Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2011, 04:04 PM   #51
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThumbLord View Post
OMFG people just stop arguing with gideongallery and yes Ma Dalton that includes you too
yeah, usually i am the one calling people stupid for argueing with him.

but i have to give him that: he's good at making people upset
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:04 PM   #52
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post

it not 99% but it up to 53%
Total top 100 TPB list
http://thepiratebay.org/top/all

featuring roughly over 30 TV shows (yes I know it's not the percentage of d/ls), who needs cable when you can watch latest for free - this is mentality of people. this mentality is also proven here in adult just by looking at falling signup ratios to paysites and majority of traffic hanging out at largest free tube sites.

I said it before and I say it again, your over 50% legit use of torrents number is pulled out of your incompetent ignorant behind. You are too blind to see what torrents are really used for. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FAIR USE no matter how hard you want to justify that.
__________________
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:13 PM   #53
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton View Post
he's good at making people upset
And we can all see how far that has gotten him in life!

I've watched him brag about how he could make millions with the "new revenue stream" of piracy for the last couple of years. And yet...he's made NOTHING. And that includes when TheDoc agreed to do provide everything for him. He IMMEDIATELY backpedaled and never sent TheDoc an email.

Fucking hilarious!
He's all talk and no action...unless by "action" you mean stealing shit off the internet!
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:13 PM   #54
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by holograph View Post
Total top 100 TPB list
http://thepiratebay.org/top/all

featuring roughly over 30 TV shows (yes I know it's not the percentage of d/ls), who needs cable when you can watch latest for free - this is mentality of people. this mentality is also proven here in adult just by looking at falling signup ratios to paysites and majority of traffic hanging out at largest free tube sites.

I said it before and I say it again, your over 50% legit use of torrents number is pulled out of your incompetent ignorant behind. You are too blind to see what torrents are really used for. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FAIR USE no matter how hard you want to justify that.
do you know how many tv show only bit torrent site there are
tvtorrents.com
eztv.it

did you look at the list

a single episode of true blood out ranks everything on the site
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:15 PM   #55
vsex
Confirmed User
 
vsex's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East and West Coast Beaches
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
do you know how many tv show only bit torrent site there are
tvtorrents.com
eztv.it

did you look at the list

a single episode of true blood out ranks everything on the site
yes, but there again, how many people downloading it, have an HBO subscription and are just downloading it because they missed it and don't have a VTR? My guess, not many.
__________________
VSEX.COM
AFFILIATES
[email protected]
New Model Signup

Most realistic thing ever written on GFY:

Shap: "Solidarity is nice in theory but this industry has proven time and time again it can not stand together. The best advice I can give you is to do what is best for you with both your short term and long term goals in mind."
vsex is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:16 PM   #56
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsex View Post
Ok, so these lawsuits going after the infringer is ok by you then, right?
as long as they don't violate those people privacy

or go forward with a settlement letter based just on ip address

or honeypot content to trick people into infringing.

or the 1/2 a dozen other bullshit things they do currently
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

Last edited by gideongallery; 07-11-2011 at 04:18 PM..
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:19 PM   #57
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
do you know how many tv show only bit torrent site there are
tvtorrents.com
eztv.it

did you look at the list

a single episode of true blood out ranks everything on the site
fucku i can make large fonts too

IS TRUE BLOOD SHOW ON FREE PUBLIC NETWORK? get it?

why would average Joe subscribe to cable if YOU are making it avaliable to watch for him for FREE ONLINE?

ANSWER THIS ONE QUESTION
__________________
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:20 PM   #58
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,958
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsex View Post
yes, but there again, how many people downloading it, have an HBO subscription and are just downloading it because they missed it and don't have a VTR? My guess, not many.
BINGO. It's a bunch of freeloading pieces of shit like gideongallery who did not PAY for an HBO subscription.

There is absolutely NO reason for a single episode of True Blood to be on a torrent site. HBO themselves offer all the episodes for FREE on video on demand with your normal subscription to HBO

The people downloading True Blood episodes are no different than the other THIEVES downloading porn.
But gideongallery is so accustomed to stealing everything online and never paying that he thinks it's normal.

