NO - I am a defender of a person's private right to view adult material - AND - the rights of children to reasonable access to the information age.

I have nothing against the adult industry ...
In fact - I am glad to see AVS's in a new form (not that I agree they needed to change - because right now I don't) ...will survive.

And BradShaw is right - the convergence of the general internet and adult internet is a foot.

This is a step we can all agree on ...
AND - it improves customer relations ...
it improves the Adult Industry image.

and KingK7 ...what's your answer?

Should aroused genitals and reproductive bodily fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain name?

What's the answer ...
Does this restrict "freedom of the press" in some manner I can not think of ?

What?

You are an idiot, pure and simple. This has been established several times on this board. Nobody gives a shit about WHAT you have to say, people just hate you for who you are. Nobody gives a flying fuck about your piece of shit website. You must seriously be the biggest troll to hit this board in a looong time. Now please do us all a favour and go kill yourself.

See the answer above. Hope that helps you out.

What ever you think of me is irrelevant ...
as the question has not been answered even once...
not ONCE ...anywhere ...
not once ...

Yes - I made mistakes - they are being fixed ...
but that does not change the question that started all this ...

Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on any directly accessed domain name?

Sure.

Congrats ... you are the first person to post an answer that doesn't slam me or my website.

For what reason ???

Do you think this starts a "Big Brother" chain of events?
Why do you think "sure" ?

Can I have your babies?

NO - the earth is already over populated.
Can we adopt one instead?

sure, because I don't think people accidentally go to porn sites unless their domain name is like 'forteengirls.com' or 'teengirl.com' or 'prettyhorses.com'. So if the domain name itself is 'misleading' in a way, then there should be a disclaimer.


..but I fail to see what this has to do with your site.

"Dad" here seems to honestly think that the only reason we don't like him is his "campaign" to mindlessly repeat his slogan about "No aroused genitalia or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain".

Personally, I think it is a fine point poorly made. I could go either way, but wouldn't be offended or upset if there were such a rule for porn sites. I don't like him because I feel he willingly broke a number of laws, and a strongly suspect he is a child molester.

GRRRR ... I had to reboot ...
This old WIN95 233 Pentium needs to be updated.
SexEducation.com has NEVER received a formal complaint - UNTIL - I started posting ...

KIDS = children (not yet reproductively capable + adolescents which are)

Kids do go to Sex.com ...not by accident but yes they are curious and go there.

Kids do search for "BullMoose.com" and "WhiteHouse.com" and even adults make mistakes and go to "AssGate.com" when they meant "PassGate.com" ...

My members are telling me that ... they agree with the statement ...
NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME ...

And ... it does not matter whether they are typing in "SexEducation.com", "Sex.com", "HowToHaveSex.com" ... or "PrettyHorses.com" ...

I am agreeing with my members and present you a discussion of this.

(now my keyboard is sticking ...roflmao)

Yes it does, fucknut.

If some adult types in gangbangedslutstaking15cumshotsintheireyes.com they should be able to see porn at some point. Big aroused cocks slamming into some little wet pussy then blowing their load all over her face.

If however, some kid types in sexeducation.com and is presented with stolen hardcore pics and some douchebag who wants to molest children calling himself "dad" then there's a problem.

UPDATE:
And I am now recieving questions on why my website is not working?

How - do I answer ?

It's not working because I had ONE CENSCORED picture of a nude minor not involved in sexual activities - they will ask - well medical books have the same?

YES ... I agree with that domain.
WhiteHouse.com - no.
Sex.com ... I don't know.
SexEducation.com - man did I pick a difficult domain to satisfy everyone.


"Dad@" is gone now - I told you that.
"Dad@" is being replaced with "JB@".

But that does not answer the question that started all of this ...

Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be shown on ANY directly accessed domain name ... and I agree with my members email - it should not - and consumers expect to click on an over 18+ button.

sexeducation:

READ THE ABOVE IDIOT!



Who cares that your website may not be working?? IT WAS AN ILLEGAL WEBSITE - Tell anyone who asks the truth, namely you DISPLAYED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY and STOLE IMAGES YOU HAD NO RIGHTS TO USE.

Now :321GFY

I made mistake on "fair use" ...
they are being corrected ..
AND THEY ARE BEING RESEARCHED ...
some of the articles I want to repost again ...

