California gets scarier - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

tony286 · 08-29-2010, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla

I'm sure they can track you by your cell phone

That was my thought.

GAMEFINEST · 08-29-2010, 06:48 PM

scary shit is the jobless rates here.

MetaMan · 08-29-2010, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob

Although it is indeed scary I don't care if they know where I am I am not doing anything wrong.

Who gets to decide who is really right or wrong? Who are the people who control that power? Who will be the people to control that power in 10 years?

Who watches over this power? Who will watch over it in 10 years?

Whoever watches over this power who do they answer too? Who will be able to use it next?

Never let unneeded laws advanced just because you are "innocent". Innocent people have never been found guilty have they?

96ukssob · 08-29-2010, 06:55 PM

oh no's! the gov't is going to know where I'm driving to!!!

they don't need to do this, they can already figure this out by looking at credit/debit card transaction statements, as well when you pay tolls on roads, airline tickets, etc.

What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy

cam_girls · 08-29-2010, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

Never let unneeded laws advanced just because you are "innocent". Innocent people have never been found guilty have they?

This is why Big Brother are so scary. Obama doesn't have a clue what they get up to, and what technology they use.

YOU ARE GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT

Have no doubt. Your state lawyer, judge, the police prosecutor and the even the court reporter are all work mates. They work in the same courtroom every day for 10 years. YOU are the new guy. You think the judge will side with YOU or the policeman?

Think of it this way. Should you lock away people who might be dangerous but you have no evidence, or let them free? THEY LOCK YOU UP ON SUSPICION. All it takes is someone to lay charges and the police do the rest.

I'm not saying it's wrong, if you're 90% sure someone is a mass murderer it's probably best to lock them away, but don't live in ignorance that being innocent is your keep safe.

And corporal punishment is in wide use.

aubreythree · 08-29-2010, 07:23 PM

yup, that might be reasonable

Brujah · 08-29-2010, 07:35 PM

This isn't a technology piece. Do you understand that sentence? Technology has existed for a long time that makes it POSSIBLE for you to be watched and followed.

This is a legal, government, and privacy piece. Just because they CAN do it, doesn't mean they've had the right to do it before, without a warrant.

Some of you people are just so stupid, it's no wonder we're in this shape. You worry more about whether some homosexual is going to be allowed to get married, more than the eroding of your rights. Sad.

d-null · 08-29-2010, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69

What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy

the thing you people that love to give away rights always forget, is the definition of "shady" tends to change through the years and governments love to become repressive to an individual's right to enjoy life as they see it without infringing on anyone else (I expect this concept to probably be over your head though)

cambaby · 08-30-2010, 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69

What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy

You must work for Google! That is exactly their stance on privacy.

Tell you what, why dont you let me install cameras in your home, I mean if you arent doing anything shady you shouldnt have a problem with it. Otherwise I think we could arrest you for refusing since you obviously are doing something illegal.

Amputate Your Head · 08-30-2010, 07:50 AM

you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway.
and owning a car is not a "right".

Brujah · 08-30-2010, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway.
and owning a car is not a "right".

At least not with states in the Ninth Circuit court

It was unanimously against it in the 4th Circuit court, DC area.

cambaby · 08-30-2010, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway. and owning a car is not a "right".

You are deranged, you gotta be trolling.

Amputate Your Head · 08-30-2010, 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby

You are deranged, you gotta be trolling.

which part are you confused on crybaby? Do you think you have a "right" to own a vehicle? or do you think your driveway is private?

damnage · 08-30-2010, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

which part are you confused on crybaby? Do you think you have a "right" to own a vehicle? or do you think your driveway is private?

My land is my land. The old phrase about an Englishman's home being his castle is my opinion on the matter.

I am realist and can see how surveillance might be needed, however I wish for it to be done in a legitimate way in a set rule of procedures and with justification for use of such invasions.

This sort of advancement leads a country down only one road.

Amputate Your Head · 08-30-2010, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damnage

My land is my land. The old phrase about an Englishman's home being his castle is my opinion on the matter.

then why don't you keep your valuables in your car while it sits in the driveway unlocked?

dyna mo · 08-30-2010, 08:15 AM

if it helps with l.a. traffic, i'm all for it.

ottopottomouse · 08-30-2010, 08:20 AM

http://gpsjammers.net/gmt14-all-civi...al-jammer.html

Rochard · 08-30-2010, 08:59 AM

Normally I could care less. I have no fear of my privacy being invaded; I have nothing to hide. They can track me through my cell phone, and if not, they can gladly put a gps tracking device in my car. Whatever.

But sneaking up onto someone's property in the middle of the night, putting a tracking device on a car, and without a warrant? Whoa. Something's not right with that.

Amputate Your Head · 08-30-2010, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Normally I could care less. I have no fear of my privacy being invaded; I have nothing to hide. They can track me through my cell phone, and if not, they can gladly put a gps tracking device in my car. Whatever.

But sneaking up onto someone's property in the middle of the night, putting a tracking device on a car, and without a warrant? Whoa. Something's not right with that.

I've had cops crawl all over my property, front, back, sides, the works.... with no warrant whatsoever. They don't generally give a damn.

JP-pornshooter · 08-30-2010, 11:05 AM

the fed or the CA state government is mostly useless..
they have such serious budget problems they need to battle, not a bunch of paranoid homos...

08-29-2010, 06:48 PM	#52
GAMEFINEST Make STACK$ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: sexy time Posts: 14,419	scary shit is the jobless rates here. __________________ Compound interest.

08-29-2010, 06:55 PM	#54
96ukssob So Fucking Banananananas Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it Posts: 12,991	oh no's! the gov't is going to know where I'm driving to!!! they don't need to do this, they can already figure this out by looking at credit/debit card transaction statements, as well when you pay tolls on roads, airline tickets, etc. What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy __________________ Email: Clicky on Me

08-29-2010, 07:35 PM	#57
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	This isn't a technology piece. Do you understand that sentence? Technology has existed for a long time that makes it POSSIBLE for you to be watched and followed. This is a legal, government, and privacy piece. Just because they CAN do it, doesn't mean they've had the right to do it before, without a warrant. Some of you people are just so stupid, it's no wonder we're in this shape. You worry more about whether some homosexual is going to be allowed to get married, more than the eroding of your rights. Sad. __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

08-30-2010, 07:50 AM	#60
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway. and owning a car is not a "right". __________________ SIG TOO BIG

08-30-2010, 08:20 AM	#67
ottopottomouse She is ugly, bad luck. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 13,177	http://gpsjammers.net/gmt14-all-civi...al-jammer.html __________________ ↑ see post ↑ 13101

08-29-2010, 07:23 PM	#56
aubreythree So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 435	yup, that might be reasonable

08-30-2010, 08:15 AM	#66
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,166	if it helps with l.a. traffic, i'm all for it.

08-30-2010, 08:59 AM	#68
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,207	Normally I could care less. I have no fear of my privacy being invaded; I have nothing to hide. They can track me through my cell phone, and if not, they can gladly put a gps tracking device in my car. Whatever. But sneaking up onto someone's property in the middle of the night, putting a tracking device on a car, and without a warrant? Whoa. Something's not right with that. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

08-30-2010, 11:05 AM	#70
JP-pornshooter Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: westcoast usa Posts: 4,007	the fed or the CA state government is mostly useless.. they have such serious budget problems they need to battle, not a bunch of paranoid homos... __________________ "Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown