Is the new Star Trek using Spock to carry Jewish heritage into space? - GoFuckYourself.com

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 05:20 AM

The one thing I have always loved about Star Trek is that it's about the future, when all men and women are joined together without the bullshit of racial restrictions, no poverty, no wars on Earth over petty bullshit land boundaries or religious wars killing people in the name of imaginary Gods from books written thousands of years ago....

Ahh, if we could only live as long to see those days, but most likely we'll kill ourselves off because we are a moron species.

O.k., back to my point....Yes, we all love Star Trek.

So why in the fuck does J.J. Abrams and the other 'powers that be' in Hollywood deem it necessary to give the new Spock a curly set of mini Jewish locks, where his side burns should be?

I know "the Jews" own Hollywood now, and most major actors are Jewish, even the new Spock is Jewish, (Zach Quinto) hey, no big deal, more power to them and it's none of my business.

But with that said, Do they have to push their religious customs into our beloved Star Trek??

There is no room for personal religious bullshit in sci fi and certainly it is not the place to be sneaking in Jewish symbols where they don't belong.

I'm not stating this to be some anti semitic jerk, but I think that personal religious beliefs should stay out of sci fi and it wasn't right what J.J. Abrams did to Spock and a few other characters.

I noticed Spock's sideburns first. Towards the bottom of his sideburns, the hair is curled and not growing out of his face like a regular sideburn would, but rather long hair curled down, which is in the tradition of Hasidic Jews. At first I thought they were trying to have a new look with the actors, or maybe a new look for the Vulcans, but then I noticed a few select actors have the new "locks" and it was not a uniform new look for all the men in Star Trek.

Spock, Dr. McCoy, Chekov all have the little curly side burns.

Capt. Kirk, Sulu and Scotty have side burns growing out of their faces.

The Torah says, "You shall not round off the peyos of your head" (Leviticus 19:27). The word peyos refers to sideburns -- i.e. the hair in front of the ears that extends to underneath the cheekbone which is level with the nose (Talmud - Makkot 20a). The Talmud explains that this law only applies to men, not to women.

The only men that curl their side burns in that fashion are Hasidic Jews.

New Spock & McCoy both have full bearded shadows and can grow regular sideburns, but didn't. Why? What type of statement is J.J. really trying to make? It wasn't an accident. Make up and costume artists are meticulous in detail, especially in multi million dollar films, so this wasn't 'by chance.'

So why didn't Captain Kirk, Scotty or Sulu have the curly locks?

Now when I see the new Star Trek movies I keep getting distracted by the Jewish implications and the 'not so subtle' message J.J. and the other producers are making with our beloved Star Trek.

I just hope he doesn't slip a few menorahs into Star Wars.

fitzmulti · 07-01-2014, 05:26 AM

That's odd, I only get distracted by:

and:

sperbonzo · 07-01-2014, 05:34 AM

Really??? You somehow see that as a hasidic haircut??

You better watch out for those Jewish bogeymen living under your bed.... They're gonna GET YA!!!!

.

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 05:39 AM

I hope he doesn't fuck with Star Wars. J.J. just cast his dad in it, and Carrie Fisher's lame ass daughter, who has no acting experience at all, and will play a young Princess Leia in flashbacks??? Oh Fuck. I hope he doesn't ruin Star Wars... that's Lucas' job. (to ruin it)

michael.kickass · 07-01-2014, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldPlayer

PR_Glen · 07-01-2014, 05:49 AM

is that really what you see when you see this picture? that's pretty messed up man...

MrBottomTooth · 07-01-2014, 05:52 AM

Lol at a religion that tells you how you should cut your hair. As if a "god" would care about the style of your sideburns. What a joke. Baffling how anyone takes religion seriously.

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Really??? You somehow see that as a hasidic haircut??
.

Not a hasidic haircut.

It is intentional in his appearance, that's why it struck me as an obvious Jewish indication.

They aren't even side burns. Side burns grow from the face. He is wearing an homage to hasidic jews. It was clearly intentional.

Star Trek has Jewish actors, producers, director, film studio CEO's, the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. It's clearly an homage and or a direct statement that was supported by the Director and all producers. A small silent statement.

