What party increases Federal spending and National debt - GoFuckYourself.com

theking · 10-28-2010, 09:48 AM

...Both parties but the Republicans are the biggest growers of Federal spending and increasing the National debt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...idential_terms

Fat Panda · 10-28-2010, 09:52 AM

its all a fucking lie!

The Demon · 10-28-2010, 09:54 AM

Some federal spending like in the Reagan years was necessary. The Bush and Obama years, it was unnecessary and detrimental. The Republicans are flying under the banner reducing budget spending by 100 million. Let's see if they're full of shit or not.

Wizzo · 10-28-2010, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon

Let's see if they're full of shit or not.

I'll take that bet...

theking · 10-28-2010, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon

Some federal spending like in the Reagan years was necessary. The Bush and Obama years, it was unnecessary and detrimental. The Republicans are flying under the banner reducing budget spending by 100 million. Let's see if they're full of shit or not.

Did you mis-speak when you said 100 million? I am of the opinion that they will prove themselves to be full of shit.

theking · 10-28-2010, 10:52 AM

Need more eyes on.

theking · 10-28-2010, 12:02 PM

Up scope.

ThunderBalls · 10-28-2010, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon

Some federal spending like in the Reagan years was necessary.

Yea like the $64 billion that was spent on the drug war during Reagan? That doesnt include the cost to lock up over 200,000 people for drug use during that time. Gotta love the party of less guvment.

theking · 10-28-2010, 03:30 PM

To the top.

Fat Panda · 10-28-2010, 03:32 PM

such a great table, democrat or republican....they all fucking suck balls

Ethersync · 10-28-2010, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

...Both parties but the Republicans are the biggest growers of Federal spending and increasing the National debt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...idential_terms

Both parties do this shit and I doubt it will stop until we go bankrupt and/or destroy the Dollar.

The Demon · 10-28-2010, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThunderBalls

Yea like the $64 billion that was spent on the drug war during Reagan? That doesnt include the cost to lock up over 200,000 people for drug use during that time. Gotta love the party of less guvment.

Please provide your sources.... I know this is a foreign concept to you but if you want to be taken seriously, don't just post shit without backing it up.

kane · 10-28-2010, 04:11 PM

Gasp! So when the republicans repackage themselves every four years as the party that will shrink the government and cut spending they really aren't? I'm shocked

theking · 10-28-2010, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

Gasp! So when the republicans repackage themselves every four years as the party that will shrink the government and cut spending they really aren't? I'm shocked

What is shocking...is that people apparently buy into it every time.

epitome · 10-28-2010, 07:11 PM

theking, I am surprised. I always took you are a Republican? Was I wrong?

theking · 10-28-2010, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome

theking, I am surprised. I always took you are a Republican? Was I wrong?

I have never been a Republican...so yes you were wrong.

The Demon · 10-28-2010, 07:45 PM

Everyone is tired of the Dens so now the Republicans have their shot. They screw up and it's all Dems come 2012.

Vendzilla · 10-28-2010, 08:05 PM

the current level is at 100 billion, but unless they take the house and the senate, that will be hard to do , but they can put a halt to the Obama Agenda. Barry even said something about that on comedy central

theking · 10-28-2010, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

the current level is at 100 billion, but unless they take the house and the senate, that will be hard to do , but they can put a halt to the Obama Agenda. Barry even said something about that on comedy central

Yes...a House with a Republican majority and a Senate with a Democrat majority...and a Democrat Administration...should mean that the Democrat's agenda will be curtailed...as well as any Republican agenda. In other words a do nothing Congress...with a crippled Presidency. So the current economic status will remain pretty much as is.

Welcome to the next couple of years.

kane · 10-28-2010, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

the current level is at 100 billion, but unless they take the house and the senate, that will be hard to do , but they can put a halt to the Obama Agenda. Barry even said something about that on comedy central

I had read something a few days ago that there are rumors that Obama secretly wants the house and senate to go back to the republicans. He has been moving to the center since he got elected and this will let him do it more. Also, if things don't work out he can blame it on the republicans in 2012. It worked for Clinton pretty well, seems like Obama is hoping to try the same strategy.

bluemoney · 10-28-2010, 08:32 PM

Neither side wants the other do anything well. Unfortunately that "anything" is us.

directfiesta · 10-28-2010, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon

Please provide your sources.... I know this is a foreign concept to you but if you want to be taken seriously, don't just post shit without backing it up.

Tempest · 10-28-2010, 11:03 PM

Holy fuck... Bush jumped the % debt/gdp from 56.4% to 83.4%.

What I find interesting is that every democrotic president left office with that % lower than when they started... The Regan/Bush presidents all left office having increased that % by huge numbers. Those guys really fucked things up.

epitome · 10-28-2010, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon

Everyone is tired of the Dens so now the Republicans have their shot. They screw up and it's all Dems come 2012.

That's what they're counting on.

They're all doing the same thing. They know that we'll keep switching the controlling party in and out and never look at the real problem: all of them.

epitome · 10-28-2010, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

I have never been a Republican...so yes you were wrong.

... my apologies then.

theking · 10-29-2010, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest

Holy fuck... Bush jumped the % debt/gdp from 56.4% to 83.4%.

What I find interesting is that every democrotic president left office with that % lower than when they started... The Regan/Bush presidents all left office having increased that % by huge numbers. Those guys really fucked things up.

It is an interesting chart.

IllTestYourGirls · 10-29-2010, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest

Holy fuck... Bush jumped the % debt/gdp from 56.4% to 83.4%.

What I find interesting is that every democrotic president left office with that % lower than when they started... The Regan/Bush presidents all left office having increased that % by huge numbers. Those guys really fucked things up.

Yeah the good old days of Carter. Man I wish we could see 22% interest rates again. Those times were fun.

Bush was a huge progressive, Obama has now jumped debt/gdp to close to 98%. We should be close to, if not over 100% by 2012.

Ton of factors go into these charts.

BestXXXPorn · 10-29-2010, 06:36 AM

All parties but Libertarians support bigger government and more spending...

theking · 10-29-2010, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BestXXXPorn

All parties but Libertarians support bigger government and more spending...

The Republicans at election time always proclaim the same thing...but as the charts show reality is different.

GregE · 10-29-2010, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Yes...a House with a Republican majority and a Senate with a Democrat majority...and a Democrat Administration...should mean that the Democrat's agenda will be curtailed...as well as any Republican agenda. In other words a do nothing Congress...with a crippled Presidency. So the current economic status will remain pretty much as is.

And then both parties can say hey don't blame us, it's the other guys who prevented us from fixing anything.

It'll be good gig for the professional politicians but a bad deal for everyone else.

GregE · 10-29-2010, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls

Yeah the good old days of Carter. Man I wish we could see 22% interest rates again. Those times were fun.

You got a funny idea of "fun"

That idiot Carter was the whole reason why it took 12 years and a nasty recession for the electorate to take a chance on voting another democrat into the White House.

Relentless · 10-29-2010, 05:48 PM

Both spend. One spends trillions on unnecessary wars started because of false cherry-picked 'intelligence' about another nation. The other spends trillions on providing significant improvements to our health care system which will evolve into a huge amount of research data capable of reducing costs and improving care exponentially.

The trillions get spent either way. The question is what do you want to spend them on. Oh, btw, anyone who claims one party or the other will reduce spending is simply incorrect.

10-28-2010, 09:48 AM	#1
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	What party increases Federal spending and National debt ...Both parties but the Republicans are the biggest growers of Federal spending and increasing the National debt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...idential_terms __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html Last edited by theking; 10-28-2010 at 09:50 AM..

10-28-2010, 09:54 AM	#3
The Demon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 7,336	Some federal spending like in the Reagan years was necessary. The Bush and Obama years, it was unnecessary and detrimental. The Republicans are flying under the banner reducing budget spending by 100 million. Let's see if they're full of shit or not. __________________ Greed is Good

10-28-2010, 10:52 AM	#6
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	Need more eyes on. __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

10-28-2010, 12:02 PM	#7
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	Up scope. __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

10-28-2010, 03:30 PM	#9
theking Nice Kitty Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: The good old USA!!! Posts: 21,053	To the top. __________________ When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me! FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

10-28-2010, 09:52 AM	#2
Fat Panda Porn is Dead. Move along. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 13,295	its all a fucking lie!

10-28-2010, 03:32 PM	#10
Fat Panda Porn is Dead. Move along. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 13,295	such a great table, democrat or republican....they all fucking suck balls

10-28-2010, 04:11 PM	#13
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	Gasp! So when the republicans repackage themselves every four years as the party that will shrink the government and cut spending they really aren't? I'm shocked

10-28-2010, 07:11 PM	#15
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,158	theking, I am surprised. I always took you are a Republican? Was I wrong?

10-28-2010, 07:45 PM	#17
The Demon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 7,336	Everyone is tired of the Dens so now the Republicans have their shot. They screw up and it's all Dems come 2012. __________________ Greed is Good

10-28-2010, 08:05 PM	#18
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,201	the current level is at 100 billion, but unless they take the house and the senate, that will be hard to do , but they can put a halt to the Obama Agenda. Barry even said something about that on comedy central __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

10-28-2010, 08:32 PM	#21
bluemoney Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Location: Kinky Town Posts: 802	Neither side wants the other do anything well. Unfortunately that "anything" is us. __________________ DIRTY HARD CASH Lets Make Some Fucking Money

10-28-2010, 11:03 PM	#23
Tempest Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: West Coast, Canada. Posts: 10,217	Holy fuck... Bush jumped the % debt/gdp from 56.4% to 83.4%. What I find interesting is that every democrotic president left office with that % lower than when they started... The Regan/Bush presidents all left office having increased that % by huge numbers. Those guys really fucked things up.

10-29-2010, 06:36 AM	#28
BestXXXPorn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asheville, NC Posts: 2,277	All parties but Libertarians support bigger government and more spending... __________________ ICQ: 258-202-811 \| Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com

10-29-2010, 05:48 PM	#32
Relentless www.EngineFood.com Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,698	Both spend. One spends trillions on unnecessary wars started because of false cherry-picked 'intelligence' about another nation. The other spends trillions on providing significant improvements to our health care system which will evolve into a huge amount of research data capable of reducing costs and improving care exponentially. The trillions get spent either way. The question is what do you want to spend them on. Oh, btw, anyone who claims one party or the other will reduce spending is simply incorrect. __________________ Website Secure \| Engine Food ICQ# 266-942-896