fantasty stories about CP produce the same effect and involve the same subject matter.

What you guys are arguing is like saying here's a some drugs visible on the table and there are some drugs hidden inside a box.

If text files about CP aren't CP then what are they?

I'm not trying to be an argumentative asswipe, just trying to legally analyze this case cause apparently we've got a wide rift in opinions on this one and no one is even close to seeing the others viewpoint.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyserver

this thread has spun out of control

-------------Bottom Line = Support free speech even when you disagree with it

Apparently this concept is just waaaaay too esoteric for KRL to comprehend. He wants you to 'tell it to the judge'.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

So a story is CP? The pixels are sentient beings who were molested and abused?

Digital images are formed by 1 and 0's.

Text files are formed by 1 and 0's.

Both file types are viewed by using your eyes.

Images are displayed on a screen using pixels.

Text is displayed on a screen using pixels.

WTF? Am I stupid and missing something here??

Fletch XXX · 10-09-2005, 10:38 PM

i think everyone should watch this funny joke before going to sleep tonight

http://www.ifilm.com/player/?ifilmId...ize=default%22

whats funny is, people sit and argue on a board while this is on mainstream.

jokes about sex with children will be on sale at amazon dvd when this movie comes out.

enjoy.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

If text files about CP aren't CP then what are they?

They're text files. Is a story about rape an actual rape? Is a movie where someone gets killed an actual murder?

This isn't a large mental gap to bridge, and if you haven't bridged it by now you're never going to.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:39 PM

By the way I send money to the ACLU every year. Just so you guys recognize I am a huge proponet of freedom of speech and not an ultra conservative.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

WTF? Am I stupid and missing something here??

Yes.

54321

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

By the way I send money to the ACLU every year. Just so you guys recognize I am a huge proponet of freedom of speech and not an ultra conservative.

You're a 'huge proponent of freedom of speech'???

coulda fooled me.

Fletch XXX · 10-09-2005, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

By the way I send money to the ACLU every year. Just so you guys recognize I am a huge proponet of freedom of speech and not an ultra conservative.

yeah but you also claim to donate so much to protect animals but invest in uranium. ;)

i find the uranium investment encouragement the funny thing due to its clear effects on animals and how much its routinely used tested on animals.

sorry. had to.

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Digital images are formed by 1 and 0's.

Text files are formed by 1 and 0's.

Both file types are viewed by using your eyes.

Images are displayed on a screen using pixels.

Text is displayed on a screen using pixels.

WTF? Am I stupid and missing something here??

I think gore pictures of people being killed, tortured and dismembered are totally offensive, unwarranted in any situation and I further believe that anyone who enjoys viewing them is a sick motherfucker. Fletch

However, I would never support any politician who wants to outlaw them. You can find someone who's mortally offended by almost anything, and a politician who'll base his campaign on outlawing whatever particular thing it is that morally outrages you. Before too long, we won't have anything left to watch, read or do that isn't governmentally pre-approved as safe for all and non-corrupting, including anything that would undermine our faith in our government and our fearless all-wise, all-knowing leaders.

directfiesta · 10-09-2005, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Digital images are formed by 1 and 0's.

WTF? Am I stupid and missing something here??

Yes to both.

To post here an image of chid porn, I must find a child and actually abuse it ....

To post a text file, I do not need to create a victim,,

Example:

- The baby was nakedon the bed... He approched with his finger extended, .....

See the difference? Probably not.

You are confusing morality with legality....

KRL · 10-09-2005, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

They're text files. Is a story about rape an actual rape? Is a movie where someone gets killed an actual murder?

This isn't a large mental gap to bridge, and if you haven't bridged it by now you're never going to.

Do images stimulate sexual desire?

Does text stimulate sexual desire?

I'm arguing this point because I dealt with a point just like this once.

