Allison Williams is suing my tgp and juicybucks and a shitload more - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

V_RocKs · 06-22-2008, 08:29 AM

Another reason why Juicy Bucks sucks.

rewn · 01-20-2009, 04:33 AM

> 3 years later, Default defendants dismissed

https://ecf.wvnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi...2005cv0051-361

Juilan · 01-20-2009, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rewn

> 3 years later, Default defendants dismissed

https://ecf.wvnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi...2005cv0051-361

Wow I just was thinking about that claim the other day, thanks for Posting this. It's pretty enlightening in terms of the ruling based on personal Jurisdiction limitations.

Far-L · 01-20-2009, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwordFish

If it breaks your heart, then back that up with some assistance for them. You can certainly afford it. Or is that just lip service?

Fuck you. You should be paying him for the advice. Everyone here always thinks that other companies should pay for their problems; when is the last time you did one good thing for the industry or any company or even any individual?

HorseShit · 01-20-2009, 11:50 AM

blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

crockett · 01-20-2009, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays

her lawyer has rejected some fair settlement offers per a friend of ours that made an offer recently. the webmaster had one link to juicybucks and some decent se placement.

countersuing and all the huffery will not sit well imho and this example is a good example of what happens when illegitimate affiliate ads get promoted by legitimate affiliates. the legit get sued while the illegit hideaway in distant locations

there were no releases on the allison williams video and it harmed her reputation. a lot of you cry about my legal rantings about content and the misnomer "public domain" and now you see reality. i am looking out for your best interests.

this case is not a joke for those caught in the cross-hairs and one should not assume that because a sponsor publishes pics or vid's that the sponsor is setup legit. greed gets you a couple quick dollars- then reality comes to take it all back and then some.

</rant>

I'd agree 100% with this.. I'd bet the samething could very likely happen with all these un-licenced girlfriend sites.. When the wrong daddy finds his daughters pictures on some website, the affiliates are going to be the ones that pay. Not the programs sit off in some hideaway.

cykoe6 · 01-20-2009, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wahooter

Ex Beauty pagent queen is suing 59 sites.

I got court papers saying I'm one of them..??

They say my search engine linked to celebflix.com who was selling her fake sex video. WTF?!? Why is that my bad?

CLICK LINK...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/31/williams/

n00bs!!

any advice? what to do?

.... fucking bump.

Si · 01-20-2009, 12:17 PM

ooops!

V_RocKs · 01-20-2009, 12:47 PM

This is why I don't use my real info in the whois.

sortie · 01-20-2009, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

This is why I don't use my real info in the whois.

You'd just get arrested, sued and prosecuted as "John Doe".
Fake whois will not protect you, it just makes it take longer to find
you and adds to your guilt when the jury hears you used fake names and
addresses because you knew you were operating outside the law.

Nicky · 01-20-2009, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie

You'd just get arrested, sued and prosecuted as "John Doe".
Fake whois will not protect you, it just makes it take longer to find
you and adds to your guilt when the jury hears you used fake names and
addresses because you knew you were operating outside the law.

That is not entirely correct.

Far-L · 01-20-2009, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky

That is not entirely correct.

Take out the arrested and prosecuted and add an "if" before the getting sued point and you are getting pretty close though.

LatinCams · 01-20-2009, 03:51 PM

This kind of Shit gives me the Chills....

We really work on thin Ice and thats Scarry

Fletch XXX · 01-20-2009, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LatinCams

This kind of Shit gives me the Chills....

We really work on thin Ice and thats Scarry

or those dealing with celeb sites?

Not everyeone is on that ice.

Far-L · 01-20-2009, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

or those dealing with celeb sites?

Not everyeone is on that ice.

Yep, file this under "little things you can do in life to make things a whole lot easier"...

Robbie · 01-20-2009, 04:43 PM

Hey guys...did you miss that the thing was dismissed? You're dramatizing over something that doesn't matter.

No affiliates were sent to jail. No affiliates were harmed at all. And no program sitting off in some "hideaway" has been sent to jail either. It's okay. No need to be scared anymore. lol

Far-L · 01-20-2009, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

Hey guys...did you miss that the thing was dismissed? You're dramatizing over something that doesn't matter.

No affiliates were sent to jail. No affiliates were harmed at all. And no program sitting off in some "hideaway" has been sent to jail either. It's okay. No need to be scared anymore. lol

There is plenty of worthy information about what people need to be watching out for. Wasn't the first and won't be the last of this kind of lawsuit.

Robbie · 01-20-2009, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L

There is plenty of worthy information about what people need to be watching out for. Wasn't the first and won't be the last of this kind of lawsuit.

Ok, keep a watchful eye out my friend.

rewn · 04-10-2009, 06:48 AM

Won 7 Million from 9 of the 57 defendents

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...223029865.html

Dr.Strangelove · 04-10-2009, 08:55 AM

Than again the co-defendants counter sue.

http://weeklyworldnews.com/celebs/74...-wins-lawsuit/

Manowar · 04-10-2009, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rewn

Won 7 Million from 9 of the 57 defendents

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...223029865.html

god damn

Shap · 04-10-2009, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rewn

Won 7 Million from 9 of the 57 defendents

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...223029865.html

"They all chose not to participate in the trial nor have attorneys represent them."

What a bunch of tools

Dr.Strangelove · 04-10-2009, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap

"They all chose not to participate in the trial nor have attorneys represent them."

What a bunch of tools

Exactly.That's why I won. I had legal counsel.

Dr.Strangelove · 02-10-2011, 05:41 AM

She won an appeal the other day to enter default judgements against 28 defendants who did not respond to the complaint. She was also awarded 7.9 million against 9 defendants in '09.

TheDoc · 02-10-2011, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie

You'd just get arrested, sued and prosecuted as "John Doe".
Fake whois will not protect you, it just makes it take longer to find
you and adds to your guilt when the jury hears you used fake names and
addresses because you knew you were operating outside the law.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky

That is not entirely correct.

Whois means nothing when it comes to court... First you have to pay for them, and you have to host them, and you login to manage them on an IP. It's VERY easy to request that information, it's VERY easy to track people down online.

TheDoc · 02-10-2011, 06:03 AM

This lady is nuts btw... Besides already losing some cases, now she is getting counter sued and will lose again, and couldn't collect shit even if she tried.

Sad anyone had to waste time with lawyer costs on this crap... she deserves to be counter sued until she is broke.

01-20-2009, 04:33 AM	#102
rewn Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 385	> 3 years later, Default defendants dismissed https://ecf.wvnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi...2005cv0051-361 __________________ ICQ: 121-043

01-20-2009, 03:51 PM	#113
LatinCams Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Hot Horny Colombia Posts: 1,614	This kind of Shit gives me the Chills.... We really work on thin Ice and thats Scarry __________________ We are looking for CAM Sites where our Colombian Models can work. Grupo Bedoya - www.GRUPO-BEDOYA.com Please let us know about your Business Skype - richard.grupobedoya

01-20-2009, 04:43 PM	#116
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,959	Hey guys...did you miss that the thing was dismissed? You're dramatizing over something that doesn't matter. No affiliates were sent to jail. No affiliates were harmed at all. And no program sitting off in some "hideaway" has been sent to jail either. It's okay. No need to be scared anymore. lol __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

04-10-2009, 06:48 AM	#119
rewn Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 385	Won 7 Million from 9 of the 57 defendents http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...223029865.html __________________ ICQ: 121-043

02-10-2011, 06:03 AM	#126
TheDoc Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Currently Incognito Posts: 13,827	This lady is nuts btw... Besides already losing some cases, now she is getting counter sued and will lose again, and couldn't collect shit even if she tried. Sad anyone had to waste time with lawyer costs on this crap... she deserves to be counter sued until she is broke. __________________ ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825 It's all disambiguation

06-22-2008, 08:29 AM	#101
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,397	Another reason why Juicy Bucks sucks.

01-20-2009, 11:50 AM	#105
HorseShit Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 17,513	blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

01-20-2009, 12:17 PM	#108
Si Such Fun! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 13,900	ooops!

01-20-2009, 12:47 PM	#109
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,397	This is why I don't use my real info in the whois.

04-10-2009, 08:55 AM	#120
Dr.Strangelove Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 87	Than again the co-defendants counter sue. http://weeklyworldnews.com/celebs/74...-wins-lawsuit/

02-10-2011, 05:41 AM	#124
Dr.Strangelove Registered User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 87	She won an appeal the other day to enter default judgements against 28 defendants who did not respond to the complaint. She was also awarded 7.9 million against 9 defendants in '09.