Gingrich Plummets, Ron Paul Surges to Lead in New Poll 12/19 - GoFuckYourself.com

glamourmodels · 12-19-2011, 10:45 AM

A new survey of likely Republican caucus voters shows Ron Paul leading the pack in Iowa.

In a Public Policy Polling survey released Sunday, the Texas congressman garnered 23 percent of the vote. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney followed with 20 percent, while former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich finished with 14 percent.

PPP surveyed 597 likely voters from Friday to Sunday. The margin of error for the survey is plus or minus 4 percent.

The poll was not paid for or authorized by any campaign or political organization, and was conducted through automated telephone interviews.

PPP is a Democratic polling company, but polling expert Nate Silver of the New York Times found that its surveys in 2010 actually exhibited a slight bias toward Republican candidates, according to a company press release.

The poll’s full results are as follows:

— Ron Paul, 23 percent

— Mitt Romney, 20 percent

— Newt Gingrich, 14 percent

— Rick Santorum, 10 percent

— Michele Bachmann, 10 percent

— Rick Perry, 10 percent

— Jon Huntsman, 4 percent

— Gary Johnson, 2 percent.

— 7 percent of respondents said they would vote for someone else, or were not sure who they would support.

http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.co...k-in-new-poll/

http://www.ronpaul2012.com

porno jew · 12-19-2011, 10:46 AM

just more evidence how degenerate and pathetic the republican candidates are. nothing more.

glamourmodels · 12-19-2011, 10:55 AM

The only thing in evidence here is that you are some kind bot that automatically jumps on any Ron Paul thread within *seconds* of the initial post LOL-

Your programmer should fine tune you to at least wait a full 1 minute before you post your drive-by smears to make it look more natural at least haha

I know it says in the post time that you did wait 1 minute but thats only because vbulletin does not count by the second. It was literally 10 seconds at most before you jumped on this thread. Pathetic

I can actually smell the fear from here as the dam is breaking and you have to face the fact that you have failed to stem the tide of support for Congressman Paul. You cant stop an idea whose time has come little man.

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

just more evidence how degenerate and pathetic the republican candidates are. nothing more.

porno jew · 12-19-2011, 10:58 AM

thought you had this bot on ignore?

i would also like if your kept your promise and stopped posting here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels

The only thing in evidence here is that you are some kind bot that automatically jumps on any Ron Paul thread within *seconds* of the initial post LOL-

Your programmer should fine tune you to at least wait a full 1 minute before you post your drive-by smears to make it look more natural at least haha

I know it says in the post time that you did wait 1 minute but thats only because vbulletin does not count by the second. It was literally maybe 10 seconds at most before you jumped on this thread. Pathetic

DamageX · 12-19-2011, 11:05 AM

Now now boys, play nice!

stocktrader23 · 12-19-2011, 11:18 AM

How many times has Ronnie's time come now?

Here, don't stain your britches.

DaddyHalbucks · 12-19-2011, 11:21 AM

www.thecaseagainstnewt.com

..

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 12-19-2011, 11:39 AM

Because we all know what happened in the Iowa primaries in 2008, and what a big impact it had on the Presidential election:

Iowa 2008 Republican Primary results:

Mike Huckabee 40,841 votes (34.4%)

Mitt Romney 29,949 (25.2%)

Fred Thompson 15,904 (13.4%)

John McCain 15,559 (13.1%)

Ron Paul 11,817 (10.0%)

ADG

Vendzilla · 12-19-2011, 11:46 AM

And in related news , I got a hair cut yesterday

Coup · 12-19-2011, 11:50 AM

My handlers tell me I should troll this thread. I COULD SEE THE FEAR IN THEIR EYES AS THEY HANDED ME MY ORDERS

Coup · 12-19-2011, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glamourmodels

The only thing in evidence here is that you are some kind bot that automatically jumps on any Ron Paul thread within *seconds* of the initial post LOL-

Your programmer should fine tune you to at least wait a full 1 minute before you post your drive-by smears to make it look more natural at least haha

I know it says in the post time that you did wait 1 minute but thats only because vbulletin does not count by the second. It was literally 10 seconds at most before you jumped on this thread. Pathetic

I can actually smell the fear from here as the dam is breaking and you have to face the fact that you have failed to stem the tide of support for Congressman Paul. You cant stop an idea whose time has come little man.

He's a bot alright. And I can tell you one damned thing for sure... We here at Illuminati Incorporated are getting real god damned sick about having our hours cut because of all these god damned bots.

kane · 12-19-2011, 01:19 PM

This could be an interesting start to the primary. Paul pulling ahead in Iowa, but Romney is way out in front in New Hampshire and Newt is way out in front in South Carolina so we could have 3 different winners in the first 3 elections. The thing is, since they changed the rules, all of them will get delegates based on how many votes they get so it could cause the election to drag on for a little while which ultimately benefits those who can raise the most money and appeal to the more moderates of the party.

baddog · 12-19-2011, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

Because we all know what happened in the Iowa primaries in 2008, and what a big impact it had on the Presidential election:

Iowa 2008 Republican Primary results:

Mike Huckabee 40,841 votes (34.4%)

Mitt Romney 29,949 (25.2%)

Fred Thompson 15,904 (13.4%)

John McCain 15,559 (13.1%)

Ron Paul 11,817 (10.0%)

ADG

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...033522.graphic

glamourmodels · 12-19-2011, 08:24 PM

I do. There's a little link saying "view post" dummy... also, the singular reason I continue to post this stuff is because of people like you and Coup posting bs so you are truly your own worst enemy and very ineffective if stoping me posting is your goal. If egging me on and encouraging me to post is your goal however then you are doing a fantastic job.

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

thought you had this bot on ignore?

i would also like if your kept your promise and stopped posting here.

Coup · 12-19-2011, 08:37 PM

2MuchMark · 12-19-2011, 08:42 PM

Good for Ron Paul. He's the smartest republican.

Joshua G · 12-19-2011, 08:53 PM

Ron Paul is the 5th element.

uno · 12-19-2011, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Good for Ron Paul. He's the smartest republican.

Wrong. Also wrong... dumb people who think Newt is the smartest guy in the room.

glamourmodels · 12-19-2011, 09:09 PM

Headline when Ron Paul wins the nomination.. "Romney and Gingrich Look to 2016"

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls

Ron Paul is the 5th element.

Sin_Vraal · 12-19-2011, 09:18 PM

Good. I hope Paul's success makes certain news networks Eat some shit for the deliberate blackout they've been pushing on him.

Just wish he'd be a little more vicious regarding foreign policy... but then again many in the military are with him, so he must not be all wrong in terms of war.

glamourmodels · 12-19-2011, 09:33 PM

The New York Times is predicting Ron Paul will win Iowa as well now:

Quote:

Mr. Paul also leads our forecast. The model gives him a 44 percent chance of winning Iowa based on the current standing of the candidates and the historic uncertainty of polling-based forecasts. Mr. Romney has a 32 percent chance of winning, while Mr. Gingrich?s chances have crashed to 15 percent.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...iowa-forecast/

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/fi...primaries/iowa

Coup · 12-19-2011, 10:51 PM

mozadek · 12-19-2011, 11:06 PM

lol @ ron paul supporters, this man will never be president.

DaddyHalbucks · 12-19-2011, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

Because we all know what happened in the Iowa primaries in 2008, and what a big impact it had on the Presidential election:

Iowa 2008 Republican Primary results:

Mike Huckabee 40,841 votes (34.4%)

Mitt Romney 29,949 (25.2%)

Fred Thompson 15,904 (13.4%)

John McCain 15,559 (13.1%)

Ron Paul 11,817 (10.0%)

ADG

The good news is... this ain't 2008.

