News To Vendzilla

[just a punk]

As I've told you about two years ago, Russia will enforce its much smaller submarine fleet to make it equal or even superior to the US one very quickly. And I was right: Here Are All the Submarines of the Russian Navy in One Infographic

A new infographic shows the underwater might of the Russian Navy and its fleet of 72 submarines, one more than the U.S. Navy at the time of this writing. Split between nuclear missile submarines, cruise missile submarines, attack submarines, and unique special mission and test submarines, the Russian Navy is no slouch.

[Bladewire]

Russia has just one aircraft carrier left in their dead fleet & it keeps breaking down

[Bladewire]

[Bladewire]

[Bladewire]

[Bladewire]

[Bladewire]

Sorry I couldn't resist you know I'm just joking I'll stop

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Russia has just one aircraft carrier left in their dead fleet & it keeps breaking down

We also don't have a cavalry army, archer squads, musketeers, siege catapults etc. So what?

Aircraft carriers are dinosaurs from 1940's and they can be used against countries like Zimbabwe only. Today a 4 billion aircraft carrier can be easily destroyed by a single cruise missile with a tactical nuke, or a few non-nuke ones just like this:



The nuclear missile submarine carriers are the major weapon of 21st century. Ask Vendzilla, because he knows.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

As I've told you about two years ago, Russia will enforce its much smaller submarine fleet to make it equal or even superior to the US one very quickly. And I was right: Here Are All the Submarines of the Russian Navy in One Infographic

Of course they have a lot of subs. It's Russian nature to sneak around.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

As I've told you about two years ago, Russia will enforce its much smaller submarine fleet to make it equal or even superior to the US one very quickly. And I was right: Here Are All the Submarines of the Russian Navy in One Infographic

How many haven't sunk? You guys seem to have issues keeping your subs off the bottom of the ocean..

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by crockett

How many haven't sunk? You guys seem to have issues keeping your subs off the bottom of the ocean..

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by crockett

How many haven't sunk? You guys seem to have issues keeping your subs off the bottom of the ocean..

You will be surprised, but no single one of them. If you are talking about "Kursk", so it was hit by the US torpedo (this picture clearly shows it). If the leader of Russia was a man but not a pussy like Putin, the States would receive an immediately response. But once again, he is a pathological coward who is afraid of his own shadow (haven't I told it to ya for many years?), so nothing happened... I hope there will be a new president like Navalny and you will feel the difference in a moment ;)

Originally Posted by Bladewire

So what? There is a graveyard of obsolete tanks:



A graveyard of obsolete aircrafts:







etc.

So what? Don't tell me you have no such graveyards in the usa.

[Mr Pheer]

"We don't even like aircraft carriers, so we will build the worst one ever"

Makes no sense.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Mr Pheer

"We don't even like aircraft carriers, so we will build the worst one ever"

Makes no sense.

We didn't build a single one. There is an aricraft cruiser which was designed before A.D. by the Soviet Union to be used against small banana countries and now it's completely obsolete. We also have this:



Does it make a sense to you? Man, the elders have to die, the youth takes their place.

Course you can build an aircraft carrier group for billions of dollars and put there many thousands of personnel. On the other hand, you can made a cheap ass ultrasonic cruse missile, which is undetectable and can't be intercepted because it flies much lower the ship's deck. The missile which can sink the whole group with ease. Which way will you go in 21st century? Course if you care of your GDP (you want it big, right?), you will choose the 1st way. If you care about the efficiency and don't care about GDP or other shit like that, you will choose the second one.

The submarines are the other thing. They are quite, hidden and can release the blast power of all bombs used in WWII + Hiroshima and Nagasaki within a minute.







This is the weapon of 21st century. Not aircraft carriers, archer squads and horse cavalry. Submarines and aviation. Not some drones, those can easily be jammed or taken under control by anyone, but the real aviation with real men aboard.

[just a punk]

The same but in English and in video:



That exactly the same words I've said to Vendz two years ago. That took only two years to create a submarine fleet greater than the USA one. Only two years...

[JFK]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Of course they have a lot of subs. It's Russian nature to sneak around.

[Rochard]

I just read Russia is cutting it's military budget for the first time in twenty years..... They are cutting it by 20%, which is a huge amount.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.dae395091b89

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Rochard

I just read Russia is cutting it's military budget for the first time in twenty years..... They are cutting it by 20%, which is a huge amount.

And what does it mean? Please explain. Russian soldiers receive a zero salary - the guys don't get a money at all, but every man in Russia have to serve in army (e.g. I'm an veteran like you and I'm an LT). The Russian aircrafts like SU are the bets in the world and they a head above the US ones, but they are cheaper in 10x times. How come, comrade?





As I said above, in the USA you call them veterans. In Russia we call them... nobody... They are just males maybe, because everybody has to do it. The army in Russia is a duty but not a job. Every man have to do it. If you denied, you'll get a prison time.

[crockett]

Shhh don't tell him, but I found crucifissio's car..

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by crockett

Shhh don't tell him, but I found crucifissio's car..

Nice car so what? Would you prefer this one - a lot of drunk guys and two extremely ugly chicks - must be a great gay party!



Unfortunately in Army you won't get such a car. You will do this and you won't be paid for it. Otherwise you'll get a jail time and that's not a joke.

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

And what does it mean? Please explain. Russian soldiers receive a zero salary - the guys don't get a money at all, but every man in Russia have to serve in army (e.g. I'm a is a veteran like you, I'm an LT). The Russian aircrafts like SU are the bets in the world and they a head above the US ones, but they are cheaper in 10x times. How come, comrade?\

You have a conscription military. LOL.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Rochard

You have a conscription military. LOL.

Yes, we have it. Every single man in Russia have to serve in army. Like in Isrel and in most of the EU countries like Germany, Switzerland, Italy etc. It's a job in the USA and it's a duty in the Europe.

You've told me that "Top Gun" is your favorite movie. Enjoy ;)

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Rochard

You have a conscription military. LOL.

Personally I haven't killed a single human. I was lucky to be away from the war zones. I don't know how many kill you - the US marine. Yes, how many? E.g. my brother in law was a ДШБ operator in Afghanistan (a dancing soldier as you call VDV). He says he was working as a cook at kitchen, but I know he was killing and he was killing a lot of people (look at the official stats of Soviet-Afghan war and you'll see that Soviet troops have killed more than a million of mujahideens). A classmate of my wife was an gun-machine operator in Chechnya. He said he has killed about 20 - maybe more, maybe less, because it's hard to say if someone who fell after a machine-gun fire is dead, injured, or not. So every man here who has no money to pay it to "кадрвовый офицер" like the father of one Czech immigrant poster here, have to serve in the army and you are really the lucky one if you (like me) have never participated in a real war.

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Personally I haven't killed a single human. I was lucky to be away from the war zones. I don't know how many kill you - the US marine. Yes, how many? E.g. my brother in law was a ДШБ operator in Afghanistan (a dancing soldier as you call VDV). He says he was working as a cook at kitchen, but I know he was killing and he was killing a lot of people (look at the official stats of Soviet-Afghan war and you'll see that Soviet troops have killed more than a million of mujahideens). A classmate of my wife was an gun-machine operator in Chechnya. He said he has killed about 20 - maybe more, maybe less, because it's hard to say if someone who fell after a machine-gun fire is dead, injured, or not. So every man here who has no money to pay it to "кадрвовый офицер" like the father of one Czech immigrant poster here, have to serve in the army and you are really the lucky one if you (like me) have never participated in a real war.

We had lost this two wars and lost one country during this time.

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Yes, we have it. Every single man in Russia have to serve in army. Like in Isrel and in most of the EU countries like Germany, Switzerland, Italy etc. It's a job in the USA and it's a duty in the Europe.

You've told me that "Top Gun" is your favorite movie. Enjoy ;)

the French have the Raffle, a better aircraft than the SU. Although, rather than the raptor, the EuroFighter is the best jet in the world due to it´s versatility.

https://www.aviationcv.com/aviation-...ets-world-2017

It´s a fighter & a bomber, the huge arsenal & ability to dog fight, it´s a win win for the number1 aircraft

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Sarn

We had lost this two wars and lost one country during this time.

Are you drunk? We have not lost the Afghan war. We won it in one single day - the first day. Educate yourself: Operation Storm-333 - Wikipedia. Everything else was just a support of the new government against the American Taliban Islamists. The limited Soviet contingent has been pulled back like an act of Gorbachov's good will. And it was not some kind of retirement. It was a parade of winners:



The result of the Gorbachev's good will:





Yes, after that it took about two years to set a chaos in Afghanistan again, reinforce the Taliban, destroy the NYC twins etc. "Thanks" to America and CIA spy Osama bin Laden personally, the guy did it for the money of the US tax payers. As we say here: "don't feed a snake", but Americans are so stupid to get this simple thing. They think it's like this (idiots):

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

It´s a fighter & a bomber, the huge arsenal & ability to dog fight, it´s a win win for the number1 aircraft

BTW, please remind me how many wars that magical eurofighter was used in and how many real dog fights it has won? The Americans were so proud of their Phantoms, equipped with cool super-duper missiles, but those were easily destroyed by the outdated Soviet MIG jet fighters in countless dogfights during a Vietnam war. How come?

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Are you drunk? We have not lose the Afghan war. We won it in one single day. Educate yourself: Operation Storm-333 - Wikipedia. Everything else was support of the new government against the American Taliban Islamists. The limited Soviet contingent has been pulled back like an act of Gorbachov's good will. And it was not some kind of retirement. It was a parade of winners:

...

Winning...

[slapass]

Sort of interesting that countries that have little or no military are better to live in.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Sarn

Winning...

In fact - yes. That was a winning. And this is a losing:



Don't you see a difference? Don't you really understand who have lost the Afghan war? The "brave mujahedin fighters of Afghanistan" have wiped out their dirty asses by American mouths and ass-raped them in the most humiliating form.





And after all of that humiliation you can say they are not idiots? Ok, maybe the right word is masochists...

[just a punk]

It may sound strange or even weird, but Soviet Army in Afghanistan was the best protection for the USA. Gorbachev has said "ok, we go out" and the Americans got 9/11 terrorist attacks made by the guys who were fed right from the Uncle Sam's hands. Checkmate.

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by slapass

Sort of interesting that countries that have little or no military are better to live in.

Ukraine?

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

In fact - yes. That was a winning. And this is a losing:
...
Don't you see a difference? Don't you really understand who have lost the Afghan war? The "brave mujahedin fighters of Afghanistan" have wiped out their dirty asses by American mouths and ass-raped them in the most humiliating form.
...
And after all of that humiliation you can say they are not idiots? Ok, maybe the right word is masochists...

We winning and the USA winning. Congrats winners.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Sarn

We winning and the USA winning. Congrats winners.

We haven't lost anything to the US Taliban. The America have lost over 3000 citizens at once. Thanks to the "brave mujahedin fighters of Afghanistan" as Rambo III movie says. Ну не дебылы, блять?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

It´s a fighter & a bomber, the huge arsenal & ability to dog fight, it´s a win win for the number1 aircraft

Sorry for bumping of your useless post but can you show me any video of manures that eurofighter can perform in a dogfight? Something even similar to those that SU-35 and SU-37 do? A post from some blog is cool but show me the video please. Something like this:





I don't know how to say it in Spanish by keep an eye on the attack angle and the speed. Any other jetfighter will split into pieces during these maneuvers.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Juts a word. it's not some special knowledge. You have to do it in army or you will go to a jail - yes you'll be sued ad get a prison time.

[dyna mo]

most of those rooskie subs are diesel-powered clunkers and half of that rooskie fleet is broken down in rooskie submarine garages at any one time.

you also have a fleet of rooskie space shuttles! yay rooskie!

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by crockett

Shhh don't tell him, but I found crucifissio's car..

I drive a small ladies car to compensate for my huge dick...it does not help...

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by slapass

Sort of interesting that countries that have little or no military are better to live in.

Like Nigeria? Antarctica? Venezuela?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

most of those rooskie subs are diesel-powered clunkers

The diesel powered ones are the most silent ones. Russia Is Set To Launch Its Quietest Submarine Yet

The Fukushima reactor is not something that a quite sub should have on the board... I'll tell you some simple thing. The US Navy is the mostly attacking one. It's created to reach the Russian coast. So Russia has enough of subs that are designed to intercept those. They are quite hunters on the noisy attacking ones.

