Anybody who thinks the moon landing was fake is a big fucking imbecile - GoFuckYourself.com

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 11:07 AM

And should have his head checked.

Thanks.

DaddyHalbucks · 06-15-2007, 11:09 AM

Agreed.

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Agreed.

You agree with anything as long as you can place your sig.

Ice · 06-15-2007, 11:11 AM

battttttttttuuuuuuuuuuuuuusssssssss

polish_aristocrat · 06-15-2007, 11:14 AM

Franck, you're funny (well, you're funny anyway but in this case - in particular)

you spend more energy making fun and arguing with the conspiracy theories believers than they do trying to defend them

you've wasted already probably 1k posts on arguing about conspiracy theories on GFY

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

Franck, you're funny (well, you're funny anyway but in this case - in particular)

you spend more energy making fun and arguing with the conspiracy theories believers than they do trying to defend them

you've wasted already probably 1k posts on arguing about conspiracy theories on GFY

So? What are you trying to say?

polish_aristocrat · 06-15-2007, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

So? What are you trying to say?

that you're obsessed with it

you think they are crazy and obsessed with their theories, but you're also obsessed with making fun on of them, arguing them and showing how they are wrong

most people who don't support these conspiracy theories just move on to a different thread instead of getting excited about this

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

that you're obsessed with it

you think they are crazy and obsessed with their theories, but you're also obsessed with making fun on of them, arguing them and showing how they are wrong

most people who don't support these conspiracy theories just move on to a different thread instead of getting excited about this

How about you move on to a different thread?

Scott McD · 06-15-2007, 11:26 AM

Rhesus · 06-15-2007, 11:36 AM

Haha you guys (Franck and PA) are too funny!

Subtle · 06-15-2007, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

And should have his head checked.

Thanks.

Can't believe that anyone can think like this? Lo!

KimJI · 06-15-2007, 01:49 PM

Dirty Franck - you are the smartest moron on gfy. And that is not a compliment

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subtle

Can't believe that anyone can think like this? Lo!

TONS of people do. Just ask our board lunatic Phoenix.

scottybuzz · 06-15-2007, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhesus

Haha you guys (Franck and PA) are too funny!

Wait till darkjedi becomes unbanned.

the 3 argue like maniacs and its awesome to watch

Alky · 06-15-2007, 02:50 PM

Not that I think we haven't ever been there, I find it odd that we haven't gone back in 35 years.

NASA is planning a trip back in another 10 years or so? Seems odd to me.

Phoenix · 06-15-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

TONS of people do. Just ask our board lunatic Phoenix.

i hear from other dutch webmasters that you are an annoying fuck
and no one really likes you

is that true Battus?

Jarmusch · 06-15-2007, 02:53 PM

Is there any conspiracy theory your believe in?

ronaldo · 06-15-2007, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alky

Not that I think we haven't ever been there, I find it odd that we haven't gone back in 35 years.

NASA is planning a trip back in another 10 years or so? Seems odd to me.

What purpose would it have served to go back?

Do you think the American people would have been happy with the money spent? I don't. Which is why I have doubts that they'll ever go again.

ronaldo · 06-15-2007, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarmusch

Is there any conspiracy theory your believe in?

Even though that wasn't directed at me...

The Kennedy assassination. Obviously I don't know WHO killed him, but I have NO doubt that Oswald didn't act alone.

KingK7 · 06-15-2007, 02:58 PM

Gnnnnggghhh

D · 06-15-2007, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

What purpose would it have served to go back?

Do you think the American people would have been happy with the money spent? I don't. Which is why I have doubts that they'll ever go again.

Ever's a long time.

And we're already planning on going back in 2018. Probably because the Chinese said they were going to do it in 2020.

We already have Projects in the works to determine once and for all if there's ice water on the moon, because if there is, that'd mean we can settle there - in order to run more lunar-geological research and use it as a jumping point to other destinations in our solar system.

I feel like I'm repeating myself today though. Why can't people just post in the threads that inspire them instread of feeling like they have to start a new thread of their own?

High Plains Drifter · 06-15-2007, 03:01 PM

This is the easiest conspiracy theory ever to debunk since they brought back rock samples that can be verified and left things there that can be seen by telescope.

Alky · 06-15-2007, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

What purpose would it have served to go back?

