All the Generals tell Bush that adding more troops is a bad idea... "Fired" - GoFuckYourself.com

aico · 01-05-2007, 01:19 AM

lol

This guy is the biggest fucking idiot on the planet. All the military in Iraq are saying sending more troops is a bad idea, so what is Dumb Fucking dipshit gonna do? Send more troops and replace the Generals...

What a fucking idiot, he is seriously trying to start a fucking World War, I swear to god, he's a lunatic.

BAKO · 01-05-2007, 01:20 AM

Bush= Idiot

baddog · 01-05-2007, 01:22 AM

Well, not sure where you got that info, but lots of high ranking generals have said it was necessary . . . . seem to recall that at least one lost his job as a result of that

aico · 01-05-2007, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Well, not sure where you got that info, but lots of high ranking generals have said it was necessary . . . . seem to recall that at least one lost his job as a result of that

I put 2 & 2 together.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070105/..._pr_wh/us_iraq

Ok, they aren't "fired" bad choice of words, they are being replaced.

minusonebit · 01-05-2007, 01:29 AM

Its never too late to shoot him and save the world.

baddog · 01-05-2007, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

I put 2 & 2 together.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070105/..._pr_wh/us_iraq

Ok, they aren't "fired" bad choice of words, they are being replaced.

Well, I guess military analysis is something you should add to your resume'.

aico · 01-05-2007, 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Well, I guess military analysis is something you should add to your resume'.

Exactly what military analysis did I make Grandpa? I mean if you're gonna try to use big words, you should at least know what they mean.

spacedog · 01-05-2007, 01:44 AM

yeah., and in 2008 Jeb Bush is running for prez..

baddog · 01-05-2007, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Exactly what military analysis did I make Grandpa? I mean if you're gonna try to use big words, you should at least know what they mean.

Well first, sonny, I don't know about you, but there are no words in my comment that I (or any 7th grader) would consider a "big word." However, as far as what analysis you made, I will admit that I made some presumptions.

You acted like Bush fired generals because they spoke against increasing the troops. You gave the impression that you thought this sucked, so I "presumed" that you felt that increasing troops was a bad idea . . . even if the prior head of the US Army, Gen Shinseki stated otherwise.

I think this would qualify as military analysis.

reynold · 01-05-2007, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

Its never too late to shoot him and save the world.

Let me just remind you that there are still some FBI personnel lurking on this board, so please be extra careful..

baddog · 01-05-2007, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold

Let me just remind you that there are still some FBI personnel lurking on this board, so please be extra careful..

Oh, that would be so sweet. Unfortunately, the hang here enough to know that not only is he minus a couple bits, but he is a couple sandwiches short of a picnic too.

aico · 01-05-2007, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Well first, sonny, I don't know about you,

And that's where you should of stopped Gramps, because everything after that is an assumption.

If you want my analysis, which would be a Politicial analysis, not a Military one, it is this:

Top Generals are telling Bush putting more troops in Iraq is not the correct thing to do.

Democrats just took over Congress, and announced that they have a plan to get troops out of Iraq.

Bush wants to add more troops.

Therefore, in order to make it so he can add more troops, he is replacing those who might favor the Democrats' plan, so he can have what are referred to as "Yes Men", so he has more leverage for his plan to add more troops.

baddog · 01-05-2007, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

And that's where you should of stopped Gramps, because everything after that is an assumption.

If you want my analysis, which would be a Politicial analysis, not a Military one, it is this:

Top Generals are telling Bush putting more troops in Iraq is not the correct thing to do.

Democrats just took over Congress, and announced that they have a plan to get troops out of Iraq.

Bush wants to add more troops.

Therefore, in order to make it so he can add more troops, he is replacing those who might favor the Democrats' plan, so he can have what are referred to as "Yes Men", so he has more leverage for his plan to add more troops.

Ever give any thought to what would happen if we just "left?" I didn't think so.

See, what you forget, is that the head of the US Army told him he needed more troops long ago. He didn't want to do it. Now, he is seeing that maybe they were right.

This war sucks. Jr did not know how to kick ass. Now the people there are fucked, and we are fucked . . . but just leaving is not the way to do it. At least, that is what he is probably being told.

baddog · 01-05-2007, 02:16 AM

BTW, there are many 'top generals" as you like to call them . . . they don't all agree.

aico · 01-05-2007, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Ever give any thought to what would happen if we just "left?" I didn't think so.

