Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-08-2010, 04:04 PM   #51
woj
<&(©¿©)&>
 
woj's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 47,882
50 republicans
__________________
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager
woj is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 04:12 PM   #52
directfiesta
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
directfiesta's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by DateDoc View Post
Republicans do not care. If they did you'd see a bunch of threads started about how biased the media is. Instead there are just a lot of threads from Dems attacking Fox News. No matter how bad Fox News is, it isn't going anywhere. No matter what Rush Limbaugh says, he is here until he chooses to retire. While Dems watch Republican shows (boosting their ratings and ad revenue), very few Republicans watch the Democrats' shows.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=996176

Seems some republicans care ( Gouge ) ... Oh, true, he is a libertarian .. or even an independent ... there are no repub on this board ...

As for caring, seems like quite a few post here grom the " right " ...
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
directfiesta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 04:35 PM   #53
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Hey dip shit, what stance did I lose? I asked for links and you are TOO FUCKING STUPID to find any, you would have done better to put this link up http://google.com

Really? A link to the actual source (Federal Elections Committee - Campaign Funds) is the same as google in your mind? And you're calling me stupid? Its a marvel of nature that you have been able to survive this long without walking in front of a bus.
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 05:10 PM   #54
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
No problem though with FOX's parent company, News Corp donating $1 million to republican candidates, FOX News commentators doing fundraisers every weekend for republican candidates, openly endorsing candidates on the air, and the fact that Hannity, Oreilly, Beck, and the rest of them have contributed 10 times the money Olbermann has to republicans. Thats the difference between a political station and a news station, one is ok to do these things, the other gets punished when they do.
I wanted a link to prove this, we were talking about Olbermann, and you were complaining about Hannity, Beck and O'reilly

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
Really? A link to the actual source (Federal Elections Committee - Campaign Funds) is the same as google in your mind? And you're calling me stupid? Its a marvel of nature that you have been able to survive this long without walking in front of a bus.

Where do you do that shit head?
You linked to a PDF file
the Washington post where the Newscorp gave 1million dollars to the Republican Governors Association
And yet another to a blog about Dick Morris
Not one of these things said anything about the news anchors at Fox news.

Your insipid ramblings about your inadequacies to comprehend the nature of this discussion and many others, I have discerned you have a lack of understanding even the basics of debate and that when giving evidence of your post, you lack the inherent evidence to prove what you wrote. Then argued that is true when still there is no evidence to prove so.
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 05:15 PM   #55
SallyRand
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In A Galaxie Far, Far Away!
Posts: 3,487

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
I wanted a link to prove this, we were talking about Olbermann, and you were complaining about Hannity, Beck and O'reilly




Where do you do that shit head?
You linked to a PDF file
the Washington post where the Newscorp gave 1million dollars to the Republican Governors Association
And yet another to a blog about Dick Morris
Not one of these things said anything about the news anchors at Fox news.

Your insipid ramblings about your inadequacies to comprehend the nature of this discussion and many others, I have discerned you have a lack of understanding even the basics of debate and that when giving evidence of your post, you lack the inherent evidence to prove what you wrote. Then argued that is true when still there is no evidence to prove so.
What you said.

I however do object to any restrictions placed on anyone for any reason which limit their ability to participate in the political system. It's like. "You work here so you cannot donate to the political candidate of your choice!"

It's just wrong.
SallyRand is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 05:40 PM   #56
SuckOnThis
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In my head
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
I wanted a link to prove this, we were talking about Olbermann, and you were complaining about Hannity, Beck and O'reilly




Where do you do that shit head?

You linked to a PDF file
the Washington post where the Newscorp gave 1million dollars to the Republican Governors Association
And yet another to a blog about Dick Morris
Not one of these things said anything about the news anchors at Fox news.

Ok, I see you obviously have some kind of learning disability and/or serious mental health issues so I will try once again and this time please try to pay attention. Feel free to reread this post if you don't understand all at once.




Click on the PDF file at http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/427/109...pdf#navpanes=0

this is directly from the Federal Elections Committee and it shows campaign funds for a person running for election, you follow so far? Scroll down to the 10th page and you will see Hannity donated $5000, got it now?
SuckOnThis is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 06:10 PM   #57
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuckOnThis View Post
Ok, I see you obviously have some kind of learning disability and/or serious mental health issues so I will try once again and this time please try to pay attention. Feel free to reread this post if you don't understand all at once.




Click on the PDF file at http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/427/109...pdf#navpanes=0

this is directly from the Federal Elections Committee and it shows campaign funds for a person running for election, you follow so far? Scroll down to the 10th page and you will see Hannity donated $5000, got it now?
Thank god you finally understand
Why couldn't just put that up with a reference, instead I'm to go thru 25 pages of typed pdf.
And if you had bothered to look, I already found that info for myself

Did your teachers use candy or sticks to get thru to you?
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that

Last edited by Vendzilla; 11-08-2010 at 06:22 PM..
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 06:21 PM   #58
Vendzilla
Biker Gnome
 
Vendzilla's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cell#324
Posts: 23,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyRand View Post
What you said.

I however do object to any restrictions placed on anyone for any reason which limit their ability to participate in the political system. It's like. "You work here so you cannot donate to the political candidate of your choice!"

It's just wrong.
Newscasters, or ones claiming to be should give the appearance of being neutral. Different for commentators, most are pretty easy to see where they stand.
I think a news company should have rights over their employee's about how they are perceived in the public and anytime a person of popularity makes three donations to any one political party, it will become public. Is it right for the newscaster? no, but his perception as a newscaster will have less value. Keith was a commentator, so I see no reason for all this
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that

Last edited by Vendzilla; 11-08-2010 at 06:22 PM..
Vendzilla is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 06:45 PM   #59
PornMD
Mainstream Businessman
 
PornMD's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,291
So Olbermann takes a little vacation and will be back on the air without any bias whatsoever, making MSNBC worlds different than Fox. Um, yea fucking right. MSNBC is a joke just like Fox News is a joke. Olbermann is a joke just like Hannity is a joke. 2 sides of the same shitty coin.
__________________
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.
PornMD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 06:48 PM   #60
SallyRand
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In A Galaxie Far, Far Away!
Posts: 3,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla View Post
Newscasters, or ones claiming to be should give the appearance of being neutral. Different for commentators, most are pretty easy to see where they stand.
I think a news company should have rights over their employee's about how they are perceived in the public and anytime a person of popularity makes three donations to any one political party, it will become public. Is it right for the newscaster? no, but his perception as a newscaster will have less value. Keith was a commentator, so I see no reason for all this
No employer, corporation or any other entity should have any kind of control over the political expression of employees. Now if the entity involved doesn't like what the employee expresses, that entity can fire them and should then experience the lawsuit for deprivation of Civil Rights; the First Amendment.

SallyRand is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.