Tea Baggers Mock a Guy with Parkinson?s Disease **VIDEO**

[TheSenator]

Tea Baggers are just getting exposed everyday. The Republicans, independents, conservatives and so called independents have a serious problem. They are poisoning everything, muddy up the water and astonishingly moronic.


Source: http://rawstory.com/2010/03/proteste...arkinsons-man/
Video: http://rawreplaymedia.com/media/2010...ts_100316a.flv
or watch the video on the source page.
======================
The passion against health care reform has elevated to such a level that protesters on Tuesday mocked an apparent Parkinson's Disease victim, scorning him as a "communist" who is looking for "handouts."

Protesters on both ends of the health care debate squared off in competing rallies outside the Columbus, Ohio office of district Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy (D-OH), who says she's undecided on her vote for the bill.

A wrinkled, kneeling man holding a stick crawled up to a group opposing the effort with a sign saying he's "got Parkinson's" and needs help.

"If you're looking for a handout you're in the wrong end of town," one man yelled at him. "Nothing for free over here, you have to work for everything you get."

Parkinson's is an incurable and degenerative brain disorder that impairs the victim's speech, motor skills and various other functions.

Another man walked up him and threw a dollar bill at him and said derisively, "I'll pay for this guy, start a pot." Tossing another bill at the sedentary man, he screamed, "No more handouts!"

"You love a communist!" shouted another protester in response.

The Columbus Dispatch offered a rundown of the dueling rallies:

Kilroy, who was in Washington yesterday, says she will not decide how she will vote until she has a chance to review the final package. The congresswoman's offices in Washington and Columbus logged more than 1,500 calls on the issue Monday.

Police on foot and bicycles kept a close eye on the crowd that stretched along Olentangy River Road. Several loud exchanges occurred as some protesters got in each other's faces, but no physical clashes were reported.

The scenes were remnant of the heated town-hall protests across the nation last summer when supporters and opponents of health reform clashed.

==================================================

These are visceral people who vote. There is barely any rational, well thought debate to usher any type of resolution. Although, I don't agree to this hand out to the big insurance company, it is a step in the right direction to single payer health care. The day will come when America will have universal health care for all. The visceral voter will at the end support universal health care just like the conservatives in every other developed country.

[PenisFace]

"If you're looking for a handout you're in the wrong end of town," one man yelled at him. "Nothing for free over here, you have to work for everything you get."

Stay classy, conservatives....

[nation-x]

lol at the last lady in the video...

Noone is allowed to read it (the bill) even though it's been online in full for no less than 6 months... lol... these people just crack me up... they want to yell and scream but not really educate themselves as to what they are opposing.

[The Demon]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=X7VyLxDrn7I

Stay honest, Democrats....

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by nation-x

lol at the last lady in the video...

Noone is allowed to read it (the bill) even though it's been online in full for no less than 6 months... lol... these people just crack me up... they want to yell and scream but not really educate themselves as to what they are opposing.

AHAHAHAAHHAHA as opposed to the Democrats educating themselves on what they're supporting? The hypocrisy and irony from the left is hilarious.

[GrouchyAdmin]

Yet another well thought-out cut and paste from our very own TheSenator.

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by GrouchyAdmin

Yet another well thought-out cut and paste from our very own TheSenator.

Totally, the guy wreaks of intelligence. If I was a liberal, I'd be proud!

[nation-x]

Originally Posted by The Demon

AHAHAHAAHHAHA as opposed to the Democrats educating themselves on what they're supporting? The hypocrisy and irony from the left is hilarious.

Have you read the bill smartass? I doubt it... I have.

[BestXXXPorn]

Wait, are you asking us to judge "Republicans, independents, conservatives and so called independents" because of the actions of a few jackasses ... seriously, blanket sweeping statements are out of hand these days...

And personally ... I don't think there should be government handouts, in fact it's not really in the power of the us government to do that... but they still do...

Anyway this was not an appropriate way to voice an opinion... and who knows what spin whatever reporter put on it. It's all self serving in the end...

[Caligari]

Originally Posted by TheSenator

Tea Baggers are just getting exposed everyday. The Republicans, independents, conservatives and so called independents have a serious problem. They are poisoning everything, muddy up the water and astonishingly moronic.