See, what you forget, is that the head of the US Army told him he needed more troops long ago. He didn't want to do it. Now, he is seeing that maybe they were right.

This war sucks. Jr did not know how to kick ass. Now the people there are fucked, and we are fucked . . . but just leaving is not the way to do it. At least, that is what he is probably being told.

I am not trying to pretend like I know how to fix the war, I am not even discussing the war, my whole point is that he is not doing it to help the war, he is doing it to get his way, regardless if it is better or worse for the war.

aico · 01-05-2007, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

BTW, there are many 'top generals" as you like to call them . . . they don't all agree.

Ya, and coincidently, the ones who agree with him are staying, and the two that didn't, or being replaced. My point exactly.

baddog · 01-05-2007, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

I am not trying to pretend like I know how to fix the war, I am not even discussing the war, my whole point is that he is not doing it to help the war, he is doing it to get his way, regardless if it is better or worse for the war.

opinion

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Ya, and coincidently, the ones who agree with him are staying, and the two that didn't, or being replaced. My point exactly.

man . . I sure hope that if you are ever put in charge of something you have people with you that you can rely on and see your vision.

aico · 01-05-2007, 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

opinion

No shit really?

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

man . . I sure hope that if you are ever put in charge of something you have people with you that you can rely on and see your vision.

I sure know that if I was and they were telling me I was doing it wrong, I wouldn't replace them with a bunch of people who just keep telling me what I am doing is right.

Phoenix · 01-05-2007, 06:22 AM

i think Baddog is on the bush payroll..lol

he is a zionist puppet and thinks he is leading a crusade

aico · 01-05-2007, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i think Baddog is on the bush payroll..lol

he is a zionist puppet and thinks he is leading a crusade

He doesn't want his Medicare taken away.

Anthony · 01-05-2007, 03:56 PM

There is some serious pwnag3 in this thread.

Strawman arguments thrown up, and shot down by Baddog.

Noice!

who · 01-05-2007, 03:57 PM

the situation in Iraq is so silly and fucked up... He should just pull the plug and get on with doing things for USA and not for some middle fucking east.

MetaMan · 01-05-2007, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

There is some serious pwnag3 in this thread.

Strawman arguments thrown up, and shot down by Baddog.

Noice!

get off his balls there is no ownage going on unless he cums on your face.

directfiesta · 01-05-2007, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

get off his balls there is no ownage going on unless he cums on your face.

aico · 01-05-2007, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

There is some serious pwnag3 in this thread.

Strawman arguments thrown up, and shot down by Baddog.

Noice!

Yaaaaah Boooy!!!

How fucking old are you? Maybe you didn't hear, but, whenever you use the word pwnag3, you look like a sophomoric ass. Keep it in mind when you post.

There is no argument here, just opinions.

baddog · 01-05-2007, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Y

There is no argument here, just opinions.

Not sure I agree

thagreek · 01-05-2007, 04:28 PM

Bush is an idiot!

aico · 01-05-2007, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Not sure I agree

Not sure I see your point. How is that an argument? I asked a question. Did the way I asked it hurt your widdle feewings?

who · 01-05-2007, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

whenever you use the word pwnag3, you look like a sophomoric ass.

I pwnt so many of these 'pwn3d' lingo domains back in the day when they were 'hip'. (2002). What fun. Some people paid good money for those junk domains, and they weren't sophomoric rectumounds.

aico · 01-05-2007, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who

I pwnt so many of these 'pwn3d' lingo domains back in the day when they were 'hip'. (2002). What fun. Some people paid good money for those junk domains, and they weren't sophomoric rectumounds.

Welcome to 2007

_Richard_ · 01-05-2007, 04:34 PM

widdle feewings?

What?

R

baddog · 01-05-2007, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Not sure I see your point. How is that an argument? I asked a question. Did the way I asked it hurt your widdle feewings?

Sure came across as you trying to start an argument. Backpeddle much?

DaddyHalbucks · 01-05-2007, 04:45 PM

GWB is correct. We do need more troops in Iraq.

If we are going to fight a war, let's fight to win!! That was a major lesson of Vietnam. Have we learned anything?

The Defeatocrats are trying to force Bush into another humiliating Vietnam.

BigCashCrew · 01-05-2007, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

I am not trying to pretend like I know how to fix the war, I am not even discussing the war, my whole point is that he is not doing it to help the war, he is doing it to get his way, regardless if it is better or worse for the war.

You sound like someone from the left coast. Do you really think he's doing this for his own good? I completely disagree with you on every level. Amazing.

King Adam · 01-05-2007, 04:46 PM

I agree with aico. He speaks words of truth.

Anthony · 01-05-2007, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

get off his balls there is no ownage going on unless he cums on your face.

You really have to see someone about your latent homosexuality.

Anthony · 01-05-2007, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Yaaaaah Boooy!!!

How fucking old are you? Maybe you didn't hear, but, whenever you use the word pwnag3, you look like a sophomoric ass. Keep it in mind when you post.

There is no argument here, just opinions.

You should pay attention to your own posting. You don't have a leg to stand on, you now backtrack and say you are stating opinions, whereas earlier you came off spouting facts.

Your strawman arguments aside, baddog has shot down everyone one of your "Facts" and yet you continue.

Non sequitur much?

aico · 01-05-2007, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

You should pay attention to your own posting. You don't have a leg to stand on, you now backtrack and say you are stating opinions, whereas earlier you came off spouting facts.

Your strawman arguments aside, baddog has shot down everyone one of your "Facts" and yet you continue.

Non sequitur much?

What facts did I state and what facts did he shoot down? I'll wait for you to take his cock out of your mouth, so you can answer, take your time.

Anthony · 01-05-2007, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

What facts did I state and what facts did he shoot down? I'll wait for you to take his cock out of your mouth, so you can answer, take your time.

Standard reply, you really suck at this, give it up. Read your own drivel above numbnuts.

Arguing with you is like arguing with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, and beat you with experience.

BoyAlley · 01-05-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

You really have to see someone about your latent homosexuality.

I don't have just latent homosexuality, but full fledged ass spread over a traffic cone certifiable homosexuality, and I STILL agree with aico.

Here's a hint for everyone: If you ever find yourself agreeing with baddog about a political issue, or hell just about anything for that matter, it's a pretty good indicator that you're dead wrong and need to switch course.

aico · 01-05-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCashCrew

You sound like someone from the left coast. Do you really think he's doing this for his own good? I completely disagree with you on every level. Amazing.

You're amazed that you disagree with me? I'm not. Yes I think he's doing it for his own good, I think that is pretty obvious that I think that, hence this thread.

aico · 01-05-2007, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

Standard reply, you really suck at this, give it up. Read your own drivel above numbnuts.

Arguing with you is like arguing with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, and beat you with experience.

Which facts did I state and which fact did Baddog shoot down?

better?

Anthony · 01-05-2007, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

I don't have just latent homosexuality, but full fledged ass spread over a traffic cone certifiable homosexuality, and I STILL agree with aico.

Here's a hint for everyone: If you ever find yourself agreeing with baddog about a political issue, or hell just about anything for that matter, it's a pretty good indicator that you're dead wrong and need to switch course.

It's a free country, you can suck all the dick you want, but stating that Bush is encircling himself with yes man is absurd when it comes to this war.

Emotional responses aside, we cannot leave Iraq, and everyone with half a brain knows this.

I'll be back later after training, I enjoy debates that are based on emotional triggers.

directfiesta · 01-05-2007, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

GWB is correct. We do need more troops in Iraq.

you got that right.

GWBUSH has been right on every single point from day one ... No reason to question his judgment ....

aico · 01-05-2007, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

It's a free country, you can suck all the dick you want, but stating that Bush is encircling himself with yes man is absurd when it comes to this war.

Emotional responses aside, we cannot leave Iraq, and everyone with half a brain knows this.

I'll be back later after training, I enjoy debates that are based on emotional triggers.

So are you saying that you only have half a brain?

BoyAlley · 01-05-2007, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

It's a free country, you can suck all the dick you want, but stating that Bush is encircling himself with yes man is absurd when it comes to this war.

It's absurd? LOL. Talk about niave.

BigCashCrew · 01-05-2007, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

You're amazed that you disagree with me? I'm not. Yes I think he's doing it for his own good, I think that is pretty obvious that I think that, hence this thread.

I'm amazed at how ignorant people are. You don't say in this thread why you think he's doing it for his own good. Is it so he can have "Yes Men" for more leverage? I don't think so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Therefore, in order to make it so he can add more troops, he is replacing those who might favor the Democrats' plan, so he can have what are referred to as "Yes Men", so he has more leverage for his plan to add more troops.

We are all more stupid for having read that.

