Best Content Management System? - GoFuckYourself.com

Vicky Vette · 02-01-2010, 10:22 AM

Sorry if this has been discussed before, I can not possibly read all the threads! Does anyone have a CMS they really love? Or hate? Any stories to share? Companies to stay away from or any that excel in service? I need a CMS for about 6 - 9 sites.

Believe it or not, most of what we do is manual, lol... I have photoshop galleries pretty automated, and it's a breeze, but the problem is I can't go on vacation! Or what if I break a leg? Or the dreaded mother in law comes to visit for god-forbid 10 days! AAAAhhhhhhhh.... so I need a cms that I program for future updates.

They range from free to very expensive. I'm leaning towards Site Depth the newest release looks really good. Any advice?

Barefootsies · 02-01-2010, 10:46 AM

Depends on the type of site.

Right now for adult pay sites, I am really enjoying the tube pay site CMS. As for celebrity sites, I still prefer my custom built site. Although I do also now have a celebrity tube pay site as well in development. So we'll see after launch.

Vicky Vette · 02-01-2010, 10:50 AM

Oh sorry, I should have said. It's for 9 solo girl sites in a network.

lazerbunny · 02-01-2010, 11:03 AM

elevated X is the best.. after using MANY free and paid cms.

MOxxx · 02-01-2010, 07:23 PM

]ADULTSITECMS[/COLOR]

Glenn Beck · 02-01-2010, 07:26 PM

have you tried wordpress?

SensationalCash · 02-01-2010, 08:13 PM

Mas by Mansion

Mutt · 02-01-2010, 08:14 PM

for solo sites - go with SiteDepth, it was created for solo sites.

ExtremeBank_Adam · 02-01-2010, 08:19 PM

Never used Sitedepth, but heard that customer service was a little slow, which isn't good if your sites go down.

I have used a few others, and ended up with Elevated X... and never been happier. You can lease it for about $150 a month, and schedule your updates as far out as you want. Hell, it'll even update your free area for you at the same time.

trevesty · 02-01-2010, 08:50 PM

We use SiteDepth ;)

Barefootsies · 02-01-2010, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExtremeBank_Adam

Never used Sitedepth, but heard that customer service was a little slow, which isn't good if your sites go down.

The company, site, script was sold off a few months back. It has new owners now.

Patrik_Ryan · 02-02-2010, 07:23 AM

This is interesting topic...
Company I work for spent several months to custom program a "web-service" to serve pictures on several sites. Idea is that we can put in the "web-service" a set of pictures of 5000 pix and it will be displayed on several sites as we like (resized, re-selected,...). The concept was created to make a part of cross content on several sites which would all have their part of own exclusive content also, it was also done to save place because when you have hundreds of thousand pics, better to have them once that one time per site.
But I am far from satisfied by the result because for obvious reasons, I cannot brand the pictures them-selves... and all technical solutions to brand the picture when they are downloaded by the user are really slow...
So I will go to have a look at the software you advise

Voodoo · 02-02-2010, 07:23 AM

I think you should be asking Captain Ice Cream!

02-01-2010, 10:22 AM	#1
Vicky Vette StickyVicky Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: Tampa Bay, Florida Posts: 114	Best Content Management System? Sorry if this has been discussed before, I can not possibly read all the threads! Does anyone have a CMS they really love? Or hate? Any stories to share? Companies to stay away from or any that excel in service? I need a CMS for about 6 - 9 sites. Believe it or not, most of what we do is manual, lol... I have photoshop galleries pretty automated, and it's a breeze, but the problem is I can't go on vacation! Or what if I break a leg? Or the dreaded mother in law comes to visit for god-forbid 10 days! AAAAhhhhhhhh.... so I need a cms that I program for future updates. They range from free to very expensive. I'm leaning towards Site Depth the newest release looks really good. Any advice?

02-01-2010, 10:46 AM	#2
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	Depends on the type of site. Right now for adult pay sites, I am really enjoying the tube pay site CMS. As for celebrity sites, I still prefer my custom built site. Although I do also now have a celebrity tube pay site as well in development. So we'll see after launch. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

02-01-2010, 11:03 AM	#4
lazerbunny Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Thrilladelphia Posts: 442	elevated X is the best.. after using MANY free and paid cms. __________________ Awesome Show, Great Job! icq- 414 975 541 LazerBunny.com - Indie AltPorn bunnybuxxx.com - The Alternative Affiliate Program TrafficHolder.com - Buy/Sell Adult Traffic

02-01-2010, 07:23 PM	#5
MOxxx Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Atlanta,GA Posts: 3,022	]ADULTSITECMS[/COLOR] __________________ Increase revenue and maximize your business potential by translating your website with a partner who truly understands your industry! For more information about X-Rated Translations visit https://www.xratedtranslations.com

02-01-2010, 08:14 PM	#8
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	for solo sites - go with SiteDepth, it was created for solo sites. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

02-01-2010, 10:50 AM	#3
Vicky Vette StickyVicky Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: Tampa Bay, Florida Posts: 114	Oh sorry, I should have said. It's for 9 solo girl sites in a network.

02-01-2010, 07:26 PM	#6
Glenn Beck So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 408	have you tried wordpress?

02-01-2010, 08:13 PM	#7
SensationalCash Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Miami Fl Posts: 539	Mas by Mansion

02-01-2010, 08:19 PM	#9
ExtremeBank_Adam Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Tampa, FL Posts: 1,671	Never used Sitedepth, but heard that customer service was a little slow, which isn't good if your sites go down. I have used a few others, and ended up with Elevated X... and never been happier. You can lease it for about $150 a month, and schedule your updates as far out as you want. Hell, it'll even update your free area for you at the same time. __________________ ExtremeBank.com, the EXTREME program for the Pornicate.com Network of sites: Naughty Alysha, Roxy Raye, Buddha Bang, Angie Noir, Fisting Sex, Extreme Ty & many more. Email: adam [at] extremebank.com \| ICQ: 331-797-412

02-01-2010, 08:50 PM	#10
trevesty Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Midwest Posts: 3,806	We use SiteDepth ;)

02-02-2010, 07:23 AM	#12
Patrik_Ryan Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Czech Republic Posts: 94	This is interesting topic... Company I work for spent several months to custom program a "web-service" to serve pictures on several sites. Idea is that we can put in the "web-service" a set of pictures of 5000 pix and it will be displayed on several sites as we like (resized, re-selected,...). The concept was created to make a part of cross content on several sites which would all have their part of own exclusive content also, it was also done to save place because when you have hundreds of thousand pics, better to have them once that one time per site. But I am far from satisfied by the result because for obvious reasons, I cannot brand the pictures them-selves... and all technical solutions to brand the picture when they are downloaded by the user are really slow... So I will go to have a look at the software you advise __________________ [email protected] ICQ: 224 513 445 HIGH QUALITY & HD CONTENT

02-02-2010, 07:23 AM	#13
Voodoo ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Porn Valley, CA Posts: 10,590	I think you should be asking Captain Ice Cream! __________________ "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."