Breaking News: Mandatory .XXX Senate Bill Created - GoFuckYourself.com

Connor · 03-16-2006, 12:23 PM

Not sure if this was posted here yet or not, but this is significant news:

https://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=...rder=0&thold=0

gornyhuy · 03-16-2006, 12:23 PM

OH christ.

RayBonga · 03-16-2006, 12:24 PM

I feel bad for that guy that paid 14 million bucks for sex.com

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 12:27 PM

Hard to do since .xxx doesn't even exist. This will get thrown out in court if it passes.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2006, 12:28 PM

Quote:

WASHINGTON, DC ? Senators Max Baucus (Dem, MT) and Mark Pryor (Dem, AR) introduced new legislation today that would serve to require websites that contain ?material that is harmful to minors? to operate from a new Top-Level Domain. The senators suggest .xxx as an example of such a domain, and a press release on Pryor?s website makes it clear that this bill is targeting adult entertainment, despite the fact that the language of the bill would require sites that offer other forms of ?harmful matter? to operate from the new TLD, as well.

Notice that folks, and dont forget it.

FightThisPatent · 03-16-2006, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor

Not sure if this was posted here yet or not, but this is significant news:

https://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=...rder=0&thold=0

So Senator Baucus and Pryor, since you are saying that a .XXX extension should let people know that this is adult material, then that means those that have a .xxx domain will have safe harbor in the US, and won't be prosecuted for obscenity???

So by having .XXX and "legitimizing" pornography, you are essentially going to have more porn in the US, since those that went overseas can now come back to the US under a .XXX domain and take advantage of cheaper bandwidth and other logistical issues.

Fight the unintended consequences!

Manowar · 03-16-2006, 12:29 PM

for fucks sake

dropped9 · 03-16-2006, 12:29 PM

so xxx is NOT dead....

interesting...

luv$ · 03-16-2006, 12:29 PM

So ok - does this mean it's set in stone now or still up in the air?

dropped9 · 03-16-2006, 12:30 PM

anybody wannt dp.xxx?

I got that shit pre-regged...

pornguy · 03-16-2006, 12:30 PM

When will the day come that parents will get in trouble for what their kids are doing??

DutchTeenCash · 03-16-2006, 12:32 PM

fuck

9chars

dissipate · 03-16-2006, 12:33 PM

That bill will never fly.

dropped9 · 03-16-2006, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

When will the day come that parents will get in trouble for what their kids are doing??

Never. Society and human kind loves to blaim everyone else.

breaker · 03-16-2006, 12:34 PM

They think all pornsites are hosted and runned by americans? :D

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet

Notice that folks, and dont forget it.

Notice they are from MONTANA and ARKANSAS

2000 election

Arkansas
Bush 472,120 51%
Gore 420,424 45%

Montana
Bush 239,755 58%
Gore 137,264 34%

2004 election

Arkansas
Bush 572,898 54%
Kerry 469,953 45%

Montana
Bush 266,063 59%
Kerry 173,710 39%

wjxxx · 03-16-2006, 12:35 PM

democrats

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by breaker

They think all pornsites are hosted and runned by americans? :D

Appearantly. I want to see the look on their faces if this passes and they type in http://thehun.net and they still see porn. WTF are they going to do then?

G-Rotica · 03-16-2006, 12:37 PM

What a bunch of fucksticks.

Grapesoda · 03-16-2006, 12:39 PM

the domain to get now is 'xxx.xxx' can ya imagine that one??? wow!!!

FightThisPatent · 03-16-2006, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by breaker

They think all pornsites are hosted and runned by americans? :D

Some senators do understand that that laws like this one will only affect US-based websites, and that offshore ones will slip right on by... I think they really do understand that websites can move themselves offshore, but it's just a feel-good short-term solution that they are looking at.

Will any of these kinds of laws stop children from unwittingly seeing porn... not at all.. it only serves to further diminish the freedoms we have in the US.... oh wait, Patriot Act I and II.. i guess we are becoming the land-of-the-quasi-free.

Fight the irony!

ronaldo · 03-16-2006, 12:41 PM

?Pryor said he believes a separate domain on the Internet for pornography will help parents filter their children?s access to inappropriate materials,? states the press release on Pryor?s website."

