The Supreme Court made a ruling - GoFuckYourself.com

theking · 06-12-2008, 12:27 PM

...that makes our constitution well again when it comes to Justice...and delivered a devasting blow to the Administrations flagrant violiation of individual rights.

CaveCreek_Russell · 06-12-2008, 12:47 PM

Habeas Corpus has been restored!

Hooray for Civil Liberties~

Phoenix · 06-12-2008, 12:48 PM

link or info?

ADL Colin · 06-12-2008, 12:53 PM

i wouldnt have told my parents

theking · 06-12-2008, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL Colin

i wouldnt have told my parents

Did you post that statement in the correct thread...if so what does the statement mean?

theking · 06-12-2008, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

link or info?

They ruled that individuals (citizen or otherwise) cannot be held without adjudication by the courts. Basically restored Habeaus Corpus rights to all that are held by the government.

Chauncy · 06-12-2008, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

...that makes our constitution well again when it comes to Justice...and delivered a devasting blow to the Administrations flagrant violiation of individual rights.

this sounds exciting post a link please I would love to read more about this

Brujah · 06-12-2008, 01:22 PM

Supreme Court backs rights for Gitmo detainees
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1

President Bush strongly disagrees
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

mikesouth · 06-12-2008, 02:28 PM

again a "conservative court" turns out to be strict constitutionalists. Very Interesting.

ronbotx · 06-12-2008, 04:25 PM

Justice Scalia writes, “The game of bait-and-switch that today’s opinion plays upon the Nation’s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Justice Scalia’s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, “The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.”

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

eightmotives · 06-12-2008, 04:37 PM

The Supreme Court proves itself once again. Buck Fush!

Brujah · 06-12-2008, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, ?The game of bait-and-switch that today?s opinion plays upon the Nation?s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.? Justice Scalia?s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, ?The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.?

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

Get sickened even more.

"Both candidates to succeed Bush in the November elections, Republican John McCain and his Democratic rival Barack Obama have said they will close the prison. "

TheDoc · 06-12-2008, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, “The game of bait-and-switch that today’s opinion plays upon the Nation’s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Justice Scalia’s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, “The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.”

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

This is a good thing, not a bad. It never protected you, that's just a bs excuse they use to keep people in jail, often people that did nothing wrong, without a lawyer, court, or any rights..

commonsense · 06-12-2008, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, ?The game of bait-and-switch that today?s opinion plays upon the Nation?s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.? Justice Scalia?s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, ?The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.?

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

Do you spend every day worrying about terrorists? Damn it must suck to be you

Just a note, this is EXACTLY how the government would like you to think.

Tempest · 06-12-2008, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, “The game of bait-and-switch that today’s opinion plays upon the Nation’s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Justice Scalia’s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, “The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.”

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

I watched an interview of Scalia recently and it's scary to think he sits on the Supreme Court. He was playing political word games over the issue of torture and not even intelligent ones.

Sly · 06-12-2008, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense

Do you spend every day worrying about terrorists? Damn it must suck to be you

Just a note, this is EXACTLY how the government would like you to think.

I don't think I have ever spent one minute worrying about terrorists. Not even in the late 2001 timeframe... does that make me insane?

commonsense · 06-12-2008, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

I don't think I have ever spent one minute worrying about terrorists. Not even in the late 2001 timeframe... does that make me insane?

Not at all. Good to hear your head is not in the sand.....

BradM · 06-12-2008, 04:56 PM

ronbotx and theking have gay sex together

pocketkangaroo · 06-12-2008, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, ?The game of bait-and-switch that today?s opinion plays upon the Nation?s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.? Justice Scalia?s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, ?The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.?

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

The irony of having someone who makes their living in the porn industry being for conservative judges.

notoldschool · 06-12-2008, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM

ronbotx and theking have gay sex together

No shit. Bet they would think different if someone came knocking on their door, drug them away and held them for 20 years without even being able to tell their families what happened to them. Free country my dick.

pocketkangaroo · 06-12-2008, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool

No shit. Bet they would think different if someone came knocking on their door, drug them away and held them for 20 years without even being able to tell their families what happened to them. Free country my dick.

You do know the guy in your avatar would have supported the desenting opinion, right?

After Shock Media · 06-12-2008, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

I don't think I have ever spent one minute worrying about terrorists. Not even in the late 2001 timeframe... does that make me insane?

I am still awaiting on all those terrorist sleeper cells that they swore were here and out to get us in 2001. There were like hundreds if not thousands of them.

kane · 06-12-2008, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, ?The game of bait-and-switch that today?s opinion plays upon the Nation?s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.? Justice Scalia?s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, ?The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.?

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

So let me ask you a hypothetical question. Say you work for a large international company and they have a manufacturing plant in Malaysia. You get sent over there for a few weeks to do some work. One night a couple of the guys you work with invite you to go to dinner with them and some of their friends. You go and have a good time. On the way out of the restaurant you and the entire group are arrested. It appears that one of your co-workers friends is a suspected terrorist. You have never met the guy until that night and know nothing about him. But you were with him so you are considered a suspect and you are held.

Should they be allowed to hold you indefinitely and torture you at will even though they have zero proof or evidence that you are involved with this guy in any way?

I'm not saying that all the people in Gitmo are innocent victims. What I am saying is that we are a country where we must prove someone is guilty of something in order to detain them and even if we believe they are guilty we provide them legal counsel and ensure that they have an acceptable defense. These people are not US citizens and are not afforded all the rights that US citizens are, but they should be given some basic rights to show the world that we are dealing with them fairly. The war against terrorism is very much about ideals, beliefs and actions. How can we decry the actions of terrorists and call them barbaric when we hold people for years in prison without ever charging them of a crime? If we arrest people, torture them then hold them forever in prison without ever putting them on trial or proving that they are guilty of something this makes us look very bad. We have to prove to the world we are the civilized ones and that we act that way even towards people we don't agree with.

Don't get your conservative panties in a wad and say that I have called us terrorist either. I haven't. I have simply said that when we act in what many consider an irresponsible way it taints the reputation of this country and that reputation and our core values as a nation. Our leaders love to talk about God and how we are a good Christian nation. Well, it does say in the bible, "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you would have them do to you." and that is the point of this ruling. If we are ever going to win a war on terror we have to do onto these people as we would have them do onto us and lead by example.

tony286 · 06-12-2008, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc

This is a good thing, not a bad. It never protected you, that's just a bs excuse they use to keep people in jail, often people that did nothing wrong, without a lawyer, court, or any rights..

We are supposed to be to a higher standard, people forget that.

"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. "

Benjamin Franklin

notoldschool · 06-12-2008, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

You do know the guy in your avatar would have supported the desenting opinion, right?

WRONG!

Ron Paul is the only Republican presidential candidate who voted against the Iraq War from the start. Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate with any respect for the Constitution and maintaining Congressional and Executive behavior anywhere near within set and explicit Constitutional limits.

In the Presidential debate Ron Paul gave a strong statement supporting privacy rights and stating that as President he would never abuse Habeas Corpus. Rudy Giuliani thinks that respecting the Constitution in that way is laughable

http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/document.php?id=548

"Congress is not much better when it comes to protecting against the erosion of the centuries-old habeas corpus doctrine. By declaring anyone an “enemy combatant”—a totally arbitrary designation by the President— the government can deny an individual his right to petition a judge or even speak with an attorney. Though there has been a good debate on the insanity of our policy of torturing prisoners, holding foreigners and Americans without charges seems acceptable to many. Did it never occur to those who condemn torture that unlimited detention of individuals without a writ of habeas corpus is itself torture—especially for those who are totally innocent? Add this to the controversial worldwide network of secret CIA prisons now known of for 2 years, and we should be asking ourselves what we have become as a people. Recent evidence that we’re using white phosphorus chemical weapons in Iraq does nothing to improve our image."

directfiesta · 06-12-2008, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, ?The game of bait-and-switch that today?s opinion plays upon the Nation?s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.? Justice Scalia?s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, ?The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.?

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

The idiot has spoken.

Gnus · 06-12-2008, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense

Do you spend every day worrying about terrorists? Damn it must suck to be you

Just a note, this is EXACTLY how the government would like you to think.

Bingo you hit the nail on the head.

Gary

pocketkangaroo · 06-12-2008, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool

WRONG!

Ron Paul is the only Republican presidential candidate who voted against the Iraq War from the start. Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate with any respect for the Constitution and maintaining Congressional and Executive behavior anywhere near within set and explicit Constitutional limits.