Had all the men in Star Trek worn their sideburns like that, then, I would think it was a change in fashion and a new look for the men in the movie. However, because only a few select men (main actors) wore their sideburns like this, it's an obvious conclusion. Otherwise, there is no reason at all for this special unique look, for just a few. It's not logical.

I"m not condemning it. I'm just saying it doesn't belong in Star Trek. Goes against the grain of what Star Trek is all about.

Grapesoda · 07-01-2014, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth

Lol at a religion that tells you how you should cut your hair. As if a "god" would care about the style of your sideburns. What a joke. Baffling how anyone takes religion seriously.

you kidding right? god tells me how to cut my hair every week

MrBottomTooth · 07-01-2014, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

you kidding right? god tells me how to cut my hair every week

When and where does he tell you? I do occasionally hear a voice in my sleep that says "grow the mullet." Maybe it has been god this whole time and I just haven't realized it.

sperbonzo · 07-01-2014, 06:37 AM

And did you notice those "black power" afro's in "Star Trek the Motion Picture"?

Those Jews are soooo sneaky, the way they get these subtle socio-political messages in with those crafty haircuts. Good thing we have fine citizens such as yourself to save us from the creeping jewish menace! Our hero!!!

.

signupdamnit · 07-01-2014, 08:19 AM

I was with you a little bit at first as I was expecting to see full on locks or something but then when I saw the picture it was "eh?". You must be kidding.

Rochard · 07-01-2014, 08:38 AM

So Jews shouldn't go to outer space?

fitzmulti · 07-01-2014, 09:43 AM

Of course, then there is this, not that there is anything wrong with that:

Aug 19 is Jewish Heritage Night! Enjoy a ticket, FREE parking, & an A's Jewish Heritage hat:

http://oakland.athletics.mlb.com/oak/schedule/group_events.jsp?content=jewish&partnerId=as_oak_2 0140701_26547846

*Note: I didn't capitalize "FREE", the article did.

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

And did you notice those "black power" afro's in "Star Trek the Motion Picture"?

Those Jews are soooo sneaky, the way they get these subtle socio-political messages in with those crafty haircuts. Good thing we have fine citizens such as yourself to save us from the creeping jewish menace! Our hero!!!

.

your comparison doesn't make sense. A 'natural' hair style worn by a black woman is her own personal choice of style or she is following the trend at the time. The 'locks' worn by Spock, (and the Dr. and Chekov) are clearly religious in nature because there has never been a 'style' in which sideburns are worn like that and that particular style is clearly religious, representing hasedic jews.

The photo isn't that great, but when you see the movie there are many close up shots of his locks, as well as the other select actors.

Personal religion doesn't belong in Star Trek.

Hard to find a pic of Spock facing the camera, because most pics want to show off his ears. When you see a close up Spock facing the camera, you will notice the 'curl' in his side locks, tweaked with hair gel.

Take a look next time you see the movie. It's pretty obvious.

bronco67 · 07-01-2014, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldPlayer

The one thing I have always loved about Star Trek is that it's about the future, when all men and women are joined together without the bullshit of racial restrictions, no poverty, no wars on Earth over petty bullshit land boundaries or religious wars killing people in the name of imaginary Gods from books written thousands of years ago....

Ahh, if we could only live as long to see those days, but most likely we'll kill ourselves off because we are a moron species.

O.k., back to my point....Yes, we all love Star Trek.

So why in the fuck does J.J. Abrams and the other 'powers that be' in Hollywood deem it necessary to give the new Spock a curly set of mini Jewish locks, where his side burns should be?

I know "the Jews" own Hollywood now, and most major actors are Jewish, even the new Spock is Jewish, (Zach Quinto) hey, no big deal, more power to them and it's none of my business.

But with that said, Do they have to push their religious customs into our beloved Star Trek??

There is no room for personal religious bullshit in sci fi and certainly it is not the place to be sneaking in Jewish symbols where they don't belong.

I'm not stating this to be some anti semitic jerk, but I think that personal religious beliefs should stay out of sci fi and it wasn't right what J.J. Abrams did to Spock and a few other characters.