That statement alone shows how ass backwards their thinking is.

So, they can still type in cnn.com and read about the recent pedo crackdown? Sex is EVERYWHERE in one form or another.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if they were REALLY out to protect our children's interest, this wouldn't be an option. The ONLY option would be .kids. Then parents could filter out everything EXCEPT .kids and the only chance their kids would have of finding objectionable conduct, is someone who is INTENTIONALLY trying to show it to children.

KitA · 03-16-2006, 12:42 PM

stupid law

Lensman · 03-16-2006, 12:42 PM

So if you're not a us company, you can still use .com?

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo

?Pryor said he believes a separate domain on the Internet for pornography will help parents filter their children?s access to inappropriate materials,? states the press release on Pryor?s website."

That statement alone shows how ass backwards their thinking is.

So, they can still type in cnn.com and read about the recent pedo crackdown? Sex is EVERYWHERE in one form or another.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if they were REALLY out to protect our children's interest, this wouldn't be an option. The ONLY option would be .kids. Then parents could filter out everything EXCEPT .kids and the only chance their kids would have of finding objectionable conduct, is someone who is INTENTIONALLY trying to show it to children.

Oh god forbid you make big corporations have to have websites like nick.kids, cartoonnetwork.kids, disney.kids etc etc

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman

So if you're not a us company, you can still use .com?

Our government expects everyone to follow US law. Seriously they do.

Matt 26z · 03-16-2006, 12:45 PM

This is just a political ploy by a couple Dems to appeal to conservatives. It will pass, there is no doubt about that.

?Senators Mark Pryor and Max Baucus (D-MT) today introduced legislation to require Web sites with adult content to have an .xxx domain that only adults can access,?

That would mean the end of free porn in the US if this goes through and the ACLU or the FSC are unable to have it struck down.

bdld · 03-16-2006, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv$

So ok - does this mean it's set in stone now or still up in the air?

things usually take a long long time to get done, so at this time it's just a proposal, nothing's been put into law yet.

breaker · 03-16-2006, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman

So if you're not a us company, you can still use .com?

Ofcourse, There are alot countries left to move your business to even if some countries do the same.

Fetish Gimp · 03-16-2006, 12:50 PM

Should I start running like a beheaded chicken now, or later? Decisions, decisions.

kmanrox · 03-16-2006, 12:51 PM

dont hold your breaths on this bill

iwantchixx · 03-16-2006, 12:58 PM

While this may just be something that will be thrown out it's stll fucking scary that they don't give a flying fuck what the financial implications of being forced to a new TLD are.

Such as:
Domain Squatting
SEO Issues
Branding
Etc

gornyhuy · 03-16-2006, 01:00 PM

The US still pwns and regulates the domain registration business, right?

leedsfan · 03-16-2006, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gornyhuy

The US still pwns and regulates the domain registration business, right?

yup, although ICANN was under EU pressure to rescind its power, the US gov put ICANN in charge for the forseeable future. That means ICANN is under US gov control, and if it goes through you can expect shit to hit the fan, and the adult industry left to fight its own battles over cyber squatting, SEO, and other fallout issues.

Bascially if you're a US based site owner you'd better hope this doesn't go through or you'll be forced to deal with massive headaches with transition moving your business aborad, or even bigger headaches with .xxx

Drake · 03-16-2006, 01:25 PM

I doubt it's going to come to pass

loverboy · 03-16-2006, 01:32 PM

this bill will stumble alot of obstacles before if get's approved, lots of uncertainty from this point on for all webmasters/owners

-HF · 03-16-2006, 01:41 PM

anyone assuming this would only hit US based sites and businesses better also assume that with ICANN under US control - scratch the idea of it being for a forseeable future only, noone can seriously expect Verisign to engage in big negotiations in 2012, so the "presumptive renewal" right given to them effectively means a US controlled entity, namely Verisign, has everlasting control over .com and we will probably see a similar deal for the Verisign controlled .net at some point - we could also expect TOS following suit and forbidding adult material under non-adult TLDs.

then add a bit of filtering for catch phrases, a bit of grassing up from rivaling webmasters, and we'll basically see the germans' crap with 'webmasters' and lawyers making a living from pissing on each other on a worldwide scale.

fun.

mardigras · 03-16-2006, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

This is just a political ploy by a couple Dems to appeal to conservatives.

