How long before Iran is bombed? - GoFuckYourself.com

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 11:54 AM

I've got within a year by -20

sfera · 01-18-2006, 11:56 AM

should do it soon

Fred Quimby · 01-18-2006, 11:57 AM

in 5 4 3 2 .......

GFX Wiz · 01-18-2006, 12:02 PM

Very shortly after we get Russia's and China's blessing. Should be right around the time hell freezes over.

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GFX Wiz

Very shortly after we get Russia's and China's blessing. Should be right around the time hell freezes over.

Somehow i doubt israel gives a flying fuck about russia or china. Infact they have orders to strike in March if the nuke research isn't stopped.

SilentKnight · 01-18-2006, 12:07 PM

Its rather interesting to think that back in history, usually a war helped kickstart the economy of the U.S. with all the munitions and military hardware manufacturing.

Not so these days with Bush's ongoing campaigns. The value of the U.S. dollar just keeps sinking farther and farther in to the toilet, while the national debt keeps escalating to the point where they're starting to talk about federal bankruptcy.

Personally, I can't see how the U.S. could even afford to make a military move on Iran. Not only that, but based on the faulty reasons for going in to Iraq - can anyone believe any justifications for action in Iran? What support would the U.S. gov't have from anyone?

sumphatpimp · 01-18-2006, 12:07 PM

just feed them Taco Bell and that won't have time to do anything but shit.

Scootermuze · 01-18-2006, 12:18 PM

Bush will probably use Iran as his 'get out of jail free' card..
If he thinks he'll face criminal charges for the wiretapping, etc.., he'll do the deed with Iran to take focus from the issue and prolong any legal proceedings..

IMO

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sumphatpimp

just feed them Taco Bell and that won't have time to do anything but shit.

so drop chilicheese burritos not bombs?

Screaming · 01-18-2006, 12:19 PM

its only a matter of time

Korban · 01-18-2006, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0

How long before Iran is bombed?

Bombed by who?

USA doesn't have any armies left

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Hands

Bombed by who?

USA doesn't have any armies left

Sure we do....100 million of them if need be

its called the draft

pornguy · 01-18-2006, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Hands

Bombed by who?

USA doesn't have any armies left

It is pretty apparent that you have no idea what you are talking about. The US can mobilize 200 to 300k men in a matter of weeks.

Rinaldo · 01-18-2006, 12:37 PM

We have 2 million forces in reserves national guard and enlisted.

We aren't using them all in iraq, they're scattered everywhere.

fetishblog · 01-18-2006, 12:45 PM

I think Israel will bomb them before we do, just like they did Iraq back in the 80s.

2477 · 01-18-2006, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fetishblog

I think Israel will bomb them before we do, just like they did Iraq back in the 80s.

word....

Matt 26z · 01-18-2006, 12:57 PM

This is the sort of thing that could quietly go away, or blow up into WW3. I think it's either one or the other. No middle ground here.

I don't think Iran would attack Israel on their own. It just doesn't make sense. Not unless there is a conspiracy on the part of Russia and China to get the US into a major war.

Israel should be of concern also. They have a history of baiting larger countries into fighting their wars for them. Usually by setting up their enemies so it looks like they attacked someone, when in reality it was Israel behind it. The evidence behind this is substantial.

The potential also exists that Russia and China could conspire with Israel to get the US involved. Then during a war, Israel does a land grab and Russia and China come out on top after the US is heavily damaged.

Doomsday scenarios, yes.... but the US isn't going to be on top of the world forever. Eventually a series of events will take place that bring us down. We can only hope it's after we are dead and gone.

Korban · 01-18-2006, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rinaldo

We have 2 million forces in reserves national guard and enlisted.

We aren't using them all in iraq, they're scattered everywhere.

You mean the ones that were promtly dispatched to help the victims of New Orleans hurrycane?

BTW, not a single sane American will draft to go fight in Iran.
Haven't Iraq taught you anything?

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

This is the sort of thing that could quietly go away, or blow up into WW3. I think it's either one or the other. No middle ground here.

I don't think Iran would attack Israel on their own. It just doesn't make sense. Not unless there is a conspiracy on the part of Russia and China to get the US into a major war.

Israel should be of concern also. They have a history of baiting larger countries into fighting their wars for them. Usually by setting up their enemies so it looks like they attacked someone, when in reality it was Israel behind it. The evidence behind this is substantial.

The potential also exists that Russia and China could conspire with Israel to get the US involved. Then during a war, Israel does a land grab and Russia and China come out on top after the US is heavily damaged.

Doomsday scenarios, yes.... but the US isn't going to be on top of the world forever. Eventually a series of events will take place that bring us down. We can only hope it's after we are dead and gone.

The world ends when we end....i can assure you of that.

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 01:32 PM

George Bush insists that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. So why, six years ago, did the CIA give the Iranians blueprints to build a bomb?

Got to get the oil prices up at whatever cost....

The Demon · 01-18-2006, 01:32 PM

hopefully soon, I'm getting an itchy trigger finger..

Webby · 01-18-2006, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

This is the sort of thing that could quietly go away, or blow up into WW3. I think it's either one or the other. No middle ground here.

Think the same Matt.

The guy heading Iran is playing games and mouthing off - most likely with an agenda and behind that, more "subtleties" than we would ever know. Either that, or he's a raving lunatic, tho he don't "appear" to be that.

Other factors are.. this ain't an Iraq scenario. Iran does have a military and, whether openly stated or otherwise, plenty friends. They also appear to have dispersed "facilities" capable of developing whatever they want to develop - and little chance of "taking out" all of them.

Who knows... but I smell some folks are thinking of a bigger picture (not necessarily a particularly good or bad one) and possibly thinking the timing is ripe for the "attitude" shown by Iranian leadership. If Iran makes a first move or strike - it's not to their advantage, they just lose all cred and any support they currently have. Let's hope other nations don't walk into the provocation bollocks and take a first strike to give them "justification" that is sellable to Iran's friends.

The leadership may be radical, but Iran overall is not to that degree and "human" underneath :-) This is the same country who were very thankful of eg.. US help with their earthquake problems recently and also offered to reciprocate by sending 20 billion barrels of crude to the the US after they found out there may be a severe oil problem after Katrina hit.

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

Think the same Matt.

The guy heading Iran is playing games and mouthing off - most likely with an agenda and behind that, more "subtleties" than we would ever know. Either that, or he's a raving lunatic, tho he don't "appear" to be that.

Other factors are.. this ain't an Iraq scenario. Iran does have a military and, whether openly stated or otherwise, plenty friends. They also appear to have dispersed "facilities" capable of developing whatever they want to develop - and little chance of "taking out" all of them.

Who knows... but I smell some folks are thinking of a bigger picture (not necessarily a particularly good or bad one) and possibly thinking the timing is ripe for the "attitude" shown by Iranian leadership. If Iran makes a first move or strike - it's not to their advantage, they just lose all cred and any support they currently have. Let's hope other nations don't walk into the provocation bollocks and take a first strike to give them "justification" that is sellable to Iran's friends.

The leadership may be radical, but Iran overall is not to that degree and "human" underneath :-) This is the same country who were very thankful of eg.. US help with their earthquake problems recently and also offered to reciprocate by sending 20 billion barrels of crude to the the US after they found out there may be a severe oil problem after Katrina hit.

There is actually a movie called "threads" made back in the 80's in which ww3 is started with an invasion of Iran....its pretty accurate of the current world stage in all actuality.

SilentKnight · 01-18-2006, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

Think the same Matt.

The guy heading Iran is playing games and mouthing off - most likely with an agenda and behind that, more "subtleties" than we would ever know. Either that, or he's a raving lunatic, tho he don't "appear" to be that.

Other factors are.. this ain't an Iraq scenario. Iran does have a military and, whether openly stated or otherwise, plenty friends. They also appear to have dispersed "facilities" capable of developing whatever they want to develop - and little chance of "taking out" all of them.

