Teacher/Student sex ok in Georgia if 16 or older. - GoFuckYourself.com

GatorB · 12-11-2009, 01:50 PM

ATLANTA -- A Cobb County judge has ruled that a former Marietta High teacher is not guilty of sexual assault charges from his affair with a 17-year-old student.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports Thursday that Judge Robert Flournoy bypassed the jury and issued a directed verdict against 36-year-old Christopher King.

Flournoy said Wednesday the teacher-student relationship was gross and awful, but not illegal because it was consensual.

The Georgia Supreme Court ruled in June that when the student is a willing participant and is 16 or older, their consent can be a defense for teachers facing a sexual assault charge.

The judge referenced that decision in his ruling but said he has a feeling the Legislature is going to amend that law.

The girl testified Wednesday that she never felt intimidated or coerced by King.

http://www.macon.com/220/story/949243.html

BlackCrayon · 12-11-2009, 01:58 PM

im shocked considering male teachers who do this are usually hung in the village square.

Tom_PM · 12-11-2009, 02:00 PM

17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful

18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck

D Ghost · 12-11-2009, 02:01 PM

arf? o_O

Horny Joe · 12-11-2009, 02:08 PM

Come on.... Wish I could fuck my 7th grade teacher back then. She had the BIGGEST cameltoe I have ever seen! Tight jeans and you could see the toe from the moon.... Fantastic!

Big Red Machine · 12-11-2009, 02:09 PM

If the kids are of the age of consent in the state , I can see not having legal action, but he shouldn't be able to be a teacher. The trust is lost.

Big Red Machine · 12-11-2009, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horny Joe

Come on.... Wish I could fuck my 7th grade teacher back then. She had the BIGGEST cameltoe I have ever seen! Tight jeans and you could see the toe from the moon.... Fantastic!

Of course there is the double standard, I wanted to fuck a couple of my hot ass teachers as well.

Tom_PM · 12-11-2009, 02:10 PM

I remember a hot study hall teacher too. You could walk into that class and every desk that a guy was sitting at was popping wheelies.

Klen · 12-11-2009, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful

18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck

It's not beacuse of years,it is beacuse of student-teacher relationship.

Bomber8888 · 12-11-2009, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horny Joe

Come on.... Wish I could fuck my 7th grade teacher back then. She had the BIGGEST cameltoe I have ever seen! Tight jeans and you could see the toe from the moon.... Fantastic!

And you can remember this?

Tom_PM · 12-11-2009, 02:19 PM

Well it's hard to disagree with the fact that he said it because they were teacher-student.

But I still dont think the judge would have said anything if not for the girls age. I think it's the tired old thing where you have to put a public face on your comments, because people dont swallow common sense as readily as drama.

Maybe if we just pretend it was 5yrs+ on their ages.. now it's not gross and awful, it's simply a matter of the law being applied.

Libertine · 12-11-2009, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

It's not beacuse of years,it is beacuse of student-teacher relationship.

That's why, above the age of consent, it should be a reason for losing his job but not a reason for going to prison.

The whole point of statutory rape is that someone is unable to consent, presumable because they're not able to understand just what they're consenting to. With most 16 and 17 year olds, however, that's an obvious absurdity - they're likely to know all about sex, and if they consent, chances are that they know what they're doing.

It changes when there's pressure involved, of course. But when I look back on being 16/17... there were a bunch of female teachers I'd have fucked without a second thought, if given the chance.

jalami · 12-11-2009, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine

That's why, above the age of consent, it should be a reason for losing his job but not a reason for going to prison.

100% correct... grounds for termination for sure, but no criminal act -- unless there's a specific law (which exists in some jurisdictions) which raises the age of consent when the older partner is in a "position of authority," which it appears that Georgia doesn't have.

potter · 12-11-2009, 02:56 PM

Well of course it's not based on her age. There's almost no states with statutory rape or age of consent laws which would have mattered in this case.

It's pure and simple the fact he was a "person of trust" and/or "authoritative figure". Which most states have worded into their age of consent laws.

Naechy · 12-11-2009, 03:41 PM

The whole point of statutory rape is that someone is unable to consent, presumable because they're not able to understand just what they're consenting to. With most 16 and 17 year olds. Totaly agree!

Horny Joe · 12-11-2009, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bomber8888

And you can remember this?

Hehe, I am not THAT old.... And yes, that image is BURNED into my mind!

GatorB · 12-11-2009, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter

Well of course it's not based on her age. There's almost no states with statutory rape or age of consent laws which would have mattered in this case.

It's pure and simple the fact he was a "person of trust" and/or "authoritative figure". Which most states have worded into their age of consent laws.

Actually in my state anyone that has sex with a 16 or 17 year old that is 4 years or older than them can be charged with statutory rape whether the 16/17 year old consented or not.

fmltube · 12-11-2009, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Actually in my state anyone that has sex with a 16 or 17 year old that is 4 years or older than them can be charged with statutory rape whether the 16/17 year old consented or not.

Florida is the same way except that its 16/17 with no one 7 years older than the consenting party under 18.

Isn't California straight 18 and up for even consensual sex?

Press Release Pro · 12-11-2009, 07:26 PM

Wish I had studied in there!

MrMaxwell · 12-11-2009, 10:17 PM

http://ageofconsent.com/
It's surprisingly low in some states
My first woman was my elder by eleven years.. and she could have been in big trouble for sucking my cock in the park, or having me up her ass with the windows open, or 1000 other things that we did... but .. that wouldn't be right

I appreciate all of it to this day
Older men/Younger women isn't the same thing
Double standard, and one that's very real, for very real reasons.

L-Pink · 12-11-2009, 10:27 PM

I'm getting a teaching degree!

.

Iron Fist · 12-11-2009, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful

18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck

born2blog · 12-11-2009, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful

18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck

kinda funny when you put it that way

discountencoding · 12-11-2009, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful

18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck

What you'r telling us is gospel.

John-ACWM · 12-12-2009, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horny Joe

Come on.... Wish I could fuck my 7th grade teacher back then. She had the BIGGEST cameltoe I have ever seen! Tight jeans and you could see the toe from the moon.... Fantastic!

LoveSandra · 12-12-2009, 08:58 AM

Very nice pics

DaddyHalbucks · 12-12-2009, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom

17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful

18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck

Interesting observation. Yes, there is an arbitrary aspect, but I'm not sure there is a better way.

fatfoo · 12-12-2009, 12:34 PM

You think that's weird? Canada’s age of consent has been 14 since 1892.

OTTAWA — Canada’s age of sexual consent increased by two years to 16 beginning May 1, 2008.

The law includes a “close-in-age” provision of five years, which means it would be legal for a 15-year-old to have relations with a 19-year-old provided the relationship is not exploitive and the older party is not in a position of authority or trust.

Actually, after writing all this I have realised it is not weird. Never mind about that, carry on.

12-11-2009, 01:50 PM	#1
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	Teacher/Student sex ok in Georgia if 16 or older. ATLANTA -- A Cobb County judge has ruled that a former Marietta High teacher is not guilty of sexual assault charges from his affair with a 17-year-old student. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports Thursday that Judge Robert Flournoy bypassed the jury and issued a directed verdict against 36-year-old Christopher King. Flournoy said Wednesday the teacher-student relationship was gross and awful, but not illegal because it was consensual. The Georgia Supreme Court ruled in June that when the student is a willing participant and is 16 or older, their consent can be a defense for teachers facing a sexual assault charge. The judge referenced that decision in his ruling but said he has a feeling the Legislature is going to amend that law. The girl testified Wednesday that she never felt intimidated or coerced by King. http://www.macon.com/220/story/949243.html

12-11-2009, 01:58 PM	#2
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	im shocked considering male teachers who do this are usually hung in the village square. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

12-11-2009, 02:00 PM	#3
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	17 yrs and 11 months and 29 days: gross and awful 18 yrs and 1 day: beautiful love, happiness, birds singing, butterflies blooming or whatever the fuck __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

12-11-2009, 02:08 PM	#5
Horny Joe Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Online Posts: 2,661	Come on.... Wish I could fuck my 7th grade teacher back then. She had the BIGGEST cameltoe I have ever seen! Tight jeans and you could see the toe from the moon.... Fantastic! __________________ The Very Best Teen Content! Make $$$$ - Join DIESEL ACTION for Great Teen content

12-11-2009, 02:09 PM	#6
Big Red Machine Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: XXXBigRed@Twitter Posts: 9,586	If the kids are of the age of consent in the state , I can see not having legal action, but he shouldn't be able to be a teacher. The trust is lost. __________________ ICQ:475437214

12-11-2009, 02:01 PM	#4
D Ghost null Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9,820	arf? o_O

12-11-2009, 02:10 PM	#8
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	I remember a hot study hall teacher too. You could walk into that class and every desk that a guy was sitting at was popping wheelies. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

12-11-2009, 02:19 PM	#11
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Well it's hard to disagree with the fact that he said it because they were teacher-student. But I still dont think the judge would have said anything if not for the girls age. I think it's the tired old thing where you have to put a public face on your comments, because people dont swallow common sense as readily as drama. Maybe if we just pretend it was 5yrs+ on their ages.. now it's not gross and awful, it's simply a matter of the law being applied. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

12-11-2009, 02:56 PM	#14
potter Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Denver Posts: 6,559	Well of course it's not based on her age. There's almost no states with statutory rape or age of consent laws which would have mattered in this case. It's pure and simple the fact he was a "person of trust" and/or "authoritative figure". Which most states have worded into their age of consent laws. __________________

12-11-2009, 03:41 PM	#15
Naechy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 6,497	The whole point of statutory rape is that someone is unable to consent, presumable because they're not able to understand just what they're consenting to. With most 16 and 17 year olds. Totaly agree! __________________ Adult SEO Labs * Buying Links * SEO 666-874

12-11-2009, 07:26 PM	#19
Press Release Pro Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 228	Wish I had studied in there! __________________ PM me for Press related consulting work. Good PR / Bad PR / PR / Articles / Headliners When results matters morals comes second

12-11-2009, 10:17 PM	#20
MrMaxwell Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 10,057	http://ageofconsent.com/ It's surprisingly low in some states My first woman was my elder by eleven years.. and she could have been in big trouble for sucking my cock in the park, or having me up her ass with the windows open, or 1000 other things that we did... but .. that wouldn't be right I appreciate all of it to this day Older men/Younger women isn't the same thing Double standard, and one that's very real, for very real reasons.

12-11-2009, 10:27 PM	#21
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,152	I'm getting a teaching degree! .

12-12-2009, 08:58 AM	#26
LoveSandra So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Just Blow Me Posts: 10,551	Very nice pics

12-12-2009, 12:34 PM	#28
fatfoo ICQ:649699063 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 27,763	You think that's weird? Canada’s age of consent has been 14 since 1892. OTTAWA — Canada’s age of sexual consent increased by two years to 16 beginning May 1, 2008. The law includes a “close-in-age” provision of five years, which means it would be legal for a 15-year-old to have relations with a 19-year-old provided the relationship is not exploitive and the older party is not in a position of authority or trust. Actually, after writing all this I have realised it is not weird. Never mind about that, carry on. __________________ Send me an email: [email protected] Last edited by fatfoo; 12-12-2009 at 12:36 PM..