harper is taking canada backwards - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

HighlyIntoxicated · 08-31-2011, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

No one on this planet needs 6 plants or more to help supplement their 'medical use' needs. If they have 6 or more they are selling something that is illegal. Setting a mandatory is an obvious move, and 6 months is nothing compared to the US so the comparison is ludicrous.

you have no idea what you are talking about. My brother is a licensed medical marijuana growers in Canada, and his prescription gives him the ability to grow 16 plants for personal use.

Best-In-BC · 09-01-2011, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce

Seriously? Its not for smoking weed or having a bit on you. Its to prevent grow houses and selling dope to (or near) minors. WTF? I personally think the sentences should be way the fuck harsher than they're proposing. A LOT of homes have been destroyed near where I live - and many industrial units, as well - because some asshole leased the property for the sole purpose of having an urban greenhouse to grow their cash crops.

Living in B.C., you should have a clue about the damage grow houses cause not only to the property owners, but their neighbours and community.

You want to grow some pot? Fine, have a few plants for personal use. Wanna sell some to your friends? Make sure they're adults and don't do it near a school.

My point only is, if we can all just look at America for one minutes we'll see that tuff laws dont work, in fact, Crime Rates will Sky Rocket. Anyone Please, Prove me Wrong on That!

Putting pressure on dessprit people is a dumb idea. Not saying what there doing is right. Just saying what we're planing on doing is what America has done and its destroying them.

Now yes, you damn right I live in BC

if they just decriminalize and make it illegal to grow in your home if you dont own in then fine. Keep the rest of the laws pertaining to minors and grow house. Most people who grow here dont use the hole house, they will use a room or something. I think if BC did this you would see less Violence.

Now I think weed should be brought up to age 21 to posses. No charges for being underage and holding, but put a community service or something like that mandatory for them.

Best-In-BC · 09-01-2011, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighlyIntoxicated

not sure if trolling or you're fucking retarded. weed does not make people aggressive, alcohol does, and that's perfectly legal.

Yeah, guys a idiot

Best-In-BC · 09-01-2011, 06:41 AM

New Laws Dont Solve Problems, 99% Of The Time Now They Just Compound On It

Sid70 · 09-01-2011, 09:06 AM

Alan Harper, Charlie Harper, now this Harper - 3 and 1/2 men!

CDSmith · 09-01-2011, 09:53 AM

I'm all for getting tougher on crime and harsher penalties. Sorry.

Not really a fan of Harper either, have never voted for him to be honest, but he did say years ago as part of his platform that he was going to get tougher on crime and this is part of it I suppose.

Potheads may *want* it to be legal, and cops do seem to look the other way when only a few plants or a couple of joints are present, but the fact is larger amounts of weed and selling to underage types is not legal, period.

This is just one step though. I'm more interested in what Harper does (if anything) with regard to young offenders, underage repeat car thieves for example. And pretty much anyone that thinks they can just do whatever they want and get away with it, like those who do B & E's one after the other, or morons who spraypaint other people's shit, etc, gang pukes who think it's okay to open fire whenever they please and WHEREVER they please. And on and on and on.

Personally I say round them all up and shoot em, but I guess I'll have to settle for whatever "harsher penalties" the Harper gov't can come up with. Still waiting on those though.

I couldn't care less if he has buddies who stand to profit from larger prisons, btw.

MrBottomTooth · 09-01-2011, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete

Honestly, I see nothing wrong with that. There are stiff penalties for selling tobacco to minors, why should the law be lenient for selling a controlled substance?

It varies from province to province, but in bc as an example selling cigs to a minor is a 575 dollar fine.

BlackCrayon · 09-01-2011, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete

Honestly, I see nothing wrong with that. There are stiff penalties for selling tobacco to minors, why should the law be lenient for selling a controlled substance?

Like I said previously, an 18 year old selling to a 17 year old would have the same 2 year mandatory minimum as a 52 year old selling to a 10 year old. Someone else commented that they can make exceptions for an 18 year old selling to a 17 year old but with mandatory minimums, you can't. thats why they are called mandatory. in effect it says judges are not doing their jobs, they are being too easy on people so these mandatory minimums are needed.

BlackCrayon · 09-01-2011, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

I'm all for getting tougher on crime and harsher penalties. Sorry.

Not really a fan of Harper either, have never voted for him to be honest, but he did say years ago as part of his platform that he was going to get tougher on crime and this is part of it I suppose.

Potheads may *want* it to be legal, and cops do seem to look the other way when only a few plants or a couple of joints are present, but the fact is larger amounts of weed and selling to underage types is not legal, period.

This is just one step though. I'm more interested in what Harper does (if anything) with regard to young offenders, underage repeat car thieves for example. And pretty much anyone that thinks they can just do whatever they want and get away with it, like those who do B & E's one after the other, or morons who spraypaint other people's shit, etc, gang pukes who think it's okay to open fire whenever they please and WHEREVER they please. And on and on and on.

Personally I say round them all up and shoot em, but I guess I'll have to settle for whatever "harsher penalties" the Harper gov't can come up with. Still waiting on those though.

I couldn't care less if he has buddies who stand to profit from larger prisons, btw.

The biggest problem with young offenders is the home environment they are living in. I think parents need to be held a bit more responsible in how they are raising their kids. keeping kids locked up instead of trying to get them the help they need only creates another generation of life long criminals.

_Richard_ · 09-01-2011, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

I'm all for getting tougher on crime and harsher penalties. Sorry.

Not really a fan of Harper either, have never voted for him to be honest, but he did say years ago as part of his platform that he was going to get tougher on crime and this is part of it I suppose.

Potheads may *want* it to be legal, and cops do seem to look the other way when only a few plants or a couple of joints are present, but the fact is larger amounts of weed and selling to underage types is not legal, period.

This is just one step though. I'm more interested in what Harper does (if anything) with regard to young offenders, underage repeat car thieves for example. And pretty much anyone that thinks they can just do whatever they want and get away with it, like those who do B & E's one after the other, or morons who spraypaint other people's shit, etc, gang pukes who think it's okay to open fire whenever they please and WHEREVER they please. And on and on and on.

Personally I say round them all up and shoot em, but I guess I'll have to settle for whatever "harsher penalties" the Harper gov't can come up with. Still waiting on those though.

I couldn't care less if he has buddies who stand to profit from larger prisons, btw.

so you're saying you want to round up all the gangbangers, murders, car thieves, graffiti artists, and 'young offenders', and shoot them?

ignoring that disturbing opinion, with minimum sentencing, how many world famous artists have risen from just starting to 'tag other peoples property'

is canada going to be the country that throws banksy in jail for 5 years?

Best-In-BC · 09-01-2011, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sid70

Alan Harper, Charlie Harper, now this Harper - 3 and 1/2 men!

ROFL, Nice Connection ;)

09-01-2011, 06:41 AM	#54
Best-In-BC Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 9,506	New Laws Dont Solve Problems, 99% Of The Time Now They Just Compound On It __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains

09-01-2011, 09:06 AM	#55
Sid70 Downshifter Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Road trip Posts: 16,413	Alan Harper, Charlie Harper, now this Harper - 3 and 1/2 men! __________________ Русня, идите нахуй!

09-01-2011, 09:53 AM	#56
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	I'm all for getting tougher on crime and harsher penalties. Sorry. Not really a fan of Harper either, have never voted for him to be honest, but he did say years ago as part of his platform that he was going to get tougher on crime and this is part of it I suppose. Potheads may want it to be legal, and cops do seem to look the other way when only a few plants or a couple of joints are present, but the fact is larger amounts of weed and selling to underage types is not legal, period. This is just one step though. I'm more interested in what Harper does (if anything) with regard to young offenders, underage repeat car thieves for example. And pretty much anyone that thinks they can just do whatever they want and get away with it, like those who do B & E's one after the other, or morons who spraypaint other people's shit, etc, gang pukes who think it's okay to open fire whenever they please and WHEREVER they please. And on and on and on. Personally I say round them all up and shoot em, but I guess I'll have to settle for whatever "harsher penalties" the Harper gov't can come up with. Still waiting on those though. I couldn't care less if he has buddies who stand to profit from larger prisons, btw. __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634