Tony Blair offers Iran hardline decision: Make a move - GoFuckYourself.com

BradM · 03-27-2007, 09:32 AM

Tony Blair has said that if Iran does not release the 15 British troops in a timely manner, he will continue to make press releases suggesting that Iran release the troops. He is committed to pursuing the release of her Majesty's soldiers until they are safe and free, even if that means making really harsh beat-around-the-bush comments for months.

A spokesperson for the Iranian government has replied "Oh. I didn't realise that the situation was so grave for us. We will be releasing the sailors immediately." he paused for a moment and then shouted "NOT!" into my face.

See also: Briton and the US have a history of being faggots and stepping on eggshells when it comes to Iran.

Jman · 03-27-2007, 09:37 AM

"I'll send you hate mail until you give me my boys back"

WOW!!!

DWB · 03-27-2007, 10:06 AM

Will he be sending any nasty letters?

crockett · 03-27-2007, 10:09 AM

LoL this is why I said in another thread the only good thing about Bush is the fact we would have already launched cruise missle at them.

I feel for the troops and hope they are released but sometimes you have to take the bull by it's horns. Iran is one of those countries that only understands payne.

I hate Bush and he's a total fuck up, but at least in a situation like this he'd probably act in force. This is the second time Iran has done the same thing to British troops and they will continue to do it because they know they can get away with it.

Iran needs to get a little bitch slap to knock some sense into them.

sumphatpimp · 03-27-2007, 10:16 AM

those sailors were bait and the Iranians took it.
now Bush and Blair have a reason to invade.
stay tuned folks. it will get better.

Sarah_Jayne · 03-27-2007, 10:41 AM

and what would Canada do?

Splum · 03-27-2007, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sumphatpimp

those sailors were bait and the Iranians took it.
now Bush and Blair have a reason to invade.
stay tuned folks. it will get better.

You are a dumb fuck, go back to moveon.org

sumphatpimp · 03-27-2007, 10:59 AM

then why the big build up in the area?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html

porno jew · 03-27-2007, 11:01 AM

the future of the islamic revolution in iran.

jono · 03-27-2007, 11:06 AM

Here we go again

Expo_Vids · 03-27-2007, 11:11 AM

Tony is a stool boy. He knows it and is just playing his part.

Bahhh baaaaaaaahhhh!!!!

Splum · 03-27-2007, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sumphatpimp

then why the big build up in the area?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html

Duhh because we may have to strike Irans nuclear projects and the only thing that these barbarians understand is a show of force. Also buddy we dont need a fucking excuse to go to war, havent you people learned that by now?

pornguy · 03-27-2007, 11:21 AM

Either way,, things are getting fucked up.

baddog · 03-27-2007, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash

and what would Canada do?

Canada doesn't have 15 sailors to lose.

wizhard · 03-27-2007, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Expo_Vids

Tony is a stool boy. He knows it and is just playing his part.

Bahhh baaaaaaaahhhh!!!!

What's worse is that in the UK he now percieved as a "lame duck" leader and I would say he would struggle to get the backing from even his party's members to use force against Iran..............and I recon the Iranians know that only too well

BradM · 03-27-2007, 11:37 AM

Sarah,
The exact same thing - because they are a bunch of lameass fags too.
The response would be:

"CNN: Stephen Harper today announced that he is thinking about going to the UN to talk about how to bring home the entire Canadian Navy from Iran. All 8 Naval officers comprising the entire Canadian Fleet were taken 2 years ago by the Iranians. They have been tortured and maimed. Today Stephen Harper is considering talking through the UN to see if they can bring them back to safety. This is after years of nasty letters and idle threats which is a staple strategy against insane leaders of fucked up countries all around the world by UK and Canadian diplomats."

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 03-27-2007, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sumphatpimp

those sailors were bait and the Iranians took it.
now Bush and Blair have a reason to invade.
stay tuned folks. it will get better.

Fap · 03-27-2007, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Canada doesn't have 15 sailors to lose.

Classic pic

rotowa85 · 03-27-2007, 04:38 PM

you know what i reckon the vast mojority of you lot chatting shit bout blair, arent even british so have no idea what you are chatting about, the simle fact is that if blair goes to war with iran over this the first thing they will do is kill the troops hld hostage. but if worse comes to worse blair will invade trust me on that.
the difference between the uk anbd american gov is that we see war as the last option whereas alot of time you tend to see it as the only option

Sarah_Jayne · 03-27-2007, 04:44 PM

This does feel a bit like when the Iranian embassy when the conclusion came as power was handed from Carter to Reagan.

Blair probably has less than two months before he steps down. I bet Gordon Brown is hoping Tony fixes it for him first.

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 04:50 PM

I dont understand why the media is making a big whoop about this - the exact same thing happened 2 years ago with some other British soldiers and sailors taken by Iran - and you didnt hear a peep in the news - and they were returned after the British finally admitted they fucked up and the guys were in Iranian waters - same case here - its just gonna take longer for Blair to admit fault this time

JamesK2 · 03-27-2007, 04:55 PM

Make a move, make a move, every posse make a move

Splum · 03-27-2007, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

I dont understand why the media is making a big whoop about this - the exact same thing happened 2 years ago with some other British soldiers and sailors taken by Iran - and you didnt hear a peep in the news - and they were returned after the British finally admitted they fucked up and the guys were in Iranian waters - same case here - its just gonna take longer for Blair to admit fault this time

Why do you assume the British are at fault here? Your friends must fucking hate you, I mean if you cant trust friends who can you trust? Oh and the media DID pay attention to it two years ago, the British NEVER admitted fucking up either. You are a fucking terrorist arent you.

GatorB · 03-27-2007, 05:07 PM

Well it took us 444 days to get out hostages back. We would have gotten back sooner but Reagan made a deal with the Iranians not to release them so he could win the election in 1980 then have then release after he was inaugurated so it would look good for him.

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Why do you assume the British are at fault here? Your friends must fucking hate you, I mean if you cant trust friends who can you trust? Oh and the media DID pay attention to it two years ago, the British NEVER admitted fucking up either. You are a fucking terrorist arent you.

Wow - you must be an US All-American - gee - did they teach you to spout BS like that when you were teaching at the Chemical school in the military - you should have come into an outfit that really went out and fought and maybe you would have a little different attitude instead of that sniveling little kid that hides at a blackboard in the Army - I love cowards that do nothing but sit at their keyboards and hate on everyone - so Splum my friend - while I tend to have very little respect for you and your "type" of flag-waving little imbeciles that have never touched a weapon in war - I also have a lot of compassion for you as its obvious that you just needed a little extra attention when you were younger and didnt get it - terrible shame

Oh and here's the news from 2004 when it happened - almost exactly the same place this recent event occured:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3835313.stm
"British officials have said that the men may have mistakenly strayed over the maritime border."

Splum · 03-27-2007, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Wow - you must be an US All-American - gee - did they teach you to spout BS like that when you were teaching at the Chemical school in the military - you should have come into an outfit that really went out and fought

You know nothing about me and I am almost certain you were never in the military so dont make me laugh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

"British officials have said that the men may have mistakenly strayed over the maritime border."

The word "MAY" is not a definite but the fact that you assume the British are at fault speaks volumes about your allegiance terrorist.

Splum · 03-27-2007, 06:04 PM

Quote:

HMS Cornwall’s commander Commodore Nick Lambert said he hoped the incident was a “simple mistake”.

He added: “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind they were in Iraqi territorial waters.”

The Revolutionary Guards were also behind the kidnap of eight British servicemen in 2004.

In a two-day ordeal, the men faced verbal abuse and a mock execution.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007130852,00.html

Now someone tell me why mock executions arent against the Geneva convention?

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You know nothing about me and I am almost certain you were never in the military so dont make me laugh.
The word "MAY" is not a definite but the fact that you assume the British are at fault speaks volumes about your allegiance terrorist.

Lets see - you were in the 3rd Chemical if I remember correctly - which makes you a teacher at a Missouri school? Ft Woods school maybe?