Who knows... but I smell some folks are thinking of a bigger picture (not necessarily a particularly good or bad one) and possibly thinking the timing is ripe for the "attitude" shown by Iranian leadership. If Iran makes a first move or strike - it's not to their advantage, they just lose all cred and any support they currently have. Let's hope other nations don't walk into the provocation bollocks and take a first strike to give them "justification" that is sellable to Iran's friends.

The leadership may be radical, but Iran overall is not to that degree and "human" underneath :-) This is the same country who were very thankful of eg.. US help with their earthquake problems recently and also offered to reciprocate by sending 20 billion barrels of crude to the the US after they found out there may be a severe oil problem after Katrina hit.

Excellent analysis. I quite agree with it all.

Nydahl · 01-18-2006, 02:20 PM

I think that your fucking US goverment should apologize for bombing Iraq and finding no nukes first , then sign up Kyotos convention (as you bring the most of the shit to worlds air) and then finaly shut the fuck up and stop sticking their stupid noses in some1elses biz.

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nydahl

I think that your fucking US goverment should apologize for bombing Iraq and finding no nukes first , then sign up Kyotos convention (as you bring the most of the shit to worlds air) and then finaly shut the fuck up and stop sticking their stupid noses in some1elses biz.

The USA are barely 5% of the world population, but want to impose to the other 95% their way of living and their beliefs ... , but still keep them in a state of subordination to them ...
Then they wonder " Why do you hate AMERIKA " and why they are the targets of attacks... dumbasses .

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

The USA are barely 5% of the world population, but want to impose to the other 95% their way of living and their beliefs ... , but still keep them in a state of subordination to them ...
Then they wonder " Why do you hate AMERIKA " and why they are the targets of attacks... dumbasses .

hey when you put it that way...it kinda makes sense

The Duck · 01-18-2006, 02:34 PM

Manufacturing Consent Is The Name Of The Game!

I Like Chocolate · 01-18-2006, 02:45 PM

I have a funny feeling that Iran wont get bombed

Pleasurepays · 01-18-2006, 02:53 PM

"The US.... The US.... The US".... here's an idea, how about the rest of the world stop those fucking idiots from developing nuclear weapons and stop sitting on your fucking asses, forcing someone else to be the bad guy?????

kenny · 01-18-2006, 03:11 PM

France and Germany called for this to be handled in the United Nations Security Council. Which it should I imagine that is what a Security Council is for.

This thing will go on for years in the UN.

If the United States finally goes in it won't even be George Bush as the commander and chief. So the Bush bashing crap makes no sense.

Thats if Israel doesn't bomb Iran's nuclear facilities first. Which they might and who can blame them?

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

"The US.... The US.... The US".... here's an idea, how about the rest of the world stop those fucking idiots from developing nuclear weapons and stop sitting on your fucking asses, forcing someone else to be the bad guy?????

That is what they are doing, but they are undercit by the US .. Very hard to look credible when a " security" member openly discusses the bombing of a sovereign country that didn't attack them ...

Mainly after the first fiasco of Iraq ... do you think Iranians will do the same mistake .. or Korea ???

And the US just gave Nuclear weapons to India and Pakistan ... so don't talk about non-proliferation, talk about non-proliferation to who today are supposevily the US ennemies ...

kenny · 01-18-2006, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

And the US just gave Nuclear weapons to India and Pakistan ... so don't talk about non-proliferation, talk about non-proliferation to who today are supposevily the US ennemies ...

The US gave nuclear weapons to India and Pakistan. That is news to me.

kenny · 01-18-2006, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

George Bush insists that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. So why, six years ago, did the CIA give the Iranians blueprints to build a bomb?

A college kid can build a nuclear bomb. The technology is 60 years old. Building it isn't the problem. It's getting the stuff to make it

WebairGerard · 01-18-2006, 03:40 PM

Enough with the bombing and the wars. Wars almost always lead to more wars in time.
It's time human beings find another way to work out problems. How about that? This means people will have to talk! Use their brains! Find common ground!