I noticed Spock's sideburns first. Towards the bottom of his sideburns, the hair is curled and not growing out of his face like a regular sideburn would, but rather long hair curled down, which is in the tradition of Hasidic Jews. At first I thought they were trying to have a new look with the actors, or maybe a new look for the Vulcans, but then I noticed a few select actors have the new "locks" and it was not a uniform new look for all the men in Star Trek.

Spock, Dr. McCoy, Chekov all have the little curly side burns.

Capt. Kirk, Sulu and Scotty have side burns growing out of their faces.

The Torah says, "You shall not round off the peyos of your head" (Leviticus 19:27). The word peyos refers to sideburns -- i.e. the hair in front of the ears that extends to underneath the cheekbone which is level with the nose (Talmud - Makkot 20a). The Talmud explains that this law only applies to men, not to women.

The only men that curl their side burns in that fashion are Hasidic Jews.

New Spock & McCoy both have full bearded shadows and can grow regular sideburns, but didn't. Why? What type of statement is J.J. really trying to make? It wasn't an accident. Make up and costume artists are meticulous in detail, especially in multi million dollar films, so this wasn't 'by chance.'

So why didn't Captain Kirk, Scotty or Sulu have the curly locks?

Now when I see the new Star Trek movies I keep getting distracted by the Jewish implications and the 'not so subtle' message J.J. and the other producers are making with our beloved Star Trek.

I just hope he doesn't slip a few menorahs into Star Wars.

Even dumber than I could have imagined.

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 05:42 PM

better view of the elevated locks from the same pic.

It's really had to see it at this angle, he has to face the camera. They pop out and our twisted.

You can see his left ear is hidden, but you can see the side burn popping out, because it is a lock and not growing from his face.

dyna mo · 07-01-2014, 05:49 PM

fuck, it worked, I got a hankering for bagel!

Major (Tom) · 07-01-2014, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldPlayer

The one thing I have always loved about Star Trek is that it's about the future, when all men and women are joined together without the bullshit of racial restrictions, no poverty, no wars on Earth over petty bullshit land boundaries or religious wars killing people in the name of imaginary Gods from books written thousands of years ago....

Ahh, if we could only live as long to see those days, but most likely we'll kill ourselves off because we are a moron species.

O.k., back to my point....Yes, we all love Star Trek.

So why in the fuck does J.J. Abrams and the other 'powers that be' in Hollywood deem it necessary to give the new Spock a curly set of mini Jewish locks, where his side burns should be?

I know "the Jews" own Hollywood now, and most major actors are Jewish, even the new Spock is Jewish, (Zach Quinto) hey, no big deal, more power to them and it's none of my business.

But with that said, Do they have to push their religious customs into our beloved Star Trek??

There is no room for personal religious bullshit in sci fi and certainly it is not the place to be sneaking in Jewish symbols where they don't belong.

I'm not stating this to be some anti semitic jerk, but I think that personal religious beliefs should stay out of sci fi and it wasn't right what J.J. Abrams did to Spock and a few other characters.

I noticed Spock's sideburns first. Towards the bottom of his sideburns, the hair is curled and not growing out of his face like a regular sideburn would, but rather long hair curled down, which is in the tradition of Hasidic Jews. At first I thought they were trying to have a new look with the actors, or maybe a new look for the Vulcans, but then I noticed a few select actors have the new "locks" and it was not a uniform new look for all the men in Star Trek.

Spock, Dr. McCoy, Chekov all have the little curly side burns.

Capt. Kirk, Sulu and Scotty have side burns growing out of their faces.

The Torah says, "You shall not round off the peyos of your head" (Leviticus 19:27). The word peyos refers to sideburns -- i.e. the hair in front of the ears that extends to underneath the cheekbone which is level with the nose (Talmud - Makkot 20a). The Talmud explains that this law only applies to men, not to women.

The only men that curl their side burns in that fashion are Hasidic Jews.

New Spock & McCoy both have full bearded shadows and can grow regular sideburns, but didn't. Why? What type of statement is J.J. really trying to make? It wasn't an accident. Make up and costume artists are meticulous in detail, especially in multi million dollar films, so this wasn't 'by chance.'

So why didn't Captain Kirk, Scotty or Sulu have the curly locks?

Now when I see the new Star Trek movies I keep getting distracted by the Jewish implications and the 'not so subtle' message J.J. and the other producers are making with our beloved Star Trek.

I just hope he doesn't slip a few menorahs into Star Wars.

I dont see it man.
ds

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

I dont see it man.
ds

sideburns grow out of the skin. You can't see the curl at the end of his sideburn?

Please. Watch the film and see for yourself.

BTW, I'm not bashing Jews here, I'm just pointing out that religion has now tainted a great sci fi film for no other reason than somebody's personal beliefs. It's a clear comment made by the production that really should not have been made. Yes, we get the fact that Jews own Hollywood and own this film. That's fine with me. Just leave the homage out of the film please.

Major (Tom) · 07-01-2014, 06:05 PM

plus not to mention, there is already the ferengi https://youtube.com/watch?v=PvFYBkesqGU

dyna mo · 07-01-2014, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldPlayer

tainted a great sci fi film

Certainly you are not referring to the last ST flick as a great sci-fi film?

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Certainly you are not referring to the last ST flick as a great sci-fi film?

no, the first one. That 2nd ST sucked ass beyond sucking ass.

The script was beyond horrible. With all the money and talent they have, they can't come up with a NEW script??? They have to mutilate the Wrath of Khan and pat themselves on the back? Horrible film, just horrible. Meaningless death of Kirk, and Spock tearing up already??? Fuck, he just met Kirk. Took the real Spock years to losen up, but this new one is an emotional sack of shit. They turned all the characters into action heroes jumping off cliffs and acting like Marvel comic super heroes. My favorite was at the ending when they had Lt. Uhura beamed down to help Spock beat up Khan. No more security officers left? so they beam down a communications female officer? And that ending??? Gag! Cut to black...ohh.... and then... Kirk is alive! wow! how smart and clever. It was the tribbles!! hooray!!! Morons. The writers just gave up and didn't know how to end it, but they think the audience is dumb and will love anything they make.

Now that Star Trek Sucks, J.J. has jumped ship and ran over to Star Wars. I swear if he films Star Wars like he did Star Trek and shakes the camera every 3 fucking seconds I will scream!!

Of course he has to shake the camera every 3 seconds during ST to keep your mind off the fact that you are watching a piece of shit.

I hope Lucas and J.J. came up with a decent script for Star Wars. The brain needs more than just lasers and a shakey camera.

AmeliaG · 07-01-2014, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldPlayer

snip

blah blah blah anti-semitic drivel blah blah blah hate-mongering blah blah blah

end snip

(1) WTF. I thought I already had you on ignore.

(2) Zach Quinto is not Jewish.

(3) That does not look remotely Hasidic.

(4) When the original Star Trek series came out, it was more common for men to use products like Vitalis in their hair. It would be weird to have someone's hair that slicked down with modern hair product technology. You are freaking out like a junior high school girl over a fractional difference in hairstyle.

(5) Yes, you obviously did mean what you posted as anti-semitic. Or, to be more specific, what you posted shows you are an anti-semite, even if you thought you were trying to do an awesome job of hiding it.

pornmasta · 07-01-2014, 09:09 PM

star trek wants to reach the stars

pornmasta · 07-01-2014, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldPlayer

.

2MuchMark · 07-01-2014, 10:34 PM

I'm going to go out on a limb here, and guess that you completely missed the entire point of Star Trek.

pornmasta · 07-01-2014, 10:35 PM

guess the religion

NewOldPlayer · 07-01-2014, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

(1) WTF. I thought I already had you on ignore.

(2) Zach Quinto is not Jewish.

(3) That does not look remotely Hasidic.

(4) When the original Star Trek series came out, it was more common for men to use products like Vitalis in their hair. It would be weird to have someone's hair that slicked down with modern hair product technology. You are freaking out like a junior high school girl over a fractional difference in hairstyle.

(5) Yes, you obviously did mean what you posted as anti-semitic. Or, to be more specific, what you posted shows you are an anti-semite, even if you thought you were trying to do an awesome job of hiding it.

1) You love responding to my posts because you are a lonely middle aged woman that uses an 8 year old self pic for your avatar and you love causing trouble to get attention because you haven't had an orgasm without a battery operated toy for over 10 years because you hate men.

2) OK, so even if he's not Jewish, the post is about his Jewish locks created by the production of Star Trek.

3) That's your opinion. I have 2 good eyes and know the difference between locks and real sideburns.

4) Has nothing to do with anything I'm was writing about. Go make your brilliant observations in the "Why am I so premenopausal at age 43?" post.

5) You don't even know the definition of being racist or anti semitic. I am writing about the relationship between hair locks on an actor relating to religion. It's an opinion. I have the right to voice a simple opinion even if you don't like it. Stop throwing around big words you don't understand. Blow your white trash comments out of your dried up cunt and stop causing trouble. It's people like you that start religious fights by bending words and opinions.

AmeliaG · 07-02-2014, 12:04 AM

Looks like it was the anti-semitic whiny guy's other whiny bigot nick ShowMe69 that I had on ignore. My bad. All fixed.

I wish GFY would get the functionality where we didn't have to see thread titles started by people we have on ignore either. I wonder if vB has a plug-in for that.

AmeliaG · 07-02-2014, 12:09 AM

Hmm, no recollection of why PornoStar69 is also on my ignore list, but it looks like similar nick punctuation. Guess the guy makes a hobby out of being anonymous and irritating at the same time.

Ah well, I suppose the point of ignore is to ignore, so I'm out now.

DerekMister33 · 07-03-2014, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta

star trek wants to reach the stars

07-01-2014, 05:20 AM	#1
NewOldPlayer So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 467	Is the new Star Trek using Spock to carry Jewish heritage into space? The one thing I have always loved about Star Trek is that it's about the future, when all men and women are joined together without the bullshit of racial restrictions, no poverty, no wars on Earth over petty bullshit land boundaries or religious wars killing people in the name of imaginary Gods from books written thousands of years ago.... Ahh, if we could only live as long to see those days, but most likely we'll kill ourselves off because we are a moron species. O.k., back to my point....Yes, we all love Star Trek. So why in the fuck does J.J. Abrams and the other 'powers that be' in Hollywood deem it necessary to give the new Spock a curly set of mini Jewish locks, where his side burns should be? I know "the Jews" own Hollywood now, and most major actors are Jewish, even the new Spock is Jewish, (Zach Quinto) hey, no big deal, more power to them and it's none of my business. But with that said, Do they have to push their religious customs into our beloved Star Trek?? There is no room for personal religious bullshit in sci fi and certainly it is not the place to be sneaking in Jewish symbols where they don't belong. I'm not stating this to be some anti semitic jerk, but I think that personal religious beliefs should stay out of sci fi and it wasn't right what J.J. Abrams did to Spock and a few other characters. I noticed Spock's sideburns first. Towards the bottom of his sideburns, the hair is curled and not growing out of his face like a regular sideburn would, but rather long hair curled down, which is in the tradition of Hasidic Jews. At first I thought they were trying to have a new look with the actors, or maybe a new look for the Vulcans, but then I noticed a few select actors have the new "locks" and it was not a uniform new look for all the men in Star Trek. Spock, Dr. McCoy, Chekov all have the little curly side burns. Capt. Kirk, Sulu and Scotty have side burns growing out of their faces. The Torah says, "You shall not round off the peyos of your head" (Leviticus 19:27). The word peyos refers to sideburns -- i.e. the hair in front of the ears that extends to underneath the cheekbone which is level with the nose (Talmud - Makkot 20a). The Talmud explains that this law only applies to men, not to women. The only men that curl their side burns in that fashion are Hasidic Jews. New Spock & McCoy both have full bearded shadows and can grow regular sideburns, but didn't. Why? What type of statement is J.J. really trying to make? It wasn't an accident. Make up and costume artists are meticulous in detail, especially in multi million dollar films, so this wasn't 'by chance.' So why didn't Captain Kirk, Scotty or Sulu have the curly locks? Now when I see the new Star Trek movies I keep getting distracted by the Jewish implications and the 'not so subtle' message J.J. and the other producers are making with our beloved Star Trek. I just hope he doesn't slip a few menorahs into Star Wars. Last edited by NewOldPlayer; 07-01-2014 at 05:32 AM..

