![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Mainstream Businessman
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,291
|
SEO question...
I could be wrong about this, but it would seem like Google sees particular pages in 2 ways - general weight/authority (PageRank) + its relevance/authority for the term being searched.
Is the order in which pages come up under a "site:siteURL.com" search basically an indication of the order of general weight/authority Google sees the pages of the site? Was just wondering because on one site I've got, I have subpages targeted to particular terms, and I happened to notice that the one that seems to have been getting the best rankings for its term (with relation to the strength of the term/the traffic coming in from it) was 2nd to the home page in the order and thought there might be some correlation.
__________________
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Radelaide
Posts: 2,160
|
I don't think Google would do that.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Mainstream Businessman
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,291
|
I wouldn't either but compelled to ask given what I saw. Anyone who knows?
__________________
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montrealquebecanada
Posts: 5,500
|
Quote:
:D
__________________
![]() YOU Are Industry News! Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB! ICQ: 248843947 Skype: Mediaguy1 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Mainstream Businessman
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,291
|
Quote:
My index page is much higher than anything else for the primary keyword (wordA for reference sake). The 2nd page coming up is ranking highly for its term (which is wordB wordA). Other pages are ranking fine too but the most traffic besides the index page is coming from that 2nd page's ranking, and my conjecture was that perhaps they order the pages from that query by overall weight/authority, which is basically what pagerank is supposed to be. But I'm not really into SEO so wanted to see if someone who knows more may know for sure if there's any pattern to the order the site's pages come up for site:sitedomain.com. Edit: One thing I notice is that it seems if it's done on a site like GFY, recent threads will come up. So I guess wouldn't be in order of simply pagerank/juice a page has. It would seem Google is trying to put more emphasis on recent or oft-updated pages, which makes sense since that's how Twitter search has gotten so popular.
__________________
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montrealquebecanada
Posts: 5,500
|
Quote:
:D
__________________
![]() YOU Are Industry News! Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB! ICQ: 248843947 Skype: Mediaguy1 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,752
|
Quote:
You can check the pr rank for each one and most likely it would not be exact. But I definably agree with your first statement: |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |