Opinion on new website's front page. - GoFuckYourself.com

Zaphieon · 10-05-2009, 06:51 PM

still working on it. but here is the just of it. absolutehomemade.com(( you will have to copy and paste.. cant use urls yet.

let me know what you think.

DefaultMan · 10-05-2009, 07:02 PM

here ya go

absolutehomemade.com

Zaphieon · 10-05-2009, 07:06 PM

thnx bud.. 13 more post and ill be good.. lol

Darkhorse · 10-05-2009, 08:20 PM

I just see a big logo? not sure what yahad there before but ya... You need to get some relevant text in there buddy higher up the page the better Search engines can't read pictures....

Guess work in progress so good luck...

backstabthekingpin · 10-05-2009, 08:23 PM

looks good where the teasers?

Zaphieon · 10-05-2009, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkhorse

I just see a big logo? not sure what yahad there before but ya... You need to get some relevant text in there buddy higher up the page the better Search engines can't read pictures....

Guess work in progress so good luck...

Its still in the early stages bud, Text will be added soon. The big logo will be broken up into the front pages template.

Quote:

Originally Posted by backstabthekingpin

looks good where the teasers?

Teasers will be added when we open it up, still working on the template for inside the site as well as the opening pages.. most likely will be Nov 1st.

RenegadeCash Mark · 10-06-2009, 05:55 AM

There is really not a lot to comment on.

Post again when you're near completion.

Zaphieon · 10-06-2009, 07:05 AM

just wondering if the general look was good or not.. doing it all myself, I have designed serveral websites in the past. but never a porn site.

thundergasm · 10-06-2009, 01:37 PM

The page does have the amateur feel to it which is good. The one thing I noticed on my laptop was the page seemed contrained...like the logo and such was squashed, making it appear a bit crowded. That's just my opinion of course. Personally I'd like to see the page a little wider.....just my

stoner529 · 10-06-2009, 05:29 PM

i dont like the "dear surfer". It isnt a necessity in the paragraph. a simple "welcome," would be better imo.

CYF · 10-06-2009, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stoner529

i dont like the "dear surfer". It isnt a necessity in the paragraph. a simple "welcome," would be better imo.

I like the graphics, looks like a nice amateur site.

purecharlie · 10-06-2009, 09:38 PM

Oh boy, where to start . . . ok, here's just a few things that jumped out straightaway . .
1. Why have you got an image viewer script on the home page? I don't see the logic in that and all it does is rrrrreeeeeeaaaaaaalllllllllyyyyyyyy slow down the page's load time. It took forever to load on my screen - if I had my dick in my hand I would have moved on long before it had loaded. Remove the image viewer script and replace it with simple links - if you click on the sample pic you go to a page with the bigger version - simple.
2. I hope this is almost a "Photoshop" design just so you can get the lay-out right, because if you are planning on using this for your final design you won't do well. The look of it is OK, but you can't just chop up the images and make your site. You need to have some targetted text on your page (and I mean TEXT - not words within a picture file as they don't count). The rule of thumb is if you can't highlight the text with your cursor then its probably contained within a picture file which means it's no longer viewable by search engines.
3. Where are the links? You say this is an initial design but links are a major part of any design - where you put them, what they look like, etc . .
4. Less space - once you have removed the image viewer script you can close up the pictures because I couldn't see the purpose of having massive spaces next to each set of images, it just looks messy and unprofessional - why should we scroll way down the page when we didn't need to (only because you decided to space the pictures out for no reason).

You have a long way to go on this my friend as it is nowhere near finished. Post back on here once you have an actual site to look at so we can all give some better feedback.

Zaphieon · 10-06-2009, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thundergasm

The page does have the amateur feel to it which is good. The one thing I noticed on my laptop was the page seemed contrained...like the logo and such was squashed, making it appear a bit crowded. That's just my opinion of course. Personally I'd like to see the page a little wider.....just my

could you explain this more bud.. not seeing the squashed issue you are saying.. or you just saying visuallly? or actually it looks distorted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by stoner529

i dont like the "dear surfer". It isnt a necessity in the paragraph. a simple "welcome," would be better imo.

That will actually be a text later on, and I think I will change that to welcome.. thank you for your input.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CYF

I like the graphics, looks like a nice amateur site.

Thanks bud still working on it, but I think I will have it completed as far as the template and design finished in a week or so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by purecharlie

Oh boy, where to start . . . ok, here's just a few things that jumped out straightaway . .
1. Why have you got an image viewer script on the home page? I don't see the logic in that and all it does is rrrrreeeeeeaaaaaaalllllllllyyyyyyyy slow down the page's load time. It took forever to load on my screen - if I had my dick in my hand I would have moved on long before it had loaded. Remove the image viewer script and replace it with simple links - if you click on the sample pic you go to a page with the bigger version - simple.
2. I hope this is almost a "Photoshop" design just so you can get the lay-out right, because if you are planning on using this for your final design you won't do well. The look of it is OK, but you can't just chop up the images and make your site. You need to have some targetted text on your page (and I mean TEXT - not words within a picture file as they don't count). The rule of thumb is if you can't highlight the text with your cursor then its probably contained within a picture file which means it's no longer viewable by search engines.
3. Where are the links? You say this is an initial design but links are a major part of any design - where you put them, what they look like, etc . .
4. Less space - once you have removed the image viewer script you can close up the pictures because I couldn't see the purpose of having massive spaces next to each set of images, it just looks messy and unprofessional - why should we scroll way down the page when we didn't need to (only because you decided to space the pictures out for no reason).