Another very interesting instance of that is Joe Lieberman co-sponsoring Sam Brownback with their recent obscenity bill...

Bastards

polish_aristocrat · 03-16-2006, 01:45 PM

oh fuck

HairToStay · 03-16-2006, 01:58 PM

And for those of us who own websites with the same URL and different TLD? What do they do, draw straws to see if the .com, .net, .org, .ws etc get the new TLD?

Why can't parents be responsible for their children? There are filters now, what makes them think that filtering out .xxx will work if the current filters don't work?

dissipate · 03-16-2006, 02:02 PM

if anything like this did ever pass - everyone in the US would move thier hosting offshore and it wouldnt matter anyways

polish_aristocrat · 03-16-2006, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdld

things usually take a long long time to get done, so at this time it's just a proposal, nothing's been put into law yet.

so when will we know if its decided?

how long does it take to either make it a law or decline it for good?

Forkbeard · 03-16-2006, 02:10 PM

What makes you think that the owner of girlsex.com or girlsex.net or whatever are going to get *any* preference when it comes to allocating girlsex.xxx? No, if any sort of mandatory .xxx ever goes live, you'll be left to fight it out with every big-money domain speculator on the globe for the .xxx versions of your current domains. Trademark law may give you some preference in certain cases, but I wouldn't count on that too much. \

It will be bloody and messy and the shit will be falling out for *decades*.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2006, 02:11 PM

All democrat sponsored bills hmmmmmmmmmmm

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet

All democrat sponsored bills hmmmmmmmmmmm

do you NOT read posts? geesh! I post AGAIN for those that need hooked on phonics. Notice which STATES they are from and who those states voted for. Montana has only voted for a democrat Presidential candidate TWICE since 1952. That's 14 elections. In 1964 and in 1992.

Notice they are from MONTANA and ARKANSAS

2000 election

Arkansas
Bush 472,120 51%
Gore 420,424 45%

Montana
Bush 239,755 58%
Gore 137,264 34%

2004 election

Arkansas
Bush 572,898 54%
Kerry 469,953 45%

Montana
Bush 266,063 59%
Kerry 173,710 39%

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2006, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

do you NOT read posts? geesh! I post AGAIN for those that need hooked on phonics. Notice which STATES they are from and who those states voted for. Montana has only voted for a democrat Presidential candidate TWICE since 1952. That's 14 elections. In 1964 and in 1992.

Notice they are from MONTANA and ARKANSAS

2000 election

Arkansas
Bush 472,120 51%
Gore 420,424 45%

Montana
Bush 239,755 58%
Gore 137,264 34%

2004 election

Arkansas
Bush 572,898 54%
Kerry 469,953 45%

Montana
Bush 266,063 59%
Kerry 173,710 39%

Your logic is a joke dude. The senators sponsoring the bill are DEMOCRATS!! It doesnt matter if every single person in the state besides them are republicans. They are DEMOCRATS! Duh fuckin duh.

Thanks for the stats that show Gore and Kerry both getting spanked by a Diabolicaly brillian moron though.

mikesouth · 03-16-2006, 03:27 PM

Oh but they CAN'T d that...just ask Greg Picconelli or Lawrence Walters ...ASSWIPES

They wanted to sell us all out to .XXX rremember.

I HATE Always being right.

GatorB · 03-16-2006, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet

Your logic is a joke dude. The senators sponsoring the bill are DEMOCRATS!! It doesnt matter if every single person in the state besides them are republicans. They are DEMOCRATS! Duh fuckin duh.

Thanks for the stats that show Gore and Kerry both getting spanked by a Diabolicaly brillian moron though.

My logic is fine. No such thing as a democrat in a republican state. fact is Montana has participated in 29 presidnetial elections and voted republican 18 times. Including 12 of the last 14. At least I looked up FACTS and not spout off at the mouth.

You are a moron. Porn webmasters for Bush. Jews for Hitler. Blacks for the KKK. Christians for Satan.

