|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
09-18-2006, 04:30 PM
|
#101 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
Dont do it. Please dont. Look at the max res those tv's can do, and hten look at the res your running on your smaller screen.... Computers using even the best TV's still look like complete shit compaired to a no name twice fallen off a truck computer monitor. |
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 04:33 PM
|
#102 | |
|
Doin fine
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,983
|
Quote:
Ive actually tested those ones out. Its still 1280x something. The quality on them is way way up there. 8ms response time etc. They are more like a monitor with a tv tuner added in. Read the reviews on them also. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 04:42 PM
|
#103 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
Why bother with the larger monitor then? the only reason would be if your blind. I set my 20.1 to 1280x1024 instead of the native 1680x1050 jsut to see. and well damn I just lost half my realestate. I cant imagine how big the cursor would be on a 27" screen at that res. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 04:49 PM
|
#104 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,864
|
edit: I ment 1280x768 not 1024.
 Thats what it looks like right now, with my new desk because the old one started to break in the middle. |
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 05:36 PM
|
#105 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA, Georgia
Posts: 1,246
|
still on 3 19s
http://www.bithosting.net/rack/imagepages/image5.html and my second box on 2 19s http://www.bithosting.net/rack/imagepages/image6.html
__________________
Hi-Quality Encoding - Bulk Orders - On Time! http://bitaudiovideo.com icq 50476697 - aim n3r0xXx |
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 05:57 PM
|
#106 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,921
|
nice setups
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 05:59 PM
|
#107 | |
|
Doin fine
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,983
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 06:43 PM
|
#108 |
|
******
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 21,846
|
some sweet setups
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 06:43 PM
|
#109 |
|
Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cowtown, USA
Posts: 32,409
|
My 24" Dell does 1920x1200... Why grab a larger LCD TV Monitor just to have less real estate? Makes no sense... If I added 6 more inches I want the resolution too!
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 09:05 PM
|
#110 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
my point was your are handy capped to a 1280x786 by using a TV as a monitor. I have ran 1600x1200 on 2 19"CRT monitors since the matrox millenium g400 came out. now running dual 20.1 widescreen LCD (FYI at the time the CRTs were much more then I paid for these lcds). So you will actually lose space, things will jsut be bigger because each pixel is larger to cover to larger surface area. |
|
|
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 10:35 PM
|
#111 | |
|
Doin fine
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,983
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