You are a disgrace gideongallery. You should be ashamed of yourself for being such a parasite on society.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:20 PM   #59
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by vsex View Post
yes, but there again, how many people downloading it, have an HBO subscription and are just downloading it because they missed it and don't have a VTR? My guess, not many.
and all you have to do is identify those people without violating the privacy rights of people like myself who subscribe to every station we download

and you can sue them.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:22 PM   #60
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,825
as long as they don't violate those people privacy

=> you steal my stuff, your privacy does mean nothing to me


or go forward with a settlement letter based just on ip address

=> we all know that this is just a lame excuse that only judges buy that have no clue of modern technology


or honeypot content to trick people into infringing.

=> then we should also close all banks cause they trick people into bank robbery?
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:26 PM   #61
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton View Post

or honeypot content to trick people into infringing.

=> then we should also close all banks cause they trick people into bank robbery?
do you even know what a honeypot is

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1025...light=honeypot

are seriously trying to defend people pulling this shit.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:36 PM   #62
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
There is absolutely NO reason for a single episode of True Blood to be on a torrent site. HBO themselves offer all the episodes for FREE on video on demand with your normal subscription to HBO
well hbo canada on demand only allows you watch the last couple of episodes

so the torrents still act as an unlimited hard drive for people who prefer to wait for the season to end and watch the episodes back to back.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:36 PM   #63
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
do you even know what a honeypot is

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1025...light=honeypot

are seriously trying to defend people pulling this shit.
i actually do know - i have been offered to make money from that and declined. but that doesnt change the fact that 99.9% of people downloading stuff for free from torrents, p2p or whereever have no legit reason to do so - no matter who put the content there. and you know that. and if you don't, you are either extremely naive or stupid
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:40 PM   #64
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Call your cable company and ask them if it's OK to put a backup of your copy of True Blood making it available to the whole world for free so you can time-shift it at your convenience, and see how quickly they cancel your subscription.
__________________
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:53 PM   #65
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
wow third time

let me make it simple for you

if i bought a chair i could break it up, it could rebuild it, it could rent it, i could sell, i could even build copies of it

property rights give me those rights

if i buy a cd even though i own that particular media (property rights) i don't have any of the normal property rights (rent it, sell it, copy it, breakup/rebuild it)
because copyright takes those right away from me, and gives them exclusively to the copyright holder to assign with a LICIENCE.

AS i said from the very begining

copyright takes away normal property rights and replaces them with Licience/USE rights.
Third time to show your stupidity on the subject? That I agree with...

None of what you said is a right at all. Rights can't take away from another person, and if you duplicate/resell what I own, you're taking away from me to give to yourself - ie: not a right.

Civil rights, don't take away from me to ensure others have the equal right - that's a right.

Property, has no rights, an object can't be granted a right, but I can transfer my rights, but normally we grant permission for you to use it. If you wanted the legal rights to do whatever you want with it, you have to fully by the "entire" ownership of it, so I have no rights to it. It takes my permission, they are MY rights until I give them to you and nobody gives you those rights - they give you permission.

Education done for the day... you're so far out of your league on this, as usual... it's pathetic.
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 04:59 PM   #66
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
well hbo canada on demand only allows you watch the last couple of episodes

so the torrents still act as an unlimited hard drive for people who prefer to wait for the season to end and watch the episodes back to back.
That's because HBO has given on-demand PERMISSION (not rights). They didn't just rip it, take it, and offer it... and it's not a backup, of any kind. At that HBO and On-D are DRM protected, making a medium change, CRIMINAL - even in Canada.
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:06 PM   #67
VGeorgie
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
copyright is a conditional monopoly there is no way shape or form you can says right holders have sole discretion to share anything.
You always get this wrong in the details. Copyright is a set of laws that provide for civil and criminal recourse against piracy, for which in exchange the holder allows the government to permit non-significant copying and reuse, in very narrow and well documented cases.

While the term "monopoly" is sometimes used to describe the rights holder's ability to restrict republication, the term is biased because the rights holder is the natural and bona fide legal owner of any creative output. There isn't a "monopoly" for any government to give, because governments can't give rights that are inalienable in the first place, only observe them. This includes rights of ownership to creative endeavor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
fair use supercedes your exclusive rights
Fair use does NOT supercede an exclusive right. Time and again you get this wrong. For one thing, the onus of establishing fair use is up to the defendant in a case, and most copyright cases are settled, leaving only minimal case law to go from. And even case law is narrowly constructed by the courts.

You'll often hear or read about a "three note" fair use exemption for sampling, or a 30 second fair use exemption for mechanical reproduction. None of it is accurate or true. Relying on bogus legal advise regarding fair use is an idiot's game.

Fair use is a doctrine that establishes a give-and-take between the government providing civil and criminal recourse against infringement, and the interests of the people. A rights holder still has the ability to license works instead of, or in addition to, filing for copyright protection (something can be both licensed AND copyrighted). A rights holder can apply restrictions to copying that in themselves (given DMCA and similar EU laws) subject an infringer to liability if the restrictions are circumvented.

Last edited by VGeorgie; 07-11-2011 at 05:15 PM..
VGeorgie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:16 PM   #68
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
Third time to show your stupidity on the subject? That I agree with...

None of what you said is a right at all. Rights can't take away from another person, and if you duplicate/resell what I own, you're taking away from me to give to yourself - ie: not a right.

Civil rights, don't take away from me to ensure others have the equal right - that's a right.

Property, has no rights, an object can't be granted a right, but I can transfer my rights, but normally we grant permission for you to use it. If you wanted the legal rights to do whatever you want with it, you have to fully by the "entire" ownership of it, so I have no rights to it. It takes my permission, they are MY rights until I give them to you and nobody gives you those rights - they give you permission.

Education done for the day... you're so far out of your league on this, as usual... it's pathetic.
the right to own property is a UN recognized human right


copyright is not a recognized Human right.


look it up

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1025...right& page=2
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:25 PM   #69
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
That's because HBO has given on-demand PERMISSION (not rights). They didn't just rip it, take it, and offer it... and it's not a backup, of any kind. At that HBO and On-D are DRM protected, making a medium change, CRIMINAL - even in Canada.
ah we don't have an anti circumvention clause in our copyright act
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:27 PM   #70
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
the right to own property is a UN recognized human right


copyright is not a recognized Human right.


look it up

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1025...right& page=2
Yeah, we know, this was said above....

It does not grant you rights or any permissions, above that ownership. You own the DVD, you do not own the rights or permission to duplicate and resell it as the original, that's not the actual property, the property is the single dvd.
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:34 PM   #71
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
ah we don't have an anti circumvention clause in our copyright act
This isn't an anti circumvention clause or anything related.... DRM protects MANY things in Canada, none of which you've ever dealt with in your life, other than probably removing some movies/songs protection for your personal use, which in Canada is allowed - but it DOES NOT give you permission to profit from it. ~ Yeah, you have no idea.
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:38 PM   #72
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by VGeorgie View Post
You always get this wrong in the details. Copyright is a set of laws that provide for civil and criminal recourse against piracy, for which in exchange the holder allows the government to permit non-significant copying and reuse, in very narrow and well documented cases.
copyright is the exclusive right granted to the creator by section 106 of copyright act.

other laws like the DMCA etc are not a copyright, they are the laws that govern the inforcement of a copyright.



Quote:
While the term "monopoly" is sometimes used to describe the rights holder's ability to restrict republication, the term is biased because the rights holder is the natural and bona fide legal owner of any creative output. There isn't a "monopoly" for any government to give, because governments can't give rights that are inalienable in the first place, only observe them. This includes rights of ownership to creative endeavor.
the supreme court explictly declared copyright to be a monopoly 20 times in the betamax case

you might want to look at the case before you try and argue that copyright is not a monopoly.

Quote:
"The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors."

http://supreme.justia.com/us/464/417/case.html

Quote:
Fair use does NOT supercede an exclusive right. Time and again you get this wrong. For one thing, the onus of establishing fair use is up to the defendant in a case, and most copyright cases are settled, leaving only minimal case law to go from. And even case law is narrowly constructed by the courts.
seriously read the copyright act

because you don't know what your talking about
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:42 PM   #73
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
Yeah, we know, this was said above....

It does not grant you rights or any permissions, above that ownership. You own the DVD, you do not own the rights or permission to duplicate and resell it as the original, that's not the actual property, the property is the single dvd.
unlike a chair where i have all those rights automatically

the reason i need to get permission is because copyright takes away those automatic rights

and replaces them with licienced rights.

The only reason that taking away of rights is not a violation of my human right is because for the scope of fair use those normal property rights exist.

for the scope of commentary i am allowed to distribute other peoples content (ask micheal moore)

and i can do it even if the copyright holder doesn't want me to do it.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:43 PM   #74
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
gideongallery.... the shit just keeps spewing from you.

The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelle...poly_privilege
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 05:47 PM   #75
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
unlike a chair where i have all those rights automatically

the reason i need to get permission is because copyright takes away those automatic rights

and replaces them with licienced rights.

The only reason that taking away of rights is not a violation of my human right is because for the scope of fair use those normal property rights exist.

for the scope of commentary i am allowed to distribute other peoples content (ask micheal moore)

and i can do it even if the copyright holder doesn't want me to do it.
Odd, if it was automatic then ownership would be implied, but it's not.. I can set terms of ownership and your agreement, ANY, way I wish, period - that's MY right and YOUR right to refuse or accept it.

Ownership is NOT automatic, the right to own property, does NOT grant your permission to do shit with it - your right is to own it, PERIOD!

And courts all over the world disagree with you, oh and MM gave permission...
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 06:06 PM   #76
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
do you believe using a pvr to record cable tv is illegal
A DVR is not the same thing as using a torrent.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 06:47 PM   #77
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
Odd, if it was automatic then ownership would be implied, but it's not.. I can set terms of ownership and your agreement, ANY, way I wish, period - that's MY right and YOUR right to refuse or accept it.

Ownership is NOT automatic, the right to own property, does NOT grant your permission to do shit with it - your right is to own it, PERIOD!

And courts all over the world disagree with you, oh and MM gave permission...
really want to point me to one furniture store in the world where i have to sign a licencing agreement to buy a chair
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 06:59 PM   #78
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
gideongallery.... the shit just keeps spewing from you.

The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelle...poly_privilege
wow a pro intellectual property says that court definition isn't right

http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/03/06/deb...opoly/id=9538/

considering that one of the questions asked was

Quote:
why would average Joe subscribe to cable if YOU are making it avaliable to watch for him for FREE ONLINE?
by definition copyright allows you to raise the price from market defined price of free to something greater than free.

The fact that digital goods gravitate to free may be a justification for having the monopoly

but it most certainly does not allow you ignore the fact that you are in fact charging a price higher than what open competition would cause the price to be (free).
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

Last edited by gideongallery; 07-11-2011 at 07:03 PM..
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:03 PM   #79
SallyRand
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In A Galaxie Far, Far Away!
Posts: 3,487
:tongue

Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
really want to point me to one furniture store in the world where i have to sign a licencing agreement to buy a chair
Dumbfuck.

The furniture store is a LICENSED dealer for the distributor/manufacturer which in turn may own the design or may be paying royalites to the designer.

Your use of the British "licenCing" tells me that you probably come from one of he socialist nations, so why don't you take your fucking Commie ass back home?
SallyRand is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:04 PM   #80
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
really want to point me to one furniture store in the world where i have to sign a licencing agreement to buy a chair
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:07 PM   #81
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
gideon it is more than obvious that you are NOT in this business so why are you here? Why isn't Eric banning this douchebag he's violating the rule that you must be in htis business to post here.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:24 PM   #82
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
wow a pro intellectual property says that court definition isn't right

http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/03/06/deb...opoly/id=9538/

considering that one of the questions asked was


by definition copyright allows you to raise the price from market defined price of free to something greater than free.

The fact that digital goods gravitate to free may be a justification for having the monopoly

but it most certainly does not allow you ignore the fact that you are in fact charging a price higher than what open competition would cause the price to be (free).
DUDE LMAO
OPEN COMPETITION? torrents don't produce anything, their users putting copyrighted material don't produce it and are not licensed to put it up there for free to all to download. WHAT COMPETITION? FIRST PRODUCE SOMETHING IN DEMAND, DISTRIBUTE IT FOR FREE, SOMEHOW MAGICALLY MAKE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS then you can talk about OPEN COMPETITION and how anyone can make money producing IP for free.

YOU failed to answer that question but reserved it to twist it for you later argument. get the fuck outta here
__________________
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:30 PM   #83
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Maybe there is a box of rocks that wants to debate this doorknob ...
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:32 PM   #84
CDSmith
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
CDSmith's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am *I* located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :)
Posts: 51,460
I have and always will support the rights of the copyright holder. I also think there are possibly a few tweaks to existing copyright laws and rules that could make the system better. BUT, to refer to 'copyright' in general as draconian is, well, just plain ignorant, and it plainly shows one's agenda.

I realize it's a broad and multi-faceted argument, but where it pertains to, for example, people grabbing porn clips out of a members area of a pay site and then uploading them on a tube site and engaging in unauthorized use I completely and unequivocably draw the line. Bringing PVR's into the argument? Please. That's just a useless smokescreen side argument pirates use to justify their thievery and scumbaggery. A PVR only allows more convenient viewing of what TV viewers can already view via their existing cable or satellite services, which by the way they PAY FOR. Do you hear TV and movie producers crying about PVRs? No. Do you hear paysite owners and content producers complaining about tubes and unauthorized use and piracy? Damn right you do, and for good reason.

I realize you'll never give up preaching your BS Gideon, but as I've told you before man, every time you post on this subject your agenda is utterly transparent. And just as no one agreed with you 4 or 5 years ago, no one is going to agree here, and I doubt anyone's going to agree with you 5 years from now, or 10, or 50. Why? Because when someone creates some original intellectual property (which I have) you need their permission to use it and/or profit from it.

You can (and likely will) argue my entire post, but frankly what I've said to you here and in umpteen other threads like it is inarguable. And you do know that arguing against the inarguable is one more indication of insanity, right? :D
__________________
Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
ICQ me at: 31024634

Last edited by CDSmith; 07-11-2011 at 07:33 PM..
CDSmith is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:44 PM   #85
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
gideon it is more than obvious that you are NOT in this business so why are you here? Why isn't Eric banning this douchebag he's violating the rule that you must be in htis business to post here.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=987596

you do realize

eric said he did his research on me a long time ago

he knows what i have done
and what i am capable of doing in terms of sales number
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 07:58 PM   #86
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith View Post
I have and always will support the rights of the copyright holder. I also think there are possibly a few tweaks to existing copyright laws and rules that could make the system better. BUT, to refer to 'copyright' in general as draconian is, well, just plain ignorant, and it plainly shows one's agenda.
never said copyright law was draconian i said the changes to the laws proposed by the pro copyright are draconian

things like making you liable based only on your ip address.

Quote:
I realize it's a broad and multi-faceted argument, but where it pertains to, for example, people grabbing porn clips out of a members area of a pay site and then uploading them on a tube site and engaging in unauthorized use I completely and unequivocably draw the line. Bringing PVR's into the argument? Please. That's just a useless smokescreen side argument pirates use to justify their thievery and scumbaggery. A PVR only allows more convenient viewing of what TV viewers can already view via their existing cable or satellite services, which by the way they PAY FOR. Do you hear TV and movie producers crying about PVRs? No. Do you hear paysite owners and content producers complaining about tubes and unauthorized use and piracy? Damn right you do, and for good reason.
Quote:
Now, the question comes, well, all right, what is wrong with the VCR. One of the Japanese lobbyists, Mr. Ferris, has said that the VCR -- well, if I am saying something wrong, forgive me. I don't know. He certainly is not MGM's lobbyist. That is for sure. He has said that the VCR is the greatest friend that the American film producer ever had.

I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone.

you might want to look back a bit they did complain about it just as bitterly when it first came out.

http://cryptome.org/hrcw-hear.htm

Quote:
I realize you'll never give up preaching your BS Gideon, but as I've told you before man, every time you post on this subject your agenda is utterly transparent. And just as no one agreed with you 4 or 5 years ago, no one is going to agree here, and I doubt anyone's going to agree with you 5 years from now, or 10, or 50. Why? Because when someone creates some original intellectual property (which I have) you need their permission to use it and/or profit from it.

You can (and likely will) argue my entire post, but frankly what I've said to you here and in umpteen other threads like it is inarguable. And you do know that arguing against the inarguable is one more indication of insanity, right? :D
at sometime in the future you guys will finally realize the put your shit on the tape solution for this problem

i have said it more then 67 times
if you respect fair use you never have a problem with piracy.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 08:22 PM   #87
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
i have said it more then 67 times
if you respect fair use you never have a problem with piracy.
Links to anything that was actually produced by you or by your company if you have one? Please show us how your own produced content that is being fairy used without having issues with piracy. Have anything to show that you produced that is in public domain, that is not commentary or parody? Care to show it?

Make your statement credible.
__________________

Last edited by Serge Litehead; 07-11-2011 at 08:24 PM..
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 08:48 PM   #88
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by holograph View Post
Links to anything that was actually produced by you or by your company if you have one? Please show us how your own produced content that is being fairy used without having issues with piracy. Have anything to show that you produced that is in public domain, that is not commentary or parody? Care to show it?

Make your statement credible.
so you want an example of the solution that you can copy for free.

you do realize i said

i used the torrents to timeshift tv shows i PAID for
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 08:54 PM   #89
CrkMStanz
Confirmed User
 
CrkMStanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 517
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
so you want an example of the solution that you can copy for free.
copying anyone elses work, taking thier income, spamming it for free = 'fair use'

copying giddyboys work = bad bad man



anyone see the insanity here?



.
__________________
believe me - without free porn, just as many people will seek porn out on the Internet, and many more will pay if there is no free alternative, its not like sex is a fad - it can be milked much like any renewable resource - long term

i wasn't born with enough middle fingers - Marilyn Manson

Last edited by CrkMStanz; 07-11-2011 at 08:58 PM..
CrkMStanz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 09:21 PM   #90
Serge Litehead
Confirmed User
 
Serge Litehead's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
so you want an example of the solution that you can copy for free.

you do realize i said

i used the torrents to timeshift tv shows i PAID for
I don't need your example and certainly am not interested in copying it. keep that to yourself.

you are making a statement which is imo pretty dumb if you've never produced and sold anything of your own, make it at least somewhat credible by showing anything produced by yourself, otherwise what you say is simply stupid phrase used by pirate kiddies to justify copyright infringement. if you have stuff in public domain - you shouldn't have any problem showing it to more public, right?
If you can't show anything - you are simply full of shit and don't know what you are talking about. For all this time on GFY you have never even once displayed your business web site. But you love to argue about fair use and that we're all wrong for seeing piracy all over the net as something damaging rather than salvaging.


What you PAID for isn't a question. You FAIL to realize there many more freeloaders using torrents than legit users.
__________________

Last edited by Serge Litehead; 07-11-2011 at 09:22 PM..
Serge Litehead is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 09:26 PM   #91
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=987596

you do realize

eric said he did his research on me a long time ago

he knows what i have done
and what i am capable of doing in terms of sales number
If you're in this business and you're against copyright then you're truly the dumbest motherfucker ever created in the entire history of dumb motherfuckers.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 09:37 PM   #92
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
wow a pro intellectual property says that court definition isn't right

http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/03/06/deb...opoly/id=9538/

considering that one of the questions asked was
That article is about Patents, it doesn't say the word Copyright anywhere in the article.

Killer Fail though


Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
by definition copyright allows you to raise the price from market defined price of free to something greater than free.

The fact that digital goods gravitate to free may be a justification for having the monopoly

but it most certainly does not allow you ignore the fact that you are in fact charging a price higher than what open competition would cause the price to be (free).
What if it's not free? What if it cost me money? Oh yeah, then it's not actually free....... wtf is this trash?

Do you have a bucket of phrases you pull this shit from?
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 12:06 AM   #93
AdultKing
Raise Your Weapon
 
AdultKing's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Outback Australia
Posts: 15,605
The best part of this thread was Sally Rand totally failing to troll GideonGallery
AdultKing is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 12:32 AM   #94
Redrob
Confirmed User
 
Redrob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks.
Posts: 4,790
Fucking thieves trying to redefine the meanings to suit their purposes.

They should all go to jail.
Redrob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 01:09 AM   #95
DamianJ
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
DamianJ's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A magical land
Posts: 15,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
And we can all see how far that has gotten him in life!

I've watched him brag about how he could make millions with the "new revenue stream" of piracy for the last couple of years. And yet...he's made NOTHING. And that includes when TheDoc agreed to do provide everything for him. He IMMEDIATELY backpedaled and never sent TheDoc an email.

Fucking hilarious!
He's all talk and no action...unless by "action" you mean stealing shit off the internet!
The thing none of you get, is he is just a troll. He comes here for one reason. To wind people up about copyright and piracy.

And he is BRILLIANT at winding you all up.

We all know he's not in porn, and is nobody.

We all know he is just trolling.

We all know he comes here for attention.

And you idiots keep giving it to him.

If everyone ignored him for two weeks he'd never come back. And yes, I'd put money on that.
DamianJ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 01:31 AM   #96
AmeliaG
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
AmeliaG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,524
Yes, we are going to end up with draconian and unreasonable laws because a handful of thieves decided to profit on the backs of artists and other productive people, while giving nothing in return. Yes, your are right, the folks stealing will most likely ruin the exchange of ideas for everyone.
__________________
GFY Hall of Famer

AltStar Hall of Famer




Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

Babe photography portfolio
AmeliaG is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 02:05 AM   #97
SleazyDream
I'm here for SPORT
 
SleazyDream's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phone # (401) 285-0696
Posts: 41,470
the problem is too many thieves got used to stealing and now think they have rights - unreal
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

Now read without the word dog.
SleazyDream is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 04:00 AM   #98
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrkMStanz View Post
copying anyone elses work, taking thier income, spamming it for free = 'fair use'

copying giddyboys work = bad bad man



anyone see the insanity here?



.
seriously point to one quote where i said it was ok to take someone income

i said i use the torrents to timeshift content i paid for

i don't have a problem with you copying my work if you pay me for teaching it to you

i only object to taking it for free

i don't expect you to pay me twice/three times for that information once i sell it to you it your to use forever

i expect the same thing for the content i BUY.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 04:07 AM   #99
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
That article is about Patents, it doesn't say the word Copyright anywhere in the article.

Killer Fail though
seriously you don't even recognize the sources for your own quotes



Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
gideongallery.... the shit just keeps spewing from you.

The United States Supreme Court frequently refers to a patent as providing a "limited monopoly." This is not, however, appropriate usage of the term monopoly in the economic sense. In fact, intellectual property protection cannot properly be thought of as providing an economic monopoly, at least in part, because a monopoly can only exist in the presence of a market and the ability of an actor to manipulate the market to a point where higher than competitive prices are able to be maintained, which is something that is rarely achievable by an owner of intellectual property.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelle...poly_privilege

go back to the wiki article

click on the footnote link for the quote you were trying to use to justify arguing that the supreme court was wrong.

see where it leads you too.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 04:12 AM   #100
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
If you're in this business and you're against copyright then you're truly the dumbest motherfucker ever created in the entire history of dumb motherfuckers.
idiot being pro fair use is not against copyright

for god sake both the exclusive rights and fair use were defined in the same act

maybe you should actually listen to what i am saying instead of making up your own interpretation of what i am saying.

copyright law as it is now is pefectly fine, it doesn't need to be fixed

it already balanced and working IF you understand how to use it properly.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.