If this fellow REALLY wanted to teach people instead of misleading them, he would donate or sell the domain to a LEGITIMATE teaching institution/person who actually is QUALIFIED to give advice and instruction. He is leading people down the garden path, and that in itself is wrong, aside from everything else.

I can only agree that if you develop adultsextechniques without the knowledge to back it up, this is as bad as your original "sins". You are not qualified to teach, half of what you "teach" is untrue, hell you can't even keep a coherant thought, let alone teach other people about one of the most intimate and infinitely important acts a human can perform.

I repeat my previous offer, I will donate $100 to a purchase fund to buy the domains and donate them to Planned Parenthood

Mr "Dad" how much do you want for your domains?

Post those resources please ...
I have been told that you are knowledgable ...

And I appologize for any previous curses. I too lose my temper every now and then.

QUOTE: "Half of the reason that women are LESS likely to have vaginal orgasms is not their fault, but actually the lack of knowledge on the part of their lover (or themselves). "
Knowledge is the reason 50% of women never have an orgasm. Stimulate their clitoris-glans my friends - as most can not have an orgasm - (slang) from just screwing.


Hugs...
Dad@

I'll match your hundred to the cause.

Any bid you wish to make - make on AfterNic.com or Sedo.co.uk - I will not accept less then 150k for the master set of domains I own that contain "sexeducation" within them ...

which is dozens ...

Otherwise ...
I will create real websites - with real information - that pertains to each of the generic domain names I own ... and cross reference them all for Google gag gah.

And I don't care if it takes 10 years.

[PLUG]
SexTherapy.com is for sale.
It would make a good "live cam" site.
SLOGON: "Feeling a little frustrated? We all need a little sex therapy every now and then!"
LIVE CAMS - LIVE CHAT - LIVE VIDEO

That isn't true either.. shall we start some lessons here? Ok.

Sex is not the physical act.. The act of sex itself is 90% mental, 10% physical.. Your neural pathways will respond to physical stimulation as they are supposed to, and it will stimulate the pleasure center in the brain, which will stimulate the hypothalamus to release the hormones into your bloodstream which are the result of pleasure stimulation. This is what results in the "pleasurable sensation" or the "headrush". This is all find and well and good, this is why masturbation is also pleasurable.. HOwever, this will not ensure a fantastic sexual experience.

Women are a million times more likely to have ANY kind of an orgasm if they have some form of mental stimulation as well. Touching and caressing also prepared the body for more intimate acts by opening up the flow of endorphins. The more flowing through the bloodstream, the more pleasurable the physical experience. Touching, caressing, even being in close proximity, physical contact with your lover will automatically draw response, and this should be a large part of foreplay. Some people jump right into eating out or blowjobs without the mental warmup that leads to truly fulfilling sex.

Try by telling a woman how attractive she is.. don't lie.. tell her about the things about her that turn her on. Most men don't realize that this can also make a woman more receptive to suggestions for things that have never been tried before. A woman achieves the most pleasure when she feels that her partner reveres her as a sexual being, and treats her like the best, most ravishing lover he's ever had. This is where the "playboys" and "sweetalkers" have it on the normal old Joe Blows.. They know the power of words to stimulate the imagination and enflame passions and lust. Touch, worship with eyes, fingers, mouth. Lose yourself in the touch.. I can almost guarantee she will return the favor... Do not progress to the next level until you KNOW her mind is only focused on you and the pleasure you can bring her. Leave her panting, begging even. You can do it if you WANT to bring her pleasure. Work your way around her clirtoris and vagina.. Don't just jump in. Big mistake #2 men make. They jump in like it's a race, and by doing so they miss out on the REALLY wild ride.

Once you ease yourself in (it's good make a woman beg, it works them up more, but don't make them wait TOO long), start slow.. some guys come in with a tongue like a weedwhacker and honestly, most women don't like that to start off with.. it's too much stimulation. Go on instinct.. If one thing you do makes her squirm and another makes her cringe, do what she enjoys.. DO NOT be afraid to ask her what feels good for her! Women will NOT always enjoy the same stimulation every single time, so asking is NOT a threat to your manhood, it's ensuring that your manhood gets some GOOD loving.. Eat her to orgasm once, twice, as many times as you like.. Then you can move on to the next step..