DaddyHalbucks · 12-19-2011, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

Is that the best you got to defame Dr. Paul?

glamourmodels · 12-19-2011, 11:34 PM

yes, it is actually...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Is that the best you got to defame Dr. Paul?

acrylix · 12-19-2011, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

Because we all know what happened in the Iowa primaries in 2008, and what a big impact it had on the Presidential election

Yes. Obama won Iowa and lost New Hampshire. He then went on to take the Democratic nomination, and become president.

Coup · 12-19-2011, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Is that the best you got to defame Dr. Paul?

- Ron Paul

Joshua G · 12-20-2011, 12:00 AM

no candidates will get the majority of delegates. This is going to a brokered convention. Best way to cap this is which candidate has the best insider connections...i would expect romney to buy the prize.

i will shout ron paul from the rooftops. but even if he gets the biggest chunk of delegates, no chance in hell he gets through a brokered convention.

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

- Ron Paul

I really doubt he wrote that.

He isn't stupid enough to call himself a "Congressmen." lol, that is the plural version of the word.

uno · 12-20-2011, 12:17 AM

rofl you people...

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

I really doubt he wrote that.

He isn't stupid enough to call himself a "Congressmen." lol, that is the plural version of the word.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/ron...etter-problem/

http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/1...uls-newsletter

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/ron...etter-problem/

The fact of the matter is that he didn't write those articles, he simply owned the company that published the articles, and his name was on the articles because his name was in the title of the company.

And this bs doesn't even matter to those who have followed Ron Paul, read his books, etc... because it's obvious that the man is not racist. Being racist goes against his entire philosophy. lol

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:39 AM

Also, something tells me that those articles which were not written by him are the only things that you can use to connect Ron Paul to racism.

I really doubt you could find anything that he actually said or wrote that even comes close to the stuff written in some of those old articles.

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:41 AM

http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/1...uls-newsletter

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:43 AM

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

The fact of the matter is that he didn't write those articles, he simply owned the company that published the articles, and his name was on the articles because his name was in the title of the company.

And this bs doesn't even matter to those who have followed Ron Paul, read his books, etc... because it's obvious that the man is not racist. Being racist goes against his entire philosophy. lol

Brainwashed much? You sound like a cult member to me.

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

Brainwashed much?

What is the point of that reply? It's just as pointless as me replying to you with something like "You're a dumbass."

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:45 AM

Can I interest you in the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard?

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

Can I interest you in the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard?

You replying to me with articles about this subject had me thinking that you actually wanted to discuss it. I guess not, you just want to make asinine comments about scientology and shit. lol, oh well... what else is new?

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:50 AM

StickyGreen: Certified Scienpaulogist

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup

StickGreen: Certified Scienpaulogist

Dude, you are so fucking immature. lol, where's a facepalm picture when you need it...

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:52 AM

How old are you Coup? Seriously... I'm curious now...

Joshua G · 12-20-2011, 12:53 AM

coup. nice job making an ass of yourself. you post propoganda crap, then call others names who point it out. Why don't you just go play at toys r us.

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:54 AM

Ten warning signs regarding people involved in/with a potentially unsafe group/leader.

Extreme obsessiveness regarding the group/leader resulting in the exclusion of almost every practical consideration.
Individual identity, the group, the leader and/or God as distinct and separate categories of existence become increasingly blurred. Instead, in the follower's mind these identities become substantially and increasingly fused--as that person's involvement with the group/leader continues and deepens.
Whenever the group/leader is criticized or questioned it is characterized as "persecution".
Uncharacteristically stilted and seemingly programmed conversation and mannerisms, cloning of the group/leader in personal behavior.
Dependency upon the group/leader for problem solving, solutions, and definitions without meaningful reflective thought. A seeming inability to think independently or analyze situations without group/leader involvement.
Hyperactivity centered on the group/leader agenda, which seems to supercede any personal goals or individual interests.
A dramatic loss of spontaneity and sense of humor.
Increasing isolation from family and old friends unless they demonstrate an interest in the group/leader.
Anything the group/leader does can be justified no matter how harsh or harmful.
Former followers are at best-considered negative or worse evil and under bad influences. They can not be trusted and personal contact is avoided.