As far as my military service - I served at the end of Viet Nam and for 12 years after that - I wont go into a lot of detail - suffice it say that I guarantee you that the medals I have are for actions you wouldnt have the allegiance to the US military or the stomach/guts for - and yes it was the US military I served in.
E6 up for Warrant when I left

I assume the British are at fault because the geographical location is exactly the same as the event in 2004 when the British admitted they had strayed - it happens all the time and the Iranians used it for a little PR - so fucking what? Like I said before - its all in the media attention its getting and we know who runs the media these days

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Now someone tell me why mock executions arent against the Geneva convention?

Because the Geneva Convention only applies to protection of prisoners of parties at war - and Iran isnt in a war

Splum · 03-27-2007, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Lets see - you were in the 3rd Chemical if I remember correctly - which makes you a teacher at a Missouri school? Ft Woods school maybe?

You should address me properly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Viet Nam

That explains it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

it happens all the time and the Iranians used it for a little PR - so fucking what?

Its ok that they verbally abuse and conduct mock executions on these British soldiers for a little PR? Are you fucking insane? I bet you were the first hippie to cry about the terrorists in Gitmo and Abu Ghraib yet when British soldiers are going through the same thing you say its PR. If you are an American you are a fucking disease to your own people, with Americans like you who needs enemies. Fucking traitor piece of shit.

Splum · 03-27-2007, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

Because the Geneva Convention only applies to protection of prisoners of parties at war - and Iran isnt in a war

Dont you mean countries at war?

Even with your "skewed" words above the rules wouldnt apply to prisoners at Gitmo. Either way you lose terrorist.

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Dont you mean countries at war?

Even with your "skewed" words above the rules wouldnt apply to prisoners at Gitmo. Either way you lose terrorist.

No I mean parties - since that is exactly what the Geneva convention says - but since youve never been in combat you wouldnt have to know the contents of the conventions:
"
Article 4 defines prisoners of war to include:
4.1.1 Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict and members of militias of such armed forces"

And did I ever bring up Gitmo or any other acts by anyone else - no - you did - which means that they must weigh heavy on your little brain - isnt it a fact that the loudest opposition to something is usually the most sympethetic - which I guess puts you in the situation of being the terrorists' friend and explains your insane rantings around here

Splum · 03-27-2007, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

....

You know what Marc Im just gonna bury the hatchet with ya here, lets go for a round of golf at Clear Creek. What do you say?

Wow your kind is certainly outnumbered down there in ole Miss, no wonder you are such a keyboard warrior.

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You should address me properly.

I did - I called you a desk jockey and idiot

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You know what Marc Im just gonna bury the hatchet with ya here, lets go for a round of golf at Clear Creek. What do you say?

Wow - you can use whois - youre good at that keyboard stuff
Come on down - its a short walk over the the first tee

Splum · 03-27-2007, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linkster

I did - I called you a desk jockey and idiot

Thats sir desk jockey to you grunt.

Linkster · 03-27-2007, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Thats sir desk jockey to you grunt.

I guess that means you were what - an O3 - I used to take little maggots like you and chew you up for breakfast - then go drink lunch with the O5s laughing at youre asses

crockett · 03-27-2007, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Canada doesn't have 15 sailors to lose.

Someone should tell Canada that Afghanistan is land locked..

IllTestYourGirls · 03-27-2007, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Someone should tell Canada that Afghanistan is land locked..

I thought that was part of the joke lol

directfiesta · 03-27-2007, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007130852,00.html

Now someone tell me why mock executions arent against the Geneva convention?

PLEASE, don't bring up the GENEVA convention ...

03-27-2007, 09:32 AM	#1
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	Tony Blair offers Iran hardline decision: Make a move Tony Blair has said that if Iran does not release the 15 British troops in a timely manner, he will continue to make press releases suggesting that Iran release the troops. He is committed to pursuing the release of her Majesty's soldiers until they are safe and free, even if that means making really harsh beat-around-the-bush comments for months. A spokesperson for the Iranian government has replied "Oh. I didn't realise that the situation was so grave for us. We will be releasing the sailors immediately." he paused for a moment and then shouted "NOT!" into my face. See also: Briton and the US have a history of being faggots and stepping on eggshells when it comes to Iran.

03-27-2007, 09:37 AM	#2
Jman Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Canuckstikan Posts: 22,719	"I'll send you hate mail until you give me my boys back" WOW!!! __________________ Wowify AI API Porn.AI Affiliates Porn AI email: [email protected] Teams: jean.francois.laverdiere TG: @jman1216

03-27-2007, 10:09 AM	#4
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	LoL this is why I said in another thread the only good thing about Bush is the fact we would have already launched cruise missle at them. I feel for the troops and hope they are released but sometimes you have to take the bull by it's horns. Iran is one of those countries that only understands payne. I hate Bush and he's a total fuck up, but at least in a situation like this he'd probably act in force. This is the second time Iran has done the same thing to British troops and they will continue to do it because they know they can get away with it. Iran needs to get a little bitch slap to knock some sense into them. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

03-27-2007, 11:01 AM	#9
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	the future of the islamic revolution in iran. Last edited by porno jew; 03-27-2007 at 11:02 AM..

03-27-2007, 11:06 AM	#10
jono Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: The Bar Posts: 617	Here we go again __________________ Web: http://www.K8TIE.com Email: gfy[at]k8tie.com ICQ: 28-638-063

03-27-2007, 10:06 AM	#3
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	Will he be sending any nasty letters?

03-27-2007, 10:16 AM	#5
sumphatpimp Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,235	those sailors were bait and the Iranians took it. now Bush and Blair have a reason to invade. stay tuned folks. it will get better.

03-27-2007, 10:41 AM	#6
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	and what would Canada do?

03-27-2007, 10:59 AM	#8
sumphatpimp Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,235	then why the big build up in the area? http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html

03-27-2007, 11:11 AM	#11
Expo_Vids Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,162	Tony is a stool boy. He knows it and is just playing his part. Bahhh baaaaaaaahhhh!!!! __________________ Squirting pussies convert like mad!!! @ Suirting 101

03-27-2007, 11:21 AM	#13
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Either way,, things are getting fucked up. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-27-2007, 11:37 AM	#16
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	Sarah, The exact same thing - because they are a bunch of lameass fags too. The response would be: "CNN: Stephen Harper today announced that he is thinking about going to the UN to talk about how to bring home the entire Canadian Navy from Iran. All 8 Naval officers comprising the entire Canadian Fleet were taken 2 years ago by the Iranians. They have been tortured and maimed. Today Stephen Harper is considering talking through the UN to see if they can bring them back to safety. This is after years of nasty letters and idle threats which is a staple strategy against insane leaders of fucked up countries all around the world by UK and Canadian diplomats." Last edited by BradM; 03-27-2007 at 11:39 AM..

03-27-2007, 04:38 PM	#19
rotowa85 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 278	you know what i reckon the vast mojority of you lot chatting shit bout blair, arent even british so have no idea what you are chatting about, the simle fact is that if blair goes to war with iran over this the first thing they will do is kill the troops hld hostage. but if worse comes to worse blair will invade trust me on that. the difference between the uk anbd american gov is that we see war as the last option whereas alot of time you tend to see it as the only option

03-27-2007, 04:44 PM	#20
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	This does feel a bit like when the Iranian embassy when the conclusion came as power was handed from Carter to Reagan. Blair probably has less than two months before he steps down. I bet Gordon Brown is hoping Tony fixes it for him first.

03-27-2007, 04:50 PM	#21
Linkster Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: DeltaHell Posts: 3,216	I dont understand why the media is making a big whoop about this - the exact same thing happened 2 years ago with some other British soldiers and sailors taken by Iran - and you didnt hear a peep in the news - and they were returned after the British finally admitted they fucked up and the guys were in Iranian waters - same case here - its just gonna take longer for Blair to admit fault this time __________________ Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

03-27-2007, 04:55 PM	#22
JamesK2 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 6,589	Make a move, make a move, every posse make a move __________________

03-27-2007, 05:07 PM	#24
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	Well it took us 444 days to get out hostages back. We would have gotten back sooner but Reagan made a deal with the Iranians not to release them so he could win the election in 1980 then have then release after he was inaugurated so it would look good for him.