Original recordings of Apollo moon missions are missing - GoFuckYourself.com

SetTheWorldonFire · 08-14-2006, 05:25 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday.

I sale moon mission tapes

08-14-2006, 05:35 PM

We all know it was staged in a Hollywood studio anyway...

JFK · 08-14-2006, 05:38 PM

its on Ebay $5.99 buy it Now

fr0gman · 08-14-2006, 05:41 PM

It is physically impossible tp send humans to the Moon. The Van Allen radaition belts prevent Earth to Moon travel by humans. If you ever really watched thos "moon landing" films you could see that they are faked.

If we could go to the Moom why would we be trying to build a free-floating spacestation? Would it not be easier to build on the Moon?

The landing films and photos were very hightech for their time but any 15 year old with an iMac could do a better job today.

2HousePlague · 08-14-2006, 05:42 PM

2hp

fr0gman · 08-14-2006, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Equinox

We all know it was staged in a Hollywood studio anyway...

it was actually filmed in the Nevada desert but I understand what you meant.

jigg · 08-14-2006, 06:04 PM

ok you conspiracy theorists get your shit in order 'cause it's starting to confuse the rest of us.

First there's no moon landing, then they're building shit on Mars already in secret missions, we are talking to aliens, annunaki and on and on.

You'd think these so called theorists could sit down and agree on something!

Dirty F · 08-14-2006, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

it was actually filmed in the Nevada desert but I understand what you meant.

But you are joking right?

fr0gman · 08-14-2006, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

But you are joking right?

Nope you can actually see the site with Google Earth... if I have time later I will dig up the pics.

BoyAlley · 08-14-2006, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SetTheWorldonFire

I sale moon mission tapes

fr0gman · 08-14-2006, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jigg

ok you conspiracy theorists get your shit in order 'cause it's starting to confuse the rest of us.

First there's no moon landing, then they're building shit on Mars already in secret missions, we are talking to aliens, annunaki and on and on.

You'd think these so called theorists could sit down and agree on something!

I am not from the Tin-Foil-Hat club I am simply a realist. I have never said that we were building shit on Mars. I simply know enough about physics to know that humans cannot cross the Vann Allen Belts and survive. The amount of lead that would need to be in the shell of a craft designed to penetrate the belts would be too heavey to escape the Earth's gravity with current propulsion technology.

It is actually very simple if you just look at the data.

Santa Klaws on the other hand to zoom there and back in the twinkle of an eye.

jimthefiend · 08-14-2006, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

The Van Allen radaition belts prevent Earth to Moon travel by humans.

If we could go to the Moom why would we be trying to build a free-floating spacestation?

And you don't even see how those two statements conflict...

*sigh*

jimthefiend · 08-14-2006, 06:32 PM

Wikipedia:

Proponents of the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax have argued that space travel to the moon is impossible because the Van Allen radiation would kill or incapacitate an astronaut who made the trip. Van Allen himself, now deceased (August 9, 2006), dismissed these ideas. In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation. Astronauts who visited the moon probably have a slightly higher risk of cancer during their lifetimes, but still remain unlikely to become ill because of it.

Bdiddy · 08-14-2006, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

It is physically impossible tp send humans to the Moon.

You just said it's phisically impossible to send humans to the moon

Quote:

Would it not be easier to build on the Moon?

with enough tinfoil maybe

reynold · 08-14-2006, 06:57 PM

Ok, I'll just wait till Dan Brown have his own story on this.

dRI-X · 08-14-2006, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold

Ok, I'll just wait till Dan Brown have his own story on this.

nice crack man..hehehe..

Dirty F · 08-14-2006, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

Nope you can actually see the site with Google Earth... if I have time later I will dig up the pics.

Yes please.

And do you have any evidence for your theory btw?

E$_manager · 08-14-2006, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold

Ok, I'll just wait till Dan Brown have his own story on this.

He could.

fr0gman · 08-14-2006, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

And you don't even see how those two statements conflict...

*sigh*

No they are not in conflict... I said "If we could then why..." that shows comparison not conflict.

Going to the Moon is quite a bit different than building something in orbit.

Brush up on your Astronomy and reading comprehension and come back.

Juilan · 08-14-2006, 10:29 PM

China has been planning to land an unmanned rover by 2017 but keeps hedging. After catching wind of China's plans, Bushie Jr. announced the US would return in 2020.

