![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,295
|
Anybody uses this way of linking?
I just found my old scrapbook and there was another way of blindlinking explained.. So now I want to know if anyone here uses that, and would the tgps which allow mouseovers allow this (also useful for CJ sites I suppose)...
Here it goes: instead of: <a href="http://www.sponsor.com?id=yourcode">, you can put <a href="http://blablabla:[email protected]?id=yourcode">, and it will still take you to the same url (if the site/directory you/re linking is not password protected). Now, since you can put ANYTHING (including A LOT of empty spaces (just hold the spacebar for a few moments)), between http:// and @, we should be able to do this: <a href="http://www.disquiseurl.com -SPACES GO HERE- :[email protected]?id=yourcode>. The goal is to make the real url part, which comes after @ - invisible to the surfer on his status line (it gets simply pushed out by those spaces). I made a simple test page, and it works with IE 5.5... Netscape 6.0 crashed my windows (buggy installation), so I didn't test it that way.. Please tell me what you think...Oh, and if I just discovered "hot water" ![]() [This message has been edited by danevans (edited 06-21-2001).] |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
No Refunds Issued.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GFY
Posts: 28,300
|
why don't just use onMouseOver ?
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Amost UK central
Posts: 772
|
LOL
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,295
|
Because if I do not disable right-click surfer can still easily see where he will go. This way, if he's not using an extremely high screen resolution, there's no way to find out the destination (except viewing source, but not many surfers will mess with that..)
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Amost UK central
Posts: 772
|
If you get your pitch right he should have dick in one hand mouse in the other and the last thing on his mind will be the link code
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,295
|
Haha, thanks Susan, I'll work in that direction
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 491
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |