Students Sent Home For Wearing Red White And BLue on Cinco De Mayo - Page 4 - GoFuckYourself.com

smutnut · 05-07-2010, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiger

Do you get this upset on St. Patrick's day too?

I certainly do, cause everyone thinks I'm Irish and I'm really English, French and Portuguese, and the second I get rid of all these Mexican terrorists, I'm going after the Irish

Barefootsies · 05-07-2010, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG

I appreciate your input on this topic, i really do. I love a good intelligent debate but dude seriously, you say some stupid shit. How old are you man? The whole "you can read minds" dig... so petty and childish. Surprised you didn't say, "nanny nanny nanny" at the end. No man, i can't read minds. You got me there. I can however, draw logical conclusions based on what I know about kids and administrators, on having attending school in the area, and from my experience with school policies. It's like reading minds for intelligent people. google it.

La_Sexorcist · 05-07-2010, 01:50 PM

This is utter crap. Don't even get me started!!!

BobG · 05-07-2010, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brentbacardi

WOW this is all fucking retarded. Since when do we need to cater to idiots with anger problems. If seeing an american flag might cause you to riot then you probably shouldn't live in america, and if you do, they have special places for you to get an education. Possibly start in special ed where a teacher can hold your hand and tell you its ok and that an american flag is ok and make sure you don't hyperventilate, and if you end up kicking someones head in, im pretty sure they teach high school in prisons, so you will still get your free education.

Why do we cater to crazy fucking morons of any race creed sexuality or color?

and BTW America was founded on a war for our freedoms, I don't think the founding fathers would have peoples freedoms taken away because there might be a brawl and someone could get a black eye OH MY!

You say "catering to idiots with anger problems," administrators say, "protecting kids." Since when do we cater to idiots with anger problems? By your definition, since we have a police department in every city and town in the country. By you're logic, we're catering to criminals by employing police. The fact is, idiots with anger problems do exist, they've always existed and they're not going anywhere. I wish they would leave the country too and we could all live in peace and harmony. We know that's impossible. In administrators eyes, the primary goal is to protect kids. This is about protecting kids. Protecting kids.

smutnut · 05-07-2010, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG

You say "catering to idiots with anger problems," administrators say, "protecting kids." Since when do we cater to idiots with anger problems? By your definition, since we have a police department in every city and town in the country. By you're logic, we're catering to criminals by employing police. The fact is, idiots with anger problems do exist, they've always existed and they're not going anywhere. I wish they would leave the country too and we could all live in peace and harmony. We know that's impossible. In administrators eyes, the primary goal is to protect kids. This is about protecting kids. Protecting kids.

It's always about the kids, right? Do you think these lazy motherfuckers really want to teach kids who know they are smarter than the people teaching them? Just curious.

BobG · 05-07-2010, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutnut

It's always about the kids, right? Do you think these lazy motherfuckers really want to teach kids who know they are smarter than the people teaching them? Just curious.

Yes, it's always about the kids unless you snutnut, say it's not based on everything you know about the administrators, the campus and the area, which is nothing. In which case then it must be that administrators like Mexico better than America.

smutnut · 05-07-2010, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG

Yes, it's always about the kids unless you snutnut, say it's not based on everything you know about the administrators, the campus and the area, which is nothing. In which case then it must be that administrators like Mexico better than America.

This particular issue I am sure was about forcing Mexico upon America, until they remembered they had an immigration issue to deal with that was much bigger and much more lucrative and profitable...

BobG · 05-07-2010, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutnut

This particular issue I am sure was about forcing Mexico upon America, until they remembered they had an immigration issue to deal with that was much bigger and much more lucrative and profitable...

Forcing Mexico upon America. LOL, sounds like "forcer's guilt." How ironic. Thanks for that one, never thought of it that way. I hope you're joking or trolling me and don't actually believe that. Either way, you haven't had a point worth arguing for your last few posts so I'm gonna leave it at that. It was nice, it was fun. Have a nice weekend.

smutnut · 05-07-2010, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG

Forcing Mexico upon America. LOL, sounds like "forcer's guilt." How ironic. Thanks for that one, never thought of it that way. I hope you're joking or trolling me and don't actually believe that. Either way, you haven't had a point worth arguing for your last few posts so I'm gonna leave it at that. It was nice, it was fun. Have a nice weekend.

Oh really? So you don't think immigrant Mexican bullshit is being forced upon America?

The last time America forced itself upon people who needed some form of support in this area was like 100 years ago. Lets take history

cykoe6 · 05-07-2010, 05:10 PM

I cannot believe there is anyone who even tries defend this shit. If the US loses the will to stand up for its own culture and traditions then it will cease to exist soon enough. Anyone involved with harassing those kids for wearing the flag of their own nation needs to be fired at a bare minimum. Unfortunately this is the natural result of the federal government's longstanding policy of unlimited immigration without assimilation. Truly depressing stuff.

Redmanthatcould · 05-10-2010, 01:34 PM

Apparently people thought Roger Ebert was a communist 'cause he was trying to point out that these kids were being provocative for attention, not for patriotism.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...NION/100509974

sperbonzo · 05-10-2010, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG

The fact that we as adults allow the flag and patriotism to be at issue as a result of the smart ass actions of these kids serves to make us all dumber. It has nothing to do with the flag and everything to do with kids being kids and administrators doing whatever it takes to prevent fights from happening at a high school in a small town. I just spoke with teacher from the next district over and he said that there, there was already heightened security and a police presence on campus that day because of the potential for "brown on brown" violence. With the potential for trouble already smoldering, administrators were surely not out of line in viewing the posturing of these 4 antagonists as a potential match.

I think the bottom line is whether or not the kids were being provocative or not, you can only punish the ones that break policy by assaulting them, you CANNOT deny the kids their right to wear flag shirts.

The ones that the authorities feared would assault the kids need to be held accountable for THEIR OWN ACTIONS. What are you teaching kids if you punish the exercising of RIGHTS rather than the responsibility for assault?

.

smutnut · 05-10-2010, 03:40 PM

The funniest thing about this is the violent liberal democrats. I was just watching this thing on a neo nazi march on Washington D.C. and they were met by protesters who were being called "anti-racists" lol, and that might be fine and dandy, and I want to punch a racist in the mouth too, but the anti racists were more violent than the racists almost proving the racists point.

I go back to my point that whoever gets too much power isn't any good. It doesn't matter what your skin color or religion or anything else is. Too much power for your personal agenda just goes against everything our country is supposed to stand for.

P.S. it's good that we can organize for a good cause though, if we could just do it faster and get the cause accomplished and then disband when it was over. That would be awesome!

brassmonkey · 05-10-2010, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutnut

The funniest thing about this is the violent liberal democrats. I was just watching this thing on a neo nazi march on Washington D.C. and they were met by protesters who were being called "anti-racists" lol, and that might be fine and dandy, and I want to punch a racist in the mouth too, but the anti racists were more violent than the racists almost proving the racists point.

I go back to my point that whoever gets too much power isn't any good. It doesn't matter what your skin color or religion or anything else is. Too much power for your personal agenda just goes against everything our country is supposed to stand for.

P.S. it's good that we can organize for a good cause though, if we could just do it faster and get the cause accomplished and then disband when it was over. That would be awesome!

bullshit those skin head types are sneaky fuckers

smutnut · 05-10-2010, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

bullshit those skin head types are sneaky fuckers

No doubt but what's your point? We should get violent and oppress their freedom of speech?

BobG · 05-10-2010, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

I think the bottom line is whether or not the kids were being provocative or not, you can only punish the ones that break policy by assaulting them, you CANNOT deny the kids their right to wear flag shirts.

The ones that the authorities feared would assault the kids need to be held accountable for THEIR OWN ACTIONS. What are you teaching kids if you punish the exercising of RIGHTS rather than the responsibility for assault?

