Interesting news maybe for 2257? - GoFuckYourself.com

crockett · 01-20-2009, 05:04 PM

I just heard Obama has already holted all pending regulations put in place under the Bush admin. I wonder if that would effect the 2257 regulation that went into effect today?

Si · 01-20-2009, 05:13 PM

I fucking hope so!

Loki · 01-20-2009, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

I just heard Obama has already holted all pending regulations put in place under the Bush admin. I wonder if that would effect the 2257 regulation that went into effect today?

Source please, considering that the man was JUST sworn in 7 hours ago, and then went to the parade, that just ended 10 mins ago, and is now heading to 10 balls.

His actual "Work" don't start till 2morrow.

-Loki-

kane · 01-20-2009, 05:40 PM

This is a pretty common thing with a new incoming president. don't be surprised if he makes some executive orders altering or overturning some of Bush's regulations.

Is 2257 one of them? Who knows.

Stephen · 01-20-2009, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

This is a pretty common thing with a new incoming president. don't be surprised if he makes some executive orders altering or overturning some of Bush's regulations.

Is 2257 one of them? Who knows.

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

crockett · 01-20-2009, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdc-Loki

Source please, considering that the man was JUST sworn in 7 hours ago, and then went to the parade, that just ended 10 mins ago, and is now heading to 10 balls.

His actual "Work" don't start till 2morrow.

-Loki-

They said it on the news on TV.

crockett · 01-20-2009, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice

kane · 01-20-2009, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice

Yep, It just came back around again about a month ago.

Loki · 01-20-2009, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

They said it on the news on TV.

lol, not to sound like a dick here, but WHICH news, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, BBC, CBC, etc etc etc

and again he's only been "in charge" for less then 8 hours now, and today is ONLY ceremony shit, he don't start work till 2morrow AFTER the "morning Prayer"

-Loki-

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 01-20-2009, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

I don't recall any 2257 inspections under Clinton.

Please tell us when they occurred?

ADG

mynameisjim · 01-20-2009, 06:05 PM

I've heard it from several news sources, the memo did go out.

But I don't think it covers all laws, just things specifically put forward by the previous administration.

I haven't seen any details though but I think the laws are still in effect, but say the previous attorney general ordered that 100 new 2257 inspectors be hired, that would be halted. Just an example.

At least that's my understanding so far.

crockett · 01-20-2009, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim

I've heard it from several news sources, the memo did go out.

But I don't think it covers all laws, just things specifically put forward by the previous administration.

I haven't seen any details though but I think the laws are still in effect, but say the previous attorney general ordered that 100 new 2257 inspectors be hired, that would be halted. Just an example.

At least that's my understanding so far.

Yea it should be interresting to see what becomes of it. They did use the word "pending" in the news story (NBC News btw) so I dunno if it would cover the part of 2257 that went active today or not.

Hotrocket · 01-20-2009, 06:20 PM

Here ya go...

Quote:

WHouse stops pending Bush regulations for review
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's new administration ordered all federal agencies and departments on Tuesday to stop any pending regulations until they can be reviewed by incoming staff, halting last-minute Bush orders in their tracks.

"This afternoon, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel signed a memorandum sent to all agencies and departments to stop all pending regulations until a legal and policy review can be conducted by the Obama administration," the White House said in a statement issued just hours after Obama took office.

The review is a tool commonly used by a new administration to delay so-called "midnight regulations" put in place by a former president between the election and Inauguration Day.

Midnight regulations have been heavily used by recent former presidents, including the Democrat Bill Clinton, Republican George H. W. Bush, and most recently, the Republican George W. Bush.

Controversial late rules by the outgoing Bush administration include allowing the carrying of concealed weapons in some national parks and prohibiting medical facilities from receiving federal money for discriminating against doctors and nurses who refuse to assist with abortions or dispense contraceptives based on religious grounds.

Federal law requires a 60-day waiting period before any major regulatory changes become law, so some presidents try to publish new major regulations to ensure they go into effect before the new president's inauguration on January 20.

(Reporting by Tabassum Zakaria; Editing by Patricia Zengerle)

http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...politi csNews

crockett · 01-20-2009, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotrocket

Here ya go...

http://www.reuters.com/article/polit...politi csNews

thanks for the link.. Yea by their explanation, it would seem that 2257 was set up as a one of these "midnight regulations" being it was set up to go into effect the day of the inauguration.

Matt 26z · 01-20-2009, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

2257 was under Reagan after the Tracy Lords incident.

Loki · 01-20-2009, 07:12 PM

Link appreciated

-Loki-

tony286 · 01-20-2009, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

Nice try, it was November 18, 1988 Title 18 United States Code Section 2257 was reenacted. that would be ronnie

StickyGreen · 01-20-2009, 07:48 PM

But will he get rid of the Patriot Act? Doubt it...

pornlaw · 01-21-2009, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

thanks for the link.. Yea by their explanation, it would seem that 2257 was set up as a one of these "midnight regulations" being it was set up to go into effect the day of the inauguration.

