Adult Friend Finder position statement - Page 6 - GoFuckYourself.com

will76 · 10-15-2006, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

excuse my ignorance, but this is a serious question.

when you use PPC programs, they will decline ads for trademarked terms. create a test ad with Adwords and throw Sony, Toyota, Nokia, Sprint and so on in the ad text and it will usually not go live. if it does, it gets deactivated fairly quickly. i noticed that yahoo won't let you bid on "xxxx.com" usually and the ad is deactived - reason "trademarked term". With yahoo they usually dont go live. the reason is always "trademarked terms"

is someone "forced" to bid on their own company and product names if they have them trademarked? can't a legal letter be sent to the company thats allowing users to bid on those terms or to those bidding on them demanding them to stop?

I may be ignorant as well but what you said seems like it makes perfect sence. it seems like AFF could sue sexsearch for bidding on their keywords, but since AFF bought sexsearch's keywords... i don't know if they would want to go that route.

Sueing zango and other "adware" companies to remove your keywords would be the best soultion for AFF.

SleazyDream · 10-15-2006, 11:58 PM

in a situation where a company buys from a compny - like say zango - that shaves from lots of little people that don't make it to the top payout levels- isn't aff paying more with bonuses and such dealing with one big guy than many little guys?

i'm thinking it's way cheaper to support the little guys as there is more of them with more volume

RawAlex · 10-16-2006, 12:31 AM

Sleazy, in theory yes... but the amount of work often required to keep a larger number of small traffic producers going is almost not worth the effort. The 80/20 rule applied here, 80% of your sales will come from 20% of your people... and conversely 20% of your sales will require 80% of your support staff time to make happen.

Buying from Zango is the ultimate "cut out the affiliate" move, especially if you buy your own keywords. It means you pay Zanog a pretty much fixed fee per click regardless of what you do. If you manage your traffic well, you can always make a profit.

TheSwed · 10-16-2006, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

thats not the same thing as your argument that AFF lost the sale. its not their sale yet to lose. its the webmasters. it only becomes AFFs when they take action, bid on keywords that show up on YOUR site, a surfer goes to your site, THEIR popups are triggered, with THEIR CODES and your traffic is now stolen.

you can't kill people because people would have been killed anyway.
you can't participate in a rape because she would have been raped anyway.
you can't steal something because YOU THINK it would have been stolen anyway.

it would seem to me that the appropriate thing to do in this situation would be to stop fucking people and partnering with scumbags first... work on a solution second.

Nice post

Big John · 10-16-2006, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

excuse my ignorance, but this is a serious question.

when you use PPC programs, they will decline ads for trademarked terms. create a test ad with Adwords and throw Sony, Toyota, Nokia, Sprint and so on in the ad text and it will usually not go live. if it does, it gets deactivated fairly quickly. i noticed that yahoo won't let you bid on "xxxx.com" usually and the ad is deactived - reason "trademarked term". With yahoo they usually dont go live. the reason is always "trademarked terms"

is someone "forced" to bid on their own company and product names if they have them trademarked? can't a legal letter be sent to the company thats allowing users to bid on those terms or to those bidding on them demanding them to stop?

Only if you have competent legal advice. From earlier Lars posts it's very clear that they don't. As has already been pointed out there are plenty of examples of how it's easy enough to stop shit like this happening by taking legal action against a scumware company.

However, that's if you believe that the legal advice really is that bad. A less trusting person than myself may think that they simply prefer to screw their affiliates and profit (in the short term) from scumware rather than pay money out to resolve the situation using expensive legal means, which would be to the affiliates (and surfers) benefit.

rigrunner · 10-16-2006, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big John

A less trusting person than myself may think that they simply prefer to screw their affiliates and profit (in the short term) from scumware rather than pay money out to resolve the situation using expensive legal means, which would be to the affiliates (and surfers) benefit.

I'm beginning to think along the same lines...Gutted.

So what is the position of AFF? Will they keep supporting Zango or is it going to be dropped?

Alex From San Diego · 10-16-2006, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rigrunner

I'm beginning to think along the same lines...Gutted.

So what is the position of AFF? Will they keep supporting Zango or is it going to be dropped?

