RemoveYourContent News: April 5, 2010 - GoFuckYourself.com

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Removeyourcontent begins removing illegal tube google serps for clients, by the thousands, this month. We will begin targeting illegal tube placement in google and have them removed for infringement in mass.

If you're a legit tube owner, you have nothing to worry about. If you are concerned, please contact your content provider.

Ladyboy King · 04-06-2010, 05:55 PM

Great news. Hit after hit, drill those cock suckers.

04-06-2010, 06:07 PM

That guy is a tardo.

tiger · 04-06-2010, 06:13 PM

Interesting. They must have a new angle for this because I'm sure many have tried it before.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiger

Interesting. They must have a new angle for this because I'm sure many have tried it before.

It is not hard to do. Do a search on chillingeffects.org, and Perfect10. They have managed to do it time and again. Anyone (company with copyright material) can do it really. You just need some proof, and to file a formal complaint.

However, 90% of this industry simply rattles the sabre on message boards about their content being stolen. If that does not work, then they post daily about it and think that will somehow stop it.

Just Mike · 04-06-2010, 06:21 PM

this is great news

L-Pink · 04-06-2010, 06:23 PM

Good news in my opinion.

.

Brujah · 04-06-2010, 06:25 PM

Celebrity sites could start using RYC, to take-out the competition.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

Celebrity sites could start using RYC, to take-out the competition.

Huge fines on false DMCA's.

gideongallery · 04-06-2010, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Huge fines on false DMCA's.

including those that infringe on fair use.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 07:14 PM

Quote:

This message is hidden because gideongallery is on your ignore list.

Brujah · 04-06-2010, 07:22 PM

That's what Perfect 10 did. Names of celebrities they didn't even own the content for, so I'm sure it could be done and has been done. There are no fines on false DMCA's unless you counter file and sue and prove you have a right to the content.

More importantly though, why would anyone with a celebrity site or that sells celebrity content applaud RYC so much for their aggressive DMCA filing and now adding Google to the mix?

Si · 04-06-2010, 07:24 PM

If they can really do it, and prove they can do it. Then even more reason to use them.

If this is true, then it's a good step for everyone.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

That's what Perfect 10 did. Names of celebrities they didn't even own the content for

You think that Google would have all the info on chillingeffects.org, and remove hundreds if not thousands of sites from an index, and risk all kinds of lawsuits based on false claims?

No offense but thanks for the laugh.

Agent 488 · 04-06-2010, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

You think that Google would have all the info on chillingeffects.org, and remove hundreds if not thousands of sites from an index, and risk all kinds of lawsuits based on false claims?

No offense but thanks for the laugh.

google did. i knew plenty of people personally who had their index pages removed due to a false claim from perfect 10.

Brujah · 04-06-2010, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

You think that Google would have all the info on chillingeffects.org, and remove hundreds if not thousands of sites from an index, and risk all kinds of lawsuits based on false claims?

No offense but thanks for the laugh.

Sounds like you don't understand DMCA.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488

google did. i knew plenty of people personally who had their index pages removed due to a false claim from perfect 10.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

Sounds like you don't understand DMCA.

Unlike you, I am a content producer. I also send out DMCA's every week.

Safe to say I know it a lot better than you.

Robbie · 04-06-2010, 07:44 PM

RYC kicks ass.

DMCA'ing stuff off of Google is a tricky thing. You have to ask yourself the question: "Do I want it off Google, or do I want it down off the offending site"
If you take it off the site then you can't dmca google for something that doesn't exist.

So you have to first get it off google and then get it off the offending site. Eric and RYC have done a great job for us coordinating that task and helping me make sales by keeping piracy in check for me.

Brujah · 04-06-2010, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Unlike you, I am a content producer. I also send out DMCA's every week.

Safe to say I know it a lot better than you.

Obviously not if you think that Google doesn't respond to fake DMCA claims.

The DMCA provisions are pretty clear cut.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_...ack_provisions

Quote:

Takedown example

Here's an example of how the takedown procedures would work:

Alice puts a copy of Bob's song on her AOL-hosted website.

Bob, searching the Internet, finds Alice's copy.

Charlie, Bob's lawyer, sends a letter to AOL's designated agent (registered with the Copyright Office) including:

contact information
the name of the song that was copied
the address of the copied song
a statement that he has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
a statement that the information in the notification is accurate
a statement that, under penalty of perjury, Charlie is authorized to act for the copyright holder
his signature

AOL takes the song down.

AOL tells Alice that they have taken the song down.

Alice now has the option of sending a counter-notice to AOL, if she feels the song was taken down unfairly. The notice includes

contact information
identification of the removed song
a statement under penalty of perjury that Alice has a good faith belief the material was mistakenly taken down
a statement consenting to the jurisdiction of Alice's local US Federal District Court, or, if outside the US, to a US Federal District Court in any jurisdiction in which AOL is found.
her signature

If Alice does file a valid counter-notice, AOL notifies Bob, then waits 10-14 business days for a lawsuit to be filed by Bob.

If Bob does not file a lawsuit, then AOL must put the material back up.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 07:54 PM

I knew we'd get some Robbie action.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie

RYC kicks ass.

DMCA'ing stuff off of Google is a tricky thing. You have to ask yourself the question: "Do I want it off Google, or do I want it down off the offending site"
If you take it off the site then you can't dmca google for something that doesn't exist.

So you have to first get it off google and then get it off the offending site. Eric and RYC have done a great job for us coordinating that task and helping me make sales by keeping piracy in check for me.

hawkadu · 04-06-2010, 07:58 PM

I'm wondering which content they are talking about and even when the biggest tube sites are owned by the biggest sponsors themselves, who has asked them to remove the content?????

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkadu

who has asked them to remove the content?????

Robbie · 04-06-2010, 08:04 PM

Huckleberried. lol

Robbie · 04-06-2010, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkadu

I'm wondering which content they are talking about and even when the biggest tube sites are owned by the biggest sponsors themselves, who has asked them to remove the content?????

When you hire RYC to remove your content from offending sites that's what they do. And to answer your question: NO. They don't just go around working for people who don't pay them! lol

You have to pay them as a client in order to get their services.

hawkadu · 04-06-2010, 08:09 PM

Hey Robbie, I know they won't work for anyone without money. What I wanted to say is tubes are full of content from biggest sponsors and they do nothing to remove it. If the industry has to get back on track, big sponsors must take action but they won't as long as they are making money.

Klen · 04-06-2010, 08:13 PM

I would love to see pornhub and keezemovies from google,but seems google doesnt care for some reason.And there is a plently of valid reason to remove them according to google rules,starting from copyright infrigment,lack of 2257 documentation,and buying hardlinks.

Robbie · 04-06-2010, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkadu

Hey Robbie, I know they won't work for anyone without money. What I wanted to say is tubes are full of content from biggest sponsors and they do nothing to remove it. If the industry has to get back on track, big sponsors must take action but they won't as long as they are making money.

You are absolutely right. It's killing affiliate sales to those particular sponsors. But you have to realize that a lot of them make their money in ways other than selling a membership to a surfer. It's a numbers game for the ones you are referring to and they don't give a damn about the actual "porn business"

It's just the reality of the situation. All I can do is make sure my stuff stays in the members area as much as I can so that when somebody joins up they have a membership that is actually worth something.

And if there are any affiliates left, they can at least know that if they send traffic to us they have a fighting chance of making a sale.

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkadu

Hey Robbie, I know they won't work for anyone without money. What I wanted to say is tubes are full of content from biggest sponsors and they do nothing to remove it. If the industry has to get back on track, big sponsors must take action but they won't as long as they are making money.

That comes down to WHO holds the copyright per licensing agreement.

Not all companies license exclusively, nor do they all shoot their own content. So it would come down to the license and who hold the copyright for each individual production. Which a lot of times, not always, would be the original producer. So it would be up to them to enforce it.

If you shoot exclusively for a company, and they hold all rights including copyright. Then it would be up to THEM to enforce it. To understand why a lot of enforcement is not done, you actually have to understand the back end of content production and licensing.

hawkadu · 04-06-2010, 08:32 PM

I just wish all the copyright owners of the content take some action to bring all the tubes down. Those motherfuckers have almost killed the biz...

Barefootsies · 04-06-2010, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkadu

I just wish all the copyright owners of the content take some action to bring all the tubes down. Those motherfuckers have almost killed the biz...

You see, that's where it starts getting tricky chief...

Keep in mind how many small to middle market content producers there have been over the years. Not to mention those who've left this business and went back to day jobs. Most of those guys do not have the time, money, staff, or interest to enforce copyright. More over chase down every site that some BROgram owns.

This does not get into affiliates, and affiliate programs, and their use of said licensed material. Do you think the smaller productions companies are going to spend all this time playing Sherlock Holmes to chase down all this information?

Not a chance.

chaze · 04-06-2010, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Good news in my opinion.

.

Tube sites are really killing so much business. It's important not to give too much for free or people never spend any money.

TeenCat · 04-06-2010, 11:44 PM

excelent ... the best thing is when company who have nothing to do with your content is blocking sites that are promoting your content only cause the company dont know that you are allowed to promote the sites that way ... as happenned to me already. lets pray that those removecontent guys will be not in fire and report everything like some bots ...

Barefootsies · 04-07-2010, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TeenCat

excelent ... the best thing is when company who have nothing to do with your content is blocking sites that are promoting your content only cause the company dont know that you are allowed to promote the sites that way ... as happenned to me already. lets pray that those removecontent guys will be not in fire and report everything like some bots ...

andrej_NDC · 04-07-2010, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

You think that Google would have all the info on chillingeffects.org, and remove hundreds if not thousands of sites from an index, and risk all kinds of lawsuits based on false claims?

No offense but thanks for the laugh.

Google can remove anyone they want from the index for no reason, its their site, their rules.

Barefootsies · 04-07-2010, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC

Google can remove anyone they want from the index for no reason, its their site, their rules.

True dat.

Barefootsies · 04-09-2010, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkadu

I just wish all the copyright owners of the content take some action to bring all the tubes down. Those motherfuckers have almost killed the biz...

04-06-2010, 05:55 PM	#2
Ladyboy King Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Ladyboy Land Posts: 215	Great news. Hit after hit, drill those cock suckers. __________________ I'll make you feel dirty and 13.7% gay. XXX - All your ladyboys are belong to me!

04-06-2010, 06:13 PM	#4
tiger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 6,986	Interesting. They must have a new angle for this because I'm sure many have tried it before. __________________

04-06-2010, 06:21 PM	#6
Just Mike Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: In a land FAR FAR away Posts: 3,726	this is great news __________________ EMAIL: [email protected] / ICQ: 56205262 AWEMPIRE

04-06-2010, 06:25 PM	#8
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	Celebrity sites could start using RYC, to take-out the competition. __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

04-06-2010, 07:22 PM	#12
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	That's what Perfect 10 did. Names of celebrities they didn't even own the content for, so I'm sure it could be done and has been done. There are no fines on false DMCA's unless you counter file and sue and prove you have a right to the content. More importantly though, why would anyone with a celebrity site or that sells celebrity content applaud RYC so much for their aggressive DMCA filing and now adding Google to the mix? __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

04-06-2010, 06:07 PM	#3
Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE Guest Posts: n/a	That guy is a tardo.

04-06-2010, 06:23 PM	#7
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,152	Good news in my opinion. .

04-06-2010, 07:24 PM	#13
Si Such Fun! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 13,900	If they can really do it, and prove they can do it. Then even more reason to use them. If this is true, then it's a good step for everyone.

04-06-2010, 07:44 PM	#19
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,958	RYC kicks ass. DMCA'ing stuff off of Google is a tricky thing. You have to ask yourself the question: "Do I want it off Google, or do I want it down off the offending site" If you take it off the site then you can't dmca google for something that doesn't exist. So you have to first get it off google and then get it off the offending site. Eric and RYC have done a great job for us coordinating that task and helping me make sales by keeping piracy in check for me. __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

04-06-2010, 07:58 PM	#22
hawkadu Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 276	I'm wondering which content they are talking about and even when the biggest tube sites are owned by the biggest sponsors themselves, who has asked them to remove the content?????

04-06-2010, 08:04 PM	#24
Robbie Leaner, Meaner, Faster Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 20,958	Huckleberried. lol __________________ -Robbie ClaudiaMarie.Com

04-06-2010, 08:09 PM	#26
hawkadu Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 276	Hey Robbie, I know they won't work for anyone without money. What I wanted to say is tubes are full of content from biggest sponsors and they do nothing to remove it. If the industry has to get back on track, big sponsors must take action but they won't as long as they are making money.

04-06-2010, 08:13 PM	#27
Klen Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Little Vienna Posts: 32,235	I would love to see pornhub and keezemovies from google,but seems google doesnt care for some reason.And there is a plently of valid reason to remove them according to google rules,starting from copyright infrigment,lack of 2257 documentation,and buying hardlinks.

04-06-2010, 08:32 PM	#30
hawkadu Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 276	I just wish all the copyright owners of the content take some action to bring all the tubes down. Those motherfuckers have almost killed the biz...

04-06-2010, 11:44 PM	#33
TeenCat Too lazy to set a koala Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: CZ/EU forever! Posts: 16,139	excelent ... the best thing is when company who have nothing to do with your content is blocking sites that are promoting your content only cause the company dont know that you are allowed to promote the sites that way ... as happenned to me already. lets pray that those removecontent guys will be not in fire and report everything like some bots ... __________________ 6bot / Coming again very soon! Svit Zlin Radio 24/7!