Do you think the American people would have been happy with the money spent? I don't. Which is why I have doubts that they'll ever go again.

Yea, you're right... we shouldn't ever go back to the moon because it's a waste of money.

That's why there is a shuttle up there right now I think just making repairs to the international space station. Is that a waste of money too?

ronaldo · 06-15-2007, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D

Ever's a long time.

And we're already planning on going back in 2018. Probably because the Chinese said they were going to do it in 2020.

We already have Projects in the works to determine once and for all if there's ice water on the moon, because if there is, that'd mean we can settle there - in order to run more lunar-geological research and use it as a jumping point to other destinations in our solar system.

I feel like I'm repeating myself today though. Why can't people just post in the threads that inspire them instread of feeling like they have to start of a new thread of their own?

PLANNING to go back. Sure. But that's still at LEAST 10 years away and a lot can happen in that time. When the ship's built and they're orbiting the moon again, I'll believe they're going back. Until then, I have serious doubts.

_Richard_ · 06-15-2007, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D

Ever's a long time.

And we're already planning on going back in 2018. Probably because the Chinese said they were going to do it in 2020.

We already have Projects in the works to determine once and for all if there's ice water on the moon, because if there is, that'd mean we can settle there - in order to run more lunar-geological research and use it as a jumping point to other destinations in our solar system.

I feel like I'm repeating myself today though. Why can't people just post in the threads that inspire them instread of feeling like they have to start a new thread of their own?

i didn't really give it much thought either......

.. till someone pointed out the lack of a blast crater

D · 06-15-2007, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

PLANNING to go back. Sure. But that's still at LEAST 10 years away and a lot can happen in that time. When the ship's built and they're orbiting the moon again, I'll believe they're going back. Until then, I have serious doubts.

Well, you have to plan for it to happen... and NASA's already invested millions of dollars into the research required in for the next generation of moon missions.

Ice water would have to be proven to be there for their current model to work. They've already proven compounds exist on the moon's surface that make everyone 90% sure water's there - but no one's 100% sure.

If there's no surface ice-water (we'll likely know in the next couple years), that'll probably mean delays... but I believe China's still said it'll be there by 2020.... water or not... so we'll probably get there beforehand just to do so.

Next time we go back, we're going back to stay - not just to visit. That much is the common consensus.

And whether it be 10 years from now, or 10,000 years from now, we're certainly returning to the moon... it's our closest neighbor, and is both a logical waypoint and training ground for missions that penetrate deeper outside of our atmosphere.

We'll have to leave the Earth eventually... the moon's the first stepping-stone to that end.

ronaldo · 06-15-2007, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D

Well, you have to plan for it to happen... and NASA's already invested millions of dollars into the research required in for the next generation of moon missions.

Ice water would have to be proven to be there for their current model to work. They've already proven compounds exist on the moon's surface that make everyone 90% sure water's there - but no one's 100% sure.

If there's no water, that'll probably mean delays... but I believe China's still said it'll be there by 2020.... water or not... so we'll probably get there beforehand just to do so.

Next time we go back, we're going back to stay - not just to visit. That much is the common consensus.

And whether it be 10 years from now, or 10,000 years from now, we're certainly returning to the moon... it's our closest neighbor, and is both a logical waypoint and training ground for missions that penetrate deeper outside of our atmosphere.

We'll have to leave the Earth eventually... the moon's the first stepping-stone to that end.

I don't disagree with anything you're saying. All I'm saying is NASA funding could be cut at any given time for political reasons or public pressure and forever delay going back.

D · 06-15-2007, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

I don't disagree with anything you're saying. All I'm saying is NASA funding could be cut at any given time for political reasons or public pressure and forever delay going back.

Yeah... I hear what you're saying.

One of the few things that this President did that I think wasn't a half-bad idea was increase NASA funding.

I'm hoping that's a vibe that doesn't go away any time soon.

To me, it seems a much better investment in our country's economy, our science, and our future to push money into the space exploration machine as opposed to the war machine. And if the last few years' receipts are any indication - it can be done a lot cheaper, too.

RaiDeN · 06-15-2007, 03:25 PM

good to see another "patriot" american who is a believer of everything the media says..

god these american rednecks are ignorant people.. next thing you know they actually believe usa went to war with afghanistan over anything other then oil LOL

frikking retards

pornguy · 06-15-2007, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

What purpose would it have served to go back?