In the Presidential debate Ron Paul gave a strong statement supporting privacy rights and stating that as President he would never abuse Habeas Corpus. Rudy Giuliani thinks that respecting the Constitution in that way is laughable

http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/document.php?id=548

"Congress is not much better when it comes to protecting against the erosion of the centuries-old habeas corpus doctrine. By declaring anyone an ?enemy combatant??a totally arbitrary designation by the President? the government can deny an individual his right to petition a judge or even speak with an attorney. Though there has been a good debate on the insanity of our policy of torturing prisoners, holding foreigners and Americans without charges seems acceptable to many. Did it never occur to those who condemn torture that unlimited detention of individuals without a writ of habeas corpus is itself torture?especially for those who are totally innocent? Add this to the controversial worldwide network of secret CIA prisons now known of for 2 years, and we should be asking ourselves what we have become as a people. Recent evidence that we?re using white phosphorus chemical weapons in Iraq does nothing to improve our image."

This has nothing to do with what he would do as a Congressman. It has nothing to do with the creation of laws. This is a decision based on how the constitution should be interpreted.

Ron Paul supports contructionist judges. In fact, his entire platform is based on that and how the government and courts have overstepped their boundaries. The strict constructionist judges dissented in this decision while the liberal judges were the majority. Argue it all you want, but Ron Paul is on the side of Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts when it comes to Supreme Court decisions.

notoldschool · 06-12-2008, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

This has nothing to do with what he would do as a Congressman. It has nothing to do with the creation of laws. This is a decision based on how the constitution should be interpreted.

Ron Paul supports contructionist judges. In fact, his entire platform is based on that and how the government and courts have overstepped their boundaries. The strict constructionist judges dissented in this decision while the liberal judges were the majority. Argue it all you want, but Ron Paul is on the side of Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts when it comes to Supreme Court decisions.

I'll take his word for it.

robfantasy · 06-12-2008, 06:47 PM

wow id like to hear each one of your opinions on 9/11..

its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us.

how ironic

tony286 · 06-12-2008, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

wow id like to hear each one of your opinions on 9/11..

its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us.

how ironic

Those arent the reasons they want to harm us, read and learn turn off the pundits. Also the right has no problem with W holding hands with Arabs, when most the 911 terrorists were Arabs. Also where's Bin Laden?

kane · 06-12-2008, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

wow id like to hear each one of your opinions on 9/11..

its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us.

how ironic

Really. So my wanting to defend human rights is why they want to harm us? I guess you also believe they want to destroy us because they hate our freedom. Please enlighten me has to how my desire to protect basic human rights is the cause of terrorist attacts.

Tempest · 06-12-2008, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

wow id like to hear each one of your opinions on 9/11..

its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us.

how ironic

Wow.. You clearly have a pea sized brain...

Sly · 06-12-2008, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

wow id like to hear each one of your opinions on 9/11..

its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us.

how ironic

That doesn't make sense. They want to harm us because they would get rights in prison?

theking · 06-12-2008, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM

ronbotx and theking have gay sex together

I am in favor of the way the court ruled...you ignorant criminal motherfucker.

Redrob · 06-12-2008, 08:21 PM

This was a very close 5-4 split decision and shows how close we are to becoming a facist state. Just one more Supreme Court appointee by the Bush clique and all our individual rights will be up for reconsideration. Remember that the next President will appoint two and, maybe, three justices so let's get some more liberal votes on that Bench.

Brujah · 06-12-2008, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob

This was a very close 5-4 split decision and shows how close we are to becoming a facist state. Just one more Supreme Court appointee by the Bush clique and all our individual rights will be up for reconsideration. Remember that the next President will appoint two and, maybe, three justices so let's get some more liberal votes on that Bench.

Know that 2 of those judges who voted with the majority were appointed by Republicans. George H. W. Bush, and Ronald Reagan.

Babaganoosh · 06-12-2008, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

That doesn't make sense. They want to harm us because they would get rights in prison?

He's one of those morons who believes Bush when he says "They hate our freedom."

stev0 · 06-12-2008, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx

Justice Scalia writes, “The game of bait-and-switch that today’s opinion plays upon the Nation’s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Justice Scalia’s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, “The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.”

I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on.

When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done.

I'm absolutely sickened by this.