They will continue to spin the situation as they are concerned and are seeking alternative measures but in the same breath, they are increasing their bids on Zango for top positions.

I'm so glad I am retired from this shit.

jayeff · 10-16-2006, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

The 80/20 rule applied here, 80% of your sales will come from 20% of your people... and conversely 20% of your sales will require 80% of your support staff time to make happen.

Buying from Zango is the ultimate "cut out the affiliate" move, especially if you buy your own keywords. It means you pay Zanog a pretty much fixed fee per click regardless of what you do. If you manage your traffic well, you can always make a profit.

Which sounds like a smart business plan... to someone who knows nothing about business.

But frustrating as it may be, the 20% who make most of your money, don't simply appear out of thin air. They come from within the ranks of that 80%. Those sponsors who squeeze - honestly or not - their small affiliates to pay extra to the "whales" fail to grasp that point and the impact will increase as competition gets tougher. What happens is that newcomers who have what it takes, join this kind of sponsor and soon move on to someone more productive. In the end that 80% is made up entirely of no-hopers and you have no-one left to replace any who cease to be top-rank producers.

Similarly, the present affiliate model needs, if not to be replaced, at least a complete overhaul. But becoming dependent on just a few traffic sources, particularly if their life expectancy is limited, is madness. You would basically be making your own business hostage to their fortunes and policies.

RawAlex · 10-16-2006, 08:36 AM

jayeff, I agree with you, but businesses like AFF are "mature" in that they have already set up who their 20% is. It truly isn't worth it for them to both fishing around the 80% looking for 1 more good one... the return on Zango I am sure far outweighed the effort to actually deal with affiliates.

It is also important to remember that they have also reached the point where at least a good part of the clicks every day come from surfers who are already members. They don't pay out on these people.

AFF / Cams could stop paying for new customers tomorrow altogether and still cruise out for the next 2 - 3 years without a blink. In the short term, medium term, well... affiliates aren't important.

Your points are well taken, but that would be for a business model that hasn't matured.

Alex

jayeff · 10-16-2006, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

jayeff, I agree with you, but businesses like AFF are "mature" in that they have already set up who their 20% is.

There are many reasons people drop out of business or move out of the sphere of influence of another business, so that "20%" is not a permanent fixture. That 80/20 cliché started out as a statement of fact and not as a call to action, but as if often the case it became misunderstood once it reached a wider audience.

Trixxxia · 10-16-2006, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream

in a situation where a company buys from a compny - like say zango - that shaves from lots of little people that don't make it to the top payout levels- isn't aff paying more with bonuses and such dealing with one big guy than many little guys?

i'm thinking it's way cheaper to support the little guys as there is more of them with more volume

Sleazy, not sure if your question is in reference to something else or not but going to answer as a standalone question.

If a company is 'BUYING' from such companies, then they are paying for the traffic themselves and it is surely costing less than the $XXX amount they'd pay to some "TOP" affiliate earner.

Also, let's say if a "TOP" affiliate is doing this - well then they are also 'getting' traffic that is destined for their competitor so it's win win for them BUT screwing people along the way. Their own affiliates too - since most affiliates promote more than one company in the same target market or niche.

Suffice to say a lot of affiliates are getting screwed.

Doctor Dre · 10-16-2006, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missie

Paul,

Why post that email publicly when she SPECIFICALLY said not to????????

What's wrong with you??

Missie

Paul loves taking over the negativity of some threads on himself...

Hotrocket · 10-16-2006, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

In the short term, medium term, well... affiliates aren't important.

While it is possible AFF/Cams may have the ability to ride out a cpl years on what they have, I think they DO need the affiliates..whether it be the big fish or the occasional sale maker..it all adds up...if it didn't, they (and other sponsors) wouldn't work so hard to garner new ones.

I will say tho..it does appear that the stance AFF/Cams has taken basically says "fuck the affiliates, we don't need em"

and though some may disagree, this entire issue and especially the statement Lars made is going to haunt them for a long time to come.

Hotrocket · 10-16-2006, 02:20 PM

bump for the 1st page

http · 10-16-2006, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

jayeff, I agree with you, but businesses like AFF are "mature" in that they have already set up who their 20% is. It truly isn't worth it for them to both fishing around the 80% looking for 1 more good one... the return on Zango I am sure far outweighed the effort to actually deal with affiliates.

It is also important to remember that they have also reached the point where at least a good part of the clicks every day come from surfers who are already members. They don't pay out on these people.

AFF / Cams could stop paying for new customers tomorrow altogether and still cruise out for the next 2 - 3 years without a blink. In the short term, medium term, well... affiliates aren't important.

Your points are well taken, but that would be for a business model that hasn't matured.

Alex

I believe AFF will go the AdultCheck route and close out all affiliates (maybe keep the biggest whales) in the near future. They clearly don't care anymore about their (formerly fabulous) image. And just like AC they aren't announcing anything beforehand, it'll happen overnight.

Boss Traffic Jim · 10-16-2006, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by http

I believe AFF will go the AdultCheck route and close out all affiliates (maybe keep the biggest whales) in the near future. They clearly don't care anymore about their (formerly fabulous) image. And just like AC they aren't announcing anything beforehand, it'll happen overnight.

Interresting point.

RawAlex · 10-16-2006, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by http

I believe AFF will go the AdultCheck route and close out all affiliates (maybe keep the biggest whales) in the near future. They clearly don't care anymore about their (formerly fabulous) image. And just like AC they aren't announcing anything beforehand, it'll happen overnight.

For this I don't disagree. My feeling is that their business model has reached a point of saturation that means they can just buy adwords / adsense and scumware traffic and pretty much keep the position they are in for a long time to come... plus of course all that affiliate traffic that will still come in even if they are not getting paid.

Worldnet · 10-16-2006, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by http

I believe AFF will go the AdultCheck route and close out all affiliates (maybe keep the biggest whales) in the near future. They clearly don't care anymore about their (formerly fabulous) image. And just like AC they aren't announcing anything beforehand, it'll happen overnight.

That is a real possibility! They may think they can go it alone.

MarkMan · 10-16-2006, 07:02 PM

i support LegendaryLars prospective on this one

you don't change the world , you don't make the rules you can only Use the system to the best of your interest.

AFF , didn't put the spyware and they can't stop them.. but they can buy traffic and make sure they take advantage of it ..

when the law will change and adware will be illegal they will be more then happy to kill it.

its better to deal with zango then google any day..

MarkMan · 10-16-2006, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by http View Post
I believe AFF will go the AdultCheck route and close out all affiliates (maybe keep the biggest whales) in the near future. They clearly don't care anymore about their (formerly fabulous) image. And just like AC they aren't announcing anything beforehand, it'll happen overnight.

lets hope not, but if they do where would we be without the spyware and zango to take all our traffic back by force

Hotrocket · 10-16-2006, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkMan

i support LegendaryLars prospective on this one

you don't change the world , you don't make the rules you can only Use the system to the best of your interest.

AFF , didn't put the spyware and they can't stop them.. but they can buy traffic and make sure they take advantage of it ..

when the law will change and adware will be illegal they will be more then happy to kill it.

its better to deal with zango then google any day..

So you are saying its ok for AFF to take the sale from YOU using zango as the vehicle and not pay you a dime for the sale that you would have been paid for otherwise?

You are very generous..you should just send Lars your bank account number so he can make direct withdrawls at his leisure.

TheSwed · 10-17-2006, 12:36 AM

Bump for LL

mortenb · 10-17-2006, 05:46 AM

Another bump for the cause

Alex From San Diego · 10-17-2006, 06:54 AM

The true colors of people really come out....

jayeff · 10-17-2006, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkMan

i support LegendaryLars prospective on this one

you don't change the world , you don't make the rules you can only Use the system to the best of your interest.

AFF , didn't put the spyware and they can't stop them.. but they can buy traffic and make sure they take advantage of it

Utter nonsense.

Order, in our families, in our communities, at whatever level, is not visited on us by passing aliens and most of our behavior is dictated by what we recognize is deemed acceptable by those around us. When that is not enough by itself, we write laws to deter and punish those who (might) choose to ignore those standards.

But we set the standards and in doing so, we do change the world. That is the only thing which can. The only time that intolerable behavior is not treated as such, is when the majority of its (potential) victims refuse to condemn it.