2257 doesnt appear to be a "midnight regulation." 2257 has been around long before the time between the election and Obama taking office.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 01-21-2009, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

2257 was Clinton, not Bush

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

It was just redone under Bush admin. Twice

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

Yep, It just came back around again about a month ago.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

I don't recall any 2257 inspections under Clinton.

Please tell us when they occurred?

ADG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

2257 was under Reagan after the Traci Lords incident.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

Nice try, it was November 18, 1988 Title 18 United States Code Section 2257 was reenacted. that would be ronnie

What do you do in adult?!?

j/k

ADG

kane · 01-21-2009, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

What do you do in adult?!?

j/k

ADG

I won't speak for the others, but me? I surf tube sites, troll boards and stalk pornstars on Myspace

SmokeyTheBear · 01-21-2009, 09:42 AM

Federal Register: December 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 244)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 77431-77472]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18de08-24]

[[Page 77431]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V

Department of Justice

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

28 CFR Part 75

Revised Regulations for Records Relating to Visual Depictions of
Sexually Explicit Conduct; Inspection of Records Relating to Depiction
of Simulated Sexually Explicit Performance; Final Rule

[[Page 77432]]

SmokeyTheBear · 01-21-2009, 09:43 AM

SUMMARY: This rule finalizes two proposed rules and amends the record-
keeping, labeling, and inspection requirements to account for changes
in the underlying statute made by Congress in enacting the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.

DATES: This rule is effective January 20, 2009. Compliance date: The
requirements of this rule apply to producers of visual depictions of
the lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a person and
producers of simulated sexually explicit conduct as of March 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
Exploitation and Obscenity section, Criminal Division, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-5780. This is
not a toll-free number.

SmokeyTheBear · 01-21-2009, 09:48 AM

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29677.htm

DamageX · 01-21-2009, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

2257 was under Reagan after the Tracy Lords incident.

Keep going guys, soon we'll have had 2257 pre-date the Great Depression and be one of the causes for it!

my2257 · 01-21-2009, 09:59 AM

Supreme Court refused to hear Goverments appeal of 6th Courts ruling on the Communications Decency Act which was ruled as unconstitutional . Has NOTHING to do with Obama!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/...ernet_blocking

01-20-2009, 05:04 PM	#1
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Interesting news maybe for 2257? I just heard Obama has already holted all pending regulations put in place under the Bush admin. I wonder if that would effect the 2257 regulation that went into effect today? __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

01-20-2009, 06:05 PM	#11
mynameisjim Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,985	I've heard it from several news sources, the memo did go out. But I don't think it covers all laws, just things specifically put forward by the previous administration. I haven't seen any details though but I think the laws are still in effect, but say the previous attorney general ordered that 100 new 2257 inspectors be hired, that would be halted. Just an example. At least that's my understanding so far. __________________ jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

01-20-2009, 07:12 PM	#16
Loki Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Michigan Posts: 4,420	Link appreciated -Loki- __________________ MAKE MONEY WITH 3D TOONS! Need hosting? LokiCa$h Uses Amerinoc and love them! Skype: LokiPorn Or Email 3dloki\|at\|gmail.com

01-20-2009, 07:48 PM	#18
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	But will he get rid of the Patriot Act? Doubt it... __________________ Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life

01-21-2009, 09:42 AM	#22
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	Federal Register: December 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 244)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 77431-77472] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr18de08-24] [[Page 77431]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Part V Department of Justice ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 28 CFR Part 75 Revised Regulations for Records Relating to Visual Depictions of Sexually Explicit Conduct; Inspection of Records Relating to Depiction of Simulated Sexually Explicit Performance; Final Rule [[Page 77432]] __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

01-20-2009, 05:13 PM	#2
Si Such Fun! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 13,900	I fucking hope so!

01-20-2009, 05:40 PM	#4
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	This is a pretty common thing with a new incoming president. don't be surprised if he makes some executive orders altering or overturning some of Bush's regulations. Is 2257 one of them? Who knows.

01-21-2009, 09:43 AM	#23
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	SUMMARY: This rule finalizes two proposed rules and amends the record- keeping, labeling, and inspection requirements to account for changes in the underlying statute made by Congress in enacting the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. DATES: This rule is effective January 20, 2009. Compliance date: The requirements of this rule apply to producers of visual depictions of the lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a person and producers of simulated sexually explicit conduct as of March 18, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity section, Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-5780. This is not a toll-free number. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

01-21-2009, 09:48 AM	#24
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29677.htm __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

01-21-2009, 09:59 AM	#26
my2257 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 110	Supreme Court refused to hear Goverments appeal of 6th Courts ruling on the Communications Decency Act which was ruled as unconstitutional . Has NOTHING to do with Obama! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/...ernet_blocking