Serious questions for AFF - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

BusterBunny · 11-20-2006, 09:53 PM

50 hard hitting questions.....

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Click Cash's participation in Zango like campaigns has absolutely nothing to do with the participation of AFF/Cams.com. They're separate issues. I don't see why people keep bringing this up. Yes, it is something Will should have looked into, but that doesn't change anything regarding AFF/Cams.com.

The lack of answers this thread has produced is pretty disappointing, though somewhat predictable. I've been trying to find answers to those exact questions for a few days now.

By the way, when somebody starts a thread about a specific company, there is absolutely no way possible that said specific company can say "oh we never saw the threads". The minute this thread was started, many ICQs were sent alerting the relevant parties. The minute a thread pops up about our company within 15 minutes I have 10 ICQs and usually an email or two.

What makes this as seperate issue? The fact that Will76 made good after the fact???? Will76 went on with all his bullshit while his own company that he pretends to have a part of but really doesn't goes on taking Zango traffic for years. Think about it for a second. Will is not on the right track. He is lashing out on people... Not caring about solving a problem... Only caring about naming BIG names to get attention.. All along his own program has been supporting Zango for YEARS!! And only until the last few days has he actually been taking care of it because of a post demanding he do so.... Come on now... First off, if you are looking for Zango users you would find ClickCash. There were there marketing for many years but that was not addressed until just the last few days. Bullshit!!! Will is out for a Crusade to up his recognizability. That's it!! If he was really into fighting Zango he would have taken care of his own backyard first. Then, went after Zango direcly. What does he do????? HMMM..... Think about it...

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

Are you suggesting this negates the case against AFF or Will's arguments aren't credible because ClickCash may be just as complicit as AFF with being in bed with Zango?

Yes... There are many posts showing ClickCash has been taking Zango traffic for MANY years. Not just some traffic but it has been recognized but professional anti-adware people that ClickCash has been a supporter and sponsor of Zango for years now. It's a fact. It's on the net. They have been there since the beginning.

Sly · 11-20-2006, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

What makes this as seperate issue? The fact that Will76 made good after the fact???? Will76 went on with all his bullshit while his own company that he pretends to have a part of but really doesn't goes on taking Zango traffic for years. Think about it for a second. Will is not on the right track. He is lashing out on people... Not caring about solving a problem... Only caring about naming BIG names to get attention.. All along his own program has been supporting Zango for YEARS!! And only until the last few days has he actually been taking care of it because of a post demanding he do so.... Come on now... First off, if you are looking for Zango users you would find ClickCash. There were there marketing for many years but that was not addressed until just the last few days. Bullshit!!! Will is out for a Crusade to up his recognizability. That's it!! If he was really into fighting Zango he would have taken care of his own backyard first. Then, went after Zango direcly. What does he do????? HMMM..... Think about it...

This thread was started by another party asking about AFF. Thats what makes it a separate issue. :-)

I don't give a fuck about Will. Nobody does. And he's fine with that. He's simply the scapegoat because he's been the most vocal about the issue. Now other people, totally unrelated to Will, are asking the questions and you still come back and tie it to Will.

Hmm... think about it...

hershie · 11-20-2006, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

This thread was started by another party asking about AFF. Thats what makes it a separate issue. :-)

I don't give a fuck about Will. Nobody does. And he's fine with that. He's simply the scapegoat because he's been the most vocal about the issue. Now other people, totally unrelated to Will, are asking the questions and you still come back and tie it to Will.

Hmm... think about it...

Why must people think by shooting the messanger everybody will forget the message. I found it particularily disgusting that Irish Pimp and Lars were employing such naked attempts at misdirection and turning it into a Will76 vs. Lars issue. Very sad stuff.

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

This thread was started by another party asking about AFF. Thats what makes it a separate issue. :-)

I don't give a fuck about Will. Nobody does. And he's fine with that. He's simply the scapegoat because he's been the most vocal about the issue. Now other people, totally unrelated to Will, are asking the questions and you still come back and tie it to Will.

Hmm... think about it...

I am a bit confused about what you are saying here. I am tying it to Will because his intentions are different than what you think they are. He didn't even research the fact that his own company he is backing has been taking HUGE amounts of adware traffic for many years. For him to come out and have an all out crusade against a subject that his own company has been backing and doing for years is only a personal crusade to up his own credibility. Look at the posts about ClickCash's responsibility in this whole matter. He would have tried to stop that first. It was a TON of traffic going to ClickCash from Zango alone. Not to mention the other 50 adware companies that make up for more than 40% of the Internet! Not just a measley .05% of Zango....