L-Pink · 08-14-2006, 10:29 PM

Bdiddy · 08-14-2006, 10:40 PM

we're all waiting for that google earth placemark froggy....

notabook · 08-14-2006, 10:45 PM

Hey they just lost it, shit happens, kinda like the time when they lost Kennedy's brain. Absolutely normal, nothing to see here folks.

DBS.US · 08-14-2006, 10:47 PM

Just check out http://moon.google.com/

Shoehorn! · 08-14-2006, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SetTheWorldonFire

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday.

I sale moon mission tapes

They can just stage a new one. I started a thread awhile ago about how the whole thing was fake and stand by that claim, crazy or not.

Dirty F · 08-15-2006, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BluewireBrian

we're all waiting for that google earth placemark froggy....

Still waiting....

Damian_Maxcash · 08-15-2006, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

And you don't even see how those two statements conflict...

*sigh*

I dont agree with what he is saying - but there is no conflict there.....

Phoenix · 08-15-2006, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend

Wikipedia:

Proponents of the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax have argued that space travel to the moon is impossible because the Van Allen radiation would kill or incapacitate an astronaut who made the trip. Van Allen himself, now deceased (August 9, 2006), dismissed these ideas. In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation. Astronauts who visited the moon probably have a slightly higher risk of cancer during their lifetimes, but still remain unlikely to become ill because of it.

wikipedia is only used by morons like yourself

it is all false info...in fact the radiation was highest when they went on their so called mission....their cameras werent protected either..so they would have been useless..the radiation would have wiped the film clean....also..the space station is inside the radiation belt to counter your idiocy in another post.

it is inside the radiation belt...get it?

Dirty F · 08-15-2006, 08:46 AM

Ahaha there he is, uber conspiracy retard Phoenix. Tell me, is there anything thats NOT a conspiracy??

Phoenix · 08-15-2006, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

Ahaha there he is, uber conspiracy retard Phoenix. Tell me, is there anything thats NOT a conspiracy??

we are pretty sure you are retarded...100% almost

Dirty F · 08-15-2006, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

we are pretty sure you are retarded...100% almost

Can you back that up?

Phoenix · 08-15-2006, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

Can you back that up?

sadly all empirical data was lost

Tom_PM · 08-15-2006, 09:03 AM

Explain how you can hit the marker they placed on the moon with a laser.
tyvm

directfiesta · 08-15-2006, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook

Hey they just lost it, shit happens, kinda like the time when they lost Kennedy's brain. Absolutely normal, nothing to see here folks.

True...

It is not like it is something rare and unique, irreplacable ... sheesh....

Dirty F · 08-15-2006, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

Explain how you can hit the marker they placed on the moon with a laser.
tyvm

They can't.

Well i mean it's easy explainable since they landed there but conspiracy retards will ignore this. Right Phoenix?

StuartD · 08-15-2006, 09:06 AM

Again, this is one of those issues where people choose one side or the other and refuse to listen to anyone.

It's entirely possible either way. There's nothing saying that it wasn't a production and there's nothing saying that they didn't really do it.

You can decide all you want, but it won't change minds, it won't prove anything and it still won't be accurate as to what likely really happened.

But by all means, continue.

szango420 · 08-15-2006, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

wikipedia is only used by morons like yourself

it is all false info...in fact the radiation was highest when they went on their so called mission....their cameras werent protected either..so they would have been useless..the radiation would have wiped the film clean....also..the space station is inside the radiation belt to counter your idiocy in another post.

it is inside the radiation belt...get it?

in support of this, the first pictures taken at Chernobyl were only exposed to radiation a short amount of time. when they were developed, they were obviously flawed.. yet completely unprotected video reels returned unharmed. i havent decided what i believe, but i find that rather compelling..

TexasDreams · 08-15-2006, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck

Yes please.

And do you have any evidence for your theory btw?

Proof of man on the moon.

Case closed.

Tom_PM · 08-15-2006, 09:24 AM

Where did the rockets go? Where did the astronauts go then fall back to earth in the capsule into the ocean? How did we get moon rocks with different structures than earth rocks?

I was a boy living in california when tv had the moonlanding live from the moon, it was awesome.

Every theory that it was hoaxed has been busted over and over again.

Phoenix · 08-15-2006, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by szango420

in support of this, the first pictures taken at Chernobyl were only exposed to radiation a short amount of time. when they were developed, they were obviously flawed.. yet completely unprotected video reels returned unharmed. i havent decided what i believe, but i find that rather compelling..

yeah interesting stuff for sure...i think it is different radiation types though...also they the gamm rays from the sun...i could be wrong here...basically what the Earths magnetic field protects us against...those rays would have gone through all film and through everything once outside the van allen radiation belt...and ruined the phtogs

dont get me wrong..id rather like to believe we went

i just am not sure we did

szango420 · 08-15-2006, 09:28 AM

after thinking about this for a fucking minute, we shouldnt be arguing if its fake or not.. we should be PISSED they are missing!! dont you think (real or not) these tapes are rather fucking important?? we have a national archives that keeps EVERYTHING.. yet nasa "cant find" the most important tapes in the history of their organization?? yet we are blinded by an argument about it being real or not.. FIND THE FUCKING TAPES, and somone can make a decision about it then... i know someones going to say "they cant find them because they arent real and dont want anyone to see them"... well, lets get pissed about that then! rather then fighting here, we should demand that they be found.. WTF is wrong with our government?! i dont know about you, but i am far from stupid and im getting really tired of MY government treating me like i am...

StuartD · 08-15-2006, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by szango420

we have a national archives that keeps EVERYTHING.. yet nasa "cant find" the most important tapes in the history of their organization?? yet we are blinded by an argument about it being real or not.. FIND THE FUCKING TAPES

I don't know about you, but I'm not sure me looking around the office will help much.

luv$ · 08-15-2006, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

sadly all empirical data was lost

That made me lawl

pocketkangaroo · 08-15-2006, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

wikipedia is only used by morons like yourself

it is all false info...in fact the radiation was highest when they went on their so called mission....their cameras werent protected either..so they would have been useless..the radiation would have wiped the film clean....also..the space station is inside the radiation belt to counter your idiocy in another post.

it is inside the radiation belt...get it?

Actually, all the scientific evidence points to the theory that JTF had said. You say it was at the highest, do you have any factual proof to back that up besides a Fox TV special?

I mean the guy who discovered the belt actually came out and said they were fine. Or was he in on this conspiracy too?

pocketkangaroo · 08-15-2006, 09:59 AM

Also for the tin foilers, where did that shuttle they launched go for a few days before landing? Did it just hang out in the atmosphere till this whole thing blew over?

OMG Jim · 08-15-2006, 10:08 AM

Sig spot!

sixsax · 08-15-2006, 10:18 AM

Sig spot!

Dollarmansteve · 08-15-2006, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

It is physically impossible tp send humans to the Moon. The Van Allen radaition belts prevent Earth to Moon travel by humans. If you ever really watched thos "moon landing" films you could see that they are faked.

This is false. Van Allen Radiation does not prevent travel to the moon. This is a lie perpetuated by conspiracy theorists.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

If we could go to the Moom why would we be trying to build a free-floating spacestation? Would it not be easier to build on the Moon?

No, obviously it would be much more difficult to build it on the moon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr0gman

The landing films and photos were very hightech for their time but any 15 year old with an iMac could do a better job today.

This statement means absolutely nothing.

xclusive · 08-15-2006, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexasDreams

Proof of man on the moon.

Case closed.

That's not a man, Thats just Franck and he's obviously an alien

Dirty F · 08-15-2006, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

Explain how you can hit the marker they placed on the moon with a laser.
tyvm

See how its being ignored...Phoenix and the other retards are suddenly gone.

08-14-2006, 05:25 PM	#1
SetTheWorldonFire Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: California Posts: 7,444	Original recordings of Apollo moon missions are missing http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday. I sale moon mission tapes __________________ www.STWOFDesign.com hit me up on icq 154206276 or Skype: JaimeGizzle

08-14-2006, 05:38 PM	#3
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,374	its on Ebay $5.99 buy it Now __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

08-14-2006, 05:41 PM	#4
fr0gman Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,093	It is physically impossible tp send humans to the Moon. The Van Allen radaition belts prevent Earth to Moon travel by humans. If you ever really watched thos "moon landing" films you could see that they are faked. If we could go to the Moom why would we be trying to build a free-floating spacestation? Would it not be easier to build on the Moon? The landing films and photos were very hightech for their time but any 15 year old with an iMac could do a better job today. __________________ Earn up to $.03 per Visitor -> No Click Monetization! "Because the World Wide Web is all about two things: horrifyingly stupid psychodrama, and naked chicks." Wild College Videos \| ICQ: 7746696

08-14-2006, 05:42 PM	#5
2HousePlague CURATOR Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: the attic Posts: 14,572	2hp __________________ tada!

08-14-2006, 06:04 PM	#7
jigg Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 2,527	ok you conspiracy theorists get your shit in order 'cause it's starting to confuse the rest of us. First there's no moon landing, then they're building shit on Mars already in secret missions, we are talking to aliens, annunaki and on and on. You'd think these so called theorists could sit down and agree on something! __________________ ...... eight,eight,two,eight,eight,four,two ......

08-14-2006, 05:35 PM	#2
X37375787 Guest Posts: n/a	We all know it was staged in a Hollywood studio anyway...

08-14-2006, 06:32 PM	#13
jimthefiend So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: icq: 121189 Posts: 18,889	Wikipedia: Proponents of the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax have argued that space travel to the moon is impossible because the Van Allen radiation would kill or incapacitate an astronaut who made the trip. Van Allen himself, now deceased (August 9, 2006), dismissed these ideas. In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation. Astronauts who visited the moon probably have a slightly higher risk of cancer during their lifetimes, but still remain unlikely to become ill because of it.

08-14-2006, 06:57 PM	#15
reynold Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Global Traveler Posts: 51,271	Ok, I'll just wait till Dan Brown have his own story on this.

08-14-2006, 10:29 PM	#20
Juilan Sultan of Swing Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: XXXodus Posts: 15,141	China has been planning to land an unmanned rover by 2017 but keeps hedging. After catching wind of China's plans, Bushie Jr. announced the US would return in 2020. __________________ My Best Converting VOD Sponsor \|

08-14-2006, 10:29 PM	#21
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151

08-14-2006, 10:40 PM	#22
Bdiddy Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Seattle & Manila Posts: 2,456	we're all waiting for that google earth placemark froggy.... __________________ "..and which one of you had the prime rib?" - Waiter "frankly, I don't see how that's any of your business!" - Peter Griffin

08-14-2006, 10:45 PM	#23
notabook Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Not a Library! Posts: 9,748	Hey they just lost it, shit happens, kinda like the time when they lost Kennedy's brain. Absolutely normal, nothing to see here folks. __________________

08-14-2006, 10:47 PM	#24
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,832	Just check out http://moon.google.com/ __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

08-15-2006, 08:46 AM	#29
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Ahaha there he is, uber conspiracy retard Phoenix. Tell me, is there anything thats NOT a conspiracy??

08-15-2006, 09:03 AM	#33
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Explain how you can hit the marker they placed on the moon with a laser. tyvm __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

08-15-2006, 09:06 AM	#36
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	Again, this is one of those issues where people choose one side or the other and refuse to listen to anyone. It's entirely possible either way. There's nothing saying that it wasn't a production and there's nothing saying that they didn't really do it. You can decide all you want, but it won't change minds, it won't prove anything and it still won't be accurate as to what likely really happened. But by all means, continue.

08-15-2006, 09:24 AM	#39
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Where did the rockets go? Where did the astronauts go then fall back to earth in the capsule into the ocean? How did we get moon rocks with different structures than earth rocks? I was a boy living in california when tv had the moonlanding live from the moon, it was awesome. Every theory that it was hoaxed has been busted over and over again. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

08-15-2006, 09:28 AM	#41
szango420 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Colorado Posts: 244	after thinking about this for a fucking minute, we shouldnt be arguing if its fake or not.. we should be PISSED they are missing!! dont you think (real or not) these tapes are rather fucking important?? we have a national archives that keeps EVERYTHING.. yet nasa "cant find" the most important tapes in the history of their organization?? yet we are blinded by an argument about it being real or not.. FIND THE FUCKING TAPES, and somone can make a decision about it then... i know someones going to say "they cant find them because they arent real and dont want anyone to see them"... well, lets get pissed about that then! rather then fighting here, we should demand that they be found.. WTF is wrong with our government?! i dont know about you, but i am far from stupid and im getting really tired of MY government treating me like i am...

08-15-2006, 09:59 AM	#45
pocketkangaroo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 8,452	Also for the tin foilers, where did that shuttle they launched go for a few days before landing? Did it just hang out in the atmosphere till this whole thing blew over?

08-15-2006, 10:08 AM	#46
OMG Jim Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Atlanta Posts: 3,153	Sig spot! __________________ ICQ: 254 914 537 - Skype: AlmightyJim

08-15-2006, 10:18 AM	#47
sixsax Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Denmark Posts: 213	Sig spot!