These are visceral people who vote. There is barely any rational, well thought debate to usher any type of resolution. Although, I don't agree to this hand out to the big insurance company, it is a step in the right direction to single payer health care. The day will come when America will have universal health care for all. The visceral voter will at the end support universal health care just like the conservatives in every other developed country.

Not surprising. An overwhemling abundance of right wing "morans" who have long since lost rational thought proccesses. And when you add a black president on top of that...watch out. More fuel for the stupidity fire.

And its not just the ultra right wing twats. There are plenty of yahoo democrats to go around.
Great example is my own mother. She is a die hard democrat, votes against republicans all the time. But when Obama was nominated she said "I don't think i'm ready for a black president." She's a racist democrat, who coulda believed such a thing

[PenisFace]

Originally Posted by BestXXXPorn

Wait, are you asking us to judge "Republicans, independents, conservatives and so called independents" because of the actions of a few jackasses ... seriously, blanket sweeping statements are out of hand these days...

And personally ... I don't think there should be government handouts, in fact it's not really in the power of the us government to do that... but they still do...

Anyway this was not an appropriate way to voice an opinion... and who knows what spin whatever reporter put on it. It's all self serving in the end...

But it is in the power of the US government. They can do what they want to who they want. You can be the most well armed, hardcore anti-government freedom loving patriot in all of the US, but they'll come in and do what they want to you, when they want to, and you'll either submit, or be killed while resisting. They need more money? They introduce more/new taxes. You pay them. They need to build some kind of super duper anti-terrorist facility in your neighbourhood because of it's strategic location? You get a bit of a cash payout and a "see you later" as they roll your house off the side of a mountain, no arguing allowed, as they'll kick you out anyway.

Face it folks, modern governments are massively powerful and they do what they like, when they like. Even the most freedom loving, liberty sexing, I-hate-my-government people will get steam rolled and can't do shit about it.

Those massive bailouts? Lots of people said no. Government said "fuck off" and did it. Protesting invasions of Afghanistan or Iraq? Government said "fuck off" and did it. Disagree with healthcare reform? Government will say "fuck off" and do it, because they can. And you'll just have to bend over and take it.

Welcome to life

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by nation-x

Have you read the bill smartass? I doubt it... I have.

Sure you have, all 2,700 pages. Please do us a favor and quit lying about your IQ and reading abilities. You can't even comprehend half of the shit that goes through these posts, we're supposed to believe you read even a fraction of the bill. Thanks for the laugh.

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by BestXXXPorn

Wait, are you asking us to judge "Republicans, independents, conservatives and so called independents" because of the actions of a few jackasses ... seriously, blanket sweeping statements are out of hand these days...

It's called a hasty generalization used by morons.

And personally ... I don't think there should be government handouts, in fact it's not really in the power of the us government to do that... but they still do...

Agreed

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by Caligari

Not surprising. An overwhemling abundance of right wing "morans" who have long since lost rational thought proccesses. And when you add a black president on top of that...watch out. More fuel for the stupidity fire.

And its not just the ultra right wing twats. There are plenty of yahoo democrats to go around.
Great example is my own mother. She is a die hard democrat, votes against republicans all the time. But when Obama was nominated she said "I don't think i'm ready for a black president." She's a racist democrat, who coulda believed such a thing

I agree a lot of right wing twats have lost rational thought process. However, it's better than liberals never having one to begin with, instead appealing to emotions, fear, etc.

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by The Demon

I agree a lot of right wing twats have lost rational thought process. However, it's better than liberals never having one to begin with, instead appealing to emotions, fear, etc.

lol.....

Full text: Bush's speech :A transcript of George Bush's war ultimatum speech from the Cross Hall in the White House


My fellow citizens, events in Iraq have now reached the final days of decision. For more than a decade, the United States and other nations have pursued patient and honorable efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime without war. That regime pledged to reveal and destroy all its weapons of mass destruction as a condition for ending the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
Since then, the world has engaged in 12 years of diplomacy. We have passed more than a dozen resolutions in the United Nations Security Council. We have sent hundreds of weapons inspectors to oversee the disarmament of Iraq. Our good faith has not been returned.

The Iraqi regime has used diplomacy as a ploy to gain time and advantage. It has uniformly defied Security Council resolutions demanding full disarmament. Over the years, U.N. weapon inspectors have been threatened by Iraqi officials, electronically bugged, and systematically deceived. Peaceful efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime have failed again and again -- because we are not dealing with peaceful men.

Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised. This regime has already used weapons of mass destruction against Iraq's neighbors and against Iraq's people.

The regime has a history of reckless aggression in the Middle East. It has a deep hatred of America and our friends. And it has aided, trained and harbored terrorists, including operatives of al Qaeda.
The danger is clear: using chemical, biological or, one day, nuclear weapons, obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country, or any other.

The United States and other nations did nothing to deserve or invite this threat. But we will do everything to defeat it. Instead of drifting along toward tragedy, we will set a course toward safety. Before the day of horror can come, before it is too late to act, this danger will be removed.

The United States of America has the sovereign authority to use force in assuring its own national security. That duty falls to me, as Commander-in-Chief, by the oath I have sworn, by the oath I will keep.

Recognizing the threat to our country, the United States Congress voted overwhelmingly last year to support the use of force against Iraq. America tried to work with the United Nations to address this threat because we wanted to resolve the issue peacefully. We believe in the mission of the United Nations. One reason the UN was founded after the second world war was to confront aggressive dictators, actively and early, before they can attack the innocent and destroy the peace.

In the case of Iraq, the Security Council did act, in the early 1990s. Under Resolutions 678 and 687 - both still in effect - the United States and our allies are authorized to use force in ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a question of authority, it is a question of will.

Last September, I went to the U.N. General Assembly and urged the nations of the world to unite and bring an end to this danger. On November 8, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441, finding Iraq in material breach of its obligations, and vowing serious consequences if Iraq did not fully and immediately disarm.

Today, no nation can possibly claim that Iraq has disarmed. And it will not disarm so long as Saddam Hussein holds power. For the last four-and-a-half months, the United States and our allies have worked within the Security Council to enforce that Council's long-standing demands. Yet, some permanent members of the Security Council have publicly announced they will veto any resolution that compels the disarmament of Iraq. These governments share our assessment of the danger, but not our resolve to meet it. Many nations, however, do have the resolve and fortitude to act against this threat to peace, and a broad coalition is now gathering to enforce the just demands of the world. The United Nations Security Council has not lived up to its responsibilities, so we will rise to ours.

...

[directfiesta]

...

In recent days, some governments in the Middle East have been doing their part. They have delivered public and private messages urging the dictator to leave Iraq, so that disarmament can proceed peacefully. He has thus far refused. All the decades of deceit and cruelty have now reached an end. Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict, commenced at a time of our choosing. For their own safety, all foreign nationals - including journalists and inspectors - should leave Iraq immediately.

Many Iraqis can hear me tonight in a translated radio broadcast, and I have a message for them. If we must begin a military campaign, it will be directed against the lawless men who rule your country and not against you. As our coalition takes away their power, we will deliver the food and medicine you need. We will tear down the apparatus of terror and we will help you to build a new Iraq that is prosperous and free. In a free Iraq, there will be no more wars of aggression against your neighbors, no more poison factories, no more executions of dissidents, no more torture chambers and rape rooms. The tyrant will soon be gone. The day of your liberation is near.

It is too late for Saddam Hussein to remain in power. It is not too late for the Iraqi military to act with honor and protect your country by permitting the peaceful entry of coalition forces to eliminate weapons of mass destruction. Our forces will give Iraqi military units clear instructions on actions they can take to avoid being attacked and destroyed. I urge every member of the Iraqi military and intelligence services, if war comes, do not fight for a dying regime that is not worth your own life.

And all Iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen carefully to this warning. In any conflict, your fate will depend on your action. Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the Iraqi people. Do not obey any command to use weapons of mass destruction against anyone, including the Iraqi people. War crimes will be prosecuted. War criminals will be punished. And it will be no defense to say, "I was just following orders."

Should Saddam Hussein choose confrontation, the American people can know that every measure has been taken to avoid war, and every measure will be taken to win it. Americans understand the costs of conflict because we have paid them in the past. War has no certainty, except the certainty of sacrifice.

Yet, the only way to reduce the harm and duration of war is to apply the full force and might of our military, and we are prepared to do so. If Saddam Hussein attempts to cling to power, he will remain a deadly foe until the end. In desperation, he and terrorists groups might try to conduct terrorist operations against the American people and our friends. These attacks are not inevitable. They are, however, possible. And this very fact underscores the reason we cannot live under the threat of blackmail. The terrorist threat to America and the world will be diminished the moment that Saddam Hussein is disarmed.