I had a phone sex biz before the Net. I had to deal with a right wing religious zealot state attorney general one year who wanted to prosecute the company by saying our phone sex messages were obscenity. I used the same argument like you are here, that these were just sound files and not images. And they were just regular silly porn, mostly simulated moaning groaning and sucking sounds. The prosecutor said it didn't matter, the sounds were stimulating people sexually and those sounds were obscene. We came back with "So moaning is considered obscene in the US?" "The simulated sucking sound created by girl placing her finger in her mouth is obscene?" It was totally ridiculous, yet we had no choice but to comply and shut down because we knew this guy was on a mission against the phone sex industry. The costs to let this guy prosecute and then spend years in court defending ourselves would have gone into the stratosphere.

This is a sample of what they said was obscene.

Sample Mp3 Phone Sex Message

Does that sound obscene to you? It doesn't to me. Its totally lame.

So they gave us the choice of shutting down the phone sex network or be prosecuted on obscenity charges and paying a fine of $75,000 per day for every day we kept our phone lines on past their order to comply.

Adult Insider Dave · 10-09-2005, 10:57 PM

this country is FUCKED UP

dig420 · 10-09-2005, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Do images stimulate sexual desire?

Does text stimulate sexual desire?

I'm arguing this point because I dealt with a point just like this once.

I had a phone sex biz before the Net. I had to deal with a right wing religious zealot state attorney general one year who wanted to prosecute the company by saying our phone sex messages were obscenity. I used the same argument like you are here, that these were just sound files and not images. And they were just regular silly porn, mostly simulated moaning groaning and sucking sounds. The prosecutor said it didn't matter, the sounds were stimulating people sexually and those sounds were obscene. We came back with "So moaning is considered obscene in the US?" "The simulated sucking sound created by girl placing her finger in her mouth is obscene?" It was totally ridiculous, yet we had no choice but to comply and shut down because we knew this guy was on a mission against the phone sex industry. The costs to let this guy prosecute and then spend years in court defending ourselves would have gone into the stratosphere.

This is a sample of what they said was obscene.

Sample Mp3 Phone Sex Message

Does that sound obscene to you? It doesn't to me. Its totally lame.

So they gave us the choice of shutting down the phone sex network or be prosecuted on obscenity charges and paying a fine of $75,000 per day for every day we kept our phone lines on past their order to comply.

And they were wrong to prosecute you. Don't be the same type of tard they are.

lawked · 10-09-2005, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Digital images are formed by 1 and 0's.

Text files are formed by 1 and 0's.

Both file types are viewed by using your eyes.

Images are displayed on a screen using pixels.

Text is displayed on a screen using pixels.

WTF? Am I stupid and missing something here??

Yes you're missing something... Someone will object to *your business*. Whether you agree or not, the framework is being built up so that the FBI can take you down.

Please post your sites here so we can look them over and see if they are in need of the FBI kicking in your door. BTW, I'll just surf with the images disabled... so no worries on that front.

The law is "fair and balanced", or should be. To have the FBI raiding someone over STORIES is crazy. What's next.. Steven King going to jail for years for the written word?

Who cares what your stance is, or how far you take it in your head.. you should be *against* the FBI going after some stories.

Sure, they should go after kid fuckers but not writers.

In a couple of months, I'll be sure to call the FBI about your sites and have you raided.. Don't let your tears hit this forum because of your previous stance.

That IS what it's about.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

And they were wrong to prosecute you. Don't be the same type of tard they are.

They didn't prosecute, just gave us a C & D order with the choice to shut down our phone lines or face an obscenity prosecution and $75k per day fines.

So, the AG was at least reasonable to first say do you want your lives ruined forever or would you like to just comply and turn 'em off and nothing further will happen.

Fletch XXX · 10-09-2005, 11:11 PM

interesting historical note before i get my beauty sleep:

the FBI at one time had an internal watchdog, who confessed to being decades of pedophile rape and was busted with a 6 year old

Quote:

Ex-FBI Agent Pleads Guilty to Child Abuse

By JOHN SOLOMON
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP)--The former chief internal watchdog at the FBI has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a 6-year-old girl and has admitted he had a history of molesting other children before he joined the bureau for a two-decade career.