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls

coup. nice job making an ass of yourself. you post propoganda crap, then call others names who point it out. Why don't you just go play at toys r us.

He's a typical troll with typical troll tactics. He's pretty good at what he does... because he's annoying as fuck lol

uno · 12-20-2011, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Dude, you are so fucking immature. lol, where's a facepalm picture when you need it...

at least ron paul isn't a reptillian agent from middle earth.

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

at least ron paul isn't a reptillian agent from middle earth.

Reptilian agent from middle earth? Damn I wanna try some of what you're smokin on...

Coup · 12-20-2011, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

at least ron paul isn't a reptillian agent from middle earth.

HOW DARE YOU ATTACK DEAR LEADER I'LL RIP YOUR FUCKING HEAD OFF MOTHERFUCKER.

StickyGreen · 12-20-2011, 12:59 AM

Believe in freedom and liberty: you're a cult member.

lmao

Some more nutjob cult members:

12-19-2011, 10:45 AM	#1
glamourmodels Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,121	Gingrich Plummets, Ron Paul Surges to Lead in New Poll 12/19 A new survey of likely Republican caucus voters shows Ron Paul leading the pack in Iowa. In a Public Policy Polling survey released Sunday, the Texas congressman garnered 23 percent of the vote. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney followed with 20 percent, while former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich finished with 14 percent. PPP surveyed 597 likely voters from Friday to Sunday. The margin of error for the survey is plus or minus 4 percent. The poll was not paid for or authorized by any campaign or political organization, and was conducted through automated telephone interviews. PPP is a Democratic polling company, but polling expert Nate Silver of the New York Times found that its surveys in 2010 actually exhibited a slight bias toward Republican candidates, according to a company press release. The poll’s full results are as follows: — Ron Paul, 23 percent — Mitt Romney, 20 percent — Newt Gingrich, 14 percent — Rick Santorum, 10 percent — Michele Bachmann, 10 percent — Rick Perry, 10 percent — Jon Huntsman, 4 percent — Gary Johnson, 2 percent. — 7 percent of respondents said they would vote for someone else, or were not sure who they would support. http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.co...k-in-new-poll/ http://www.ronpaul2012.com Last edited by glamourmodels; 12-19-2011 at 10:48 AM..

12-19-2011, 11:05 AM	#5
DamageX Marketing & Strategy Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Former nomad Posts: 14,293	Now now boys, play nice! __________________ Whitehat is for chumps If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

12-19-2011, 11:18 AM	#6
stocktrader23 Let's do some business. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The dirty south. Posts: 18,781	How many times has Ronnie's time come now? Here, don't stain your britches. __________________ Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life "I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."

12-19-2011, 11:21 AM	#7
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	www.thecaseagainstnewt.com .. __________________ Boner Money

12-19-2011, 11:39 AM	#8
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	Because we all know what happened in the Iowa primaries in 2008, and what a big impact it had on the Presidential election: Iowa 2008 Republican Primary results: Mike Huckabee 40,841 votes (34.4%) Mitt Romney 29,949 (25.2%) Fred Thompson 15,904 (13.4%) John McCain 15,559 (13.1%) Ron Paul 11,817 (10.0%) ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

12-19-2011, 10:46 AM	#2
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	just more evidence how degenerate and pathetic the republican candidates are. nothing more.

12-19-2011, 11:46 AM	#9
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,201	And in related news , I got a hair cut yesterday __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

12-19-2011, 11:50 AM	#10
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	My handlers tell me I should troll this thread. I COULD SEE THE FEAR IN THEIR EYES AS THEY HANDED ME MY ORDERS

12-19-2011, 01:19 PM	#12
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	This could be an interesting start to the primary. Paul pulling ahead in Iowa, but Romney is way out in front in New Hampshire and Newt is way out in front in South Carolina so we could have 3 different winners in the first 3 elections. The thing is, since they changed the rules, all of them will get delegates based on how many votes they get so it could cause the election to drag on for a little while which ultimately benefits those who can raise the most money and appeal to the more moderates of the party.