I will agree to the extent that you cannot change human nature. Being a thief is a state of mind. A real thief is someone who, regardless of how much he has and whether he has the ability to earn more, wants to take what is yours. If you manage to block him one way, he will try to steal from you in another and sometimes he will be successful. But the number of real thieves is much smaller than the number of people who will steal when the opportunity is stuck under their noses. Failing to oppose scumware is the same as inviting all these bottom-feeding opportunists to rob you.

JimiJimi · 10-17-2006, 07:00 AM

sig spot

Damian_Maxcash · 10-17-2006, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

Utter nonsense.

Order, in our families, in our communities, at whatever level, is not visited on us by passing aliens and most of our behavior is dictated by what we recognize is deemed acceptable by those around us. When that is not enough by itself, we write laws to deter and punish those who (might) choose to ignore those standards.

But we set the standards and in doing so, we do change the world. That is the only thing which can. The only time that intolerable behavior is not treated as such, is when the majority of its (potential) victims refuse to condemn it.

I will agree to the extent that you cannot change human nature. Being a thief is a state of mind. A real thief is someone who, regardless of how much he has and whether he has the ability to earn more, wants to take what is yours. If you manage to block him one way, he will try to steal from you in another and sometimes he will be successful. But the number of real thieves is much smaller than the number of people who will steal when the opportunity is stuck under their noses. Failing to oppose scumware is the same as inviting all these bottom-feeding opportunists to rob you.

You had my attention for a while with your previous posts, I thought you had a point to make - my error.

u-Bob · 10-17-2006, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoWhErE

The fact that you would choose to support adware makes me sick... thats all I can say. I don't care wether you have to use it to compete or not, the fact that you choose to support such shady tactics shows the kind of business ethic you have.

what he said.

jayeff · 10-17-2006, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

You had my attention for a while with your previous posts

The only reason anyone appears to have your attention is if they provide you with some excuse to attempt gloss over what is going on. Until you are willing to be honest about your agenda, your comments - personal or otherwise - will continue to be a waste of time.

Damian_Maxcash · 10-17-2006, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff

The only reason anyone appears to have your attention is if they provide you with some excuse to attempt gloss over what is going on. Until you are willing to be honest about your agenda, your comments - personal or otherwise - will continue to be a waste of time.

Lots of words that mean nothing. That seems to be your style.

I dont have any agenda, and THATS the point.

Quickdraw · 10-17-2006, 07:34 AM

http://www.benedelman.org/spyware/ex...ads-adult.html
Below was taken from the above page, and it's just a small sample, if you have good traffic, you were/are a target.

Ad number: 12808
Ad URL: http:// oas-central .realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/www.ap.com/AdultFriendFinderUSfebio4310atv/1/x01/ExactAdv/ AdultFriendFinderUS_io4310a_tv/pixel.gif/6
Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1
Targets: access2.ifriends.net, adultfriendfinder.com, apps.nightsurf.com, gallys.nastydollars.com, grab.nastydollars.com, link.siccash.com, passion.com, search.passion.com, signup.avsofchoice.com, voy.voyeurweb.com, www.ampland.com, www.camgirlslive.com, www.consumptionjunction.com, www.cumfiesta.com, www.FLESHLIGHT.COM, www.freeones.com, www.girlsgonewild.com, www.ifriends.net, www.literotica.com, www.ls-university.com, www.men4sexnow.com, www.milfhunter.com, www.sleazydream.com, www.squirt.org, www.ultrapasswords.com, and 2 others

Hotrocket · 10-17-2006, 08:37 AM

Very interesting..I'm sure those sites that are being targeted by AFF with that ad will be thrilled to see their names listed there...

Nicolas · 10-17-2006, 09:14 AM

I just pulled my aff links.

kenny · 10-17-2006, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quickdraw

http://www.benedelman.org/spyware/ex...ads-adult.html
Below was taken from the above page, and it's just a small sample, if you have good traffic, you were/are a target.

Ad number: 12808
Ad URL: http:// oas-central .realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/www.ap.com/AdultFriendFinderUSfebio4310atv/1/x01/ExactAdv/ AdultFriendFinderUS_io4310a_tv/pixel.gif/6
Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1
Targets: access2.ifriends.net, adultfriendfinder.com, apps.nightsurf.com, gallys.nastydollars.com, grab.nastydollars.com, link.siccash.com, passion.com, search.passion.com, signup.avsofchoice.com, voy.voyeurweb.com, www.ampland.com, www.camgirlslive.com, www.consumptionjunction.com, www.cumfiesta.com, www.FLESHLIGHT.COM, www.freeones.com, www.girlsgonewild.com, www.ifriends.net, www.literotica.com, www.ls-university.com, www.men4sexnow.com, www.milfhunter.com, www.sleazydream.com, www.squirt.org, www.ultrapasswords.com, and 2 others

Thats fucked.

Alex From San Diego · 10-17-2006, 09:34 AM

But you can win a Ferrari, get paid $105.00/join, passes to parties etc etc etc.....

It is all thievery.

Missie · 10-17-2006, 09:42 AM

What you forgot to say is that those ads date back to 2005 and it's not zango, it's exact advertising adware. So AFF has been stealing from their affiliates and others for quite some time, and they're using more than one avenue to do it too.

As mentioned many, many times already, zango is ONLY ONE of these applications. There are over 400 of them! Even if sponsors stopped using zango, they have a lot of other options that could very well go undetected. If everyone concentrates on zango alone, it will be very misleading down the road. Because a program isn't targeted by zango it doesn't mean by any stretch of the imagination that they're not targeted at all.

Missie

Xenophage · 10-17-2006, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missie

What you forgot to say is that those ads date back to 2005 and it's not zango, it's exact advertising adware. So AFF has been stealing from their affiliates and others for quite some time, and they're using more than one avenue to do it too.

As mentioned many, many times already, zango is ONLY ONE of these applications. There are over 400 of them! Even if sponsors stopped using zango, they have a lot of other options that could very well go undetected. If everyone concentrates on zango alone, it will be very misleading down the road. Because a program isn't targeted by zango it doesn't mean by any stretch of the imagination that they're not targeted at all.

Missie

If you were not so quick to bash you might have clicked the link and found it was an affialite who was banned.

Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1

But you just want blood so continue on.

Missie · 10-17-2006, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars

If you were not so quick to bash you might have clicked the link and found it was an affialite who was banned.

Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1

But you just want blood so continue on.

After your admission of using zango it was an easy conclusion to jump to. Sorry, my bad.

However, the bottomline remains the same... zango is not the only program out there being used to do this and it's been done for a long time.

Missie

Quickdraw · 10-17-2006, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars

If you were not so quick to bash you might have clicked the link and found it was an affialite who was banned.

Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1

But you just want blood so continue on.

That link was still active when I clicked it earlier Lars

mortenb · 10-17-2006, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars

If you were not so quick to bash you might have clicked the link and found it was an affialite who was banned.

Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1

But you just want blood so continue on.

It doesn't really help you to start putting this on Missie. What she has been doing the last few weeks has been for herself AND for the affiliate community.

You fucked up. And yes, you owned up and admitted it. The problem is that you guys at AFF still haven't really shown that you are actively doing anything to remedy the situation.

Missie · 10-17-2006, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars

If you were not so quick to bash you might have clicked the link and found it was an affialite who was banned.

Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1

But you just want blood so continue on.

Lars, I don't know you, I don't promote AFF, never did and most likely probably never will now, but I have a question for you.

So you terminated the affiliate who used exact advertising last year. Why? He/she was taking sales from other affiliates and you as well. But by using zango yourself, you are doing the exact same thing.

Based on your own reasoning, an affiliate is basically forced to use scumware to promote AFF because if he/she doesn't, others will. So why terminate an affiliate for doing the same thing your'e doing? Where's the difference? Different scumware application?

I have no personal agenda here, just curious.

Missie

SpeakEasy · 10-17-2006, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quickdraw

That link was still active when I clicked it earlier Lars

Yes it was active for the rest of us as well until the thieves just took it down.

Pleasurepays · 10-17-2006, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missie

So you terminated the affiliate who used exact advertising last year. Why? He/she was taking sales from other affiliates and you as well. But by using zango yourself, you are doing the exact same thing.

Based on your own reasoning, an affiliate is basically forced to use scumware to promote AFF because if he/she doesn't, others will. So why terminate an affiliate for doing the same thing your'e doing? Where's the difference? Different scumware application?