Heywood Jablome · 03-16-2006, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

My logic is fine. No such thing as a democrat in a republican state. fact is Montana has participated in 29 presidnetial elections and voted republican 18 times. Including 12 of the last 14. At least I looked up FACTS and not spout off at the mouth.

Did you look up what party the Governor of Montana belongs to?

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2006, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

My logic is fine. No such thing as a democrat in a republican state. fact is Montana has participated in 29 presidnetial elections and voted republican 18 times. Including 12 of the last 14. At least I looked up FACTS and not spout off at the mouth.

You are a moron. Porn webmasters for Bush. Jews for Hitler. Blacks for the KKK. Christians for Satan.

Do you know what recent President was FROM FUCKIN ARKANSAS? And won the state? What a dumbass you are srsly. lol

03-16-2006, 12:23 PM	#1
Connor Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,294	Breaking News: Mandatory .XXX Senate Bill Created Not sure if this was posted here yet or not, but this is significant news: https://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=...rder=0&thold=0 __________________ YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! \| SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

03-16-2006, 12:23 PM	#2
gornyhuy Chafed. Join Date: May 2002 Location: Face Down in Pussy Posts: 18,041	OH christ. __________________ icq:159548293

03-16-2006, 12:29 PM	#9
luv$ !$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$ Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Paper Street Posts: 6,158	So ok - does this mean it's set in stone now or still up in the air? __________________ Domain Auction - now till 12:01AM on the 2nd... Paper Streeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet Cash The Real Workout - Innocent High - Oye Loca - Her Freshman Year - Solo Interviews - This Girl Sucks. ** HQ Fresh ORIGINAL sites.

03-16-2006, 12:30 PM	#11
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	When will the day come that parents will get in trouble for what their kids are doing?? __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-16-2006, 12:32 PM	#12
DutchTeenCash I like Dutch Girls Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: dutchteencash.com Posts: 21,684	fuck 9chars __________________ ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash bob AT dutchteencash DOT com ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

03-16-2006, 12:24 PM	#3
RayBonga too cool for highschool Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: East side, West side, Worldwide! Posts: 12,164	I feel bad for that guy that paid 14 million bucks for sex.com

03-16-2006, 12:27 PM	#4
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	Hard to do since .xxx doesn't even exist. This will get thrown out in court if it passes.

03-16-2006, 12:29 PM	#7
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	for fucks sake

03-16-2006, 12:29 PM	#8
dropped9 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Your moms box Posts: 26,727	so xxx is NOT dead.... interesting...

03-16-2006, 12:33 PM	#13
dissipate The Dirty Frenchman Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Lost Angeles Posts: 8,904	That bill will never fly.

03-16-2006, 12:34 PM	#15
breaker Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: .EU Fiasco Posts: 652	They think all pornsites are hosted and runned by americans? :D __________________ Cash Breaker Latinas Deliciosas Blonde Loves Black She's Fuckable Fresh Blowjobs ICQ: 147104800

03-16-2006, 12:35 PM	#17
wjxxx So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 4,448	democrats

03-16-2006, 12:37 PM	#19
G-Rotica Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,258	What a bunch of fucksticks. __________________

03-16-2006, 12:39 PM	#20
Grapesoda So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Montana Posts: 46,238	the domain to get now is 'xxx.xxx' can ya imagine that one??? wow!!!

03-16-2006, 12:41 PM	#22
ronaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: ICQ#: 272000271 Posts: 5,475	?Pryor said he believes a separate domain on the Internet for pornography will help parents filter their children?s access to inappropriate materials,? states the press release on Pryor?s website." That statement alone shows how ass backwards their thinking is. So, they can still type in cnn.com and read about the recent pedo crackdown? Sex is EVERYWHERE in one form or another. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if they were REALLY out to protect our children's interest, this wouldn't be an option. The ONLY option would be .kids. Then parents could filter out everything EXCEPT .kids and the only chance their kids would have of finding objectionable conduct, is someone who is INTENTIONALLY trying to show it to children.

03-16-2006, 12:42 PM	#23
KitA Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 338	stupid law

03-16-2006, 12:42 PM	#24
Lensman GFY Chaperone Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Adult.com Posts: 9,846	So if you're not a us company, you can still use .com?

03-16-2006, 12:45 PM	#27
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	This is just a political ploy by a couple Dems to appeal to conservatives. It will pass, there is no doubt about that. ?Senators Mark Pryor and Max Baucus (D-MT) today introduced legislation to require Web sites with adult content to have an .xxx domain that only adults can access,? That would mean the end of free porn in the US if this goes through and the ACLU or the FSC are unable to have it struck down.

03-16-2006, 12:50 PM	#30
Fetish Gimp Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,699	Should I start running like a beheaded chicken now, or later? Decisions, decisions. __________________ Strapon Seduction - femdom blog \| Twitter

03-16-2006, 12:51 PM	#31
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,285	dont hold your breaths on this bill

03-16-2006, 12:58 PM	#32
iwantchixx Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: The Boonies Posts: 12,860	While this may just be something that will be thrown out it's stll fucking scary that they don't give a flying fuck what the financial implications of being forced to a new TLD are. Such as: Domain Squatting SEO Issues Branding Etc

03-16-2006, 01:00 PM	#33
gornyhuy Chafed. Join Date: May 2002 Location: Face Down in Pussy Posts: 18,041	The US still pwns and regulates the domain registration business, right? __________________ icq:159548293

03-16-2006, 01:25 PM	#35
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	I doubt it's going to come to pass

03-16-2006, 01:32 PM	#36
loverboy When it rains, it pours Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 20,609	this bill will stumble alot of obstacles before if get's approved, lots of uncertainty from this point on for all webmasters/owners

03-16-2006, 01:41 PM	#37
-HF Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: EU Posts: 174	anyone assuming this would only hit US based sites and businesses better also assume that with ICANN under US control - scratch the idea of it being for a forseeable future only, noone can seriously expect Verisign to engage in big negotiations in 2012, so the "presumptive renewal" right given to them effectively means a US controlled entity, namely Verisign, has everlasting control over .com and we will probably see a similar deal for the Verisign controlled .net at some point - we could also expect TOS following suit and forbidding adult material under non-adult TLDs. then add a bit of filtering for catch phrases, a bit of grassing up from rivaling webmasters, and we'll basically see the germans' crap with 'webmasters' and lawyers making a living from pissing on each other on a worldwide scale. fun. __________________ .

03-16-2006, 01:45 PM	#39
polish_aristocrat Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 40,377	oh fuck __________________ I don't use ICQ anymore.

03-16-2006, 01:58 PM	#40
HairToStay Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Southcoast, Mass. Posts: 1,521	And for those of us who own websites with the same URL and different TLD? What do they do, draw straws to see if the .com, .net, .org, .ws etc get the new TLD? Why can't parents be responsible for their children? There are filters now, what makes them think that filtering out .xxx will work if the current filters don't work? __________________ Make bank by giving your surfers free pics every day and it costs you NOTHING! Use POTD Sponsors to find adult sponsors in more than 75 niches who offer a POTD feature!

03-16-2006, 02:02 PM	#41
dissipate The Dirty Frenchman Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Lost Angeles Posts: 8,904	if anything like this did ever pass - everyone in the US would move thier hosting offshore and it wouldnt matter anyways

03-16-2006, 02:10 PM	#43
Forkbeard Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: I Roam Around Posts: 2,236	What makes you think that the owner of girlsex.com or girlsex.net or whatever are going to get any preference when it comes to allocating girlsex.xxx? No, if any sort of mandatory .xxx ever goes live, you'll be left to fight it out with every big-money domain speculator on the globe for the .xxx versions of your current domains. Trademark law may give you some preference in certain cases, but I wouldn't count on that too much. \ It will be bloody and messy and the shit will be falling out for decades. __________________ Offering sponsored blog posts and custom writing services.

03-16-2006, 02:11 PM	#44
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	All democrat sponsored bills hmmmmmmmmmmm

03-16-2006, 03:27 PM	#47
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,334	Oh but they CAN'T d that...just ask Greg Picconelli or Lawrence Walters ...ASSWIPES They wanted to sell us all out to .XXX rremember. I HATE Always being right. __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.