07-01-2014, 05:26 AM	#2
fitzmulti I Like Depth Of Field! Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA: 36.12318 N, 115.090219 W Posts: 14,861	That's odd, I only get distracted by: and: __________________ www.SexyGirlsCash.com CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM // {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

07-01-2014, 05:34 AM	#3
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,743	Really??? You somehow see that as a hasidic haircut?? You better watch out for those Jewish bogeymen living under your bed.... They're gonna GET YA!!!! . __________________ Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/ ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

07-01-2014, 05:49 AM	#6
PR_Glen Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 9,058	is that really what you see when you see this picture? that's pretty messed up man... __________________ webmaster at pimproll dot com

07-01-2014, 05:52 AM	#7
MrBottomTooth Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,795	Lol at a religion that tells you how you should cut your hair. As if a "god" would care about the style of your sideburns. What a joke. Baffling how anyone takes religion seriously. __________________ Get Paid Per Email Like The WEGCASH Days!!!!

07-01-2014, 05:39 AM	#4
NewOldPlayer So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 467	I hope he doesn't fuck with Star Wars. J.J. just cast his dad in it, and Carrie Fisher's lame ass daughter, who has no acting experience at all, and will play a young Princess Leia in flashbacks??? Oh Fuck. I hope he doesn't ruin Star Wars... that's Lucas' job. (to ruin it)

07-01-2014, 06:37 AM	#11
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,743	And did you notice those "black power" afro's in "Star Trek the Motion Picture"? Those Jews are soooo sneaky, the way they get these subtle socio-political messages in with those crafty haircuts. Good thing we have fine citizens such as yourself to save us from the creeping jewish menace! Our hero!!! . __________________ Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/ ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

07-01-2014, 08:19 AM	#12
signupdamnit Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 6,697	I was with you a little bit at first as I was expecting to see full on locks or something but then when I saw the picture it was "eh?". You must be kidding. __________________ You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.

07-01-2014, 08:38 AM	#13
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 72,947	So Jews shouldn't go to outer space? __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

07-01-2014, 09:43 AM	#14
fitzmulti I Like Depth Of Field! Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA: 36.12318 N, 115.090219 W Posts: 14,861	Of course, then there is this, not that there is anything wrong with that: Aug 19 is Jewish Heritage Night! Enjoy a ticket, FREE parking, & an A's Jewish Heritage hat: http://oakland.athletics.mlb.com/oak/schedule/group_events.jsp?content=jewish&partnerId=as_oak_2 0140701_26547846 Note: I didn't capitalize "FREE", the article did. __________________ www.SexyGirlsCash.com* CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM // {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

07-01-2014, 05:42 PM	#17
NewOldPlayer So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 467	better view of the elevated locks from the same pic. It's really had to see it at this angle, he has to face the camera. They pop out and our twisted. You can see his left ear is hidden, but you can see the side burn popping out, because it is a lock and not growing from his face. Last edited by NewOldPlayer; 07-01-2014 at 05:46 PM..

07-01-2014, 05:49 PM	#18
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,914	fuck, it worked, I got a hankering for bagel!

07-01-2014, 06:05 PM	#21
Major (Tom) Anti Communist Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 29,770	plus not to mention, there is already the ferengi https://youtube.com/watch?v=PvFYBkesqGU

07-01-2014, 09:09 PM	#25
pornmasta Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 18,963	star trek wants to reach the stars

07-01-2014, 10:34 PM	#27
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,567	I'm going to go out on a limb here, and guess that you completely missed the entire point of Star Trek. __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

07-01-2014, 10:35 PM	#28
pornmasta Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 18,963	guess the religion

07-02-2014, 12:04 AM	#30
AmeliaG Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 10,530	Looks like it was the anti-semitic whiny guy's other whiny bigot nick ShowMe69 that I had on ignore. My bad. All fixed. I wish GFY would get the functionality where we didn't have to see thread titles started by people we have on ignore either. I wonder if vB has a plug-in for that. __________________ GFY Hall of Famer AltStar Hall of Famer Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com Babe photography portfolio

07-02-2014, 12:09 AM	#31
AmeliaG Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 10,530	Hmm, no recollection of why PornoStar69 is also on my ignore list, but it looks like similar nick punctuation. Guess the guy makes a hobby out of being anonymous and irritating at the same time. Ah well, I suppose the point of ignore is to ignore, so I'm out now. __________________ GFY Hall of Famer AltStar Hall of Famer Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com Babe photography portfolio