John H. Conditt Jr., 53, who retired in 2001, was sentenced last Friday to 12 years in prison in Tarrant County court in Fort Worth, Texas, after he admitted he molested the daughter of two FBI agents after he retired. He acknowledged molesting at least two other girls before his law enforcement career, his lawyer said.

Conditt sought treatment for sex offenders after his arrest last year, said his attorney, Toby Goldsmith.

``The problem these people have is they don't really feel like it is their fault,'' Goldsmith said. ``The treatment doesn't work unless you admit you are the one who instigated it, and he did that.''

Conditt headed the internal affairs unit that investigates agent wrongdoing for the Office of Professional Responsibility at FBI headquarters in Washington from 1999 until his retirement in June 2001, the FBI said. He wrote articles in law enforcement journals on how police agencies could effectively investigate their own conduct.

FBI officials said Tuesday they had no information to suggest that Conditt had any problems during his career and he was never the subject of an investigation.

Goldsmith said he was concerned about the safety of his client in prison given that he is a former FBI agent and an admitted child molester. ``He's not going to be comfortable in the penitentiary,'' the lawyer said.

Goldsmith said his client had admitted that he had molested at least two other girls before he became an FBI agent more than 30 years ago, but that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing while he served in the bureau.

``It seems that he never did because he had stricter control at that time,'' the lawyer said.

Conditt could have faced life in prison, and prosecutors requested he get 50 years. The judge sentenced him to 12 years in prison, in part citing Conditt's decision to spare the victim the trauma of a trial, Goldsmith said.

Conditt's conviction is the latest controversy to strike the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility.

Last year, FBI Director Robert Mueller transferred the head of the office to another supervisory assignment outside Washington, three months after rebuking him for his conduct toward a whistleblower.

That whistleblower, John Roberts, alleged the FBI disciplinary office had a double standard that let supervisors off easier than line agents.

Those allegations prompted investigations by Congress and the Justice Department inspector general. The latter concluded there was no systematic favoritism of senior managers over rank-and-file employees but there was a double standard in some cases involving crude sexual jokes and remarks.

AP-NY-02-17-04 1508EST

Copyright 2004, The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP Online news report may not be published, broadcast or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news...ional/AP.V4502. AP-FBI-Child-Moles.html

Fletch XXX · 10-09-2005, 11:12 PM

note:

all he got was 12 years

John H. Conditt Jr., 53, who retired in 2001, was sentenced last Friday to 12 years in prison in Tarrant County court in Fort Worth, Texas, after he admitted he molested the daughter of two FBI agents after he retired. He acknowledged molesting at least two other girls before his law enforcement career, his lawyer said.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawked

To have the FBI raiding someone over STORIES is crazy. What's next.. Steven King going to jail for years for the written word?

This is comparing apples to oranges. There is no way in hell Steve King's stories could be considered obscene.

Come on guys, comparing regular violent movies and books to the case at hand is stretching it.

Fletch XXX · 10-09-2005, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Conditt could have faced life in prison, and prosecutors requested he get 50 years. The judge sentenced him to 12 years in prison, in part citing Conditt's decision to spare the victim the trauma of a trial, Goldsmith said.

this made me laugh

i can go to sleep now.

this country acts like it has penalties for pedos. no it doesnt.

Mr.Fiction · 10-09-2005, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

By the way I send money to the ACLU every year. Just so you guys recognize I am a huge proponet of freedom of speech and not an ultra conservative.

From your previous posts, I do think you would usually be a free speech supporter. That's why I think you are responding emotionally on this issue. If you ignore the specific content and really think about allowing the government to ban fictional writing, I think you might reconsider your position.

The supreme court already ruled on "virtual child porn" and they agreed that there is no child porn if there is there is no real child. That is a reasonable position on the issue.

Once you decide that fictional crimes equal real crimes, then most hollywood movies, novels, and video games must be banned.

KRL · 10-09-2005, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction

From your previous posts, I do think you would usually be a free speech supporter. That's why I think you are responding emotionally on this issue. If you ignore the specific content and really think about allowing the government to ban fictional writing, I think you might reconsider your position.

The supreme court already ruled on "virtual child porn" and they agreed that there is no child porn if there is there is no real child. That is a reasonable position on the issue.

Once you decide that fictional crimes equal real crimes, then most hollywood movies, novels, and video games must be banned.

I guess what made me less of a free speech advocate than I was in the past was becoming a parent. It does change your attitudes and makes you a bit more conservative, no doubt about it.

Probably why i've been trending everything I do more to the mainstream and less to adult each year.

I see your point and respect your point. And if this site was involving older teens it probably wouldn't seem so obscene, but when you start getting into stories about having sex with infants and toddlers, that to me is just really sick and depraved and indicative of the kinds of people that would have a high propensity to actually live out their fantasies with real kids.

elitetec · 10-09-2005, 11:31 PM

im bored just gonna click some sigs and signup

Mr.Fiction · 10-09-2005, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I see your point and respect your point.

We can always agree to disagree. That's part of the beauty of free speech.

Rebecca Love · 10-09-2005, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elitetec

im bored just gonna click some sigs and signup

Sign up through my bangbros!!!! PLEASE! .............Hey I said please.

Bladewire · 10-10-2005, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

I guess what made me less of a free speech advocate than I was in the past was becoming a parent. ...........I see your point and respect your point. And if this site was involving older teens it probably wouldn't seem so obscene, but when you start getting into stories about having sex with infants and toddlers, that to me is just really sick and depraved and indicative of the kinds of people that would have a high propensity to actually live out their fantasies with real kids.

Being a single parent in the adult business and having gone through a 9 month court case being persecuted for having adult sites, and being a parent, then being found clean as a whistle beyond any reasonable doubt by everyone involved I can honestly tell you the content on this site is fucked up.

I've read EVERY post in this thread (yeah I was bored and couldn't sleep)

Whenever it comes to issues like this I ask myself, would I fight to the death in the defense of this?

So I ask those of you supporting the red rose site... would you fight to the physical death, if necessary, to defend (what you think is) "their right" to create, and distribute this specific content involving the rape of babies, and defend the people who read it?

And don't broaden my question to include all free speech and movies and everything else under the sun.

The question is simple.

Would you fight to the physical death, if necessary, to defend (what you feel is) "their right" to create, and distribute this specific content involving the rape of babies, and defend the people who read it?

Theo · 10-10-2005, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

i think everyone should watch this funny joke before going to sleep tonight

http://www.ifilm.com/player/?ifilmId...ize=default%22

whats funny is, people sit and argue on a board while this is on mainstream.

jokes about sex with children will be on sale at amazon dvd when this movie comes out.

enjoy.

check this out guys

Libertine · 10-10-2005, 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirtit

Being a single parent in the adult business and having gone through a 9 month court case being persecuted for having adult sites, and being a parent, then being found clean as a whistle beyond any reasonable doubt by everyone involved I can honestly tell you the content on this site is fucked up.

I've read EVERY post in this thread (yeah I was bored and couldn't sleep)

Whenever it comes to issues like this I ask myself, would I fight to the death in the defense of this?

So I ask those of you supporting the red rose site... would you fight to the physical death, if necessary, to defend (what you think is) "their right" to create, and distribute this specific content involving the rape of babies, and defend the people who read it?

And don't broaden my question to include all free speech and movies and everything else under the sun.

The question is simple.

Would you fight to the physical death, if necessary, to defend (what you feel is) "their right" to create, and distribute this specific content involving the rape of babies, and defend the people who read it?

That's a rather ridiculous question. There are few things I would fight to the death for. I would not fight to the death to prevent the whole of Africa getting nuked, nor would I fight to the death for your right not to be randomly arrested, tortured and subsequently burned for witchcraft.

The mere fact that I value my life over other people's rights has very little bearing on this discussion, I think.

crockett · 10-10-2005, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

i think everyone should watch this funny joke before going to sleep tonight

http://www.ifilm.com/player/?ifilmId...ize=default%22

whats funny is, people sit and argue on a board while this is on mainstream.

jokes about sex with children will be on sale at amazon dvd when this movie comes out.

enjoy.

That's about the most relevant argument in this case. Anyone whom thinks words are obscene and should be banned, should really think about what they are saying.

If these words are obscene then what is next?

Bladewire · 10-10-2005, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld

That's a rather ridiculous question. There are few things I would fight to the death for......The mere fact that I value my life over other people's rights has very little bearing on this discussion, I think.

Exactly my point.

Your arguments are based on theory, not reality. You wouldn't even fight for your own rights, let alone those of your children, family, or fellow countrymen.

And when it comes time for you to fight for the "freedom of speech" that you value so much, you wouldn't. You have no sense of community, yet spew what the community should accept.

The reality is that, when push comes to shove, you are not willing to defend what you believe in. Your convictions exist only in theory.

Libertine · 10-10-2005, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirtit

Exactly my point.

Your arguments are based on theory, not reality. You wouldn't even fight for your own rights, let alone those of your children, family, or fellow countrymen.

And when it comes time for you to fight for the "freedom of speech" that you value so much, you wouldn't. You have no sense of community, yet spew what the community should accept.

The reality is that, when push comes to shove, you are not willing to defend what you believe in. Your convictions exist only in theory.

My convictions actually do exist in practice. One of my convictions is that to me, my life is the most important thing in the world. Thus, standing by that conviction, I am forced to value my life over the rights of others.

But apart from that, your argument makes no sense. Are you seriously trying to say that you can't have valid and true opinions on things you wouldn't die for?
If so, you are an idiot. An idiot of the dangerous type, namely the fundamentalist type, the type that refuses to see the relativity of things and is willing to kill and die for beliefs.
I believe in animal welfare, and thus try to treat animals well and don't eat them. Does the fact that I am not risking my life in animal protection mean that my opinions on animal welfare are invalid?

You don't seem to fully grasp the concepts of individualism, freedom and civil rights too well either. You seem to consider freedom something that communities can give. However, freedom is the natural state. Communities do not grant it, they can only lessen it. If they do so, they have to have very good reason to do so.
The idea that communities can just take away freedoms because the people defending them don't participate in the community in the way you would like borders on totalitarianism.

You know, the more I think about your argument, the less sense it makes. Only suicidal radicals' ethical positions and arguments are valid? What sort of an idiotic position is that anyway?

tony286 · 10-10-2005, 07:13 AM

Once again the speech you have to protect is the kind that really pisses you off or upsets you not just the easy stuff.

BVF · 10-10-2005, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL

Digital images are formed by 1 and 0's.

Text files are formed by 1 and 0's.

Both file types are viewed by using your eyes.

Images are displayed on a screen using pixels.

Text is displayed on a screen using pixels.

WTF? Am I stupid and missing something here??

Yes you MORON! one type is created by typing keystrokes on a screen and the other involves ACTUALLY having a naked child in front of you.

Jesus Christ You're dense as hell. You really don't give a shit about anything unless it involves a Cat.

Bladewire · 10-10-2005, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld

If so, you are an idiot. An idiot of the dangerous type, namely the fundamentalist type, the type that refuses to see the relativity of things and is willing to kill and die for beliefs.

You resort to name calling so soon, a sure indication you can't rationalize your stance.

You fail to realize that hundreds of thousands of Americans have died for their belief in freedom and democracy, yet you label me, and all those who have fought for freedom, and those who have died, fundamentalist?

It's all a game to you, a mind fuck. For you and the very few others here who think this kind of material is theoretically ok to support, none of you have given your money to the red rose defence fund.