Like the article about WhiteHouse.com changing to WhiteHouseSEX.com ...

Not sure yet how to handle it ..

A couple mistake does not justify a website with HUNDREDS of original content to be shut down.

They are just mistakes ...
That's all ...

Sorry ... I have to go get my son.
I am already late.
Back in about an hour.

POOF
John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

sexeducation:

KNOW THIS! What you have done has NOTHING to do with "fair use" and "mistakes". The law is not interested in your "mistakes" - more to do with your PUBLISHING OF CHILD PORN and other issues.

Stop wasting time here and :321GFY

Apparently, idiot, the word CONTEXT has absolutely no meaning for you, and that's what ALL this bullshit boils down to.

Original content implies that you took the images yourself.. unless you did, they are not original for you. ANd I say you're still a content thief, among other things.

The last part cracks me up. Do you think if the government (US in this case, since this is where you are hosted) got a warrant to view all files on your server, that people wouldn't be busted if you had, say, illegal child porn pictures on your site? If someone wrote a threatening e-mail to someone? If someone admitted to molesting a child? They could very easily get all the information on your "members" if they felt it was needed.

You cannot assure your members what you are stating.

Incorrect - not from what I have been studying up on.
If the "quotes" have social value.
If the "quotes" better the knowlegde of mankind.

It appears - I was correct in what I did in a high majority of cases. NOT ALL - I admit.

However, thanx to JFPdudes ... informative phone call - I may be "excused" for past offences - if I do not do them again.

GET THIS CLEAR - I HAVE NEVER PUBLISHED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY!

I had one nude picture of a minor that was censored ... to protect her identity ... that's it that's all ...
and that was a mistake ... not because I personally believe it was a mistake (medical books do the same) - it was a mistake because I did not comply to the communities I was attempting to enter.

Then under that circumstance - I am prepared to go to jail.
There must exist a place on the internet where no sexual topic is barred and all contributors remain anonymous.

CAVEAT: If someone admitted to "raping" a child I would personally bust them.

Why MUST it exist? And if it does, why do YOU have to run it? You who have NO idea..


And what I was saying before about context you completely ignored. You say you made mistakes and try to explain yourself, but you are taking things ENTIRELY out of context, and appropriateness. You don't sit and laugh hysterically at a funeral. You don't put pictures of kids on websites with adult material. Who the FUCK cares if medical textbooks do it. THEY DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH ADULT RELATED MATERIALS. Your site is a FAR CRY from a medical textbook, therefore the analogy is not comperable in any way. It's like comparing apples to oranges loosely based on the fact they're both fruit. They are NOTHING alike. It's situational and you don't get the gist.

Apparently - you may be mistaken from the very links you provided me ...

"Transformative" content according to the US Supreme Court oversedes "copyright" law according to several cases I am studying currently ...

HOWEVER, my studies are irrelevent to the "letter of the law" ... as I am going to cross every "t" and dot every "i" according to THIS COMMUNITY ...

And yet - even with those efforts - the best this "hamburger flipper" can do ...

There has STILL NOT been provided a reason as to why " NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE FLUIDS SHOULD BE SHOWN ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN" ...

I don't think I am the best person to run this.

I have up until now been the best person to protect this.

SexEducation.com deserves professional development and protection.

Someone - like Larry Flynt or Hugh Hefner- both have done much for the protection of freedom of speech.

Should aroused genitals or reproductive fluids be shown on any directly accessed domain?

Yes - No - Why?

No, THEY SHOULD NOT have this domain. The domain should be turned over to a SEXUAL EDUCATION INSTITUTION, with proper professionals giving TRUE advice about sexeducation. If you want to have some kind of discussion forum that's all fine and well and good.. But do NOT use a domain that is so misleading and will have kids and unwitting people believing that conjecture and speculation is fact. THAT IS MORALLY WRONG.

DO NOT EVER QUESTION ME ABOUT MORALS - EVER!!!
I could have turned this site into a "WhiteHouse.com" site years ago - I have and continue to - have more then enough skills to do this.

True sexual equality begins with a complete sex education.
That includes - complete sexual intercourse (discussion of social issues).

Do NOT ever test whether I could have turned SexEducation.com into a friggen porn site - I have endured much - much more then most - to protect it.

I have more strength and patience then imaginable - for most individuals.

sexeducation:

Sheesh you are just TOTALLY MENTAL!

Your "studies" on crap re "social values" blah are IRRELEVANT. You are not, by the slightest chance, a lawyer. You need one!! GFY is NOT a "discussion group" to assess your "opinions" on "sex education", "rights", "freedoms" and child pornography, - it is an adult webmaster board. Join some other more relevant board with professionals and get blasted there!

I cannot think of ONE THING you did right. You have no legal guidance, you offer stupid "opinions. You are the last person on earth to be discussing "sex education", especially as it relates to children. YOU ARE NEITHER A DOCTOR OR CONNECTED WITH ANY SEX EDUCATION ORGANIZATION - YOU HAVE NO CREDENTIALS.

You are TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED to make ANY statements on the adult industry, whether this be on a "guidance" level or legally. I have been in this business well over 25 years and can assure you a 20 year old newbie knows more than you.

GET THIS CLEAR - THIS IS A LIE. YOU HAVE PUBLISHED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY and I have copies of your "work". This is not a matter of some "opinion" but a CLEAR FACT. Others also have copies of your web "content" - far more legally qualified than me - and ALL AGREE THIS IS CHILD PORN.

If there ever was an understatement - that quote is it!! Especially when your track record is known.

You know absolutely fuck all about anything in this business, therefore why do you assume you are "protecting" it. YOU ARE NOT QUALIFIED.

SexEducation.com is a $10 domain you sucessfully screwed up by your tendencies toward child pornography and content theft. It is worth zero now. - especially since several legal inquiries are proceeding. You opted out of any "protection" when you publish child porn and stole images you had no rights to use.

Flynt and Hefner have lawyers and LOTS more experience that you ever will have - they are not relevant to your child porn activities.

What's with the quotes around rape??? DO YOU NOT LIKE THE WORDS "CHILD MOLESTATION"?? You use many words on GFY, frankly, they are not going to be your protection.

Now.. Once again... :321GFY

PEDO.. Take your morals and stuff em up your ass and piss off out of here.

YOU ARE AN IRRELEVANT... You are NOT qualifed to even discuss Whitehouse.com. YOU ARE A CHILD PORNOGRAPHER AND THIEF.

PISS OFF! :321GFY

Webby ...
I don't know how you are doing this mutiple quote thing ...

So I will manually reply to each of you statementss ..
"Adult" - ya right - we have seen the previous abuses of attempting to post my family's personals details. That's adult?

"I cannot think of ONE THING you did right."
Aaaa ... you're own of them ..
"nothing", "always", "never" ... lol
got it now - BACK ON IGNORE

I emailed both regarding content ... I wrote about and included ...
shove it ...

They have a higher understanding of freedom of the press then your self serving interests.

lol

sexeducation:

THICKO... I am one of these people that know you "family's personal details", but much more about you.

I have told you already to pull that shit you call websites down altogether and piss off. You were warned of the consequences if you failed, - you failed!

Therefore, I have no qualms about providing other more "persuasive" parties to sort your crap.

And yes, that's "adult"!! IT IS YOU WHO IS THE ABUSER, BOTH IN GFY AND WITH CHILDREN!

:321GFY

Don't do it on a domain name that is misleading.. how about discussingsexualissues.com or something? Sexeducation.com should be turned over to a proper teaching institution. I think anything less is TOTALLY IMMORAL, so yes, I AM questioning your morals. Who the fuck are you to tell me what I can and cannot do?

Just because you havent' done what you COULD have done DOES NOT MEAN SHIT. You have still made the site a mockery.

Yeah I'm so self-serving.. that's why I am telling you to give it to someplace that will use it properly. Uh huh.. It's all about serving my interests.. How about the interests of all the children and teenagers who'll no longer be mislead by YOUR "fluff and fodder", pal?

What the FUCK does sexeducation have to do with free speech? NOTHING. Sexeducation is the imparting of FACTS. Free speech and facts DO NOT get along, this is history. So get off your fucking high horse and admit that you are NOT QUALIFIED TO TEACH.

sexeducation:

What happened to "answering"??? You short on words now? JUST KEEP TO THE FACTS if you can answer any, - not discussion about "body fluids" blah...

JUST TELL WHY YOU ARE HERE AND WHAT QUALIFICATIONS YOU POSSESS TO EDUCATE CHILDREN IN "SEX EDUCATION".

ELSE :321GFY