Our government is on heightened watch against these dangers. Just as we are preparing to ensure victory in Iraq, we are taking further actions to protect our homeland. In recent days, American authorities have expelled from the country certain individuals with ties to Iraqi intelligence services. Among other measures, I have directed additional security of our airports, and increased Coast Guard patrols of major seaports. The Department of Homeland Security is working closely with the nation's governors to increase armed security at critical facilities across America.

Should enemies strike our country, they would be attempting to shift our attention with panic and weaken our morale with fear. In this, they would fail. No act of theirs can alter the course or shake the resolve of this country. We are a peaceful people - yet we're not a fragile people, and we will not be intimidated by thugs and killers. If our enemies dare to strike us, they and all who have aided them, will face fearful consequences.

We are now acting because the risks of inaction would be far greater. In one year, or five years, the power of Iraq to inflict harm on all free nations would be multiplied many times over. With these capabilities, Saddam Hussein and his terrorist allies could choose the moment of deadly conflict when they are strongest. We choose to meet that threat now, where it arises, before it can appear suddenly in our skies and cities.

The cause of peace requires all free nations to recognize new and undeniable realities. In the 20th century, some chose to appease murderous dictators, whose threats were allowed to grow into genocide and global war. In this century, when evil men plot chemical, biological and nuclear terror, a policy of appeasement could bring destruction of a kind never before seen on this earth.

Terrorists and terror states do not reveal these threats with fair notice, in formal declarations - and responding to such enemies only after they have struck first is not self-defense, it is suicide. The security of the world requires disarming Saddam Hussein now.

As we enforce the just demands of the world, we will also honor the deepest commitments of our country. Unlike Saddam Hussein, we believe the Iraqi people are deserving and capable of human liberty. And when the dictator has departed, they can set an example to all the Middle East of a vital and peaceful and self-governing nation.

The United States, with other countries, will work to advance liberty and peace in that region. Our goal will not be achieved overnight, but it can come over time. The power and appeal of human liberty is felt in every life and every land. And the greatest power of freedom is to overcome hatred and violence, and turn the creative gifts of men and women to the pursuits of peace.

That is the future we choose. Free nations have a duty to defend our people by uniting against the violent. And tonight, as we have done before, America and our allies accept that responsibility.

Good night, and may God continue to bless America.


W.


lol.....

Fear, emotions and ... lies ...lol

[The Demon]

So I say liberals argue based on fear and emotion, which is a logical generalization... And you respond with... Bush? Just say you have no point rofl, instead of wasting bandwidth.

[GatorB]

Seriously if someon shot those assholes and I as on the jury I vote NOT GUILTY. Some people deserve to not be here. This would world would be better off is all assholes died.

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by GatorB

Seriously if someon shot those assholes and I as on the jury I vote NOT GUILTY. Some people deserve to not be here. This would world would be better off is all assholes died.

Lol. At the same time, if we shot all the liberals in this country, we would prosper.

[TheSenator]

Originally Posted by The Demon

Lol. At the same time, if we shot all the liberals in this country, we would prosper.

Promoting violence against liberals or anybody of different opinion, race, ethnicity, religion as an act of cowardliness.

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by TheSenator

Promoting violence against liberals or anybody of different opinion, race, ethnicity, religion as an act of cowardliness.

Hahaha notice how you didn't reprimand GatorB. Man, making my point against you idiots is way too easy.

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by The Demon

So I say liberals argue based on fear and emotion, which is a logical generalization... And you respond with... Bush? Just say you have no point rofl, instead of wasting bandwidth.

lol.....

you SAID .... I PROVED .... as usual ...

[nation-x]

Originally Posted by The Demon

So I say liberals argue based on fear and emotion...

You are kidding right? You really are clueless... go look at some republican statements from the floor of the house and senate or watch some gop campaign ads... then come back and say it's liberals who use fear and emotion.

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by nation-x

You are kidding right? You really are clueless... go look at some republican statements from the floor of the house and senate or watch some gop campaign ads... then come back and say it's liberals who use fear and emotion.

And yet another stupid human being unable to read. Did I say Republicans don't? No, I said Liberals argue purely from emotion and fear, that is it. Rofl

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by directfiesta

lol.....

you SAID .... I PROVED .... as usual ...

Because as usual I did, and as usual, your stupidity is why you're largely ignored in these threads.

