Looks like the Planned Attack on Syria is Near

[wehateporn]

First they're coming out with this line from the Theater of the Absurd that Assad is preparing to use chemical weapons on his own people, this is their pretext for invasion.

US ramps up threats in 'psychological' war on Assad
http://rt.com/news/syria-chemical-weapons-rebels-460/

And now we see the troops arriving near the Syrian shore.

Thousands of US troops arrive near Syrian shore on USS Eisenhower
http://rt.com/usa/news/us-eisenhower...-military-369/

"The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention."



As soon as Syria is done, then it's time for Iran

[DWB]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

"The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention."

Fuck yea, it's "liberation" time!

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by DWB

Fuck yea, it's "liberation" time!

Sounds like there will be a Chemical Weapon false flag which will be blamed on Assad, the UN will then authorize a humanitarian invasion.

[Oracle Porn]

false flag? dude syria got chemical weapons it's no secret.

also you from what I hear you got some buddies in the neighborhood with f35's ready to hit the target

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn

false flag? dude syria got chemical weapons it's no secret.

also you from what I hear you got some buddies in the neighborhood with f35's ready to hit the target

Absolutely, Syria have chemical weapons for sure.

Assad wants to protect his own people, he won't want to use chemical weapons on them, that's just Western propaganda. The West have planned this war for over 10 years (and a coming war in Lebanon too). Who benefits if chemical weapons are used and it's blamed on Assad? He saw what happened to Gaddafi after similar humanitarian propaganda, he knows he'll lose, the only way he can remain in power is with no intervention.

As for Britain, yep, that's where it's all coming from, the Global Bankers who rule Britain and control USA are the root of the evil.

[SGS]

[247mg]

Once agian they will regret that we are sorry we are unable to find chemical weapon and WMD...

they should see GREEN ZONE before they took any action

[wehateporn]

According to a classified memo the original plan (after Afghan) was to attack 7 countries in 5 years:- Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Lebanon and Iran.

[Frank21]

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn

dude syria got chemical weapons it's no secret.

I found them:

https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=H-6O-gApVrU

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn

false flag? dude syria got chemical weapons it's no secret.

also you from what I hear you got some buddies in the neighborhood with f35's ready to hit the target

Saddam said "we have chemical weapons".... none found.

Syria also needed to give the big one to the other countries close to hand

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by Frank21

I found them:

https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=H-6O-gApVrU

That ^

[EddyTheDog]

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

Saddam said "we have chemical weapons".... none found.

Syria also needed to give the big one to the other countries close to hand

Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds - He had them and he used them.

[Frank21]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds - He had them and he used them.

Did saddam pull those chemical weapons out of his ass or did he get them from the USA/NATO?

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds - He had them and he used them.

My bad.

The US & British never found them, maybe they still have them hidden? Unless they were all used.

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by Frank21

Did saddam pull those chemical weapons out of his ass or did he get them from the USA/NATO?

The money was borrowed in the 80s & 90s from the US, ironic

[seeandsee]

Same chemical weapons like Sadam Husein? lol fucking war fagots

[Barry-xlovecam]

Don't be naive -- a knuckle-dragger could make Sarin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin#History
In mid-1939, the formula for the agent (Sarin) was passed to the chemical warfare section of the German Army Weapons Office,

[Kolargol]

Originally Posted by seeandsee

Same chemical weapons like Sadam Husein? lol fucking war fagots

[Frank21]

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Don't be naive -- a knuckle-dragger could make Sarin.

The germans also had also the first ballistic missiles, and the first infra-red anti-aircraft missiles and first guided missiles. It is amazing how big country's like iraq and syria 70 year later have difficulties achieving those simple goals.

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds - He had them and he used them.

If we're talking about Halabja, this was during the bloody 8 year Iraq-Iran war, the gassing occurred during a battle between Iraqis and Iranians; the Kurds had been killed with a cyanide-based gas. Iraq was not known to possess this, whereas Iran was known to use it.

The most likely explanation is that Iran attacked Halabja with the gas which killed the Iraqi Kurds. That story isn't particularly useful for War on Iraq propaganda though.

[sperbonzo]

Originally Posted by dpapa

Once agian they will regret that we are sorry we are unable to find chemical weapon and WMD...

they should see GREEN ZONE before they took any action

I'm not saying you are right or wrong, but what's REALLY scary to me is that there is a generation growing up thinking that movies actually depict history and reality, and taking their view of the world and world events from movies.








.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

According to a classified memo the original plan (after Afghan) was to attack 7 countries in 5 years:- Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Lebanon and Iran.

you mean declassified memo? because if its classified that means you wouldn't get access and know what was going on and it was bullshit as usual. Do you even know what a credible source is or do you just accept anything that sounds fucked up that will bring you more hits on your scare sites?

any of your followers off themselves today? getting much sleep?

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

you mean declassified memo? because if its classified that means you wouldn't get access and know what was going on and it was bullshit as usual. Do you even know what a credible source is or do you just accept anything that sounds fucked up that will bring you more hits on your scare sites?

any of your followers off themselves today? getting much sleep?

There was a video below my post of General Wesley Clark, the post won't make much sense unless you watch it.

[bronco67]

I've always thought that at the very least, we should have given them a no-fly zone. The rebels would probably have Assad out by now.

[DWB]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

According to a classified memo the original plan (after Afghan) was to attack 7 countries in 5 years:- Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Lebanon and Iran.

Shenanigans! What could a retired four star general and NATO supreme commander possibly know?

We're over there because they hate us for our freedoms.

[DWB]

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

Do you even know what a credible source is or do you just accept anything that sounds fucked up that will bring you more hits on your scare sites?

any of your followers off themselves today? getting much sleep?

Four star general and NATO supreme commander Wesley Clark is the source.

Are you getting much sleep?

[baddog]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Absolutely, Syria have chemical weapons for sure.

Assad wants to protect his own people, he won't want to use chemical weapons on them, that's just Western propaganda.

It is readily apparent that you have not been paying attention to what is going on over there if you came to that conclusion. Wants to protect his own people . . .

That was my first LOL of the day and I have only been awake 15 minutes. Thank you.

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by bronco67

I've always thought that at the very least, we should have given them a no-fly zone. The rebels would probably have Assad out by now.

The rebels are terrorists, how can we not allow Assad to defend and protect his people from these people?

[fatfoo]

These communications are hard to figure out. Some of them are messages that are saying things like “talk to Caesar” or something. They are counting heads for sure. Good luck creating more peace in the world.

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by baddog

It is readily apparent that you have not been paying attention to what is going on over there if you came to that conclusion. Wants to protect his own people

I do pay attention to the propaganda, then I see that it can be easily debunked

[wehateporn]

Originally Posted by DWB

Shenanigans! What could a retired four star general and NATO supreme commander possibly know?

PR_Glen has watched more war movies than Wesley Clark, we'll need to listen to him instead

[Oracle Porn]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

he won't want to use chemical weapons on them

dumbass, already used.
here's the latest news for you

https://warsclerotic.wordpress.com/2...sition-claims/

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds - He had them and he used them.

wherever did Saddam get chemical weapons, dear american friend?

[PornoMonster]

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

I'm not saying you are right or wrong, but what's REALLY scary to me is that there is a generation growing up thinking that movies actually depict history and reality, and taking their view of the world and world events from movies.








.

Exactly!
If he can bury a Mig in the sand some 55 gal drums can be hidden as well. I believe he sold them to other countries and hid some.

They were there, trust me on this.

[PornoMonster]

Originally Posted by _Richard_

wherever did Saddam get chemical weapons, dear american friend?

Job security, Americans sell stuff to other countries, then go and take them back..

I do NOT know where Iraq got the weapons, some are easily made, but yes I see what you are doing and it happens a LOT!

[Helix]

Originally Posted by Frank21

I found them:

https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=H-6O-gApVrU

The infidel rabbits start at 2:26

[PornoMonster]

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/06/world/...html?hpt=hp_t2

The situation in Syria is accelerating, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday, amid reports that President Bashar al-Assad's government may be preparing to use chemical weapons.

U.S. officials are "very concerned" that al-Assad's forces may use chemical weapons as rebels advance, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters in Washington Thursday.

"The intelligence that we have raises serious concerns that this is being considered," he said.

The defense secretary did not provide additional details about the intelligence information.

[MaDalton]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

The rebels are terrorists, how can we not allow Assad to defend and protect his people from these people?

i see what you did there...

[Mutt]

i love how people who really know nothing about these countries take sides - rebels, waring sects of religious lunatics, terrorists - no matter what side you take it will always end up being the wrong side because there are NO good guys in the Middle East - none. it's one huge snake pit.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

I do pay attention to the propaganda, then I see that it can be easily debunked

Really? Where are you getting your propaganda? What is your source fr propaganda?

[DWB]

Originally Posted by PornoMonster

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/06/world/...html?hpt=hp_t2

The situation in Syria is accelerating, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday, amid reports that President Bashar al-Assad's government may be preparing to use chemical weapons.

U.S. officials are "very concerned" that al-Assad's forces may use chemical weapons as rebels advance, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters in Washington Thursday.

"The intelligence that we have raises serious concerns that this is being considered," he said.

The defense secretary did not provide additional details about the intelligence information.

Fool me once...

Hopefully their intel is a little better with Syria than it was with Iraq, but I'm not holding my breath. How could they possibly know Syria is *planning* on using chems on their own people? That is absurd. If they had solid intel like that they would be in there RIGHT NOW. That is, if they really cared about the people.

That said, everyone needs to watch that video posted above of General Wesley Clark. That is a real eye opener. You can argue with uninformed GFY idiots all day long, but none of you can argue facts with a four star general.

[Mutt]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

According to a classified memo the original plan (after Afghan) was to attack 7 countries in 5 years:- Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Lebanon and Iran.

nothing he said in that speech is surprising - at the end he is angry about all the troops who are dying - this is precisely why Americans are blase about the US involvement in the Middle East, the number of US deaths has been very low. In Vietnam people would see every night on the network news a casualty/death count and footage of plane loads of coffins coming home. And it enraged people.

there are many who agree with that policy, of bringing as many countries under US influence before the Chinese/Russians do. As I said in an earlier post, there are no good guys in the Middle East, none of their populations are well educated, well treated, prosperous, political/religious rivals are brutally killed etc etc

for me it's only the cost of American lives and the money being spent that is the concern and who is benefiting from the billions being spent.

[onwebcam]

I do find it rather convenient all this chemical weapon talk at the very same time Clinton is in the middle of (or just left from) a chemical weapon summit.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by DWB

Fool me once...

Hopefully their intel is a little better with Syria than it was with Iraq, but I'm not holding my breath. How could they possibly know Syria is *planning* on using chems on their own people? That is absurd. If they had solid intel like that they would be in there RIGHT NOW. That is, if they really cared about the people.

That said, everyone needs to watch that video posted above of General Wesley Clark. That is a real eye opener. You can argue with uninformed GFY idiots all day long, but none of you can argue facts with a four star general.

it's pretty easy to find videos of the 'rebels' using captured soldiers to delivery bombs

they tell the prisoners they're going to be 'set free' then put em in a truck etc

it's a war crime

there is lots of war crimes on the rebels side.. over and over

yet

[butter99]

The elite bankers in charge of the bucks are certainly benefiting.

Financing armed conflicts is Ideal, and the debt involved is even better.

[Joe Obenberger]

Chemical weapons are low tech, cheap, and easy to make. (Read the "final battle" chapter of Lucifer's Hammer showing how field expedient mustard gas can be made without equipment and delivered in mason jars with catapaults, any of the volumes of The Poor Man's James Bond by Saxton, or consider how much damage they did using the technology of 1914 or so in WWI).