Do you think the American people would have been happy with the money spent? I don't. Which is why I have doubts that they'll ever go again.

Thats a simple answer. Why would you build a flaoting space station that is in more danger of falling, than putting one on the moon. Makes a lot more sense.

I also think that the moon landing was fake. I dont think that they ever got past the radiation belts.

D · 06-15-2007, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

I also think that the moon landing was fake. I dont think that they ever got past the radiation belts.

Then, with all due respect, you either haven't bothered researching the topic, or you're not all that bright.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/21jul_llr.htm

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

I also think that the moon landing was fake. I dont think that they ever got past the radiation belts.

Youre joking right?

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 04:03 PM

Im gonna make a list of these nutjobs. I refuse to do any business with lunatics anymore.

Pornguy
Split_joel
Phoenix

Im serieus. People like them shouldnt be allowed to be on computers or do business with sane people.

KimJI · 06-15-2007, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

Im gonna make a list of these nutjobs. I refuse to do any business with lunatics anymore.

Pornguy
Split_joel
Phoenix

Im serieus. People like them shouldnt be allowed to be on computers or do business with sane people.

Insecure people like to point fingers to make themselves look better.

Those people you just listed have a job... you submit gallerys.

Grats to the winners

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI

Insecure people like to point fingers to make themselves look better.

Those people you just listed have a job... you submit gallerys.

Grats to the winners

Good one dumb cunt!

Yet even if i only did galleries that would still make me more than what those 3 combined make with their job.

Your turn again cunt!

KimJI · 06-15-2007, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Franck

Good one dumb cunt!

Yet even if i only did galleries that would still make me more than what those 3 combined make with their job.

Your turn again cunt!

I already said what I had to say, and you confirmed it

Dirty F · 06-15-2007, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI

I already said what I had to say, and you confirmed it

Well done cunt although i have no idea what youre talking about.

06-15-2007, 11:07 AM	#1
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Anybody who thinks the moon landing was fake is a big fucking imbecile And should have his head checked. Thanks.

06-15-2007, 11:09 AM	#2
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	Agreed. __________________ Boner Money

06-15-2007, 11:11 AM	#4
Ice Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sunny California Posts: 26,053	battttttttttuuuuuuuuuuuuuusssssssss __________________ icq 1904905

06-15-2007, 11:14 AM	#5
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	Franck, you're funny (well, you're funny anyway but in this case - in particular) you spend more energy making fun and arguing with the conspiracy theories believers than they do trying to defend them you've wasted already probably 1k posts on arguing about conspiracy theories on GFY __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

06-15-2007, 11:26 AM	#9
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	__________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

06-15-2007, 11:36 AM	#10
Rhesus Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 2,009	Haha you guys (Franck and PA) are too funny!

06-15-2007, 01:49 PM	#12
KimJI Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Location: So fucking gone Posts: 1,839	Dirty Franck - you are the smartest moron on gfy. And that is not a compliment __________________ Trafficadept \| Best traffic I have ever tested \| web "@t" cuul.org

06-15-2007, 02:50 PM	#15
Alky Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Houston Posts: 5,651	Not that I think we haven't ever been there, I find it odd that we haven't gone back in 35 years. NASA is planning a trip back in another 10 years or so? Seems odd to me.

06-15-2007, 02:53 PM	#17
Jarmusch Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 12,464	Is there any conspiracy theory your believe in?

06-15-2007, 02:58 PM	#20
KingK7 Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 6,372	Gnnnnggghhh

06-15-2007, 03:01 PM	#22
High Plains Drifter Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ♠ ♣ ♥ Posts: 2,341	This is the easiest conspiracy theory ever to debunk since they brought back rock samples that can be verified and left things there that can be seen by telescope. __________________

06-15-2007, 03:25 PM	#29
RaiDeN Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Netherlands Posts: 496	good to see another "patriot" american who is a believer of everything the media says.. god these american rednecks are ignorant people.. next thing you know they actually believe usa went to war with afghanistan over anything other then oil LOL frikking retards

06-15-2007, 04:03 PM	#33
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Im gonna make a list of these nutjobs. I refuse to do any business with lunatics anymore. Pornguy Split_joel Phoenix Im serieus. People like them shouldnt be allowed to be on computers or do business with sane people.