Ok, let me speak in your noob language. Let's imagine that some Los Angeles class submarine has entered the Russian waters. It's a big an noisy thing with a nuclear engine and nuclear warheads aboard. And what will happen to it? I'll tell ya... A "small" diesel-powered clunker of Kilo class will sink it down in a few seconds. And all the crew of that Los Angeles class will never know where their death has come from, because these rooskie subs are quiet as hell and they are classified by NATO as "black holes". These submarines are not attackers. They are hunters. They don't have to be in water for years. They have to hit and run.

Idiot

P.S. If you google for the biggest submarine ever, the result will say "Russians". If you will google for the quietest submarines, the result will say "Russians". If you will google for the fastest submarines, the result will say "Russians". The country which has launched 16 ICBM-s from a sub at once? Not some light cruise misses, but heavy ICBM-s that can wipe out the whole your country. Surprised? ;)

[Bladewire]

Why have all of Russia's missions to Mars since the 1970's failed?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Why have all of Russia's missions to Mars since the 1970's failed?

Have no idea, but I know that Soviet Union was 1st on the Moon (Luna-9) and we are one and only nation who was able to land to Venus (multiple times - google for it, fag).

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Have no idea,

[just a punk]

Я б вдул. Но ты же пидарас. Зачм запостил?

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Sorry I couldn't resist you know I'm just joking I'll stop

if you follow actual current events you'll then be aware china just stopped accepting garbage for the world. you are gonna see trash issue lots of places in the near future

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by crockett

How many haven't sunk? You guys seem to have issues keeping your subs off the bottom of the ocean..

I was under the impression if a sub did not sink it wasn't working properly lol!!

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

The same but in English and in video:



That exactly the same words I've said to Vendz two years ago. That took only two years to create a submarine fleet greater than the USA one. Only two years...

so your idea is the US and Russia blow billions of dollars on war machines?

[Nitzer Ebb]

Originally Posted by crucifissio

I drive a small ladies car to compensate for my huge dick...it does not help...

Thats because the dick doesn't have any balls attached to it. They got lost when you were running away from Americans.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

so your idea is the US and Russia blow billions of dollars on war machines?

Yep, exactly. I'm not kidding at all. They really are doing this right now.

Originally Posted by Nitzer Ebb

Thats because the dick doesn't have any balls attached to it.

Please accept my deepest condolences then. Someday even pierced gayish norvegian half-woman will grow up the balls. You have a picture on your signature. Please tell me which war the pierced norwegian gays have participated at? Maybe a you'll take a look at wikipedia? The only war I know was WWII where Nazis have literally shit at your mouths and you ate it. Did you like it? As a shit eaters you were a great nation - hands down, but did you anything at all as soldiers? No. A nation of girlish cowards and pierced fags. You have lost a war to Hiter in a few days and started to suck German cocks like bitches. Did I say "like"? No, you are cock sucking bitches.

[just a punk]

@ a norwy fag. The country which was first in the space was Russia. The country which has sent a first human to the Earth's orbit was Russia. The country which has built a first space station was Russia. The country which made a first soft landing to the Moon? Yes, that was Russia again, clown. The country which is the only one on planet Earth which can land to Venus? Even Curiosity was sent to Mars by the Russian rocket (yes, мудила, двигатели были наши). So shut up your useless shitty month. The norway did noting good but sucked Hitler's cock. Every time when you say "losers" you mean pierced homo-fags of norway, because cowards and gays means norway - the "homo-soldiers of odin" LOL ))))

[Sarn]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

most of those rooskie subs are diesel-powered clunkers and half of that rooskie fleet is broken down in rooskie submarine garages at any one time.

you also have a fleet of rooskie space shuttles! yay rooskie!

Oh comrade

https://coub.com/view/136fun

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Sarn

Oh comrade

https://coub.com/view/136fun

The dude have the US education so be lenient to him. He thinks that diesel-electric hybrid-powered engines are some outdated ones. The idiot even has "dyna mo" in his nick name but he doesn't know how it works. The nuclear-powered submarines are also hybrid ones. The enriched Uranium cores boil water and turn it in to steam, that steam is being transformed into power like locos done it 200 years ago. The diesel powered engines do it the same way - they generate the electricity to make their engines work. Yep, just like any hybrid-car does it in the 21st century. Diesel-powered electric engine is not so autonomic as the nuclear powered one, but it's extremely quit and it has no strategic mission planes. It's a silent hunter. It has to come quit, kill and go away.





@ dyna mo, have you ever been to the army? Do you understand that your education literally sucks?