Did you even read the forum link someone here provided where she says specifically that she has found out the hard way that what she's done by writing and diseminating this content is illegal... yes... already illegal. She's not talking out of her ass either, it's what her counsil has advised her.

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld

You don't seem to fully grasp the concepts of individualism, freedom and civil rights too well either. You seem to consider freedom something that communities can give. However, freedom is the natural state.

You are severely misguided.

Even in the wild dogs piss on trees to mark their teritory, other dogs know where they can, and can't go, without reprocutions. Even with no government, no society, wild animals have rules to follow to survive.

And freedom is not the natural state, anarchy is. If you feel, to live a true life, is to live in anarchy, the "free state of being", then goto the desert and roam free! But don't live in any kind of society because you will always feel like the man is keeping you down.

pornstar2pac · 10-10-2005, 07:30 AM

sig placement. sorry, i'm a little late

10-09-2005, 10:32 PM	#312
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	Bomb making substances. bottle rag gas amazon sells books on how to make bombs that is put out by the United States Military. looks like we are all subject to arrest at any time. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

10-09-2005, 10:33 PM	#315
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	Some great arguments on both sides in this thread, but you know.. it's almost a waste of time because the conditioned emotional response is blinding. My last post in this thread will be some notes about ACLU/Nambla/Amazon in response when confronted about selling NAMBLA on it's site, and similiar books. * The ACLU, defending NAMBLA, argues the lawsuit is the same as if someone was killed due to the permissive attitude of sex, drugs and rock music, and then sued Rolling Stone magazine for creating a climate in which the murder was possible. Amazon has stated it does not endorse "Understanding Boys and Boylovers," but insists "people have the right to choose their own reading material." Law-enforcement agencies say they cannot do much about "written words," emphasizing they deal mostly with trafficking in child pornography. The FBI and local agencies have been trying for years to find NAMBLA in violation of laws against the sexual exploitation of children, and a U.S. Senate committee concluded NAMBLA did not engage in criminal activity. * So a new day is dawning. How far will it go ? I guess we're finding out. __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

10-09-2005, 10:38 PM	#319
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	i think everyone should watch this funny joke before going to sleep tonight http://www.ifilm.com/player/?ifilmId...ize=default%22 whats funny is, people sit and argue on a board while this is on mainstream. jokes about sex with children will be on sale at amazon dvd when this movie comes out. enjoy. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

10-09-2005, 10:39 PM	#321
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	By the way I send money to the ACLU every year. Just so you guys recognize I am a huge proponet of freedom of speech and not an ultra conservative. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

10-09-2005, 10:57 PM	#328
Adult Insider Dave Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 533	this country is FUCKED UP __________________ Promote our penis growth and acne books, earn 75% on sales and rebills. Contact me if you want a custom backend like Pornstarbucks and Freenetpass integrated with any billing gateway:

10-09-2005, 10:33 PM	#314
pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: I convert perverts like catholic church! Posts: 5,133	this thread has spun out of control .. -------------Bottom Line = Support free speech even when you disagree with it

10-09-2005, 11:12 PM	#333
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	note: all he got was 12 years John H. Conditt Jr., 53, who retired in 2001, was sentenced last Friday to 12 years in prison in Tarrant County court in Fort Worth, Texas, after he admitted he molested the daughter of two FBI agents after he retired. He acknowledged molesting at least two other girls before his law enforcement career, his lawyer said. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

10-09-2005, 11:31 PM	#338
elitetec Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New York Posts: 4,944	im bored just gonna click some sigs and signup __________________ Add Your Site To My PR4 Blog Selling Sig ICQ-200636146

10-10-2005, 07:13 AM	#347
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	Once again the speech you have to protect is the kind that really pisses you off or upsets you not just the easy stuff.

10-10-2005, 07:30 AM	#350
pornstar2pac Omaha Hi/Lo Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 17,380	sig placement. sorry, i'm a little late __________________ Trump haters gonna hate. that's all they can do