Womens health sure has changed this week - GoFuckYourself.com

Sly · 11-20-2009, 10:58 AM

Guidelines for both cervical cancer and breast cancer change the same week. Seems kind of like a coincidence... announce them both at the same time to minimize the PR flack?

Prostate and testicular cancer are next!

dyna mo · 11-20-2009, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Guidelines for both cervical cancer and breast cancer change the same week. Seems kind of like a coincidence... announce them both at the same time to minimize the PR flack?

Prostate and testicular cancer are next!

it's all manipulated data force-fed to the masses by media agencies in cahoots with government to ration healthcare.

it's perfectly diabolical!

/

BlackCrayon · 11-20-2009, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it's all manipulated data force-fed to the masses by media agencies in cahoots with government to ration healthcare.

it's perfectly diabolical!

/

I don't get it really. We don't limit time frames to get certain things checked out here in canada. America seems to be going about this health care reform thing all wrong.

Tom_PM · 11-20-2009, 11:11 AM

That same panel has recommended that nonsense for like a decade now. It's always ignored.
The sec of health and human svcs has said to ignore it, and she also said the reaction to the panels "recommendations" took her by surprise.

I'd chalk it up to her being completely naive on that! 100%

ALL of the nonsense about this meaning rationing and other baloney is COMPLETE whitewash, hogwash, spin, utter desperate bullshit.

dyna mo · 11-20-2009, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

ALL of the nonsense about this meaning rationing and other baloney is COMPLETE whitewash, hogwash, spin, utter desperate bullshit.

gleem · 11-20-2009, 02:35 PM

yep, guidlines change when the gov. realized it's gonna be paying for it! lol, what a bunch of sheep!

Sly · 11-20-2009, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

That same panel has recommended that nonsense for like a decade now. It's always ignored.
The sec of health and human svcs has said to ignore it, and she also said the reaction to the panels "recommendations" took her by surprise.

I'd chalk it up to her being completely naive on that! 100%

ALL of the nonsense about this meaning rationing and other baloney is COMPLETE whitewash, hogwash, spin, utter desperate bullshit.

So what you're saying is this committee is making medical recommendations that nobody listens to or believes... so why are they making medical recommendations?

Tom_PM · 11-20-2009, 02:54 PM

Well my understanding was that this panel has been active for many years and always comes out with it's annual recommendations and that the problem this time was the amazingly naive kathleen sebelius. They didnt get out "ahead of the story" they're saying, lol. And of course it's perfectly bad timing.

The best argument against these recommendations that I heard was from Elisabeth on the View. She pointed out that Utah has recommended age 50 for a long time now. They have the lowest rate of breast cancer detection, and the highest death rate from it.. terrible.

I'd be interested to know more about this panel and where they came up with that recommendation because it seems to me it's just garbage.

Tom_PM · 11-20-2009, 03:00 PM

It's called the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

11-20-2009, 10:58 AM	#1
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,292	Womens health sure has changed this week Guidelines for both cervical cancer and breast cancer change the same week. Seems kind of like a coincidence... announce them both at the same time to minimize the PR flack? Prostate and testicular cancer are next! __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available. Wanted: CCBill pay sites for sale

11-20-2009, 11:11 AM	#4
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	That same panel has recommended that nonsense for like a decade now. It's always ignored. The sec of health and human svcs has said to ignore it, and she also said the reaction to the panels "recommendations" took her by surprise. I'd chalk it up to her being completely naive on that! 100% ALL of the nonsense about this meaning rationing and other baloney is COMPLETE whitewash, hogwash, spin, utter desperate bullshit. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

11-20-2009, 02:35 PM	#6
gleem Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Sunny Land Posts: 5,593	yep, guidlines change when the gov. realized it's gonna be paying for it! lol, what a bunch of sheep! __________________ Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

11-20-2009, 02:54 PM	#8
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Well my understanding was that this panel has been active for many years and always comes out with it's annual recommendations and that the problem this time was the amazingly naive kathleen sebelius. They didnt get out "ahead of the story" they're saying, lol. And of course it's perfectly bad timing. The best argument against these recommendations that I heard was from Elisabeth on the View. She pointed out that Utah has recommended age 50 for a long time now. They have the lowest rate of breast cancer detection, and the highest death rate from it.. terrible. I'd be interested to know more about this panel and where they came up with that recommendation because it seems to me it's just garbage. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar. Last edited by Tom_PM; 11-20-2009 at 02:57 PM..

11-20-2009, 03:00 PM	#9
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	It's called the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.