Innocent people ALWAYS die when you start dropping bombs. Think before you say bomb the crap out em.

traffic99 · 01-18-2006, 03:46 PM

go thanks the Israelies for taking care of so many shit the muslems bring.
Israel will be the first to join the states against Iran.

But the Iranies are stupids. They can be one of the normal countries but they choose to kill al time.
They mustn't atack Iran, Only replacing the goverment there.

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WebairGerard

Enough with the bombing and the wars. Wars almost always lead to more wars in time.
It's time human beings find another way to work out problems. How about that? This means people will have to talk! Use their brains! Find common ground!

Innocent people ALWAYS die when you start dropping bombs. Think before you say bomb the crap out em.

common ground?

how about food & gold?

there is no common ground when it comes to resources

WebairGerard · 01-18-2006, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0

common ground?

how about food & gold?

there is no common ground when it comes to resources

Let's face it, this has nothing to do with food.

I agree with you though on resources,etc. But that is the challenge isn't it? To be able to use our minds and not our might. It can be done but will anyone try?

je_rome · 01-18-2006, 04:04 PM

maybe Bush is tired of fucking with Iraq so Iran is next on his list

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny

The US gave nuclear weapons to India and Pakistan. That is news to me.

Everything not on FAUX NEWS is news to you ....

So play on words again ...

gave , or sold, or gave access or supplied ... smart dumbass.

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by traffic99

go thanks the Israelies for taking care of so many shit the muslems bring.
Israel will be the first to join the states against Iran.

But the Iranies are stupids. They can be one of the normal countries but they choose to kill al time.
They mustn't atack Iran, Only replacing the goverment there.

Another kid ...

Who exactly has the Iranians killed ( aside from Iraqis in 1980 with the blessing of the USA - now the USA is doing the killing themselves ).

What is a normal country? Believe in GOD ? Have Wal-Mart ? live in a bungalow with a flag ?

BTW, the USA already had replaced the government in Iran .. see what it gave ... and look at Iraq now...

Diplomacy is to the US what eating pussy is to a gay

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny

A college kid can build a nuclear bomb. The technology is 60 years old. Building it isn't the problem. It's getting the stuff to make it

Can you ??? You are smarter than a kid, aren't you ...

If it is so easy, why this covert CIA operation. Why the interest by the Iranians if you can get it with a bubble gum wrapper ????

Go back to your brainwashing and DON'T read that article ... it could damage the few brain cells that you have left .

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Another kid ...

Who exactly as the Iranians killed ( asaide from Iraqis in 1980 with the blessing of the USA - now the USA is doink the killing themselves ).

What is a normal country? Believe in GOD ? Have Wal-Mart ? live in a bungalow with a flag ?

BTW, the USA already had replaced the government in Iran .. see what it gave ... and look at Iraq now...

Diplomacy is to the US what eating pussy is to a gay

you forgot budweiser, hotdogs, baseball & the nfl

oh & crack!

kenny · 01-18-2006, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Can you ??? You are smarter than a kid, aren't you ...

If it is so easy, why this covert CIA operation. Why the interest by the Iranians if you can get it with a bubble gum wrapper ????

Go back to your brainwashing and DON'T read that article ... it could damage the few brain cells that you have left .

The Guardian reports that the Pentagon hired two young physicists in 1964 to see if they could reverse-engineer a nuke, using only a library card and notebook. They did.

How two students built an A-bomb

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0...983646,00.html

kenny · 01-18-2006, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Everything not on FAUX NEWS is news to you ....

So play on words again ...

gave , or sold, or gave access or supplied ... smart dumbass.

I'm not suppose to believe the news yet I'm suppose to believe whatever nonsense happens to come out of your mouth - get real

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny

The Guardian reports that the Pentagon hired two young physicists in 1964 to see if they could reverse-engineer a nuke, using only a library card and notebook. They did.