[nation-x]

Originally Posted by The Demon

And yet another stupid human being unable to read. Did I say Republicans don't? No, I said Liberals argue purely from emotion and fear, that is it. Rofl

No... I am saying that liberals are largely not guilty of your accusation... quite the opposite.

[The Demon]

Originally Posted by nation-x

No... I am saying that liberals are largely not guilty of your accusation... quite the opposite.

haha yea ok. If a conservative makes a logical point about Obama, he hates him or is racist. If a conservative doesn't support gay marriage, he's a bigot. If a conservative supports the death penalty, he's a murderer.

Way to live in reality nation.

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by The Demon

Because as usual I did, and as usual, your stupidity is why you're largely ignored in these threads.

I see ....

[cwd]

Palin 2012

[smutnut]

I was tea bagged once. It was a very humiliating experience!

[nation-x]

Originally Posted by The Demon

haha yea ok. If a conservative makes a logical point about Obama, he hates him or is racist. If a conservative doesn't support gay marriage, he's a bigot. If a conservative supports the death penalty, he's a murderer.

Way to live in reality nation.

It's interesting that you think what you post typically makes any sense at all... but the reality is that I find that many "liberals" that I know personally are fairly independent on a variety of issues... including myself... but the typical "conservative" like you tends to toe the line on almost every issue without actually knowing the issue at all. I will agree that there are just as many wackadoos on the left as on the right... however, I find that those on the left are usually educated on the subject... unlike 90% of the "tea party conservatives" I have talked to personally. In general, I find that most self identifying "tea party conservatives" are typically ignorant of anything except for the talking points they have absorbed from their brainwashing masters.

If a liberal calls someone a racist because they have legitimate concerns about Obama and are educated about those concerns... that liberal is guilty of being an idiot... however, if someone can only say "I don't like Obama because <insert a-z talking point>" and won't engage in substantive discussion or educate themselves on the subject... I have found that they usually ARE racists. As a matter of fact, I got in a heated debate with a guy (who turned out to be a city councilman here where I live and an active tea party activist) while I was at the bank down the street from my house where he was going off about how "Obama's buddies at fanny and freddie" caused the financial meltdown... when I showed him how he was wrong and the bank manager even agreed with me... so the dude just yells out "Well... I ain't supportin' a n****r president... ever!".

Tell me a good reason why gay people shouldn't marry... I am waiting.

The death penalty has killed many innocent people... is the punishment worth executing a single innocent person? If you are punishing someone for murder while murdering them... does that make sense? The death penalty is government sanctioned murder... period. It's hypocrisy to say that you are a "good christian" and also support the death penalty when it clearly states "Thou shalt not kill" in the 10 commandments. I am an athiest but I think the death penalty is wrong because it has killed many innocent people.

[burntfilm]

Opposition to healthcare is manufactured media nonsense. An angry, riled up 1-5 stanine means nothing to anyone with any sense. Let them wail, they'll forget as soon as someone makes them.

[smutnut]

Originally Posted by The Demon

haha yea ok. If a conservative makes a logical point about Obama, he hates him or is racist. If a conservative doesn't support gay marriage, he's a bigot. If a conservative supports the death penalty, he's a murderer.

Way to live in reality nation.

The one package deal I never understood was the death penalty/abortion relationship from either political party. I sort of understand it from the Republican side because if you keep unwanted babies alive you'll have more criminals to kill one day and you can keep the extermination racket going. I'm still trying to figure out the democrats perspective on it all...

[cykoe6]

Originally Posted by GrouchyAdmin

Yet another well thought-out cut and paste from our very own TheSenator.

Every board needs an Obama bot because it is mildly amusing to read their trite and simplistic sloganeering ........... unfortunately this board has more than its fair share.

[Houdini]

Originally Posted by smutnut

The one package deal I never understood was the death penalty/abortion relationship from either political party. I sort of understand it from the Republican side because if you keep unwanted babies alive you'll have more criminals to kill one day and you can keep the extermination racket going. I'm still trying to figure out the democrats perspective on it all...

Democrats reason behind abortion is that they don't want the government controlling their body, yet they favor more government control in their lives lol . Who said Americans dont get irony?

[nation-x]

Originally Posted by Houdini

Democrats reason behind abortion is that they don't want the government controlling their body, yet they favor more government control in their lives lol . Who said Americans dont get irony?

They don't want government control in their lives... they want a fair shake against corporate greed.