If you claim to be a free country with liberty and justice for all, then you must practice what you preach. If you can jail people without due process and trial, then what separates the US from fascist regimes such as Iraq under Saddam?

robfantasy · 06-12-2008, 09:12 PM

they dont like the western way of life.. the freedoms we enjoy.. the abundance.. the indulgence.... pornographers would be the first to have their throat slit in their view.

what is so hard to understand about this..

dont you know anything about radical islamic ideology??

do you know the reason why they believe islam should dominate the world?? do you know the meaning of jihad..

do you understand that they have no regard for human rights let alone human life and would kill you the day they were let out of prison after you fought to get them out...

why do you all hate america. why do you pander to terrorists who would like nothing more than to see you and i killed.

we are not rounding up innocent people for the fuck if it.. there is a reason why they are detained.. this is a war they are the enemy.

this ruling is a disgrace and slap in the face to america. it sickens me.

SmokeyTheBear · 06-12-2008, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us.

that makes no sense

think about it for 2 seconds, they are mad we are defending their rights as humans ?

if that were really true they would waive all their rights and agree to be detained just to piss us off wouldnt they ?

SmokeyTheBear · 06-12-2008, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

why do you all hate america. why do you pander to terrorists who would like nothing more than to see you and i killed..

why do you put words in people's mouths they never said.

#1 nobody mentioned hating america, and if you really wanted the truth , start by asking.

Do i hate america ? NO , so you are wrong

#2 i have never heard one of the gitmo detaineed say they would like nothing more than to kill me. prove me wrong and post their words.

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

we are not rounding up innocent people for the fuck if it..

so you think everyone is guilty until proven innocent ? so you are a terrorist if someone says you are ? What exactly do you have against them being tried in a real court ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

there is a reason why they are detained..

thats what we are trying to figure out , if there is a reason , most of the time when you are being held in prison they tell everyone what they did .

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

this is a war they are the enemy.

who decides who is the enemy ?

robfantasy · 06-12-2008, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

that makes no sense

think about it for 2 seconds, they are mad we are defending their rights as humans ?

if that were really true they would waive all their rights and agree to be detained just to piss us off wouldnt they ?

smokey someone who would conceive stapping a bomb to themselves and blowing up a crowd of people for 72 virgins isnt a rational thinker.

robfantasy · 06-12-2008, 09:29 PM

quote......... from bin laden..

We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest ... You separate religion from your policies, ... You are the nation that permits Usury, which has been forbidden by all the religions ... You are a nation that permits the production, trading and usage of intoxicants ... You are a nation that permits acts of immorality ... You are a nation that permits gambling in its all forms. ... You use women to serve passengers, visitors, and strangers to increase your profit margins.

robfantasy · 06-12-2008, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

why do you put words in people's mouths they never said.

#1 nobody mentioned hating america, and if you really wanted the truth , start by asking.

Do i hate america ? NO , so you are wrong

#2 i have never heard one of the gitmo detaineed say they would like nothing more than to kill me. prove me wrong and post their words.

so you think everyone is guilty until proven innocent ? so you are a terrorist if someone says you are ? What exactly do you have against them being tried in a real court ?

thats what we are trying to figure out , if there is a reason , most of the time when you are being held in prison they tell everyone what they did .

who decides who is the enemy ?

these are rights that come with being an american citizen. we arent talking about american citizens here we are talking about foreign combatants in a war.. this is about a matter of national security...

why would you want to put our nation at risk ??

i believe in torture, renditions or any means necessary to protect our country.

bloggingseo · 06-12-2008, 09:45 PM

There isn't enough time in life to worry 24/7 about terrorists. IF you are going to die, you are going to die. Worrying about when or where is just going to make your life a lot less enjoyable.

The Duck · 06-12-2008, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

You do know the guy in your avatar would have supported the desenting opinion, right?

That is a lie.

SmokeyTheBear · 06-12-2008, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

smokey someone who would conceive stapping a bomb to themselves and blowing up a crowd of people for 72 virgins isnt a rational thinker.

none of those people are in gitmo nor do they have anything to do with this ruling

SmokeyTheBear · 06-12-2008, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy

quote......... from bin laden..

We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest ... You separate religion from your policies, ... You are the nation that permits Usury, which has been forbidden by all the religions ... You are a nation that permits the production, trading and usage of intoxicants ... You are a nation that permits acts of immorality ... You are a nation that permits gambling in its all forms. ... You use women to serve passengers, visitors, and strangers to increase your profit margins.

I hate to break it to you but we dont have bin laden in gitmo

robfantasy · 06-12-2008, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

I hate to break it to you but we dont have bin laden in gitmo

smokey i was refering to islamic ideology

and as for gitmo.. its full of detainees who share the same ideology..

i doubt they are seeking release so they can register and vote in the US 2008 Election

06-12-2008, 12:48 PM	#3
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,462	link or info? __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

06-12-2008, 12:53 PM	#4
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	i wouldnt have told my parents __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

06-12-2008, 01:22 PM	#8
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	Supreme Court backs rights for Gitmo detainees http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...ow_article= 1 President Bush strongly disagrees http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1 __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

06-12-2008, 02:28 PM	#9
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,334	again a "conservative court" turns out to be strict constitutionalists. Very Interesting. __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

06-12-2008, 04:25 PM	#10
ronbotx Registered User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 1,634	Justice Scalia writes, “The game of bait-and-switch that today’s opinion plays upon the Nation’s Commander in Chief will make the war harder on us. It will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Justice Scalia’s 25-page dissenting opinion concludes, “The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today. I dissent.” I guess terrorist rights are more important than the safety of U.S. citizens. That's something the 5 justices, the dems, and the media can all agree on. When the next terrorist attack comes, and thousands of dead bodies litter the streets due to lost intelligence as a result of this decision, perhaps they will realize what they've done. I'm absolutely sickened by this. Last edited by ronbotx; 06-12-2008 at 04:27 PM..

06-12-2008, 12:27 PM	#1
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	The Supreme Court made a ruling ...that makes our constitution well again when it comes to Justice...and delivered a devasting blow to the Administrations flagrant violiation of individual rights. __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

06-12-2008, 12:47 PM	#2
CaveCreek_Russell Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Tempe Posts: 211	Habeas Corpus has been restored! Hooray for Civil Liberties~ __________________ Offering New h.264 HD Flash 3.0 Streaming at blazing fast speeds with Cavecreek CDN Newer, Faster, Better, Cheaper, Free 2-week trial ICQ#475666557

06-12-2008, 04:37 PM	#11
eightmotives Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 811	The Supreme Court proves itself once again. Buck Fush! __________________ DNPimping.com - "Pimping Domains Ain't Easy" 23868443

06-12-2008, 04:56 PM	#18
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	ronbotx and theking have gay sex together

06-12-2008, 06:47 PM	#30
robfantasy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Medellin, Colombia Posts: 6,445	wow id like to hear each one of your opinions on 9/11.. its funny that those of you who scream the loudest for the rights of "those who wish to harm us" are the very reasons why they want to harm us. how ironic __________________ Looking to speak w/ high volume nutra CPA affiliates or networks... msg me

06-12-2008, 08:21 PM	#36
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	This was a very close 5-4 split decision and shows how close we are to becoming a facist state. Just one more Supreme Court appointee by the Bush clique and all our individual rights will be up for reconsideration. Remember that the next President will appoint two and, maybe, three justices so let's get some more liberal votes on that Bench.

06-12-2008, 09:12 PM	#40
robfantasy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Medellin, Colombia Posts: 6,445	they dont like the western way of life.. the freedoms we enjoy.. the abundance.. the indulgence.... pornographers would be the first to have their throat slit in their view. what is so hard to understand about this.. dont you know anything about radical islamic ideology?? do you know the reason why they believe islam should dominate the world?? do you know the meaning of jihad.. do you understand that they have no regard for human rights let alone human life and would kill you the day they were let out of prison after you fought to get them out... why do you all hate america. why do you pander to terrorists who would like nothing more than to see you and i killed. we are not rounding up innocent people for the fuck if it.. there is a reason why they are detained.. this is a war they are the enemy. this ruling is a disgrace and slap in the face to america. it sickens me. __________________ Looking to speak w/ high volume nutra CPA affiliates or networks... msg me

06-12-2008, 09:29 PM	#44
robfantasy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Medellin, Colombia Posts: 6,445	quote......... from bin laden.. We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest ... You separate religion from your policies, ... You are the nation that permits Usury, which has been forbidden by all the religions ... You are a nation that permits the production, trading and usage of intoxicants ... You are a nation that permits acts of immorality ... You are a nation that permits gambling in its all forms. ... You use women to serve passengers, visitors, and strangers to increase your profit margins. __________________ Looking to speak w/ high volume nutra CPA affiliates or networks... msg me

06-12-2008, 09:45 PM	#46
bloggingseo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Location: Austin Posts: 1,793	There isn't enough time in life to worry 24/7 about terrorists. IF you are going to die, you are going to die. Worrying about when or where is just going to make your life a lot less enjoyable. __________________ Writing mainstream and adult since 2003 Hit me up ICQ 375089597