Sly · 11-20-2006, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

I am a bit confused about what you are saying here. I am tying it to Will because his intentions are different than what you think they are. He didn't even research the fact that his own company he is backing has been taking HUGE amounts of adware traffic for many years. For him to come out and have an all out crusade against a subject that his own company has been backing and doing for years is only a personal crusade to up his own credibility. Look at the posts about ClickCash's responsibility in this whole matter. He would have tried to stop that first. It was a TON of traffic going to ClickCash from Zango alone. Not to mention the other 50 adware companies that make up for more than 40% of the Internet! Not just a measley .05% of Zango....

Ok. Will is an idiot and Click Cash are scammers.

Sweet. Now we can get back to the threads original topic and maybe get some answers from AFF!

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

This thread was started by another party asking about AFF. Thats what makes it a separate issue. :-)

I don't give a fuck about Will. Nobody does. And he's fine with that. He's simply the scapegoat because he's been the most vocal about the issue. Now other people, totally unrelated to Will, are asking the questions and you still come back and tie it to Will.

Hmm... think about it...

I am sorry. I should have answered this as "buying traffic from Zango is 100% legal and up until 6 weeks ago it has been accepted by well over 50,000 different companies not discluding some of the biggest companies on NASDAQ. Meaning... this is 100% legal and accepted. Will has lead sheep to places they or he doesn't understand. What do I mean by this? Porn is a perfect analogy for this situation. Most people don't want it here but it's perfectly legal if you follow certain standards. Now think about it in terms of perveyors of porn and customers. If there wasn't anyone making money on porn there would not be a fucking internet porn industry. Think about it..... The reason porn is legal is because there are MANY people who are trying to keep it legal because they make money off it. Now look at adware. Let's look at a legal download and install. Companies are proving services for this install and making money on it. If there wasn't anyone making money on it it would be gone almost as fast porn if there was noone making money on it.

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

Why must people think by shooting the messanger everybody will forget the message. I found it particularily disgusting that Irish Pimp and Lars were employing such naked attempts at misdirection and turning it into a Will76 vs. Lars issue. Very sad stuff.

Will came out against AFF. Not coming out solely againts Zango. Think about what perspired in the last few weeks..... Think about ONE THING!!!!

AFF againts ClickCash!
The 2 top live cam companies in the world!!!

Will is not going after the other thousand or so companies using Zango. Only one!!! think about the reasoning.
Don't be his sheep!!!!!!!!!!!

Sly · 11-20-2006, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

I am sorry. I should have answered this as "buying traffic from Zango is 100% legal and up until 6 weeks ago it has been accepted by well over 50,000 different companies not discluding some of the biggest companies on NASDAQ. Meaning... this is 100% legal and accepted. Will has lead sheep to places they or he doesn't understand. What do I mean by this? Porn is a perfect analogy for this situation. Most people don't want it here but it's perfectly legal if you follow certain standards. Now think about it in terms of perveyors of porn and customers. If there wasn't anyone making money on porn there would not be a fucking internet porn industry. Think about it..... The reason porn is legal is because there are MANY people who are trying to keep it legal because they make money off it. Now look at adware. Let's look at a legal download and install. Companies are proving services for this install and making money on it. If there wasn't anyone making money on it it would be gone almost as fast porn if there was noone making money on it.

Just because something is legal doesn't make it right. Any new thing is legal until its weighed by society and then deemed good or bad. If you follow the "its legal" camp, thats certainly your choice. However, legal is not the same as ethical.

And the reason porn is legal has nothing to do with the money makers keeping it legal, lol, it has to do with societies acceptance and people that are willing to defend freedoms that they believe do not harm others.

You can believe what you want. You can say what you want. And you can think what you want. But in my eyes, Zango and like programs are parasites that profit by stealing ad revenues from legitimate websites and until someone can prove me otherwise, thats where I stand. And that has absolutely nothing to do with Will, I've probably read 2 of his threads.

hershie · 11-20-2006, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

I am sorry. I should have answered this as "buying traffic from Zango is 100% legal and up until 6 weeks ago it has been accepted by well over 50,000 different companies not discluding some of the biggest companies on NASDAQ. Meaning... this is 100% legal and accepted. Will has lead sheep to places they or he doesn't understand. What do I mean by this? Porn is a perfect analogy for this situation. Most people don't want it here but it's perfectly legal if you follow certain standards. Now think about it in terms of perveyors of porn and customers. If there wasn't anyone making money on porn there would not be a fucking internet porn industry. Think about it..... The reason porn is legal is because there are MANY people who are trying to keep it legal because they make money off it. Now look at adware. Let's look at a legal download and install. Companies are proving services for this install and making money on it. If there wasn't anyone making money on it it would be gone almost as fast porn if there was noone making money on it.

