It's OK to use poison gas - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-08-2013, 12:22 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VX_%28nerve_agent%29

Robbie · 09-08-2013, 12:23 PM

They have a pissant amount compared to the U.S. is what I said.

The U.S. has more chemical weapons than any country on Earth and we are one of only 13 countries that MAKE the stuff.

Google it up for yourself. That's what I did, and I was shocked.

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-08-2013, 12:29 PM

Inconsequential as a single weapon in the stratosphere is endless misery.

Barry-xlovecam · 09-08-2013, 01:36 PM

Gimme a break: You might be mistaking corruption for outright stupidity, " So we take out the responsible guy and then we have to worry about the chemical weapons falling into the "wrong hands"."

If Obama has fucked everything up so much why would you gamble on him stopping one man with a stolen chemical weapon?

All the intel and military power of the Western powers could not stop 15 knuckle-dragger terrorists on 9/11 or Assad from gassing his opponents with SARIN even 2 punk Chechen rejects from setting off a bomb this year at the Boston Marathon.

You got to admit that the CIA and NSA with all their bullshit have made some serious and fatal mistakes.

<|Red herring<

Robbie · 09-08-2013, 02:15 PM

I think you might be misunderstanding what I am saying...
I'm trying to say that we should have stayed out of it BECAUSE we fuck it up worse everytime.

Assad has never threatened any country with chemical weapons. But now that Syria is destabilized (and we are wanting to destabilize it FURTHER)...we are possibly looking at chemical weapons falling into the "wrong hands" and then being used against other countries in "terror" attacks.

If we had stayed out of it from the beginning...his govt. would have quelled the unrest 2 years ago. Instead we have fanned the flames and the fighting has gone on and on and now one of the two sides has used Sarin (probably Assad, but who knows?).

We should have learned this lesson by now. It NEVER turns out "good" when we stick our nose into other countries.

And of course...it's also illegal as hell according to international law.

The United Nations was established for a REASON.
It's not supposed to be easy to attack another country.

And after what happened with the Bush Admin and Iraq...and all the recent "whistle blowers" revealing what the United States govt. has been up to...it's pretty obvious that we are not being told the full story here.

I wouldn't put ANYTHING past the corrupt politicians in Washington D.C.

And I do NOT want to see my countries military bombing and killing the citizens of Syria.

Barry-xlovecam · 09-08-2013, 02:58 PM

Well: Be careful what you ask for you may just get it.

Quote:

[ WASHINGTON (AP) ]-- The White House asserted Sunday that a "common-sense test" dictates the Syrian government is responsible for a chemical weapons attack that President Barack Obama says demands a U.S. military response. But Obama's top aide says the administration lacks "irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence" that skeptical Americans, including lawmakers who will start voting on military action this week, are seeking.

"This is not a court of law. And intelligence does not work that way," White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said during his five-network public relations blitz Sunday to build support for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad....
http://www.wsvn.com/news/articles/po...ttack-lacking/

What if: The Assad regime loses control over 10kg of SARIN for example to a terrorist organization? Would you feel responsible for the result? Let's make if more personal -- what if the targets were 5 Las Vegas Casinos at a busy time of day and 1,550 die?

What if: Next time Assad really goes for the prize and exterminates a town of 40,000? Would you think that your hands are clean?
You can say it was meant to be but if you didn't try to prevent it at the source of the poison gas -- would you think that your hands are clean?

Robbie · 09-08-2013, 03:11 PM

Do I think my hands are clean?

I have NOTHING to do with any of this...so of course MY hands are clean of it.

As for the Federal Govt. of The United States...IF they bomb and kill hundreds more Syrian citizens then the Govt.'s hands are dirty. Not mine.

I'm not really sure where you are coming from on this. Are you bloodthirsty or something? That's sure what it sounds like. You sound like you just can't wait for the U.S. to get into ANOTHER war.

I'm telling you...this kind of thing has never worked out for the U.S. (or any other country). Imperialism and trying to run the world just does not work.

As I said earlier, if the U.S. hadn't been supporting the rebels from the beginning this whole thing would have ended 2 years ago with minimal bloodshed.

09-08-2013, 12:23 PM	#52
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,960	They have a pissant amount compared to the U.S. is what I said. The U.S. has more chemical weapons than any country on Earth and we are one of only 13 countries that MAKE the stuff. Google it up for yourself. That's what I did, and I was shocked. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

09-08-2013, 01:36 PM	#54
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Gimme a break: You might be mistaking corruption for outright stupidity, " So we take out the responsible guy and then we have to worry about the chemical weapons falling into the "wrong hands"." If Obama has fucked everything up so much why would you gamble on him stopping one man with a stolen chemical weapon? All the intel and military power of the Western powers could not stop 15 knuckle-dragger terrorists on 9/11 or Assad from gassing his opponents with SARIN even 2 punk Chechen rejects from setting off a bomb this year at the Boston Marathon. You got to admit that the CIA and NSA with all their bullshit have made some serious and fatal mistakes. <\|Red herring< Last edited by Barry-xlovecam; 09-08-2013 at 01:40 PM..

09-08-2013, 02:15 PM	#55
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,960	I think you might be misunderstanding what I am saying... I'm trying to say that we should have stayed out of it BECAUSE we fuck it up worse everytime. Assad has never threatened any country with chemical weapons. But now that Syria is destabilized (and we are wanting to destabilize it FURTHER)...we are possibly looking at chemical weapons falling into the "wrong hands" and then being used against other countries in "terror" attacks. If we had stayed out of it from the beginning...his govt. would have quelled the unrest 2 years ago. Instead we have fanned the flames and the fighting has gone on and on and now one of the two sides has used Sarin (probably Assad, but who knows?). We should have learned this lesson by now. It NEVER turns out "good" when we stick our nose into other countries. And of course...it's also illegal as hell according to international law. The United Nations was established for a REASON. It's not supposed to be easy to attack another country. And after what happened with the Bush Admin and Iraq...and all the recent "whistle blowers" revealing what the United States govt. has been up to...it's pretty obvious that we are not being told the full story here. I wouldn't put ANYTHING past the corrupt politicians in Washington D.C. And I do NOT want to see my countries military bombing and killing the citizens of Syria. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

09-08-2013, 03:11 PM	#57
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,960	Do I think my hands are clean? I have NOTHING to do with any of this...so of course MY hands are clean of it. As for the Federal Govt. of The United States...IF they bomb and kill hundreds more Syrian citizens then the Govt.'s hands are dirty. Not mine. I'm not really sure where you are coming from on this. Are you bloodthirsty or something? That's sure what it sounds like. You sound like you just can't wait for the U.S. to get into ANOTHER war. I'm telling you...this kind of thing has never worked out for the U.S. (or any other country). Imperialism and trying to run the world just does not work. As I said earlier, if the U.S. hadn't been supporting the rebels from the beginning this whole thing would have ended 2 years ago with minimal bloodshed. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

09-08-2013, 12:22 PM	#51
Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE Barterer Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 4,864	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VX_%28nerve_agent%29

09-08-2013, 12:29 PM	#53
Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE Barterer Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 4,864	Inconsequential as a single weapon in the stratosphere is endless misery.