The fact is this. If we left Iraq right now the situation would be far more fucked. You need to read up on your history and current events before you say we need to pull out. If you are going to respond, please tell us why we should pull out and what positive effects it will have in the Middle East, the United States and the rest of the world.

On a lighter note, It sure is stormy here in Seattle. ;)

aico · 01-05-2007, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCashCrew

I'm amazed at how ignorant people are. You don't say in this thread why you think he's doing it for his own good. Is it so he can have "Yes Men" for more leverage? I don't think so.

We are all more stupid for having read that.

The fact is this. If we left Iraq right now the situation would be far more fucked. You need to read up on your history and current events before you say we need to pull out. If you are going to respond, please tell us why we should pull out and what positive effects it will have in the Middle East, the United States and the rest of the world.

On a lighter note, It sure is stormy here in Seattle. ;)

This thread is not about whether or not we should pull our troops out of Iraq, nor did I say anywhere in this thread that we should pull our troops out of Iraq. This thread is about how two Generals told him that his idea was a bad idea, and they were replaced with two Generals who think, or at least will say, his idea is a good idea.

I don't actually live in Seattle, I live in Sequim, we're in the Rain Shadow so it was nice and sunny today. Was windy though, same yesterday, worked out in the yard all day.

MetaMan · 01-05-2007, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley

Here's a hint for everyone: If you ever find yourself agreeing with baddog about a political issue, or hell just about anything for that matter, it's a pretty good indicator that you're dead wrong and need to switch course.

[/B][/COLOR]

this i totally agree with.

baddog · 01-05-2007, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

this i totally agree with.

That should make TBA feel better, having a dolt like you backing him up.

01-05-2007, 01:19 AM	#1
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	All the Generals tell Bush that adding more troops is a bad idea... "Fired" lol This guy is the biggest fucking idiot on the planet. All the military in Iraq are saying sending more troops is a bad idea, so what is Dumb Fucking dipshit gonna do? Send more troops and replace the Generals... What a fucking idiot, he is seriously trying to start a fucking World War, I swear to god, he's a lunatic.

01-05-2007, 01:20 AM	#2
BAKO Etology.com Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Hollywood CA Posts: 18,386	Bush= Idiot __________________ http://DatingNetwork.com Telegram: @bakokaye

01-05-2007, 06:22 AM	#19
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	i think Baddog is on the bush payroll..lol he is a zionist puppet and thinks he is leading a crusade __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

01-05-2007, 03:56 PM	#21
Anthony Keyboard Warrior Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: One of the outer rings of Hell Posts: 9,653	There is some serious pwnag3 in this thread. Strawman arguments thrown up, and shot down by Baddog. Noice! __________________

01-05-2007, 04:28 PM	#27
thagreek Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 463	Bush is an idiot! __________________ ICQ: 335034 For sale: oojz.com / upbot.com / iMarijuana.com / toughmarketing.com / playfulencounter.com (website included) Misc.: 2x ATX2 licenses ($50 each)

01-05-2007, 01:22 AM	#3
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	Well, not sure where you got that info, but lots of high ranking generals have said it was necessary . . . . seem to recall that at least one lost his job as a result of that

01-05-2007, 01:29 AM	#5
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	Its never too late to shoot him and save the world.

01-05-2007, 01:44 AM	#8
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	yeah., and in 2008 Jeb Bush is running for prez..

01-05-2007, 02:16 AM	#14
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	BTW, there are many 'top generals" as you like to call them . . . they don't all agree.

01-05-2007, 03:57 PM	#22
who So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: ICQ #23642053 Posts: 19,593	the situation in Iraq is so silly and fucked up... He should just pull the plug and get on with doing things for USA and not for some middle fucking east.

01-05-2007, 04:34 PM	#31
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989	widdle feewings? What? R

01-05-2007, 04:45 PM	#33
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	GWB is correct. We do need more troops in Iraq. If we are going to fight a war, let's fight to win!! That was a major lesson of Vietnam. Have we learned anything? The Defeatocrats are trying to force Bush into another humiliating Vietnam. __________________ Boner Money

01-05-2007, 04:46 PM	#35
King Adam Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Valley of the Sun Posts: 5,408	I agree with aico. He speaks words of truth. __________________ TWISTYSCASH.com - Proven to be One of the BEST Adult Programs Around Promote These Sites : Twistys ~ Busty Ones ~ Nicole Graves ICQ : 9 6 4 4 0 2 2 1