Now that was much better for me than the Will grows horns line... Interesting perspective.

MaddCaz · 11-20-2006, 10:45 PM

seriouisness is good...I think

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Just because something is legal doesn't make it right. Any new thing is legal until its weighed by society and then deemed good or bad. If you follow the "its legal" camp, thats certainly your choice. However, legal is not the same as ethical.
.

Bud, that was my point with the porn issue. Just because Internet Porn is legal doesn't make it moral....

Sly · 11-20-2006, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Bud, that was my point with the porn issue. Just because Internet Porn is legal doesn't make it moral....

Absolutely. Which is why people question and challenge it all the time. Luckily for us, they have yet to win, haha.

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Absolutely. Which is why people question and challenge it all the time. Luckily for us, they have yet to win, haha.

Do you think it's the porn customers out there fighting for their rights to see porn on the net or the Porn Perveyors that are making a difference? I am asking you a serious question. What do you think? Who makes the laws? The customers or the profiteers?

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 11:36 PM

Sly? Want to comment on this?

hershie · 11-20-2006, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Sly? Want to comment on this?

Why do you think Lars hasn't bothered to answer the questions in the original post since many of his affiliates seem to want to hear the comments?

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

What makes this as seperate issue? The fact that Will76 made good after the fact???? Will76 went on with all his bullshit while his own company that he pretends to have a part of but really doesn't goes on taking Zango traffic for years. Think about it for a second. Will is not on the right track. He is lashing out on people... Not caring about solving a problem... Only caring about naming BIG names to get attention.. All along his own program has been supporting Zango for YEARS!! And only until the last few days has he actually been taking care of it because of a post demanding he do so.... Come on now... First off, if you are looking for Zango users you would find ClickCash. There were there marketing for many years but that was not addressed until just the last few days. Bullshit!!! Will is out for a Crusade to up his recognizability. That's it!! If he was really into fighting Zango he would have taken care of his own backyard first. Then, went after Zango direcly. What does he do????? HMMM..... Think about it...

Come on who's fake nic are you? Lars? DH?

Which company did i pretend to own ? Just curious.

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

Why do you think Lars hasn't bothered to answer the questions in the original post since many of his affiliates seem to want to hear the comments?

This is a tough situation. One thread I read said he needed to maintain his database. This could mean that if he drops adware companies all of a sudden becauase of one person that is on a crusade when it has been perfectly acceptable for years including the crusaders own company it could mean he would stress over chargeback issues. You have to keep in mind that if you drop let's say 5% of your processing one month the next month you might be facing chargeback issues because your chargebacks kept coming in and your transactions droppped. I don't know if you are informed about these sort of things but it means you could actually lose your business. Not only lose your business but lose your business overnight because ONE person decideded to try to make a name for himself and ruin one company and not even try to clean up his own backyard first.

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:50 PM

NOTE TO EVERYONE READING THIS.

This is what you call "spin" and an attempt to kill a thread.

TrafficHog is trying to spin the issue here to Will76 instead of leaving the thread be which is focusing on questions for AFF and has nothing to do with me.

There is a 99% chance that TrafficHog is a fake nick of someone who has a vested interest in AFF.

hey is hoping to shit on this thread make it personally and hope people stop bumping it. We all know what he is saying is BULLSHIT. if agree with him or want answers to any of his comments make a new thread.

OTHERWISE IGNORE him and keep the this thread focused on the questions that you wanted answers.

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:51 PM

Don't argue with this moron.

Bump for answers from post 1

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

Come on who's fake nic are you? Lars? DH?

Which company did i pretend to own ? Just curious.

ClickCash dumbfuck! You have been trying to act as ClickCash is all high and mighty when they are one of the biggest supporters of Zango. Then, just recently, did you start to have links removed. Now you say... "if you see a clickcash code contact them and they will remove it"

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:54 PM

it isn't by chance this fake nic has poped into this thread and started making up all kind of shit we ALL know is false. These guys want this thread to go away. It is obvious. Since they do I will not make sure to bump this thread 5 times a day until your questions are answered. Nice try fuckers. as usually your agenda is obvious and back fires.