This is not like building an atomic bomb. (Not all that hard either, just very expensive to do. They were first built using circa 1940, pre-transistsor, radio tube, pre-computer technology by theoretical specialists doing it for the first time, who did not know, to start, how much fissionable mass it took to go critical, how to initiate the first particles to start detonation, what geometry to use, what material to make a particle reflector with, how to place conventional explosives, how to time synchronous explosions, etc. They kept it pretty basic for the first one and it worked. A sawed off howitzer barrel and two hunks of fissionable uranium and a firing mechanism. That's all it took to kill more than 10,000 Hiroshima. The Nagasaki bomb used a Plutonium sphere, more complicated, and worked just hunky-dory, too. All that's been worked out and is known to every advanced physicist in the world; the difficulty is in getting enough ore, in having enough equipment working long enough to produce enough fissionable material in a reasonable time; if you have to make it from scratch, it takes the resources of a nation-state, but not necessarily a big or rich one. Israel, Pakistan, South Africa, and North Korea all pulled it off - and it's rumored that Israel stole its first quantity of fissionable Uranium)

The hard part is using them effectively without killing your own troops - storage and delivery issues. And that's a whole different issue.

In West Germany, during the 80's, we'd go on alert wearing those NBC suits for 24 hours and try to do our jobs. Not comfortable at all. Try connecting the canteen to a tube in your mask to get a drink. Or to read or see in general when the mask fogs up. Or to scratch an itch. I would not envy those Marines on alert off the coast right now in those temperatures.

If Syria wants them, it already has them. It's just not hard at all to do using commonly available chemicals and grade school science lab equipment.

[madm1k3]

Wow it always amazes me

After the USA lied to the entire world about Iraq and WMD's there are still some people who will believe this new lie.

Sorry but if you beleive this chemical weapons bullshit you are just stupid

On a side note.... notice how the believers are the same members who will come on here and complain about the size of government, government spending, taxes, etc yet somehow don't believe the military is government. must be nice to live in a dream world

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

Saddam said "we have chemical weapons".... none found.

Yeah, he sent them over to Syria...

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by wehateporn

First they're coming out with this line from the Theater of the Absurd that Assad is preparing to use chemical weapons on his own people, this is their pretext for invasion.

US ramps up threats in 'psychological' war on Assad
http://rt.com/news/syria-chemical-weapons-rebels-460/

And now we see the troops arriving near the Syrian shore.

Thousands of US troops arrive near Syrian shore on USS Eisenhower
http://rt.com/usa/news/us-eisenhower...-military-369/

"The USS Eisenhower, an American aircraft carrier that holds eight fighter bomber squadrons and 8,000 men, arrived at the Syrian coast yesterday in the midst of a heavy storm, indicating US preparation for a potential ground intervention."



As soon as Syria is done, then it's time for Iran

That's a trustworthy website for sure.

I don't think the US is going to invade. I think they are sending a very strong message, but that's about it.

I think the world has changed. People can easily see outside of their country and they see how the rest of the world lives. Propaganda no longer works, and now with the recent changes in the Middle East people know they can over throw their government.

I wonder how much involvement the US has here. Russia as well.

[_Richard_]

Originally Posted by Rochard

That's a trustworthy website for sure.

I don't think the US is going to invade. I think they are sending a very strong message, but that's about it.

I think the world has changed. People can easily see outside of their country and they see how the rest of the world lives. Propaganda no longer works, and now with the recent changes in the Middle East people know they can over throw their government.

I wonder how much involvement the US has here. Russia as well.

http://rt.com/usa/news/two-new-meningitis-outbreak-513/

this is reporting that there is two more drugs that are connected to this outbreak

if you can find any american newspaper stating the same, we can call RT an 'untrustworthy news source'

i can't.