Fake moon landing .. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Pete · 01-17-2017, 04:07 AM

Aliens don't allow humans on the moon. Everyone knows that

XXXtrailers · 01-17-2017, 04:08 AM

In Moon Landing We Trust!

Paul Markham · 01-17-2017, 04:09 AM

Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time.

Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station.

Pete · 01-17-2017, 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time.

Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station.

I always wondered why they didn't build a space station on the moon in some kind of bunker rather than in space.

wehateporn · 01-17-2017, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick

And the Russians never disputed that the moon landing were genuine ?

Funny that.

So the various space walks and crafts launched by the Russians, was that all faked by them ?

Or is that piece of the Space race genuine ?

What about the various dogs, monkeys, mice and bullfrogs that have apparently been in orbit ?

All bullshit ???

Or is that true ?

It's relatively simple to get into orbit, but it's not simple to send people on a 500,000 mile trip through space, land half way and then get back again. If they could do that in the 60's then in 2017 there would be day-trips available for tourists

NewNick · 01-17-2017, 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

It's relatively simple to get into orbit, but it's not simple to send people on a 500,000 mile trip through space,

Relatively simple to get into orbit ? Fucking nonsense.

Getting in and out of the Earths atmosphere and gravitational pull is the difficult bit.

Take off and re entry is what takes the real engineering and technological difficulty.

Sailing across the empty bit in between is the easy bit.

Idiot.

wehateporn · 01-17-2017, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick

Relatively simple to get into orbit ? Fucking nonsense.

Getting in and out of the Earths atmosphere and gravitational pull is the difficult bit.

Take off and re entry is what takes the real engineering and technological difficulty.

Sailing across the empty bit in between is the easy bit.

Idiot.

Relatively simple compared to sending a man to the moon and bringing them back alive, yes, that's why the Russians put a man in space in 1961, yet even with exponential technology improvements, over 50 years later no one has been able to send a man to the moon

just a punk · 01-17-2017, 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Do you have any links to proof the moon landing was real, or is there no proof ( i.e. lunar rocks, lunar soil, our equipment on the moon, our foot tracks on the moon )?

It was German Moon program, not yours. Everything was done by Nazi genius Wernher Von Braun and his team. The US astronauts were used just like...

Plus your money of course. Wernher Von Braun has died and the Moon program has died too. Now the States can't send even a banana into the outer space.

Bladewire · 01-17-2017, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

It's relatively simple to get into orbit, but it's not simple to send people on a 500,000 mile trip through space, land half way and then get back again. If they could do that in the 60's then in 2017 there would be day-trips available for tourists

Day trips? It takes 3 days to get to the moon! Leaving and re-entering the atmosphere is not easy, and it's taxing on hardware.

The moons days last 13 days and temperatures reach 123C the nights are -153C. No water source. The list goes on.

Its not like a day trip to the desert. It's like 3 days of risking your life to reach the desert and 3 days risking your life to get back to earth.

You have a limited pool of space tourist wanting to visit the atmosphere let alone risk there life to visit a cold hot dusty rock by leaving & re-entering the atmosphere.

CaptainHowdy · 01-17-2017, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete

Aliens don't allow humans on the moon. Everyone knows that

DownThePoole · 01-17-2017, 08:09 AM

There were so many people involved in this operation, it's not possible that all of them were involved in such a lie and never came out with the truth.

2MuchMark · 01-17-2017, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time.

Top Ten Scientific Discoveries Made During Apollo Exploration of the Moon

https://airandspace.si.edu/explore-a...pollo-results/

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station.

"To boldly go where no man has gone before" doesn't tug your heartstrings I guess...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete

I always wondered why they didn't build a space station on the moon in some kind of bunker rather than in space.

There are many reasons. The technology didn't exist (and still doesn't). But even if you could, you need energy, food, water and other resources to keep people alive. It is too expensive to bring food and water to the moon so food would have to be grown there, and water would have to be found there (which they recently did). Besides keeping everyone alive, the low gravity would cause bones and muscle mass to turn to mush. Then there's problems due to radiation, living in a closed environment and other things that need to be addressed.

I'm all for a Moonbase Alpha type place, but it's a really big deal...

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Relatively simple compared to sending a man to the moon and bringing them back alive, yes, that's why the Russians put a man in space in 1961, yet even with exponential technology improvements, over 50 years later no one has been able to send a man to the moon

No, NewNick is right. The hardest part is leaving the earth, and returning. Leaving the earth requires a shit-ton of energy and fuel. Once in orbit, a few seconds of energy is only needed to push the capsule out of orbit and towards the moon. The ship uses almost no fuel during the trip, and the stresses on the ship are much less. Of course there are all kinds of other things to worry about during the trip, but I think its less than escape and re entry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Having worked at Launch Complex 39 at KSC for more than a few years I ...

No. fucking. way. Did you really??!? really really? Wow!

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Even Kubrick left messages that he filmed it

(For those who don't know, this is a documentary called "Room 237" about "The Shining" movie).

When I first heard about this movie I really wanted to see it. If you like the movie The Shining, its great. It contains all kinds of interesting ideas about the movie, its references, filming techniques, etc.

But the guy who made this movie is also a quack. He thinks continuity errors are on screen on purposes, and, he thinks the movie contains a hidden message claiming the landings were fake. It is so beyond stupid, and it is such a stretch that I dismissed most of the rest of the movie. Too bad.

Pete · 01-17-2017, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

LMFAO!!

DBS.US · 01-17-2017, 09:38 AM

If you know your U.S. history and know why we would fake it, you know if we did.

Bladewire · 01-17-2017, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US

If you know your U.S. history and know why we would fake it, you know if we did.

We didn't fake it. We went to the moon, and back

john1975 · 01-17-2017, 10:14 AM

overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves...

The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

Pete · 01-17-2017, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john1975

overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves...

The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

because there are aliens on the far side of the moon.

john1975 · 01-17-2017, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete

because there are aliens on the far side of the moon.

0:20 seconds into clip

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvoJHjbiXr0

rogueteens · 01-17-2017, 11:38 AM

The US sent men to the moon, its a fact for the simple reason that the one country that could have blown their "faked" story stayed silent even though they could have numerous reasons to blow a lie apart - the old USSR

Bladewire · 01-17-2017, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john1975

overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves...

The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

If we never went to the moon, how have we been using the retroflectors we put on there? Are you saying Russia verifying their existence means Russia is lying too? The territories were put there during the Apollo mission in '69, you know, USA Americans on the moon

"The first successful tests were carried out in 1962 when a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from moon's surface using a laser with a millisecond pulse length. Similar measurements were obtained later the same year by a Soviet team at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory using a Q-switched ruby laser.

Greater accuracy was achieved following the installation of a retroreflector array on July 21, 1969, by the crew of "Apollo 11", and two more retroreflector arrays left by the "Apollo 14" and "Apollo 15" missions have also contributed to the experiment.

Successful lunar laser range measurements to the retroreflectors were first reported by the 3.1 m telescope at Lick Observatory, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Lunar Ranging Observatory in Arizona, the Pic du Midi Observatory in France, the Tokyo Astronomical Observatory, and McDonald Observatory in Texas.

PR_Glen · 01-17-2017, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Having worked at Launch Complex 39 at KSC for more than a few years I can tell you there was nothing fake about the lunar landings.

If you look at the site referenced most of the arguments that it was faked stem from the lack of knowledge of basic physics,,,,its well know the flag was a foil like substance made to look like it was blowing in the wind, which there is none...no stars...really are you that dumb? stars are magnified by the earths atmosphere plus the light gathering ability of cameras in the 60s wasnt exactly sensitive enough to capture the very dim light from stars..one light source huh apparently this moron doesnt know that from the lunar surface the earth is very large and it reflects light from the sun...theres 2 HUGE light sources...Imprints...hello gravity or lack thereof.

Everytime I read some moron who uses these args it makes me wonder what they actually did learn in science class this is all very basic very simple stuff....

SMFH

come on, you are really going to come back at us with basic physics? that hasn't been taught to people at capacity for decades now. clearly it isn't important! If it were we may even believe the facts of the matter or even understand why they are facts at all! Not to mention the logic involved ie if it was something we couldn't do wouldn't it make more sense not to push their luck by faking it fucking 5 more times?? not to mention the numerous fly by's we did first!

next you are going to tell me that nasa released over 1400 images taken from the moon itself!

Bladewire · 01-17-2017, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

come on, you are really going to come back at us with basic physics? that hasn't been taught to people at capacity for decades now. clearly it isn't important! If it were we may even believe the facts of the matter or even understand why they are facts at all! Not to mention the logic involved ie if it was something we couldn't do wouldn't it make more sense not to push their luck by faking it fucking 5 more times?? not to mention the numerous fly by's we did first!

next you are going to tell me that nasa released over 1400 images taken from the moon itself!

What are you trying to say?

john1975 · 01-17-2017, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

The US sent men to the moon, its a fact for the simple reason that the one country that could have blown their "faked" story stayed silent even though they could have numerous reasons to blow a lie apart - the old USSR

werd..

you can gather a lot more information by staying quiet, when your gut instinct tells you the opposite.

why do u think the CIA lies so much..? It's all to keep relations happy, and business profitable.

Pete · 01-17-2017, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john1975

0:20 seconds into clip

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvoJHjbiXr0

That's proof right there

Bladewire · 01-17-2017, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

America sucks tho...

Only if you're in a U.S. Government building with Crucifissio

romeo22 · 01-17-2017, 01:13 PM

yes the best real movie

01-17-2017, 04:07 AM	#51
Pete Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Mr. Rogers Neighborhood Posts: 6,617	Aliens don't allow humans on the moon. Everyone knows that __________________ Evoke Electronics

01-17-2017, 04:08 AM	#52
XXXtrailers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 488	In Moon Landing We Trust! __________________ Trailers/Teasers/Prerolls \| Photo/Video Editing \| GIF/Video Banners [email protected] Skype: xxxtrailers

01-17-2017, 04:09 AM	#53
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Whether Man did land on the Moon or not. It was a waste of time. Robots are the future, the cost of sending people into space, keeping them alive and bringing them back is ridiculous. Even the space station. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

01-17-2017, 09:38 AM	#64
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	If you know your U.S. history and know why we would fake it, you know if we did. __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

01-17-2017, 11:38 AM	#69
rogueteens So fucking bland Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: England Posts: 8,005	The US sent men to the moon, its a fact for the simple reason that the one country that could have blown their "faked" story stayed silent even though they could have numerous reasons to blow a lie apart - the old USSR __________________ Free traffic and backlinks from one of the fastest growing adult pinsites on the net - SAUCY PICTURES! Easily my best performing webcam sponsor - CLICK HERE!!

01-17-2017, 08:09 AM	#61
DownThePoole Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 164	There were so many people involved in this operation, it's not possible that all of them were involved in such a lie and never came out with the truth.

01-17-2017, 10:14 AM	#66
john1975 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 985	overwhelming evidence we've never made it to the moon, and anybody trying to convince us otherwise is probably Gov. / NASA themselves... The technology available in the 60's would of made it impossible. If it was so easy, why hasn't any country (including our own) been back since? The moon is the most interesting near-earth object...yet we completely ignore it like it's not even there. Lets instead spend $billions$ more trying to get to Mars...where we've only had a 50% success rate so far. (or less)

01-17-2017, 01:13 PM	#76
romeo22 你自己去他媽的 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 23,346	yes the best real movie