Now I'm sure other things will happen in between, but in the meantime.. remember the g-spot! This is the key to vaginal orgasm! You can find it by inserting a finger with your fingertip towards the TOP of her body, and do a "come hither" type movement.. The g-spot is a knobby, harder bit of tissue approximately 6 inches in (but this is different for some women) and it can be anywhere from the size of a pea to the size of a quarter, or thereabouts. Most women it's dime sized and up. Don't start reefing on it! But make note of where it is, caress it lightly (it's a tightly packed bundle of nerves, it CAN be overstimulated). When you enter her, make sure to angle the head of your penis to rub the ridge against that spot. If you continue in a RHYTHMICAL motion (most women have their trains of orgasm broken by a guy CONSTANTLY changing pace) I can almost guarantee orgasm, without clirotral stimulation. YOu might not even get it the first time, but if you keep trying, the results can be wet and messy to say the least. Even if you don't hit the g-spot, rhythmical motion is the key to vaginal orgasm, and women CAN achieve it. In fact, the more a woman masturbates, the more likely she is to achieve vaginal orgasm. Why? Because she knows her body better.. she's more aware of her body's response, the angles, speeds and whatnot required to bring her to orgasm. Female masturbation is a beautiful thing. Men would learn a lot if they watched their women masturbate more often. Anyways, this is the reader's digest version, I COULD make this a LOT longer, but I have work to do.

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, mister "I know so much about women's bodies".

As for sources, why not try http://www.the-clitoris.com

You might learn a thing or two about a subject you really know NOTHING about.

QUOTE: "Sex is not the physical act.. The act of sex itself is 90% mental, 10% physical.. Your neural pathways will respond to physical stimulation as they are supposed to, and it will stimulate the pleasure center in the brain, which will stimulate the hypothalamus to release the hormones into your bloodstream which are the result of pleasure stimulation. This is what results in the "pleasurable sensation" or the "headrush". This is all find and well and good, this is why masturbation is also pleasurable.. HOwever, this will not ensure a fantastic sexual experience. "

That is what I said. I agree.

QUOTE:"
Women are a million times more likely to have ANY kind of an orgasm if they have some form of mental stimulation as well. Touching and caressing also prepared the body for more intimate acts by opening up the flow of endorphins. The more flowing through the bloodstream, the more pleasurable the physical experience. Touching, caressing, even being in close proximity, physical contact with your lover will automatically draw response, and this should be a large part of foreplay. Some people jump right into eating out or blowjobs without the mental warmup that leads to truly fulfilling sex. "

Yes - I agree.

QUOTE: "Try by telling a woman how attractive she is.. don't lie.. tell her about the things about her that turn her on. Most men don't realize that this can also make a woman more receptive to suggestions for things that have never been tried before. A woman achieves the most pleasure when she feels that her partner reveres her as a sexual being, and treats her like the best, most ravishing lover he's ever had. This is where the "playboys" and "sweetalkers" have it on the normal old Joe Blows.. They know the power of words to stimulate the imagination and enflame passions and lust. Touch, worship with eyes, fingers, mouth. Lose yourself in the touch.. I can almost guarantee she will return the favor... Do not progress to the next level until you KNOW her mind is only focused on you and the pleasure you can bring her. Leave her panting, begging even. You can do it if you WANT to bring her pleasure. Work your way around her clirtoris and vagina.. Don't just jump in. Big mistake #2 men make. They jump in like it's a race, and by doing so they miss out on the REALLY wild ride. "

YES - I agree.

QUOTE: "Once you ease yourself in (it's good make a woman beg, it works them up more, but don't make them wait TOO long), start slow.. some guys come in with a tongue like a weedwhacker and honestly, most women don't like that to start off with.. it's too much stimulation. Go on instinct.. If one thing you do makes her squirm and another makes her cringe, do what she enjoys.. DO NOT be afraid to ask her what feels good for her! Women will NOT always enjoy the same stimulation every single time, so asking is NOT a threat to your manhood, it's ensuring that your manhood gets some GOOD loving.. Eat her to orgasm once, twice, as many times as you like.. Then you can move on to the next step.."

YES - I agree.

QUOTE: "Now I'm sure other things will happen in between, but in the meantime.. remember the g-spot! This is the key to vaginal orgasm!" ...
this is where we separate in our opinions. Because most guys think they can fuck a girl to orgasm without stimulating her clitoris. Our difference on of opinion of "vaginal orgasm" comes from the definition of it. A "g-spot" orgasm is a "g-spot" orgasm where as - a vaginal orgasm is the stimulation of the vaginal walls.

The problem with sex currently is that there is not enough words to describe it. We have thousands of words for "penis" but relatively few for "vagina". It gets even worse for when we get down to the difference between a clitoris-glans orgasm and a g-spot orgasm. This is another reason - I am here in this newsgroup. We need to "invent" new terms for a new global understanding of sex. Adult Webmaster's will play the most important role in making that happen - most important. Not the academic community that seems so often to be only concerned with "credit of discovery" - follow?

I don't doubt that you have knowledge - I feel it is a continuous battle between you and I for comprehension of the others point of view. It's really a lack of words. That lack of words so we can communicate is a symptom of female sexual inequality ... IMO

There are as many words for the vagina.. guess you haven't been talking to the right people. And I understand your motivation, but your implimentation is more sloppy than a cum-filled hooker in a panty store.

As far as comprehension, half of YOUR problem has been your flagrant disregard for the law. I don't feel ANY sexual inequality.. only lack of sexual eduction, and it's GENERALLY on the part of the men. Women are faced with the reality of sex and it's implications every day. Men get to stick it in, wiggle it around, and leave. You are STILL totally naive.

I can only do the best that I can - I make no appologies for 100% effort.

However, in comparison there are substantially less words for vagina.

NO - half of your problem has been that you THINK I AM TRYING to break the law. This is not true.

You may not feel any sexual inequality but it does exist globally.

Yes - this is a penis dominated world.

US or Canadian?

I guess since you are unrealistic on values we will just wait the the US government takes you down for having a misleading name that is designed to attract minors to your site. Never thought I would have anything good to say about that law.

Adults need more sex education then minors ... IMO ...
We have learned more about sex in the lat 10 years then in the entire history of the world.

Ooops I am Canadian.

The sale of the domains is in the international trade of currency - US ... ; )

I'm taking a break.
Have a good day everyone.
POOF

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

whatever it is. its down

Ya - just passing by.
I thought the domain was as at Melbourne IT.
It turns out - previous requests for registrar changes failed.
SexEducation.com is at NetWorkSolutions.com

After this - temp - shut down.
It turns out the delay is my fault. lol


Should be on as soon as it propogates.
[fingers crossed...]

sexeducation:

I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement.

There is no way on earth you can claim "I have never published any images or video of children engaged in sexual acts". I cannot answer to any adventures you had into the video world, but can assure you YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS.

In response to para B, I really don't care much about that, (you are just a waste of time!), but I know it IS illegal, not just under the Digital Millenium Act.

Concerning your domain names for sale - that is a joke!! You could not pay me to buy any of them - especially since this matter is not finished and they are the subject of concern, as are you and several others, with various law enforcement agencies.

Have a nice day :Graucho

My God, what is it about this site that made such a long threa? Anyone wants to make me a resume?

More fluff & fodder ...

QUOTE: "YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS."

That is a lie - a complete fabrication.
Post the textual description of the picture/s OR more preferably post the HEAVILY censored graphic of your evidence.
Continued - libelous slander.

QUOTE: "I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement."
It was explained to me that free speech online has different laws then free speech offline. I admit I may have unknowingly made some copyright violations. I have deleted ALL GRAPHICS - ALL GRAPHICS ... including those licensed from Huslter.com, DavidLace.com, TopBucks.com, and more ... all graphics ... and each and every page I built over the years - will undergo a complete review before reposting.

It was debate over free speech in essence that was clouded by neither side truly understanding the other's point of view.

The conclusion is - I had made some mistakes that are being corrected.

In fact I am just waiting for my domain to begin resolving again - to really write about - what occured here, and on other boards I got banned from.

Do you have the actual licenses from these places? As far as I know, Topbucks does NOT give licenses to their content, and you CAN NOT use their affiliate content unless it's for promoting THEIR SITES. If you're just putting it up, you can have your affiliate status pulled.. Did you pay for the content from David Lace? The Hustler content.. did you buy it or is it affiliate content? If it's affiliate contnet, again you can ONLY use it to promote those programs.. NOTHING ELSE.. You better read a little better next time.

Yes - I did/do promote TopBucks.com - they provide a "picture of the day" and were the only picture of the day website linked on SexEducation.com. Got a few checks too.

NO - I did not pay for the DavidLace.com content - although - some of his I definitely would. It was free content - I gave credit for - and which I promote the DavidLace.com affiliate program for content.

Past mistakes have been corrected - LadyMischief.

The graphics are basically irrelevent to the most important issues I wish to discuss.

When a particular AVS terminated my account - I just swapped out the graphics of AdultSexTechniques.com with Swoit.com licensed graphics. The text barely changed. Have a look.

Almost every article on the old terminated SexEducation.com will be done the same way on the new globally accepted SexEducation.com ... : )

Is this thread in line for a prize?

I don't know ...
However - I do know Swoit.com has a "sig" program that should generate at least a case beer for this thread I figure. roflmao ...
; )

I was a Top 3 sig whore for a few days. Promoting the program too. :thumbsup :thumbsup

I picked Swoit.com for the quality of their graphics series. The sig program is just a bonous.... a why not sorta thing.

sexeducation:

Fluff & fodder - you still sexually abusing children and showing your "guests" images of child porn??

When I see a sick fucker like you spouting a load of crap about "free speech" I know you are warped and looking at jail time - all others I knew like you are serving time right now.

On images and your response above... there ain't such a thing as "unknowingly" - the law ain't too keen on idiots taking action out of sheer ignorance (alledgedly) - tis still an offense!

Once again YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS. This is NOT a lie but a matter of record.



:321GFY

sexeducation:


Are you going to deny you have ever published images on the net which depicted both young kids naked and also sexual activity between adults and children?????

Take care in any answer you may give...

God Dammit stop already...

keep talking, DAD will not care...he's right in HIS mind and thats all that matters to him...

If you haven't already reported him, do it and stop giving this guy a nice long thread to spread his crap in...

NO - IT IS A LIE.
LIBELOUS - UNFOUNDED SLANDER.
I HAVE NEVER PUBLISHED PICTURES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES.

However, I would entertain a discussion of whether or not a "sex education magazine" would have right to publish nude pictures of minors ...as long as you drop the fluff & fodder and discuss it rationally.

Do you think no where - any where - nude pictures of minors should be allowed ... ANYWHERE?
And if there are places - where nude pictures of minors should be allowed - why there - and not on others?

You say your job is to discuss the truth..but you lie. You say in the same sentence that vaginal orgasm is a lie but then state it doesn't happend to the majority.

For some odd reason, everything takes you days to figure out in your head. If you say something is a lie, then it is a complete false...can't happen or didn't happen. If you state the majority doesn't have something, then you can't state that it is a lie.

Does someone have to go back to kindergarten to learn what a lie is?

If the majority of people believe something to be true - yet it does not happen for the majority of people - it is a global lie.

The word lie is specifically choosen for the attention it gets.
The message - as defined by my job - [email protected] - is getting out.


Vaginal orgasm - is a lie.

Without the IDs necessary to maintain 2257 information, how do you know that you never had pictures of minors having sex?

sexeducation:

IT IS A LIE that you are not responsible for publishing child porn.. you will have that explained to you shortly.

As for discussion.. I have no interest in "discussing" your "rights" on the subject of a "sex education magazine" - that is totally irrelevant in relation to your other offenses. You are clearly not qualified to say anything on the subject of sex education.

Meantime.. sue my ass off for my "libelous unfounded slander"!
:1orglaugh That is going to a source of amusement!

You are just nuts!! You ain't neither a webmaster, not do you have any operational domain called sexeducation.com!

What you did have was a "website" which was a cloak for child pornography!!

You "job" is gotta be cleaning out the toilets in jail.. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Thank you for showing just how dumb you are.

Did you teach your "kids" about lying? Did you use this reasoning?

Here is the defination of lie.

1. A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
2. Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.

You are doing #1 for sure. You are deliberately saying vaginal orgasm is a myth and doesn't happen. Yet it does in some. So you are the one lying by saying it doesn't happen. You are deceiving people. I never hear "hollywood" saying all women can have vaginal orgasm's. But I do hear you saying it is a lie and a myth.

Maybe you should use the word rare.

"It is rare for women to have a vaginal orgasm"

"Vaginal orgasm is rare"

But again...thanks for showing that you are spreading false information on a site you claim you want to help people with and spread the truth about. I guess the only way you figure to spread your information is lying.

Who is worse? "Hollywoods" respresentation of sex, or your resprentation of false info?

Because on the child pornography essay which caused all this hassle ...

which by the way - was read thousands of times - yet never had a single complaint - until I began posting ...
"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN" into adult webmaster boards like GFY ...

because... primary picture I think everyone is flipping out about ...
I still have her holding a picture of a magic marker sign to the domain name which does/did have 2257 on it's homepage.

The thing is ... no-one has described textually or by presenting a heavily censored graphic - any evidence - to which I can respond.

I am not talking about your sick child porn article illustrations. I am talking about the many images in your tour that are undocumented, either in terms of copyright or 2257 info. For example, an image early in your tour of a man having sex with someone of indeterminate gender, in what you call "a variation on the missionary position". Prove to me that they are both over 18.

you guys are just hell bent on taking down some one who disagrees with you.


:2 cents:


oh and for "lady mischef" the lady with the vendetta ahaha i have dirt i dug up on you = to that of an atomic bomb ahahha
if what i found out is correct ......i will know for sure by monday hahah:321GFY