How two students built an A-bomb

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0...983646,00.html

thats awsome, i wonder if someone could build a stealth bomber from regular civilian manufacturer parts

Bluewire Ross · 01-18-2006, 05:28 PM

after Afghanistan...Iraq...i dont think the US is ready for Iran, unless of course other allies agreed to do so.

pr0 · 01-18-2006, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bluewire Ross

after Afghanistan...Iraq...i dont think the US is ready for Iran, unless of course other allies agreed to do so.

they called for the destruction of israel, we wouldn't be doing it alone now

Webby · 01-18-2006, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0

thats awsome, i wonder if someone could build a stealth bomber from regular civilian manufacturer parts

Na pr0, quit teasing

You know damned fine that you only need a Chevy 1953 truck with the 216 cu.in. babbit bearing type engine, a few kitchen utensils and ya got one unique stealth bomber.

I'm surprised kenny never knew this or I'm 100% sure he would have said.

directfiesta · 01-18-2006, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny

I'm not suppose to believe the news yet I'm suppose to believe whatever nonsense happens to come out of your mouth - get real

doesn't come from my mouth ... but from your own bunch of hawks in office:

Quote:

US aims to set aside India reactor controversy
Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:21 PM ET9

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration, confronting a potential threat to its 2005 nuclear deal with India, has signaled it will set aside concerns that New Delhi violated a previous agreement with the United States.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsAr...UCLEAR-USA.xml

It's never been about nuclear weapons or programs .. that is another lie ... It is about controlling the whole middle east with Israel as the sheppard ....

As the USA tried in Central-South America ...

View Poll Results: How long till Iran gets an airstrike?
Within 2 years	11	21.15%
Sometime in 2006	11	21.15%
Iran will cave to the sanctions	6	11.54%
Russia & Syria will back Iran & start ww3	13	25.00%
I don't care, someone nuke that shithole	11	21.15%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

01-18-2006, 11:54 AM	#1
pr0 rockin tha trailerpark Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: ~Coastal~ Posts: 23,088	How long before Iran is bombed? I've got within a year by -20 __________________ __________ Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

01-18-2006, 11:57 AM	#3
Fred Quimby Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Long Island, NY Posts: 5,430	in 5 4 3 2 ....... __________________

01-18-2006, 12:02 PM	#4
GFX Wiz Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: SW Florida Posts: 916	Very shortly after we get Russia's and China's blessing. Should be right around the time hell freezes over. __________________ ICQ: 148.167.599

01-18-2006, 12:19 PM	#10
Screaming I can change this!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18,972	its only a matter of time __________________

01-18-2006, 11:56 AM	#2
sfera Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: ICQ: 248877409 Posts: 8,597	should do it soon

01-18-2006, 12:07 PM	#6
SilentKnight Megan Fox's fluffer Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: shooting pool in Elysium Posts: 24,818	Its rather interesting to think that back in history, usually a war helped kickstart the economy of the U.S. with all the munitions and military hardware manufacturing. Not so these days with Bush's ongoing campaigns. The value of the U.S. dollar just keeps sinking farther and farther in to the toilet, while the national debt keeps escalating to the point where they're starting to talk about federal bankruptcy. Personally, I can't see how the U.S. could even afford to make a military move on Iran. Not only that, but based on the faulty reasons for going in to Iraq - can anyone believe any justifications for action in Iran? What support would the U.S. gov't have from anyone?

01-18-2006, 12:07 PM	#7
sumphatpimp Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,235	just feed them Taco Bell and that won't have time to do anything but shit.

01-18-2006, 12:18 PM	#8
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	Bush will probably use Iran as his 'get out of jail free' card.. If he thinks he'll face criminal charges for the wiretapping, etc.., he'll do the deed with Iran to take focus from the issue and prolong any legal proceedings.. IMO

01-18-2006, 12:37 PM	#14
Rinaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: South Florida Posts: 5,086	We have 2 million forces in reserves national guard and enlisted. We aren't using them all in iraq, they're scattered everywhere.

01-18-2006, 12:45 PM	#15
fetishblog Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Your mom is my favorite pornstar!#% Posts: 5,995	I think Israel will bomb them before we do, just like they did Iraq back in the 80s. __________________ Fling.com doesn't steal your traffic and sales unlike some other dating companies. I promote them, and so should you!