Michael, administrators didn't know who specifically, would be violent, just that some might. So they couldn't send anyone in particular home. Their only other option was to send home the ones who might have (for whatever reason or not) triggered or been the target of violence, home. What if for example, those offended were snipers (undetectable)? Would you still want to leave your American Flag wearing kid at school? Just leave your kid at school to stand for his rights until they find the sniper because it should be the snipers who should be sent home not the patriots? If you absolutely agree that the safety of kids comes first, and plan A is not possible, to protect kids... is it not reasonable to go to plan B? to protect kids? If I was an administrator, I'd rather do whatever it takes, no matter how unpopular, to protect the kids and then have to apologize later, than not do anything at all and be responsible for hurt or dead kids.

smutnut · 05-10-2010, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG

Michael, administrators didn't know who specifically, would be violent, just that some might. So they couldn't send anyone in particular home. Their only other option was to send home the ones who might have (for whatever reason or not) triggered or been the target of violence, home. What if for example, those offended were snipers (undetectable)? Would you still want to leave your American Flag wearing kid at school? Just leave your kid at school to stand for his rights until they find the sniper because it should be the snipers who should be sent home not the patriots? If you absolutely agree that the safety of kids comes first, and plan A is not possible, to protect kids... is it not reasonable to go to plan B? to protect kids? If I was an administrator, I'd rather do whatever it takes, no matter how unpopular, to protect the kids and then have to apologize later, than not do anything at all and be responsible for hurt or dead kids.

Here we go again - Mexican Terrorist Snipers Who Want to Shoot at Kids wearing the American Flag?

If I didn't know better I'd think you were one of those sneaky white supremicists I just heard about

ProG · 05-10-2010, 06:47 PM

I really don't think the issue was whether the kids were trying to be disruptive, that part is obvious. It's that they succeeded by wearing American flags.... in America. For anyone to find that offensive, no matter where you are or what day it is, offends me.

BobG · 05-10-2010, 09:00 PM

http://www.theliveoak5.com/

don't forget to donate!

harvey · 05-10-2010, 09:37 PM

05-07-2010, 05:10 PM	#160
cykoe6 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vegas Posts: 4,499	I cannot believe there is anyone who even tries defend this shit. If the US loses the will to stand up for its own culture and traditions then it will cease to exist soon enough. Anyone involved with harassing those kids for wearing the flag of their own nation needs to be fired at a bare minimum. Unfortunately this is the natural result of the federal government's longstanding policy of unlimited immigration without assimilation. Truly depressing stuff. __________________ бабки, шлюхи, сила

05-10-2010, 03:40 PM	#163
smutnut So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Babylon Posts: 5,889	The funniest thing about this is the violent liberal democrats. I was just watching this thing on a neo nazi march on Washington D.C. and they were met by protesters who were being called "anti-racists" lol, and that might be fine and dandy, and I want to punch a racist in the mouth too, but the anti racists were more violent than the racists almost proving the racists point. I go back to my point that whoever gets too much power isn't any good. It doesn't matter what your skin color or religion or anything else is. Too much power for your personal agenda just goes against everything our country is supposed to stand for. P.S. it's good that we can organize for a good cause though, if we could just do it faster and get the cause accomplished and then disband when it was over. That would be awesome! Last edited by smutnut; 05-10-2010 at 03:41 PM..

05-10-2010, 06:47 PM	#168
ProG Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,319	I really don't think the issue was whether the kids were trying to be disruptive, that part is obvious. It's that they succeeded by wearing American flags.... in America. For anyone to find that offensive, no matter where you are or what day it is, offends me. __________________ History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.

05-10-2010, 09:37 PM	#170
harvey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 9,266	__________________ This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth

05-07-2010, 01:50 PM	#153
La_Sexorcist Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 337	This is utter crap. Don't even get me started!!!

05-10-2010, 01:34 PM	#161
Redmanthatcould Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,771	Apparently people thought Roger Ebert was a communist 'cause he was trying to point out that these kids were being provocative for attention, not for patriotism. http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...NION/100509974

05-10-2010, 09:00 PM	#169
BobG Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 4,274	http://www.theliveoak5.com/ don't forget to donate!