Everyone who was bumping this, step it up now. Bump the fuck out of this thread. They wouldnt have come in here with this fake nic if they didn't want this thread to go away.

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

ClickCash dumbfuck! You have been trying to act as ClickCash is all high and mighty when they are one of the biggest supporters of Zango. Then, just recently, did you start to have links removed. Now you say... "if you see a clickcash code contact them and they will remove it"

bump for you

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

Don't argue with this moron.

Bump for answers from post 1

Will, in your honest opinion... how many years has ClickCash had links from Zango and directly profiting from Zango? Now be honest... We are trying to stop a problem right? We are working for a cause right?????

Please... Please be honest with us. How long has ClickCash been without Zango? Never? 2 Days?
how long big crusader? You can't check your own backyard before you try to deface other companies?

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucky1

All night long it seems that AFF and their supporters are trying to spin the hell out of the zango issue.

They have reduced a serious problem in the adult industry to a kindergarten argument.

I don't want to hear that this company is using zango or that company is using zango. I don't what to hear that Will is an asshole or Lars is an asshole. What I want are these questions answered from AFF since they are the only company that has come forward and admitted that they directly purchase traffic from zango.

Is Zango a problem in the adult industry as a whole?

Is theft on any level whether it is 20% or .0001% acceptable?

Do you bid on url's of other companies?

Does Zango pop up a page or window over a site thus possibly taking away traffic from the original site?

Why do you use zango if it is such a small portion of your traffic and income?

Are you doing anything to stop zango and if so what?

Serious questions and I would like serious answers.

Answer them right and gain some respect.
Extra points for honesty and I'll check your answers.

Incase anyone missed it Lucky1 was trying to get the questions above answered.

will76 · 11-20-2006, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Will, in your honest opinion... how many years has ClickCash had links from Zango and directly profiting from Zango? Now be honest... We are trying to stop a problem right? We are working for a cause right?????

Please... Please be honest with us. How long has ClickCash been without Zango? Never? 2 Days?
how long big crusader? You can't check your own backyard before you try to deface other companies?

whoooa bump-o-rama.... thanks for another bump BRO! remind me to buy you a drink at the next show

TrafficHog · 11-20-2006, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

Don't argue with this moron.

Bump for answers from post 1

It's obvious you are upset people are actually questioning you and actually opening their minds to what's really going on. Sorry Will... The sheep won't always follow a moron.... There comes a time....

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

whoooa bump-o-rama.... thanks for another bump BRO! remind me to buy you a drink at the next show

Come on Will..... Please answer these honest questions.... Please......

will76 · 11-21-2006, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

It's obvious you are upset people are actually questioning you and actually opening their minds to what's really going on. Sorry Will... The sheep won't always follow a moron.... There comes a time....

If you want to chat with me start a new thread. Don't try to hijack this one.

Thanks for another bump

will76 · 11-21-2006, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucky1

All night long it seems that AFF and their supporters are trying to spin the hell out of the zango issue.

They have reduced a serious problem in the adult industry to a kindergarten argument.

I don't want to hear that this company is using zango or that company is using zango. I don't what to hear that Will is an asshole or Lars is an asshole. What I want are these questions answered from AFF since they are the only company that has come forward and admitted that they directly purchase traffic from zango.

Is Zango a problem in the adult industry as a whole?

Is theft on any level whether it is 20% or .0001% acceptable?

Do you bid on url's of other companies?

Does Zango pop up a page or window over a site thus possibly taking away traffic from the original site?

Why do you use zango if it is such a small portion of your traffic and income?

Are you doing anything to stop zango and if so what?

Serious questions and I would like serious answers.

Answer them right and gain some respect.
Extra points for honesty and I'll check your answers.

Seems like someone is trying to divert the attention away from the questios that were orginally posted. Here is another bump to keep the thread on track.

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

Seems like someone is trying to divert the attention away from the questios that were orginally posted. Here is another bump to keep the thread on track.

You are right. You are totally trying to divert attention away from questions that were asked. Come on Will... answer the questions.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Will, in your honest opinion... how many years has ClickCash had links from Zango and directly profiting from Zango? Now be honest... We are trying to stop a problem right? We are working for a cause right?????

Please... Please be honest with us. How long has ClickCash been without Zango? Never? 2 Days?
how long big crusader? You can't check your own backyard before you try to deface other companies?

Please answer the questions...... Please just one answer...

Martin · 11-21-2006, 12:07 AM

Im glad to see these things come to light and debated on the boards.. Threw my years of doing this I've seen these scams come and go.. Webmasters have been getting ripped off ever since I started. I love seeing these guys get dragged threw the mud. LOVE IT! The word travels much faster these days..

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

You are right. You are totally trying to divert attention away from questions that were asked. Come on Will... answer the questions.....

Please answer the questions...... Please just one answer...

Bumb for the person who thinks this thread doesn't want to get bumped!

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin

Im glad to see these things come to light and debated on the boards.. Threw my years of doing this I've seen these scams come and go.. Webmasters have been getting ripped off ever since I started. I love seeing these guys get dragged threw the mud. LOVE IT! The word travels much faster these days..

We just need to get rid of the ClickCash Zango supporters and we are good.

will76 · 11-21-2006, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

You are right. You are totally trying to divert attention away from questions that were asked. Come on Will... answer the questions.....

Please answer the questions...... Please just one answer...

here I will expose you for the fake nic fraud you are.

If you really want me to answer questions. Use the copy paste function and start a new thread. I will answer any question you want then.

Deal ? Failure to do so will expose your agenda.

If anyone thinks this fake fuck has any validity start a new thread and I will answer any questions you may have.

will76 · 11-21-2006, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucky1

All night long it seems that AFF and their supporters are trying to spin the hell out of the zango issue.

They have reduced a serious problem in the adult industry to a kindergarten argument.

I don't want to hear that this company is using zango or that company is using zango. I don't what to hear that Will is an asshole or Lars is an asshole. What I want are these questions answered from AFF since they are the only company that has come forward and admitted that they directly purchase traffic from zango.

Is Zango a problem in the adult industry as a whole?

Is theft on any level whether it is 20% or .0001% acceptable?

Do you bid on url's of other companies?

Does Zango pop up a page or window over a site thus possibly taking away traffic from the original site?

Why do you use zango if it is such a small portion of your traffic and income?

Are you doing anything to stop zango and if so what?

Serious questions and I would like serious answers.

Answer them right and gain some respect.
Extra points for honesty and I'll check your answers.

just to put the focus back on why this thread was started.

hershie · 11-21-2006, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

This is a tough situation. One thread I read said he needed to maintain his database. This could mean that if he drops adware companies all of a sudden becauase of one person that is on a crusade when it has been perfectly acceptable for years including the crusaders own company it could mean he would stress over chargeback issues. You have to keep in mind that if you drop let's say 5% of your processing one month the next month you might be facing chargeback issues because your chargebacks kept coming in and your transactions droppped. I don't know if you are informed about these sort of things but it means you could actually lose your business. Not only lose your business but lose your business overnight because ONE person decideded to try to make a name for himself and ruin one company and not even try to clean up his own backyard first.

OK, I totally agree that if they are in fear of losing their processing and thus business, that justifies them doing what they have to that is still legal to stay afloat.

But, that doesn't seem plausible given what else they have said, like it represents such a small percentage of traffic...(if they are on verge of losing their ability to process if they lose zango signups then I would have no problem with them lying to hide this fact to protect their company's lifeline).

If they need zango to stay compliant with visa, that is deeply disturbing to affiliates and clients i imagine and what about targetting their competitors and all the other stuff that doesn't support your contentions.

will76 · 11-21-2006, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Bumb for the person who thinks this thread doesn't want to get bumped!

Thanks for the bumb

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Will, in your honest opinion... how many years has ClickCash had links from Zango and directly profiting from Zango? Now be honest... We are trying to stop a problem right? We are working for a cause right?????

Please... Please be honest with us. How long has ClickCash been without Zango? Never? 2 Days?
how long big crusader? You can't check your own backyard before you try to deface other companies?

Oooppps. Why start a new thread???? You seem to jump in other theads that have no want for you..... Please answer the question.... Why would you want me out of this thread??? Do you have an alterior motive for getting me out of this thread??? Maybe because some people are seeing the light???

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

OK, I totally agree that if they are in fear of losing their processing and thus business, that justifies them doing what they have to that is still legal to stay afloat.

But, that doesn't seem plausible given what else they have said, like it represents such a small percentage of traffic...(if they are on verge of losing their ability to process if they lose zango signups then I would have no problem with them lying to hide this fact to protect their company's lifeline).

If they need zango to stay compliant with visa, that is deeply disturbing to affiliates and clients i imagine and what about targetting their competitors and all the other stuff that doesn't support your contentions.

Buying contexual marketing from adware companies has been a practise of some of the largest companies on the Internet today for many years past. If you aren't aware it is one of the BIGGEST advertising mediums there is. Now you expect everyone to all of a sudden stop and lose that revenue stream all because one person got all hot an bothered. It's been an acceptable traffic medium for many years now undergoing many laws mandating certain requirements that Zango seems to be following. Will76 didn't even check his own programs use of Zango which has been IMMENSE for the last 4 years. This is a serious concern to anyone who wants to know Will76's true vendetta. let's see ClickCash against AFF? Hmm........

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

Seems like someone is trying to divert the attention away from the questios that were orginally posted. Here is another bump to keep the thread on track.

Come on... let's keep this thread on track..... Does Will have a different agenda then we think? Did ClickCash have TONS of Zango traffic going to it up to just a few days ago???? Yes... People ... Wake up....

will76 · 11-21-2006, 12:45 AM

thanks for proving my point of why you dont want to start a new thread.

Please bump this thread a couple times tonight and I will be back in the morning to bump it some more ;)

Actually. New policy. I am not going to reply to fake nicks any more. If you want answers log in with your REAL name, pussy.

Pleasurepays · 11-21-2006, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Come on... let's keep this thread on track..... Does Will have a different agenda then we think? Did ClickCash have TONS of Zango traffic going to it up to just a few days ago???? Yes... People ... Wake up....

ok... so why doesn't AFF/cams.com stop now too? ClickCash seems to be the better company and immune to all the excuses that AFF/Cams has. are you saying that ClickCash is just a more stable and solid company?

weird.

Pleasurepays · 11-21-2006, 12:55 AM

also, how do you reconcile these three arguments?

- "its a very small percentage of traffic.. less than .05%"
and
- "we have to do it to maintain the size of our member base"
and
- "if we don't do it, we can lose our merchant account"

hershie · 11-21-2006, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

Buying contexual marketing from adware companies has been a practise of some of the largest companies on the Internet today for many years past. If you aren't aware it is one of the BIGGEST advertising mediums there is. Now you expect everyone to all of a sudden stop and lose that revenue stream all because one person got all hot an bothered. It's been an acceptable traffic medium for many years now undergoing many laws mandating certain requirements that Zango seems to be following. Will76 didn't even check his own programs use of Zango which has been IMMENSE for the last 4 years. This is a serious concern to anyone who wants to know Will76's true vendetta. let's see ClickCash against AFF? Hmm........

Everytime you bring it all back to it being just a vendetta of Will comes across to me as raising a red herring to cloud the realities of the issue. Worse, chalking it up as just another contextual ad buy is disingenuous to the webmaster community who easily saw through the difference of Guba from newsgroups just like they distinguish what zango is to them here from other contextual advertising.

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hershie

OK, I totally agree that if they are in fear of losing their processing and thus business, that justifies them doing what they have to that is still legal to stay afloat.

But, that doesn't seem plausible given what else they have said, like it represents such a small percentage of traffic...(if they are on verge of losing their ability to process if they lose zango signups then I would have no problem with them lying to hide this fact to protect their company's lifeline).

If they need zango to stay compliant with visa, that is deeply disturbing to affiliates and clients i imagine and what about targetting their competitors and all the other stuff that doesn't support your contentions.

INMO.... It doesn't represent a small % of their traffic and their traffic is growing because of Will76. Look at alexa's ranking for zangocash.com

He is building their traffic up HUGE!!!! Will, can I hire you for some promotions I am doing?

On the other hand it appears cams.com is still growing...

So what is Will76 actually doing? Helping Zango? Promoting Zango? How many GFY'ers didn't know about Zangocash.com or MetricsDirect.com that are now in the now and using them? Look at the charts I posted and you tell me what you think is happening.

TrafficHog · 11-21-2006, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

also, how do you reconcile these three arguments?

- "its a very small percentage of traffic.. less than .05%"
and
- "we have to do it to maintain the size of our member base"
and
- "if we don't do it, we can lose our merchant account"

It's common knowledge that Zango is 0.05% of the US surfers. Then, you take the popups, which don't occur every site you browse, that are only clicked on 15% of the time. In the end you are looking an EXTREMELEY small amount..

I am not AFF. I don't know if they have a problem with their database and chargebacks. Check with them.

Martin · 11-21-2006, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

INMO.... It doesn't represent a small % of their traffic and their traffic is growing because of Will76. Look at alexa's ranking for zangocash.com

He is building their traffic up HUGE!!!! Will, can I hire you for some promotions I am doing?

On the other hand it appears cams.com is still growing...

So what is Will76 actually doing? Helping Zango? Promoting Zango? How many GFY'ers didn't know about Zangocash.com or MetricsDirect.com that are now in the now and using them? Look at the charts I posted and you tell me what you think is happening.

I have a hard time believing this is due to Will's threads on gfy.

Pleasurepays · 11-21-2006, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrafficHog

It's common knowledge that Zango is 0.05% of the US surfers. Then, you take the popups, which don't occur every site you browse, that are only clicked on 15% of the time. In the end you are looking an EXTREMELEY small amount..

I am not AFF. I don't know if they have a problem with their database and chargebacks. Check with them.

ok... i accept your statements.

so....

1) it has no direct effect on user levels since its basically an irrelevant amount of traffic.

2) it has no consequences on the merchant account and processing since normal fluctuations are such that not having zango traffic wouldn't even register

3) its apparently not enough worth stealing to begin with.

so, lets take the time to examine the arguments for it based on your statements.

1)......uhmm.... hm...........

11-20-2006, 09:53 PM	#51
BusterBunny perverted justice decoy Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: unborn still in the womb connected via blackberry Posts: 19,291	50 hard hitting questions..... __________________ my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died

11-20-2006, 10:45 PM	#62
MaddCaz Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Illinois Posts: 9,483	seriouisness is good...I think __________________ BigCocks.com - MatureWomen.com - Tranny.com - DrunkGirls.com - TeenGirls.com - MonsterCock.com and many more... Click here to see them all!

11-20-2006, 11:50 PM	#70
will76 Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 18,037	NOTE TO EVERYONE READING THIS. This is what you call "spin" and an attempt to kill a thread. TrafficHog is trying to spin the issue here to Will76 instead of leaving the thread be which is focusing on questions for AFF and has nothing to do with me. There is a 99% chance that TrafficHog is a fake nick of someone who has a vested interest in AFF. hey is hoping to shit on this thread make it personally and hope people stop bumping it. We all know what he is saying is BULLSHIT. if agree with him or want answers to any of his comments make a new thread. OTHERWISE IGNORE him and keep the this thread focused on the questions that you wanted answers. __________________ ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread) FNCash \| Media Revenue

11-20-2006, 11:51 PM	#71
will76 Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 18,037	Don't argue with this moron. Bump for answers from post 1 __________________ ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread) FNCash \| Media Revenue

11-20-2006, 11:54 PM	#73
will76 Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 18,037	it isn't by chance this fake nic has poped into this thread and started making up all kind of shit we ALL know is false. These guys want this thread to go away. It is obvious. Since they do I will not make sure to bump this thread 5 times a day until your questions are answered. Nice try fuckers. as usually your agenda is obvious and back fires. Everyone who was bumping this, step it up now. Bump the fuck out of this thread. They wouldnt have come in here with this fake nic if they didn't want this thread to go away. __________________ ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread) FNCash \| Media Revenue

11-20-2006, 11:36 PM	#66
TrafficHog Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 88	Sly? Want to comment on this?

11-21-2006, 12:07 AM	#83
Martin "Assassins" Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: At home Posts: 17,277	Im glad to see these things come to light and debated on the boards.. Threw my years of doing this I've seen these scams come and go.. Webmasters have been getting ripped off ever since I started. I love seeing these guys get dragged threw the mud. LOVE IT! The word travels much faster these days.. __________________

11-21-2006, 12:45 AM	#93
will76 Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 18,037	thanks for proving my point of why you dont want to start a new thread. Please bump this thread a couple times tonight and I will be back in the morning to bump it some more ;) Actually. New policy. I am not going to reply to fake nicks any more. If you want answers log in with your REAL name, pussy. __________________ ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread) FNCash \| Media Revenue

11-21-2006, 12:55 AM	#95
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	also, how do you reconcile these three arguments? - "its a very small percentage of traffic.. less than .05%" and - "we have to do it to maintain the size of our member base" and - "if we don't do it, we can lose our merchant account"