01-18-2006, 12:57 PM	#17
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	This is the sort of thing that could quietly go away, or blow up into WW3. I think it's either one or the other. No middle ground here. I don't think Iran would attack Israel on their own. It just doesn't make sense. Not unless there is a conspiracy on the part of Russia and China to get the US into a major war. Israel should be of concern also. They have a history of baiting larger countries into fighting their wars for them. Usually by setting up their enemies so it looks like they attacked someone, when in reality it was Israel behind it. The evidence behind this is substantial. The potential also exists that Russia and China could conspire with Israel to get the US involved. Then during a war, Israel does a land grab and Russia and China come out on top after the US is heavily damaged. Doomsday scenarios, yes.... but the US isn't going to be on top of the world forever. Eventually a series of events will take place that bring us down. We can only hope it's after we are dead and gone.

01-18-2006, 01:32 PM	#20
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Punta Cana, DR Posts: 29,596	George Bush insists that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. So why, six years ago, did the CIA give the Iranians blueprints to build a bomb? Got to get the oil prices up at whatever cost.... __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

01-18-2006, 01:32 PM	#21
The Demon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 7,336	hopefully soon, I'm getting an itchy trigger finger..

01-18-2006, 02:20 PM	#25
Nydahl Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: closer then it appears Posts: 6,655	I think that your fucking US goverment should apologize for bombing Iraq and finding no nukes first , then sign up Kyotos convention (as you bring the most of the shit to worlds air) and then finaly shut the fuck up and stop sticking their stupid noses in some1elses biz. __________________ www.garciniatrio.com www.acaitrio.com www.greencoffeetrio.com ICQ 153918034 email [email protected]

01-18-2006, 02:34 PM	#28
The Duck Adult Content Provider Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 18,243	Manufacturing Consent Is The Name Of The Game! __________________ Skype Horusmaia ICQ 41555245 Email [email protected]

01-18-2006, 02:45 PM	#29
I Like Chocolate Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 821	I have a funny feeling that Iran wont get bombed

01-18-2006, 02:53 PM	#30
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	"The US.... The US.... The US".... here's an idea, how about the rest of the world stop those fucking idiots from developing nuclear weapons and stop sitting on your fucking asses, forcing someone else to be the bad guy?????

01-18-2006, 03:11 PM	#31
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	France and Germany called for this to be handled in the United Nations Security Council. Which it should I imagine that is what a Security Council is for. This thing will go on for years in the UN. If the United States finally goes in it won't even be George Bush as the commander and chief. So the Bush bashing crap makes no sense. Thats if Israel doesn't bomb Iran's nuclear facilities first. Which they might and who can blame them? __________________ 7

01-18-2006, 03:40 PM	#35
WebairGerard Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 8,113	Enough with the bombing and the wars. Wars almost always lead to more wars in time. It's time human beings find another way to work out problems. How about that? This means people will have to talk! Use their brains! Find common ground! Innocent people ALWAYS die when you start dropping bombs. Think before you say bomb the crap out em. __________________

01-18-2006, 03:46 PM	#36
traffic99 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 152	go thanks the Israelies for taking care of so many shit the muslems bring. Israel will be the first to join the states against Iran. But the Iranies are stupids. They can be one of the normal countries but they choose to kill al time. They mustn't atack Iran, Only replacing the goverment there. __________________ FREE advertising program at Quammy.com

01-18-2006, 04:04 PM	#39
je_rome Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 6,846	maybe Bush is tired of fucking with Iraq so Iran is next on his list __________________ Make money on any traffic. Join KlikRevenue.com Today!

01-18-2006, 05:28 PM	#47
Bluewire Ross Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,169	after Afghanistan...Iraq...i dont think the US is ready for Iran, unless of course other allies agreed to do so. __________________ Cam2CamLive! Feature Rich Flash-Based Cam Site Script MAINSTREAM WEB DESIGN CUSTOM ILLUSTRATIONS [email protected] ICQ:259-582-973YahooIM: ross_collado1975