So Now I Guess the Global Warming Naysayers Were Wrong - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

CDSmith · 03-16-2007, 03:21 PM

I don't know, we had a pretty fucking cold winter up here this year. Lots of weeks of -40 (and colder).

Where's the warming?

Penthouse Tony · 03-16-2007, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

So if you have HIV you might was well not give a fuck about getting syphillis.

CO2 is an STD now?

Here is a better analogy. Your river water has 0.055% impurities in it. When you scoop it out into your drinking vessel the vessel (man made) adds 0.005% more impurities to. It's no cause for alarm.

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

I'm sure Russia loves global warming since that means Siberia will turn into the next great grain belt. Since Russia is basically turning back into it's former self if you are against reducing man made emmisions of green house gasses you support communism.

The Russians don't believe the Global Warming hype either.
So much for your theory on that point.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Sexbankroll

stickyfingerz, do you believe that co2 doesn't cause global warming?

have you ever thought about what you're arguing for? if you're right, nothing really matters.

What happens if you're wrong? Frankly, i really hope you ARE right, but what happens dude, if you are wrong?

R

Do you eat meat?

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Would depend how much you use them.

A Prius owner that put 30,000 miles year on his car is going to pollute more than a Hummer owner than only takes it out once in a great while and puts maybe 3000 miles a year

I'm talking an apples to apples comparison.
Lets say 10,000 miles on any of the three.

Dvae · 03-16-2007, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

Your argument is just as useless as my websites. Just because medicine and medical care is getting better, does not justify polluting more.

Who said I was for polluting. I'm not.
I believe we should recycle as much as possible as well.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 03:59 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_21b7...elated&search=

Splum · 03-16-2007, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_21b7...elated&search=

Exposing the cult of Gore for sure.

AdultDeals · 03-16-2007, 04:21 PM

I've generally given up on this 'argument' since it is best left up to the experts. I do follow the discussion and evidence on both sides, but at the end of the day I'd rather err on the side of caution when our environment is concerned. Even among scientists this is a very hot-button issue.

Fortunately most countries have adopted Kyoto and other regulations to decrease the amount of pollution their companies produce. I think the most important argument is what the proper steps are to reduce air pollution and water pollution and other things that have an undeniable impact on us. Any type of greenouse gas benefits will follow suit. I don't think anyone on either side would argue that making cars cleaner and factories cleaner and not dumping toxic materials into rivers and water supplies is a GOOD thing.

I support regulations on companies to produce clean vehicles and factories and power plants. That has a direct affect on quality of life for everyone. Whether humans are directly causing a greenhouse effect will be debated for years to come, so I for one will watch as an interested bystander.

scardog · 03-16-2007, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultDeals

I've generally given up on this 'argument' since it is best left up to the experts. I do follow the discussion and evidence on both sides, but at the end of the day I'd rather err on the side of caution when our environment is concerned. Even among scientists this is a very hot-button issue.

Fortunately most countries have adopted Kyoto and other regulations to decrease the amount of pollution their companies produce. I think the most important argument is what the proper steps are to reduce air pollution and water pollution and other things that have an undeniable impact on us. Any type of greenouse gas benefits will follow suit. I don't think anyone on either side would argue that making cars cleaner and factories cleaner and not dumping toxic materials into rivers and water supplies is a GOOD thing.

I support regulations on companies to produce clean vehicles and factories and power plants. That has a direct affect on quality of life for everyone. Whether humans are directly causing a greenhouse effect will be debated for years to come, so I for one will watch as an interested bystander.

Regulating companies always scares me. Get everybody thinking we are saving the planet, put big restrictions on what companies can produce, and what people can buy. Pretty soon, they start saying online porn is causing children to become perverts. Let's err on the side of caution, and start regulating more on what people can sell online. 2257, COPA, all under the guise of protecting children. We all know that is not what they were up to, but people not in the biz would support them all day long, right? Leave companies and individuals alone. Stop making up junk science so you can tax us and control us more. Everybody wants a clean environment, and all electric cars would be fantastic.

scardog · 03-16-2007, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Good for Mars. You realize Mars and Earth are completely sperate. Explain Venus dipshit.

Yes, Mars and Earth are completely separate. Can you consider the possiblity that Earth and Mars are heating up for the same reason "solar intensity"? What if Al Gore told you it was true, would you believe it then? And I don't think you are a dipshit, just because we don't share the same opinion on this issue.

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae

The Russians don't believe the Global Warming hype either.
So much for your theory on that point.

So if you don't believe in something it's not true? So if you stepped in front of a train and as long as you didn't believe the train would kill you, you'd live?

GatorB · 03-16-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scardog

Yes, Mars and Earth are completely separate. Can you consider the possiblity that Earth and Mars are heating up for the same reason "solar intensity"? What if Al Gore told you it was true, would you believe it then? And I don't think you are a dipshit, just because we don't share the same opinion on this issue.

"solar intensity" even though the sun's intensity is 30% LESS than what it was during the age of dinosaurs? Go look it up.

stickyfingerz · 03-16-2007, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

"solar intensity" even though the sun's intensity is 30% LESS than what it was during the age of dinosaurs? Go look it up.

Hmm odd tha during the middle ages it was much hotter than it was today. So even if its 30% less than it was during the age of the dinosaurs its still might be much more intense than it was during the last ice age ya think?

03-16-2007, 03:21 PM	#51
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	I don't know, we had a pretty fucking cold winter up here this year. Lots of weeks of -40 (and colder). Where's the warming? __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

03-16-2007, 03:59 PM	#57
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	https://youtube.com/watch?v=_21b7...elated&search=

03-16-2007, 04:21 PM	#59
AdultDeals Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 70	I've generally given up on this 'argument' since it is best left up to the experts. I do follow the discussion and evidence on both sides, but at the end of the day I'd rather err on the side of caution when our environment is concerned. Even among scientists this is a very hot-button issue. Fortunately most countries have adopted Kyoto and other regulations to decrease the amount of pollution their companies produce. I think the most important argument is what the proper steps are to reduce air pollution and water pollution and other things that have an undeniable impact on us. Any type of greenouse gas benefits will follow suit. I don't think anyone on either side would argue that making cars cleaner and factories cleaner and not dumping toxic materials into rivers and water supplies is a GOOD thing. I support regulations on companies to produce clean vehicles and factories and power plants. That has a direct affect on quality of life for everyone. Whether humans are directly causing a greenhouse effect will be debated for years to come, so I for one will watch as an interested bystander.