12-19-2011, 08:37 PM	#15
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932

12-19-2011, 08:42 PM	#16
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,529	Good for Ron Paul. He's the smartest republican. __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

12-19-2011, 08:53 PM	#17
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	Ron Paul is the 5th element.

12-19-2011, 09:18 PM	#20
Sin_Vraal Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Seattle Posts: 465	Good. I hope Paul's success makes certain news networks Eat some shit for the deliberate blackout they've been pushing on him. Just wish he'd be a little more vicious regarding foreign policy... but then again many in the military are with him, so he must not be all wrong in terms of war. __________________ "Youjizz: Henry, Thanks to you 1 in 150 people online at any given time are jerking off on my websites" Swift Communications -- UU net / Sprint / level 3 / savvis / Gblx Quad Core SaS HDD 1000mbits dedicated bandwidth $2500 AmySpears! Amy getting fucked in the ass and getting choked on a chain! -- Devil Bucks! skype: henry.goss ICQ: 5.6.4.8.0.9.8.6

12-19-2011, 10:51 PM	#22
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932

12-19-2011, 11:06 PM	#23
mozadek Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,325	lol @ ron paul supporters, this man will never be president.

12-20-2011, 12:00 AM	#29
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	no candidates will get the majority of delegates. This is going to a brokered convention. Best way to cap this is which candidate has the best insider connections...i would expect romney to buy the prize. i will shout ron paul from the rooftops. but even if he gets the biggest chunk of delegates, no chance in hell he gets through a brokered convention.

12-20-2011, 12:17 AM	#31
uno RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Area Posts: 18,450	rofl you people... __________________ -uno icq: 111-914 CrazyBabe.com - porn art MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

12-20-2011, 12:39 AM	#34
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	Also, something tells me that those articles which were not written by him are the only things that you can use to connect Ron Paul to racism. I really doubt you could find anything that he actually said or wrote that even comes close to the stuff written in some of those old articles.

12-20-2011, 12:41 AM	#35
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/1...uls-newsletter

12-20-2011, 12:43 AM	#36
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076

12-20-2011, 12:45 AM	#39
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	Can I interest you in the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard?

12-20-2011, 12:50 AM	#41
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	StickyGreen: Certified Scienpaulogist Last edited by Coup; 12-20-2011 at 12:52 AM..

12-20-2011, 12:52 AM	#43
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	How old are you Coup? Seriously... I'm curious now...

12-20-2011, 12:53 AM	#44
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	coup. nice job making an ass of yourself. you post propoganda crap, then call others names who point it out. Why don't you just go play at toys r us.

12-20-2011, 12:54 AM	#45
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,932	Ten warning signs regarding people involved in/with a potentially unsafe group/leader. Extreme obsessiveness regarding the group/leader resulting in the exclusion of almost every practical consideration. Individual identity, the group, the leader and/or God as distinct and separate categories of existence become increasingly blurred. Instead, in the follower's mind these identities become substantially and increasingly fused--as that person's involvement with the group/leader continues and deepens. Whenever the group/leader is criticized or questioned it is characterized as "persecution". Uncharacteristically stilted and seemingly programmed conversation and mannerisms, cloning of the group/leader in personal behavior. Dependency upon the group/leader for problem solving, solutions, and definitions without meaningful reflective thought. A seeming inability to think independently or analyze situations without group/leader involvement. Hyperactivity centered on the group/leader agenda, which seems to supercede any personal goals or individual interests. A dramatic loss of spontaneity and sense of humor. Increasing isolation from family and old friends unless they demonstrate an interest in the group/leader. Anything the group/leader does can be justified no matter how harsh or harmful. Former followers are at best-considered negative or worse evil and under bad influences. They can not be trusted and personal contact is avoided.

12-20-2011, 12:59 AM	#50
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	Believe in freedom and liberty: you're a cult member. lmao Some more nutjob cult members: