Who Would Win a United States-Russia Naval War? - GoFuckYourself.com

patadeperro · 02-28-2018, 12:52 PM

a Kinf of a weird think to ask, but I guess everybody is wondering with the political climate: Who Would Win a United States-Russia Naval War? | Maritime Herald

Sid70 · 02-28-2018, 12:55 PM

Boozer · 02-28-2018, 01:00 PM

Are you the same guy who linked to this site last week?

If I remember correctly, someone mentioned this site trying to drop a crypto miner.

thommy · 02-28-2018, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patadeperro

a Kinf of a weird think to ask, but I guess everybody is wondering with the political climate: Who Would Win a United States-Russia Naval War? | Maritime Herald

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

Albert Einstein

pimpmaster9000 · 02-28-2018, 01:07 PM

Russia has nukes it does not get attacked by anybody ever...the us navy is for 3rd world farmers...

Sid70 · 02-28-2018, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

Russia has nukes

TheDynasty · 02-28-2018, 01:11 PM

Merica!!!

Don't click the link

Sarn · 02-28-2018, 01:20 PM

kane · 02-28-2018, 01:32 PM

In a conventional war, it wouldn't even be close. The US has 11 aircraft carriers. Russia has one. The US has 62 destroyers while Russia has about a dozen.

Rochard · 02-28-2018, 01:44 PM

I would think the United States would win - for four reasons.

1) The Russian Navy is not a blue water navy. A blue water navy is a navy that can operate anywhere in the world. The Russian Navy cannot operate anywhere in the world, which leads to point number two....

2) The Russian Navy has a lack of overseas Navy bases. In fact, the only Russian naval base outside of Russia is in Syria. (Which is difficult enough for them to get to.)

3) The Russian Navy was in a period of decline after the cold war... Spending was greatly reduced, ships were scrapped, and new ship building completely stopped. Due the lack of building and scrapping of ships, ships in use have continued in use well past their expected date of use.

4) The Russian Navy has only one aircraft carrier. While it's easy to dismiss an aircraft carrier saying a submarine could easily take them out, the truth is they are pretty well protected. Warplanes sent from aircraft carriers would be used to take out ships hundreds of miles away.

One of my favorite books about naval warfare is about the UK and the Falklands war, which was mostly a naval battle. The UK had to deploy a naval fleet thousands of miles to the Falkland islands. While the British Navy is considered a blue water navy, it was very difficult for them to do this.

pimpmaster9000 · 02-28-2018, 04:28 PM

there is no war...it will never happen...

US navy: we are attacking!
pooty: go home or nuclear winter
US navy: yes sir

the end...

no matter how bad ass you are, no matter how many waste of money ships you built, when a dude has the "off" switch to your life and everybody you know, you leave the dude alone...

the end....

Vendzilla · 02-28-2018, 05:22 PM

The answer to the question is no one wins.
Our military is by far more powerful and more advanced, it always has been.
But when one submarine can take out the east coast, no one wins

Rochard · 02-28-2018, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

The answer to the question is no one wins.
Our military is by far more powerful and more advanced, it always has been.
But when one submarine can take out the east coast, no one wins

I find it hard to believe either side would resort to nukes.

ilnjscb · 02-28-2018, 07:53 PM

Putin is correct Nuclear bombs are last millennium. The next nuke is AI.

brassmonkey · 02-28-2018, 08:08 PM

we would love free vodka!

Sarn · 03-01-2018, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

we would love free vodka!

bronco67 · 03-01-2018, 07:09 AM

Holy shit we would crush them.

BaldBastard · 03-01-2018, 07:33 AM

The aftermath of war will decide who the winner is, and no ones coming to Russia's aid.. well Iran and North Korea might.. hehe

Sarn · 03-01-2018, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

The aftermath of war will decide who the winner is, and no ones coming to Russia's aid.. well Iran and North Korea might.. hehe

We do not need aid comrade

Sarn · 03-01-2018, 09:40 AM

new underwater drone Putin release today

brassmonkey · 03-01-2018, 09:46 AM

the taliban don't even have a country and they beat russia

pimpmaster9000 · 03-01-2018, 10:01 AM

its amusing to watch americans place importance on their complete waste of money fleet

dudes you can diamond stud your fleet and invest trillions in more waste of money ships and tech, as long as pooty has the "off" switch to your lives your fleet is a waste of money...as soon as pooty mentions nukes your fleet will be in need of adult diapers...as well as your government, as well as your entire population...

no matter how you try to spin it or make it look like you would win, the only thing you would win is a nuclear winter...you will never ever ever ever attack russia ever...

your fleet is good for 3rd world farmers and nobody else...even 3rd world farmers will nuke the fuck up one day...thanks USA!

Phoenix · 03-01-2018, 10:02 AM

ship makers...

PR_Glen · 03-01-2018, 10:23 AM

It could never happen for two reasons.

1. Russia has zero interest in invading or occupying the US
2. USA has zero interest in invading or occupying Russia

For forty years it has been nothing but flexing bullshit and its practically embarrassing either nation still wastes money on such arms these days as no other nation has any interest in invading them either.

poncabare · 03-01-2018, 03:52 PM

Sean Connery would know

crockett · 03-01-2018, 05:58 PM

"Assuming" US & Russia could have "just" a Naval war which included only Naval assets (naval assets include carriers which include aircraft) It would be a easy victory by the US due to not just technology advantage but also straight up numbers advantage.

The US could dominate Russia in any "conventional" war due to straight up numbers advantage. Not to mention US has logistical advantage and Russia would be lock out of all ports, making it a very short fight.

The only thing that gives Russia any sort of fight back ability is nuclear weapons. Nuclear is the great deterrent because conventional armies don't matter just that you have enough nukes to make the other guy hurt very badly. This is why no major nuclear power will ever fight one another.

beerptrol · 03-01-2018, 06:16 PM

Right now Russia would win. Chump wouldn't order our fleets into battle as he's a russian CUCK.

CAHEK · 03-01-2018, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

It could never happen for two reasons.

1. Russia has zero interest in invading or occupying the US
2. USA has zero interest in invading or occupying Russia

For forty years it has been nothing but flexing bullshit and its practically embarrassing either nation still wastes money on such arms these days as no other nation has any interest in invading them either.

well said

Sarn · 03-02-2018, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

"Assuming" US & Russia could have "just" a Naval war which included only Naval assets (naval assets include carriers which include aircraft) It would be a easy victory by the US due to not just technology advantage but also straight up numbers advantage.

The US could dominate Russia in any "conventional" war due to straight up numbers advantage. Not to mention US has logistical advantage and Russia would be lock out of all ports, making it a very short fight.

The only thing that gives Russia any sort of fight back ability is nuclear weapons. Nuclear is the great deterrent because conventional armies don't matter just that you have enough nukes to make the other guy hurt very badly. This is why no major nuclear power will ever fight one another.

Underwater drones even without nukes which resurface from depths can destroy aircraft carriers groups - and it can work around the world now. Ports will be fast unblocked, and how logistics will be without aircraft-carriers. Video above.

02-28-2018, 12:52 PM	#1
patadeperro Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 929	Who Would Win a United States-Russia Naval War? a Kinf of a weird think to ask, but I guess everybody is wondering with the political climate: Who Would Win a United States-Russia Naval War? \| Maritime Herald __________________ email me at support (at) adultvideoblaster (dot) com

02-28-2018, 12:55 PM	#2
Sid70 Downshifter Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Road trip Posts: 16,413	__________________ Русня, идите нахуй!

02-28-2018, 01:07 PM	#5
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	Russia has nukes it does not get attacked by anybody ever...the us navy is for 3rd world farmers... __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

02-28-2018, 01:11 PM	#7
TheDynasty See Signature Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: noneya Posts: 5,882	Merica!!! Don't click the link __________________ Try out WP-SCRIPT The Best Tube Script

02-28-2018, 01:44 PM	#10
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 72,819	I would think the United States would win - for four reasons. 1) The Russian Navy is not a blue water navy. A blue water navy is a navy that can operate anywhere in the world. The Russian Navy cannot operate anywhere in the world, which leads to point number two.... 2) The Russian Navy has a lack of overseas Navy bases. In fact, the only Russian naval base outside of Russia is in Syria. (Which is difficult enough for them to get to.) 3) The Russian Navy was in a period of decline after the cold war... Spending was greatly reduced, ships were scrapped, and new ship building completely stopped. Due the lack of building and scrapping of ships, ships in use have continued in use well past their expected date of use. 4) The Russian Navy has only one aircraft carrier. While it's easy to dismiss an aircraft carrier saying a submarine could easily take them out, the truth is they are pretty well protected. Warplanes sent from aircraft carriers would be used to take out ships hundreds of miles away. One of my favorite books about naval warfare is about the UK and the Falklands war, which was mostly a naval battle. The UK had to deploy a naval fleet thousands of miles to the Falkland islands. While the British Navy is considered a blue water navy, it was very difficult for them to do this. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

02-28-2018, 01:00 PM	#3
Boozer So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 3,134	Are you the same guy who linked to this site last week? If I remember correctly, someone mentioned this site trying to drop a crypto miner.

02-28-2018, 01:20 PM	#8
Sarn So Sanctions!!11 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 10,862

02-28-2018, 01:32 PM	#9
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	In a conventional war, it wouldn't even be close. The US has 11 aircraft carriers. Russia has one. The US has 62 destroyers while Russia has about a dozen.

02-28-2018, 04:28 PM	#11
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	there is no war...it will never happen... US navy: we are attacking! pooty: go home or nuclear winter US navy: yes sir the end... no matter how bad ass you are, no matter how many waste of money ships you built, when a dude has the "off" switch to your life and everybody you know, you leave the dude alone... the end.... __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

02-28-2018, 05:22 PM	#12
Vendzilla Biker Gnome Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: cell#324 Posts: 23,201	The answer to the question is no one wins. Our military is by far more powerful and more advanced, it always has been. But when one submarine can take out the east coast, no one wins __________________ Webair died? Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants think about that

02-28-2018, 07:53 PM	#14
ilnjscb Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 8,785	Putin is correct Nuclear bombs are last millennium. The next nuke is AI.

02-28-2018, 08:08 PM	#15
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 76,916	we would love free vodka! __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - Support The Laken Riley Act!!! END DACA - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

03-01-2018, 07:09 AM	#17
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	Holy shit we would crush them. __________________

03-01-2018, 07:33 AM	#18
BaldBastard Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Sydney Posts: 15,869	The aftermath of war will decide who the winner is, and no ones coming to Russia's aid.. well Iran and North Korea might.. hehe

03-01-2018, 09:40 AM	#20
Sarn So Sanctions!!11 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 10,862	new underwater drone Putin release today

03-01-2018, 09:46 AM	#21
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 76,916	the taliban don't even have a country and they beat russia __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - Support The Laken Riley Act!!! END DACA - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

03-01-2018, 10:01 AM	#22
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	its amusing to watch americans place importance on their complete waste of money fleet dudes you can diamond stud your fleet and invest trillions in more waste of money ships and tech, as long as pooty has the "off" switch to your lives your fleet is a waste of money...as soon as pooty mentions nukes your fleet will be in need of adult diapers...as well as your government, as well as your entire population... no matter how you try to spin it or make it look like you would win, the only thing you would win is a nuclear winter...you will never ever ever ever attack russia ever... your fleet is good for 3rd world farmers and nobody else...even 3rd world farmers will nuke the fuck up one day...thanks USA! __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

03-01-2018, 10:02 AM	#23
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	ship makers...

03-01-2018, 10:23 AM	#24
PR_Glen Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 9,058	It could never happen for two reasons. 1. Russia has zero interest in invading or occupying the US 2. USA has zero interest in invading or occupying Russia For forty years it has been nothing but flexing bullshit and its practically embarrassing either nation still wastes money on such arms these days as no other nation has any interest in invading them either. __________________ webmaster at pimproll dot com

03-01-2018, 03:52 PM	#25
poncabare Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: carmel Posts: 2,553	Sean Connery would know

03-01-2018, 05:58 PM	#26
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	"Assuming" US & Russia could have "just" a Naval war which included only Naval assets (naval assets include carriers which include aircraft) It would be a easy victory by the US due to not just technology advantage but also straight up numbers advantage. The US could dominate Russia in any "conventional" war due to straight up numbers advantage. Not to mention US has logistical advantage and Russia would be lock out of all ports, making it a very short fight. The only thing that gives Russia any sort of fight back ability is nuclear weapons. Nuclear is the great deterrent because conventional armies don't matter just that you have enough nukes to make the other guy hurt very badly. This is why no major nuclear power will ever fight one another. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

03-01-2018, 06:16 PM	#27
beerptrol Confirmed Asshole Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Half way between sobriety and fubar. Posts: 12,722	Right now Russia would win. Chump wouldn't order our fleets into battle as he's a russian CUCK. __________________ “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.” -- Ulysses S. Grant