Manwin vs .XXX just on CNBC - GoFuckYourself.com

Forest · 12-06-2011, 02:59 PM

very interesting segment

Forest · 12-06-2011, 03:00 PM

lol even religious groups are opposed to .xxx

2intense · 12-06-2011, 03:03 PM

and ???????????????????

porno jew · 12-06-2011, 03:16 PM

xxx is on every major news outlet today. they are going to make mad bank.

Barry-xlovecam · 12-06-2011, 03:18 PM

Why You Don't Need to Buy an XXX Domain
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...xx_domain.html

Adult businesses that can afford to litigate don't need to either.

Smaller guys or those with a lot of SEO names may have a problem ...

femdomdestiny · 12-06-2011, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest

very interesting segment

is video available online?

Forest · 12-06-2011, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

is video available online?

i did a search on the site and it isnt up yet

DotXXX · 12-06-2011, 04:05 PM

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

Si · 12-06-2011, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

Looking forward to your failure

DBS.US · 12-06-2011, 05:23 PM

.xxx domain are for suckers

u-Bob · 12-06-2011, 07:23 PM

I wonder what Manwin's next move will be

Nikki_Licks · 12-06-2011, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

Piss off

seeric · 12-06-2011, 07:26 PM

I just watched two diff LA stations call it XXX.COM for their segments on it. I sat there an laughed in joy to myself like a damn fool. The newscaster said it was a new domain, and the graphics abover her shoulder read XXX.COM. HAHA.

seeric · 12-06-2011, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Smaller guys or those with a lot of SEO names may have a problem ...

Google will not be showing preference to the extension in SERPS. That is for sure.

SmutHammer · 12-06-2011, 08:10 PM

curious, where do you see the tos for .xxx?

DotXXX · 12-06-2011, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Hammer

curious, where do you see the tos for .xxx?

You can find it here: http://www.about.xxx/policies/

marlboroack · 12-06-2011, 08:45 PM

The same bots that predicted the end of the world said .xxx will make millions. Figured you would like to know that.

Chris · 12-06-2011, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

You can find it here: http://www.about.xxx/policies/

Cool cant wait to enforce this small section for anyone who infringes on trademarks

Quote:

The RES is intended to provide a prompt remedy to address a limited class of situations in which there is objectively clear abuse of well-known, distinctive registered trademarks or service marks of significant commercial value, or of personal or professional names of individuals

SmutHammer · 12-07-2011, 12:32 AM

ummm am I reading this right? according to your tos, anyone that puts "any content" on a .xxx you own full rights to do what you want with?!?!?

fogfever · 12-07-2011, 02:20 AM

the average surfer hasn't heard of .xxx and probably never will.

Plugrush · 12-07-2011, 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

Would anyone else besides me hulk smash that redhead reporter?

PornMD · 12-07-2011, 02:43 AM

I've been published in BusinessInsider twice - tempting to try and run an article past them titled "Just Don't F*cking Buy .XXX - There's No Reason To". Half-kidding of course, but seriously, a larger brand could absolutely ream anyone who tries to fuck with their brand on .xxx and smaller brands don't really have to worry because it's unlikely anyone cares enough about them to get the .xxx equivalent and wreak havoc. Some generics might have an initial hype-filled day in the sun before the type-ins wear off since everyone already knows where to find free porn. It was mostly domainers that snagged the best of those already anyways due to backroom deals with the registry.

This just really seems like a pointless extension especially with the state of the adult industry. 5-10 years ago I could see a point to getting a .xxx, but not now.

u-Bob · 12-07-2011, 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

I've been published in BusinessInsider twice - tempting to try and run an article past them titled "Just Don't F*cking Buy .XXX - There's No Reason To". Half-kidding of course, but seriously, a larger brand could absolutely ream anyone who tries to fuck with their brand on .xxx and smaller brands don't really have to worry because it's unlikely anyone cares enough about them to get the .xxx equivalent and wreak havoc. Some generics might have an initial hype-filled day in the sun before the type-ins wear off since everyone already knows where to find free porn. It was mostly domainers that snagged the best of those already anyways due to backroom deals with the registry.

This just really seems like a pointless extension especially with the state of the adult industry. 5-10 years ago I could see a point to getting a .xxx, but not now.

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...xx_domain.html

2intense · 12-07-2011, 04:12 AM

.xxx sucks

Lykos · 12-07-2011, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob

I wonder what Manwin's next move will be

Me too,can't wait to see!

CamTraffic · 12-07-2011, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

Corbin fisher bought gay.xxx for 500k ?
fetish.xxx 300 K
shemales.xxx 200K

Interesting numbers there

There are some VERY generic domains that are already taken, i wonder why...

Fabien · 12-07-2011, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric

Google will not be showing preference to the extension in SERPS. That is for sure.

How do you know ?

Paul Markham · 12-07-2011, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

I now see how this guy thinks he can make money. Not from porn, but from people buying the .xxx extension to protect their name or brand. 100s of times easier and cheaper than going after a domain squatter after it's registered.

Lawley doesn't need Adult to pick it up, he will make his money over the years using the fear factor.

Respect to him, he out scammed us all.

seeandsee · 12-07-2011, 06:49 AM

xxx is best

Caligari · 12-07-2011, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...xx_domain.html

Good article on why you don't need to buy a .xxx domain

.

bean-aid · 12-15-2011, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by femdomdestiny

is video available online?

I still can't find the video... anyone?

JFK · 12-15-2011, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest

lol even religious groups are opposed to .xxx

Bless their little hearts

InfoGuy · 12-15-2011, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric

I just watched two diff LA stations call it XXX.COM for their segments on it. I sat there an laughed in joy to myself like a damn fool. The newscaster said it was a new domain, and the graphics abover her shoulder read XXX.COM. HAHA.

That's not the least bit surprising since AVN, the leading adult industry journal, has gotten it wrong themselves. There was a graphic at the top of AVN's homepage with "FSC vs. XXX.com", although the content of their article was correct.

DamianJ · 12-15-2011, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

Here's one from Fox Business.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online

Seriously, how much are you paid not to get it?

Vendzilla · 12-15-2011, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

Bless their little hearts

Nice Hat!

InfoGuy · 12-15-2011, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InfoGuy

That's not the least bit surprising since AVN, the leading adult industry journal, has gotten it wrong themselves. There was a graphic at the top of AVN's homepage with "FSC vs. XXX.com", although the content of their article was correct.

nico-t · 12-16-2011, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric

Google will not be showing preference to the extension in SERPS. That is for sure.

but you never know though. If they decide they will, they can by just flipping a switch.
Think of the panda mess. They destroyed alot of businesses, they have the power to do so.

TheSquealer · 12-16-2011, 05:06 AM

asdfasdf

TheSquealer · 12-16-2011, 05:08 AM

asdfasdfasdf

nico-t · 12-16-2011, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

This guy has always been full of shit, but his campaign to shape how people create websites obviously works given the degree that everyone acts as if his word is gospel.

Content content content content... quality content, quality content, rich engaging content...blah blah blah.

How much of an idiot do you have to be to not realize he's been saying that same lame shit since day 1 of his blog? His agenda and that of google is to steer people into creating content rich, useful websites and discourage spammers.

Some of you fucking morons act as if writing great text matters. It doesn't. It never has. Why do you think it matters? Go write 1000 blog posts about teen sex and you think you are going to be number 1 for that term? The top 10? Of course not.. .the same tgps that still rank well with barely a single word on the page... that have been in the top 10 for that term for a decade already will still be there or be replaced with a tube with no text who has a better linking strategy and seo network behind it.

In the last 10 years that everyone has talking about all the new changes in SEO, the SEO/Blackhat community has still been doing 90% of the same shit they were doing 10 years ago.

Clowns.

i see this post was intended for this thread: https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1050019

TheSquealer · 12-16-2011, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

i see this post was intended for this thread: https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1050019

haha. shit.
sorry everyone.

tired.

edit: BOOOOOO .XXX!

12-06-2011, 02:59 PM	#1
Forest Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Hollywood Fl. Posts: 8,973	Manwin vs .XXX just on CNBC very interesting segment

12-06-2011, 03:03 PM	#3
2intense Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Google Posts: 12,444	and ??????????????????? __________________ Most Affordable Firewall & Malware Protection for Linux Servers

12-06-2011, 03:18 PM	#5
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Why You Don't Need to Buy an XXX Domain http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...xx_domain.html Adult businesses that can afford to litigate don't need to either. Smaller guys or those with a lot of SEO names may have a problem ...

12-06-2011, 04:05 PM	#8
DotXXX Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 226	Here's one from Fox Business. http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/13130...n-light-online __________________ prbot at icmregistry dot com

12-06-2011, 05:23 PM	#10
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	.xxx domain are for suckers __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

12-06-2011, 03:00 PM	#2
Forest Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Hollywood Fl. Posts: 8,973	lol even religious groups are opposed to .xxx

12-06-2011, 03:16 PM	#4
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	xxx is on every major news outlet today. they are going to make mad bank.

12-06-2011, 07:23 PM	#11
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	I wonder what Manwin's next move will be

12-06-2011, 07:26 PM	#13
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	I just watched two diff LA stations call it XXX.COM for their segments on it. I sat there an laughed in joy to myself like a damn fool. The newscaster said it was a new domain, and the graphics abover her shoulder read XXX.COM. HAHA.

12-06-2011, 08:10 PM	#15
SmutHammer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,845	curious, where do you see the tos for .xxx?

12-06-2011, 08:45 PM	#17
marlboroack So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: ☣ Posts: 9,327	The same bots that predicted the end of the world said .xxx will make millions. Figured you would like to know that.

12-07-2011, 12:32 AM	#19
SmutHammer Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,845	ummm am I reading this right? according to your tos, anyone that puts "any content" on a .xxx you own full rights to do what you want with?!?!?

12-07-2011, 02:20 AM	#20
fogfever Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,245	the average surfer hasn't heard of .xxx and probably never will.

12-07-2011, 02:43 AM	#22
PornMD Mainstream Businessman Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 9,291	I've been published in BusinessInsider twice - tempting to try and run an article past them titled "Just Don't F*cking Buy .XXX - There's No Reason To". Half-kidding of course, but seriously, a larger brand could absolutely ream anyone who tries to fuck with their brand on .xxx and smaller brands don't really have to worry because it's unlikely anyone cares enough about them to get the .xxx equivalent and wreak havoc. Some generics might have an initial hype-filled day in the sun before the type-ins wear off since everyone already knows where to find free porn. It was mostly domainers that snagged the best of those already anyways due to backroom deals with the registry. This just really seems like a pointless extension especially with the state of the adult industry. 5-10 years ago I could see a point to getting a .xxx, but not now. __________________ Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

12-07-2011, 04:12 AM	#24
2intense Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Google Posts: 12,444	.xxx sucks __________________ Most Affordable Firewall & Malware Protection for Linux Servers

12-07-2011, 06:49 AM	#29
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	xxx is best __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

12-16-2011, 05:06 AM	#38
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,093	asdfasdf __________________ . Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens. Rochard Last edited by TheSquealer; 12-16-2011 at 05:18 AM..

12-16-2011, 05:08 AM	#39
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,093	asdfasdfasdf __________________ . Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens. Rochard Last edited by TheSquealer; 12-16-2011 at 05:18 AM..