You have a long way to go on this my friend as it is nowhere near finished. Post back on here once you have an actual site to look at so we can all give some better feedback.

1. It was loading slow earlier tonight due to the files being so large. each file was 3mb's it should be loading alot faster now. I was in the middle of working on that when you visited most likely.

2. Yes there will be text on the site soon. I do not plan on actually opening it to the public tell november 1st. It is in the very early stages of design still but the input on here is very helpful.

3. The Links will be up soon, I would say in the next day or so.

4. The image view script which is about 30kbs total is staying it was the large photos that was making it so slow.. next to the viewer I am putting up a video player, with a teaser video of each model. above each video player and image viewer, will be text talking about the model, and the site. Thats the reason the pictures are spaced out.

Thank you all for your input its very helpful

10-05-2009, 06:51 PM	#1
Zaphieon Registered User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 34	Opinion on new website's front page. still working on it. but here is the just of it. absolutehomemade.com(( you will have to copy and paste.. cant use urls yet. let me know what you think.

10-05-2009, 07:02 PM	#2
DefaultMan Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Hell.A. Posts: 1,869	here ya go absolutehomemade.com __________________ mypornolife [at] gmail [dot] com

10-06-2009, 05:55 AM	#7
RenegadeCash Mark Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 1,002	There is really not a lot to comment on. Post again when you're near completion. __________________ Make Real Money With Your Traffic! Promote Unsaturated High Converting Micro Niche Sites Pissing, Diapers, Teen, Amateur, Thai & More

10-06-2009, 01:37 PM	#9
thundergasm Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Frozen Tundra Posts: 369	The page does have the amateur feel to it which is good. The one thing I noticed on my laptop was the page seemed contrained...like the logo and such was squashed, making it appear a bit crowded. That's just my opinion of course. Personally I'd like to see the page a little wider.....just my __________________ Thundergasm ICQ Me at 197808662 Exclusive Shemales Of AmateurDough: AnaTranny \| Mariana Cordoba \| Sapphire Young \| Keria Verga \| Angeles Cid \| Transworldasia

10-06-2009, 09:38 PM	#12
purecharlie Confirmed User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 622	Oh boy, where to start . . . ok, here's just a few things that jumped out straightaway . . 1. Why have you got an image viewer script on the home page? I don't see the logic in that and all it does is rrrrreeeeeeaaaaaaalllllllllyyyyyyyy slow down the page's load time. It took forever to load on my screen - if I had my dick in my hand I would have moved on long before it had loaded. Remove the image viewer script and replace it with simple links - if you click on the sample pic you go to a page with the bigger version - simple. 2. I hope this is almost a "Photoshop" design just so you can get the lay-out right, because if you are planning on using this for your final design you won't do well. The look of it is OK, but you can't just chop up the images and make your site. You need to have some targetted text on your page (and I mean TEXT - not words within a picture file as they don't count). The rule of thumb is if you can't highlight the text with your cursor then its probably contained within a picture file which means it's no longer viewable by search engines. 3. Where are the links? You say this is an initial design but links are a major part of any design - where you put them, what they look like, etc . . 4. Less space - once you have removed the image viewer script you can close up the pictures because I couldn't see the purpose of having massive spaces next to each set of images, it just looks messy and unprofessional - why should we scroll way down the page when we didn't need to (only because you decided to space the pictures out for no reason). You have a long way to go on this my friend as it is nowhere near finished. Post back on here once you have an actual site to look at so we can all give some better feedback. __________________ www.purecfnm.com \| www.ladyvoyeurs.com \| www.amateurcfnm.com www.girlsabuseguys.com \| www.heylittledick.com Amazing ratios from the biggest CFNM Network in the world! Follow us on Twitter @purecfnm

10-05-2009, 07:06 PM	#3
Zaphieon Registered User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 34	thnx bud.. 13 more post and ill be good.. lol

10-05-2009, 08:20 PM	#4
Darkhorse Horsing Around Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: AU Posts: 5,860	I just see a big logo? not sure what yahad there before but ya... You need to get some relevant text in there buddy higher up the page the better Search engines can't read pictures.... Guess work in progress so good luck...

10-05-2009, 08:23 PM	#5
backstabthekingpin Registered User Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 57	looks good where the teasers?

10-06-2009, 07:05 AM	#8
Zaphieon Registered User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 34	just wondering if the general look was good or not.. doing it all myself, I have designed serveral websites in the past. but never a porn site.

10-06-2009, 05:29 PM	#10
stoner529 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: longwood, fl Posts: 421	i dont like the "dear surfer". It isnt a necessity in the paragraph. a simple "welcome," would be better imo.