I have no personal agenda here, just curious.

where did he say he banned that affilaite for using scumware? i am sure he was banned for something totally unrelated.. because obviously it would look silly to say he was banned for the same reason Lars is defending.

besides... as he said, "some people call it adware" and its "perfectly legal" ---- so that why would that be a reason at all to stop an affiliate.

Missie · 10-17-2006, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

where did he say he banned that affilaite for using scumware? i am sure he was banned for something totally unrelated.. because obviously it would look silly to say he was banned for the same reason Lars is defending.

besides... as he said, "some people call it adware" and its "perfectly legal" ---- so that why would that be a reason at all to stop an affiliate.

That's what I'd like to know as well so that's why I asked.

Missie

WarChild · 10-17-2006, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex

The 80/20 rule applied here, 80% of your sales will come from 20% of your people... and conversely 20% of your sales will require 80% of your support staff time to make happen.

Totally off topic, but that's called Pareto's Law. Knowledge is power, G.I. Joe!

will76 · 10-17-2006, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars

If you were not so quick to bash you might have clicked the link and found it was an affialite who was banned.

Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1

But you just want blood so continue on.

In all fairness, how do we really know it was an affiliate and not an AFF account set up by AFF so if it got heat they could blame it on their "affiliate" and just close the account and make a new one.

This is a fair question for all sponsors who are playing the adware game, only seems logical they would do this. I am sure some affiliates of these companies are trying their luck with "adware" as well but how can we tell the difference.

Also if you banned an "affiliate" for using adware but you continue to use it yourself, isn't that another major conflict of interest ?

GonZo · 10-17-2006, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

In all fairness, how do we really know it was an affiliate and not an AFF account set up by AFF so if it got heat they could blame it on their "affiliate" and just close the account and make a new one.

This is a fair question for all sponsors who are playing the adware game, only seems logical they would do this. I am sure some affiliates of these companies are trying their luck with "adware" as well but how can we tell the difference.

Also if you banned an "affiliate" for using adware but you continue to use it yourself, isn't that another major conflict of interest ?

Didnt you read?
Lars says he was forced!

Lets help him out and track down the evil forcing demon!!!

FREE LEGENDARY LARS!!!

GonZo · 10-17-2006, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex From San Diego

It is all thievery.

We both know people like that.

Damian_Maxcash · 10-17-2006, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

In all fairness, how do we really know it was an affiliate and not an AFF account set up by AFF so if it got heat they could blame it on their "affiliate" and just close the account and make a new one.....

Thats starting to sound a bit desparate Will.....

Its Lars we are talking about - not Bush.

mortenb · 10-17-2006, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001

Thats starting to sound a bit desparate Will.....

Its Lars we are talking about - not Bush.

We are talking about someone who has openly admitted to redirecting affiliate traffic to serve their own purposes. I know Lars has done a lot of good for the business and he is probably a very nice guy, but this situation in being handled very poorly and there is really no nothing good to be said about what they have done.

10-15-2006, 11:58 PM	#252
SleazyDream I'm here for SPORT Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Phone # (401) 285-0696 Posts: 41,470	in a situation where a company buys from a compny - like say zango - that shaves from lots of little people that don't make it to the top payout levels- isn't aff paying more with bonuses and such dealing with one big guy than many little guys? i'm thinking it's way cheaper to support the little guys as there is more of them with more volume __________________ This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog! Now read without the word dog.

10-17-2006, 12:36 AM	#272
TheSwed Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Sweden. Posts: 3,483	Bump for LL __________________ Cheap Viagra and Cialis Erectionpills

10-17-2006, 06:54 AM	#274
Alex From San Diego Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: San Diego Posts: 1,642	The true colors of people really come out.... __________________ We are what we repeatedly do.-Aristotle

10-17-2006, 07:00 AM	#276
JimiJimi Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Posts: 483	sig spot __________________ Call or Click http://18666WebCam.com

10-17-2006, 07:34 AM	#281
Quickdraw Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: → → → Posts: 1,717	http://www.benedelman.org/spyware/ex...ads-adult.html Below was taken from the above page, and it's just a small sample, if you have good traffic, you were/are a target. Ad number: 12808 Ad URL: http:// oas-central .realmedia.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/www.ap.com/AdultFriendFinderUSfebio4310atv/1/x01/ExactAdv/ AdultFriendFinderUS_io4310a_tv/pixel.gif/6 Redirects to reach ad destination: http://adultfriendfinder.com/go/p128244.subcreative1 Targets: access2.ifriends.net, adultfriendfinder.com, apps.nightsurf.com, gallys.nastydollars.com, grab.nastydollars.com, link.siccash.com, passion.com, search.passion.com, signup.avsofchoice.com, voy.voyeurweb.com, www.ampland.com, www.camgirlslive.com, www.consumptionjunction.com, www.cumfiesta.com, www.FLESHLIGHT.COM, www.freeones.com, www.girlsgonewild.com, www.ifriends.net, www.literotica.com, www.ls-university.com, www.men4sexnow.com, www.milfhunter.com, www.sleazydream.com, www.squirt.org, www.ultrapasswords.com, and 2 others Last edited by Quickdraw; 10-17-2006 at 07:35 AM..

10-16-2006, 12:31 AM	#253
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	Sleazy, in theory yes... but the amount of work often required to keep a larger number of small traffic producers going is almost not worth the effort. The 80/20 rule applied here, 80% of your sales will come from 20% of your people... and conversely 20% of your sales will require 80% of your support staff time to make happen. Buying from Zango is the ultimate "cut out the affiliate" move, especially if you buy your own keywords. It means you pay Zanog a pretty much fixed fee per click regardless of what you do. If you manage your traffic well, you can always make a profit.

10-16-2006, 08:36 AM	#259
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	jayeff, I agree with you, but businesses like AFF are "mature" in that they have already set up who their 20% is. It truly isn't worth it for them to both fishing around the 80% looking for 1 more good one... the return on Zango I am sure far outweighed the effort to actually deal with affiliates. It is also important to remember that they have also reached the point where at least a good part of the clicks every day come from surfers who are already members. They don't pay out on these people. AFF / Cams could stop paying for new customers tomorrow altogether and still cruise out for the next 2 - 3 years without a blink. In the short term, medium term, well... affiliates aren't important. Your points are well taken, but that would be for a business model that hasn't matured. Alex

10-16-2006, 02:20 PM	#264
Hotrocket Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,327	bump for the 1st page

10-16-2006, 07:02 PM	#269
MarkMan Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Money Land Posts: 1,370	i support LegendaryLars prospective on this one you don't change the world , you don't make the rules you can only Use the system to the best of your interest. AFF , didn't put the spyware and they can't stop them.. but they can buy traffic and make sure they take advantage of it .. when the law will change and adware will be illegal they will be more then happy to kill it. its better to deal with zango then google any day..

10-17-2006, 05:46 AM	#273
mortenb Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Denmark ICQ: 7880009 Posts: 2,203	Another bump for the cause

10-17-2006, 08:37 AM	#282
Hotrocket Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,327	Very interesting..I'm sure those sites that are being targeted by AFF with that ad will be thrilled to see their names listed there...

10-17-2006, 09:14 AM	#283
Nicolas Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 1,497	I just pulled my aff links. __________________ Buy Clicked Traffic Cheap Hosting - Adult Script Depot - TGP CMS

10-17-2006, 09:34 AM	#285
Alex From San Diego Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: San Diego Posts: 1,642	But you can win a Ferrari, get paid $105.00/join, passes to parties etc etc etc..... It is all thievery. __________________ We are what we repeatedly do.-Aristotle

10-17-2006, 09:42 AM	#286
Missie Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 372	What you forgot to say is that those ads date back to 2005 and it's not zango, it's exact advertising adware. So AFF has been stealing from their affiliates and others for quite some time, and they're using more than one avenue to do it too. As mentioned many, many times already, zango is ONLY ONE of these applications. There are over 400 of them! Even if sponsors stopped using zango, they have a lot of other options that could very well go undetected. If everyone concentrates on zango alone, it will be very misleading down the road. Because a program isn't targeted by zango it doesn't mean by any stretch of the imagination that they're not targeted at all. Missie __________________ Looking for a clean sponsor that won't steal from you?check them out here!