![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Keystone XL pipeline debate is a joke!
Everyone knows it is a good thing. Except for Warren Buffet who owns the railroad that currently ships that oil. Since he is a huge supporter of Obama, Obama keeps saying he will veto any bill and the Democrats are supporting him.
Billionaire gets his way and the US loses out on tons of jobs, revenue, etc. WTG Buffet and Obama! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: FL - TN/NC
Posts: 5,211
|
Yep, ship that dirty oil through our country.
Those are the kind of jobs we need. What about jobs after the pipe is built? When does the pipeline get removed? Who pays for that? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Quote:
Why would we remove it? and the answer is the owner of the pipeline. Shipping it by rail is a better idea? Environmentalists are agreeing that this is happening and going to happen, the only question is where and how. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: FL - TN/NC
Posts: 5,211
|
Quote:
Look at other pipelines in the US that have been abandoned and what has happened to the land owners whose families owned the land before, during and after the functional life of a pipeline. The companies that put them in doesn't just rip them up and clean up the mess. If we burn all the oil that is in the ground in North America alone, we will blow past the urgent tipping point of carbon 4 TIMES what conservative estimates are. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Quote:
"But the State Department concluded in a highly anticipated environmental analysis released in January that the pipeline?s contribution to greenhouse gases would be minimal, since the oil would find a way to market with or without the project." It produces 17% more greenhouse gases then normal oil. Why not capture some of the economics of that? |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
i think the biggest part is it would be pipeline through the Bakken and could be used to ship that oil out instead of by rail.
Edit: nope other pipeline is proposed for that and wow also being held up. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
It's 42
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
|
Why dnon't they just use/or add capacity of the existing northern route -- looks like it is near the Williston Basin where there is USA produced oil ...
The southern extension make sense to Houston and Port Aurther. Analysis: $1B in subsidies for Keystone XL refiners | Midwest Energy News ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: FL - TN/NC
Posts: 5,211
|
With an extra 34% taxes to go to alternate energy on this dirty oil I am fine with that.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 212
|
I don't understand how people think shipping it or railing it is better for the environment because the reality is that oil will get there just a matter of how. Here's a list of just a few things oil is used to make, its not just gas.
Clothes Toothbrushes Ice Chests CD's & DVD's Paint Brushes Detergents Vaporizers Balloons Sun Glasses Tents Heart Valves Crayons Parachutes Telephones Floor Wax Ballpoint Pens Football Cleats Upholstery Sweaters Bicycle Tires Nail Polish Fishing lures Tires Golf Bags Perfumes Dishwasher parts Tool Boxes Shoe Polish Motorcycle Helmets Caulking Petroleum Jelly Transparent Tape Ipods Faucet Washers Antiseptics Food Preservatives Basketballs Soap Vitamin Capsules Antihistamines Purses Shoes Dashboards Cortisone Deodorant Footballs Putty Dyes Panty Hose Refrigerant Percolators Life Jackets Skis TV Cabinets Shag Rugs Electrician's Tape Epoxy Paint Mops Insect Repellent Umbrellas Yarn Fertilizers Hair Coloring Roofing Toilet Seats Fishing Rods Lipstick Denture Adhesive Linoleum Ice Cube Trays Synthetic Rubber Speakers Plastic Wood Electric Blankets Glycerin Tennis Rackets Rubber Cement Fishing Boots Dice Nylon Rope Candles Trash Bags House Paint Water Pipes Hand Lotion Roller Skates Surf Boards Shampoo Wheels Paint Rollers Shower Curtains Guitar Strings Luggage Aspirin Safety Glasses Antifreeze Football Helmets Awnings Eyeglasses Enamel Pillows Dishes Cameras Anesthetics Artificial Turf Artificial limbs Bandages Dentures Model Cars Folding Doors Hair Curlers Cold cream Movie film Soft Contact lenses Drinking Cups Fan Belts Car Enamel Shaving Cream Ammonia Refrigerators Golf Balls Toothpaste and of course Gasoline. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: FL - TN/NC
Posts: 5,211
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Quote:
Same with the bakken oil. This is a dumb argument. It is being pumped, refined and used. The question is how to transport it. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
|
Republicans want this so badly because it's going to make some their friends very rich.
It's not creating many long term jobs. It's a pork project that will put money in a few people's pocket, destroy some land and keep us relying on fossil fuels longer. You can bet if conservatives want something, it sucks ass and only benefits them. When have they ever wanted to do something that helps anyone?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
in a van by the river
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
|
Why can't can't Canadians just refine it them selves? The simple fact is they just want to pump it across the US to then sell it on the open market. It's not like the oil will be refined and used in the US. Meaning we get next to no benefit in the US for that pipeline, yet we carry all the risk of spills and cleanups with no real benifit.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Jägermeister Test Pilot
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,814
|
I am on the fence about this but I am siding with "let them build it".
It will create a fair amount of short term construction jobs, and of course any jobs are good for the economy. Discussions about the environmental impact are silly. People don't know this, but early all gas / oil isn't shipped via truck, but by pipeline. For example, gas in Phoenix is really made in California and shipped by pipeline. When the pipeline broke one year, it caused a huge gas shortage. But the environmental impact was nil - when the pipeline broke, it broke and they fixed it; It didn't dump millions of barrels anywhere. These pipelines criss-cross the United States and it's not an environmental issue at all. If Canada needs to refine it's oil.... Why wouldn't it just send it to Minnesota, which is one of the top five states for refining oil? Make no mistake about it - this is not about refining oil, it's about transporting it. They are going to pass this oil through the United States and sell it elsewhere. If that's not enough... It seems most of the pipeline is already built and in place and running. So... - More jobs - More money in the US (to maintain and run the pipeline, then to refine it) - More money in taxes - Zero to little environmental impact Just build it already.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||||||||||
Videochat Solutions
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 48,537
|
Yeah, except it's not.
It's being sold to Americans as a job creator but its not. The truth is that it creates a few temporary jobs as it sells you guys extremely dirty and extremely dangerous energy from CANADA. Not even Canadians outside of the industry are behind this fiasco. Every smart person here hopes president Obama veto's this fucking thing. No, but this is the dirtiest of the dirt. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Because it is cheaper and safer to be have this garbage refined in your country. (Sorry, just sayin') Quote:
Quote:
No my friend, this is really different. The pipe isn't transporting regular oil or natural gas. Pollution from tar sands oil greatly eclipses that of conventional oil. During tar sands oil production alone, levels of carbon dioxide emissions are three to four times higher than those of conventional oil, due to more energy-intensive extraction and refining processes. The Keystone XL pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels of dirty tar sands oil into the United States daily, and result in climate-damaging emissions equal to adding more than 5.6 million new cars to U.S. road. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I bet you $100 that the oil companies refining this crap get tax exceptions. I wish, but no... this is is another fuck-you to the environment I'm sure. I'd bet you but I'd hate to win this one. Nooo!!! Just kill it already. No one needs it. Why does the US need to buy more energy when you are already producing so much? Currently, we have an extreme excess of this shit that we don't know what to do with. Canada sold the US on this crap with a really sweet deal that will be "refined" and marked-up like crazy to consumers while fat cats grin. Why not sell your own energy instead? No - the XL Pipeline is some greedy SOB's plan to make more money with a dirt-cheap, and very dirty product. Say No to the XL Pipeline.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,740
|
Normally I am all for this sort of thing, but tar sands oil is where we as a race need to figure out that sometimes you have to go in a different direction. Buffet wins here, but so do the oil billionaires. They win no matter what. Oil sands is a stupid way to get oil. Do that when all else fails.
__________________
![]() ![]() * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: FL - TN/NC
Posts: 5,211
|
There is your answer.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Quote:
It will create short term jobs and long term revenue for the leaseholders of the land or one time payments or whatever. Pipeline spills are less common and usually smaller then tanker spills etc. So they dig a trench down through the least populated part of the US. This is a good thing for everyone. We are not going to stop using oil. We can wait for them to build their own refinery. Their own pipeline. Their own system but as a country we do need jobs and infrastructure. I bet some advertising company gets a royalty every time someone types "dirty oil." |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
|
Quote:
Stopping the pipeline is not stopping the mining and refining of this oil. It keeps us/them doing it in an inefficient manner. And benefits billionaires. It is just different billionaires. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |