[QUOTE=Shoehorn!;16619063]
Seriously, you are not kidding. he made some great records, I met him at the sky bar in hollywood a fews years ago, we bought each other drinks, he is a cool welsh man.

On the note of videos, anyone know where I can get the unedited video with Hitler that everyone makes into a parody?

Ok, I just got one from a "lovely" lol, a lot of spammers atm on icq. ill add you now

So was the TOS updated yet?

Could just copy Blockbuster's and Find/Replace with Crackwhore Confessions.

"What methods can I use to send traffic?
All email promotions must be CAN-SPAM compliant. You can send traffic many ways. We have plenty of banners, hosted galleries, and hosted free sites for you to choose from. You can also use text links, blind links, exit consoles, entrance consoles, 404 traffic and site reviews."

Nope.

here's a friendly bump for you

Dirty D thinks this bad publicity is good publicity. This thread may get googled and when someone types in howigotrich this thread will be listed...

Dirty D is probably somewhere tooting lines of coke off this shit, cussing ppl out, and throwing tantrums... He's jus too full of himself to see outside his own view... May even be a lil antisocial... I jus wonder how his program is doing since this thread blew? I actually thought he was a cool guy, saw him partying it up in a few videos with some broads... :thumbsup

But now, it really appears he's delusional... Sorta like Hitler b4 he died...

If it was such an issue, you would figure that he would quickly add that in the TOS to prevent this scenario from reoccurring.

But since he didn't, it comes off as a scheme to continually fuck WM's out of money with little 'gotcha' games.

unbelievable how either dumb or shady this guy is - i'm gonna assume since he's built a fairly popular program that he's not dumb.

you've had the issue explained to you by shoehorn and a hundred other people, many of them who probably don't even know shoehorn - he was not breaking any rules, he was doing what hundreds of other webmasters do. you don't like what he was doing, too fucking bad, you never told him that until after the fact, using trademarks/domain keyword phrases is done all the time in this industry for PPC ads, so don't try comparing it to shady practices like carding that are universally unacceptable by all programs. change your Terms, pay him, and move on. There is NO PRINCIPLE here for you, there is for Shoehorn.

18 fucking pages, and he still thinks he is in the right! Why oh why would anyone trust their money with him or his program?

Holly shit a Hitler on coke shooting bukkake porn sounds like a dangerous combo :1orglaugh

i don't think he cares.

he's probably doing a fat line using a $440 dollar bill and laughing ....

Dont waste your breath man, Robbie and D think they are gangsters.

You are right, Cybersquatting does not appear to be an approved method of advertisement.

Source: Wikipedia

The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d), was enacted in 1999

Sorry if this is a repost, 18 pages... WOW!!

[QUOTE=Robbie;16619034]Insulted you? fuck you, you are on my shit list now.no respect' go suck Dirty D's cock.

Shoehorn, I'll give you a little tip. Search Google for "Curiouscash" and see which board ranks well... post there and you're pretty much guaranteed the thread will be on G, and ranked well, within hours.

Wait... what? You mean How I Got Rich might get googled because of this thread about Crack Whore Confessions??

Btw... is crack whore confessions even trademarked? people keep talking about trademarks, i don't think dirty d ever mentioned that it was.

I went to look at the Playboy TOS to check it out. Granted, I am not really in the mood to do in depth investigation, but they at least say:

You know how I feel about you, but I have to say, after looking at your TOS, as long as it doesn't say you can't . . . .

What do you mean :winkwink: ? You know it is fact.

That is actually pretty amazing and sad at the same time.

B dog in the house, sort this shit out big brother.

Warren posted this in the wrong thread so I thought I'd move it here:

I just want to be paid the $477 he owes me.

Or like I said earlier, at this point I would take $350 so we can both go our separate ways.

Thank you.

Been paid yet?

Nope, he hasn't even contacted me to try and work something out.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

"He's been lining he pockets of Google for too long!" :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Lol, now if you can just throw in a few lines from Robbie about how he's made millions and we don't know what we are talking about, the video will then summarize the entire thread.

Spot on!

Nicely done Mutt. :1orglaugh

Bump this bitch like the pinball wizard.

i'd love to take credit for it .......... but i can't

That is too friggin' funny!!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://blogs.sfweekly.com/shookdown/hitlermemeweb.jpg

ADG

Thank you so much, what ever going to happen you made my day.

None of you know fuck-all about what you're talking about. These things need not be discussed in "TOS" because is a fucking difference between fucking right and wrong.

You do NOT go and bid someone's terms for keywords they already rank #1 on, and expect them not to shit-can you as an affiliate. Black and white. Straight forward. Simple as that.

If someone tried to do that to me, I'd shit-can you too.

Having affiliates means having people generating traffic for me. Not having affiliates exploit my pre-existing marketing to generate money for you. Do you firmly understand that's the definition of cyber-squatting? Exploitation of someone else's sweat... and your direct benefit? You DO understand that courts will NOT rule in your favor... correct? Cyber squatters do not have any legal ground to stand on.

Brilliant video!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


Has Dirty D paid yet?

Courts have already ruled before that trademarks can be bid on, do some research.

Logic would dictate that one would not be paid for sending such PPC.

Let me ask you... would YOU pay for an affiliate to send you your OWN traffic?

No.

That's why this thread should not exist. Because Shoehorn, or whatever he calls himself, is basically committing fraud. Nothing needs to exist in a Terms of Service agreement that would basically convey logic. You don't say to yourself "ahh, as an affiliate I know I can generate traffic this program isn't generating themselves by bidding on their own name!" The way you come to that conclusion is by thinking "ahh, as an affiliate I know I can pull the wool over this program's eyes by capitalizing off their own hard work!"

That is the reason this is a fucking retarded thread.

Sorry, but there is no program that will allow this. Period. End of story. No TOS needed.

People bid on "someone elses" keywords all the time to rank higher. Some sites welcome it, since they have a hard time ranking for search terms for their own site names.

Simply update terms and pay for the real joins.

That's NOT the problem. You are avoiding the debate here. The problem is THIS: The guy was generating ALL of his joins with the keyword being the NAME of the site alone. Not for terms that they couldn't rank #1 on, terms that they DID rank #1 on.

That is not allowed by ANY program. Period!

Every domain I own is #1 in the SE's for that term. Any affiliate who tries to send me my own traffic is going to be canned just like Shoehorn. End of story. Cut and dry.

Yeah but you're still being used to make someone else money since they can still bid on your keywords, the only difference being you're now not making anything off it.

Great idea, genius.

That was great :1orglaugh

But the one about gfy was too fucking funny i cried watching it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Some mainstream programs allow it, I wouldnt be surprised if some adult affiliates have realized that there is some value to it as well, whether you already have an organic 1st place position or not.

Does noone see the value in having 2 listings for your keyphrase since the user has just been served up a page with plenty of options, inclusive of competitors and paid ads that may be more enticing than the 1st organic search result?

moneyyyzzzzz ... ? :)

so you'd rather i bid on your terms and send them to a different site?

you do realize that review sites probably get the majority of their traffic from the same method, except that's just seo. just because someone types in xyz into google doesn't mean they want to go to xyz.com.

try 100 times or more...

Actually the avatar is perfect for him. He looks like a arrogant self centered know it all whose shit doesn't stink but is actually a douche bag.

Besides learning about HowIrobbedYou.com in this thread and to avoid him at all costs, I learned about the true nature of Robbie who was never on my radar before and to avoid him in business too.

lol over 13,000 views. Being new to the porn industry myself, this is the first post of this kind ive seen (havent ever seen a mainstream equiv to gfy) this post is definitely sticking out in my mind, and if I ever ran this dudes ads, Id be worried about getting paid. Unfortunate, cause Im down with the crackwhore niche

Im just starting to wondering if he can't afford to pay up, or just doesnt want to at this point.

Saying it is not allowed by any program is untrue. When an affiliate runs adword campaigns they have a whole gambit of keywords to try. Yes, in this instance the joins were based off the domain keywords. But that is not always the case.

Everyone wishes there were no competition for their keywords. When you run a program you make terms for situations like this. You can't forsee everything, since situations change. As they change you update your terms. It's that simple. It's ok to not like it but to not pay on a proven advertising method for real joins isn't right. Calling it fraud is completely wrong.



Some programs actually run their own ads on their own keywords to provide an alternative SE join point for surfers. There are surfers that prefer ads and convinced to click by that text.