Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-15-2007, 04:27 AM   #51
BusterBunny
perverted justice decoy
 
BusterBunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: unborn still in the womb connected via blackberry
Posts: 19,291
50 .........
__________________
my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died
BusterBunny is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:23 AM   #52
not2new
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Right behind you.
Posts: 62
OK , So now that we all have been educated about being lied to and taken advantage of , we are all victims...
What do we do now?????
If our founding fathers came back at this very moment ( most all of them Christians) what do you think they would say??????
They gave us the right to bear arms so things like this wouldnt happen ( forget about the religeon thing , ive herd we are from fish to martins in theroy) What now???
I think if Georg Washington came back today he would say something like "LETS START KILLING MOTHER-FUCKERS"....
But we all know that isnt going to happen , is it ????
Thank you for the Movie , it was very inspiring and emmotional , but like one of the posts said above ;"lets all just go back to work like good little sheep before we all get indicted for being terorests or comunists or maybe even rebels..."Every so offten the tree of Democrecy must be watered with the blood of Patriots..... Thomas Jefferson

Goes to show you what real men are founding fathers really were.
God bless all of you
P.S. The quot above may be slightly off but i'm sure you all get the picture.
By the way , i have 2-younger brothers that just came home around 2-months ago from Iraq....
Marines , the two of them... As a matter of fact the older of the two came home with ,the way he describs it, a Prime-rib size piece taken out of his left thigh.... the result of an RPG (Rocket propeled Grenade).
The guy in front of him was blown apart.
He says when they would enter a village on patrol , to start kicking in doors, the people , natives, would run out and greet them with hot tea.....
He talked about the troops having to rummedge through the dumps to find Steal to put on the door of there humm-v's as protection and how the Gov has body armour that will prevent AK-47 rounds from cutting through there personal b/armour like butter ,but the gov wont give it to them as its to expessive, the new stuff i mean....
They didnt have any interest in re-signing.....
The older of the two brothers has two combat tours ( Afganistan and Iraq) and a purple hart....
When he returned to the states he called me irate...
Turns out that when he came home with only 2-3 weeks left , he was in a short timers squad...
Most of the men in this squad had a whole bunch of combat experience...
They had a young (ass-hole ) sargent that, insted of letting them go home after role call , he made them pick up PINE-CONE'S around the base....
Thanks for staying in harms way for over 3.11 years and getting a nice chunk of your ass blown off YOU PEICE OF SHIT is what he figures he was being told...
I am sure many of you have a story so ill leave it here. Thank you again for the film.....
Take care all....
__________________
[email protected]
ICQ : 405993908
I can help you....
Free service,
I am a former 3pp sales director. I am currently researching the best 3pp's and merchant banks. Reputation , Pay-Out Consistancy and Client Service. In light of the past 1 1/2 years of 3pp's going under and taking your hard earned $ with them, i strongly suggest that you conact me. I can get you , at least , 1% discount on your current fee/rate. I dont want you to give up your current 3pp , i simply want you to diversify your risk.This is a Free service. cc,checks,etc...
not2new is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:30 AM   #53
VicD
ICQ: 304-611-162
 
VicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Masterdam
Posts: 13,245
interesting stuff
VicD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 09:27 AM   #54
potter
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,559
Just finished, watched the whole thing.

Part I - I never believe in religion to begin with, so yeah woohoo.
Part II - Utter disgust that it could be true
Part III - Eek, Don't want to have kids and put them through that shiot.

Incredible video though, true or not it is hands down the absolute best "conspiracy" theory ever. Utterly outstanding, and I'm glad to have seen it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin View Post
Powerful video. Thanks for posting....

Im ready to join the revolution.. Power to the people. Lets do it..
That's exactly what I was thinking about half way through. I was like, "ok time for a revolution, where do i sign up, will there be coffee?"
__________________

potter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 09:38 AM   #55
JFK
FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
 
JFK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: FUBARLAND
Posts: 67,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Money View Post
I'm the chosen one.
I saw dat
__________________

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com
JFK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 09:50 AM   #56
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
Internal Revenue Code 6011(a) requires to file a return while Section 6151 requires taxpayers to submit payment of their taxes with their returns.

You asked for the laws, there they are.
6011(a) General rule
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title, or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary. Every person required to make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such forms or regulations.

When required... doesn't say who is required..
Every person required to make a return... doesn't say who is required..

6151(a) General rule
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, when a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall, without assessment or notice and demand from the Secretary, pay such tax to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed, and shall pay such tax at the time and place fixed for filing the return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the return).

Again... doesn't say who is required...

Neither of those codes are laws requiring anyone to pay anything...

Now.. go find the title or regulation that actually requires a wage earner to file and pay taxes on those wages...

They work with the knowledge that they have all the money in the world to fight, where the average Joe Citizen can't afford the battle..
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 10:08 AM   #57
Phoenix
BACON BACON BACON
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet
Posts: 35,457
nifty video...
__________________
Skype Phoenixskype1
Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Phoenix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 10:16 AM   #58
stickyfingerz
Doin fine
 
stickyfingerz's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porn Farmer View Post
How many atheists do you think become theologians?
Well I can name one big one off the top of my head. C.S. Lewis.
stickyfingerz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 10:42 AM   #59
donkevlar
Confirmed User
 
donkevlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,325
So what do people think about the 9/11 section?

The buildings fell demolition style.

The steel all came down with it, and was cut.

There was molten metal burning hotter than jet fuel can.

You can't fly a huge plane into the first floor of the pentagon.

And that other plane that crashed just vaporized?

The military couldn't stop 2 planes headed directly for downtown NY?

They faked a Bin Laden video and lied over and over.

...
__________________
[email protected]
donkevlar is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 10:57 AM   #60
potter
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,559
I just linked this on a Colorado based board I'm on. Holy shit. I know it's a hardcore red state and anything anti- republicans, religion, current administration gets heat. But shit, guess I'll think twice about posting anything unless it's from FOX news from now on.
__________________

potter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 11:17 AM   #61
potter
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,559
Still taking heat. Not one person's even watched it yet either, just bitching.
__________________

potter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 11:27 AM   #62
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by potter View Post
Still taking heat. Not one person's even watched it yet either, just bitching.
When people have their minds made up, and don't want to have to go through the process of maybe changing their views on some things, they avoid any sources that could maybe cause it to happen...
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 11:30 AM   #63
Jarmusch
 
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12,464
I'm downloading the flv file and will watch it later, thanks.
Jarmusch is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 11:38 AM   #64
potter
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
When people have their minds made up, and don't want to have to go through the process of maybe changing their views on some things, they avoid any sources that could maybe cause it to happen...
For real. It's sad.
__________________

potter is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 12:16 PM   #65
Mr Steele
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 392
Good video...Well put together, with lotta interesting info.

Heard a lot of it all before, so maybe i'm a bit numb to it all by now, but the video that really blew me away was:

RING OF POWER Pt 1
: RING OF POWER Pt 2
From the mystery religions of ancient Egypt to the Zionist role in 9/11, "Ring Of Power" unrevises 4000 years of revisionist human history with never - before - seen revelations. "Ring Of Power" puzzles together the pieces of a giant puzzle into one BIG PICTURE documentary series.

Part I: 9/11 THE UNTOLD STORY (38 min.) Half the world believes Muslims were responsible for 9/11. The other half believes Israeli Zionists were responsible. Who?s right?

Part II: HIDDEN EMPIRE (22 min.) The world?s most powerful empire is not the U.S.A. It is an empire that insiders call ?Empire Of The City?.

Part III: TRAIL OF THE PHARAOHS (25 min.) Did the Biblical Abraham really live to be 175? Did Moses really turn staffs into snakes and rivers into blood?

Part IV: GOD AND THE QUEEN (30 min.) Genealogy charts show that British and French royalty are descendants of Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ. Is it true?

Part V: ALL THE QUEEN?S MEN (22 min.) How rich and powerful is Queen Elizabeth II?

Part VI: THE GODFATHERS (30 min.) They scammed control of the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve, then they found GOD ? Gold, Oil and Drugs.

Part VII: CHEATING AT MONOPOLY (52 min.) How many people would play a game of monopoly if the banker was cheating and fixing the rules? Over 6 billion.

Part VIII: ASSES OF EVIL (29 min.) The New World Order Mafia are invisible rulers who make puppets out of politicians, heroes out of villains and villains out of heroes.

Part IX: KING OF HEARTS (22 min.) The ultimate goal of ?insiders? is to disarm the world and create one world empire under one world ruler. Who is he?

Part X: SOLUTIONS (28 min.) Protesting and writing letters to deaf politicians doesn?t work. What does work?
__________________
www.memberchannels.com

New Full length DVD's in Flash and Window Media formats
RSS tool to let your members know when we add new content

Get in touch with me for great deals!
ICQ: 304-216-163
Mr Steele is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 12:42 PM   #66
juz
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Van down by the river
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by [db] View Post
No, there is no law that says American wage earners are required to pay taxes. Wages are not profits, only corporate profits are supposed to be taxed. The IRS is a criminal organization who rule through intimidation.

Call the IRS and ask what law it is that requires someone to pay taxes on their wages. You will not get a response. You may, however, get an audit.


You have to watch this movie:

http://www.freedomtofascism.com
The 16th amendment -
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."




documentaries are the new religion, praying on the weak minded
juz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 12:50 PM   #67
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
Yes there was proof that Jesus lived. Besides the littany Christian writers, there were a handful of non-Christian writers that referenced him in their works. I'm not sure why biblical scholars and religous historians "have to" do anything. Most aren't religous at all and in fact view the history of religion as just that, history.

The only thing disputed are the references to Jesus in ancient writings. Some say that they aren't that reliable, while others point to some omissions of his name in certain writings. Whatever your view is on the issue, I'm simply pointing out that your opinion on him not existing is in the extreme minority of those who dedicate their lives to the historical research of religions. They believe that Jesus was in fact a man who lived and had a following, but that he was also fairly insignifigant.
No one wrote about Jesus when he was said to have lived. They all wrote after the fact and through word of mouth.
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 12:59 PM   #68
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
6011(a) General rule
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title, or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary. Every person required to make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such forms or regulations.

When required... doesn't say who is required..
Every person required to make a return... doesn't say who is required..

6151(a) General rule
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, when a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall, without assessment or notice and demand from the Secretary, pay such tax to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed, and shall pay such tax at the time and place fixed for filing the return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the return).

Again... doesn't say who is required...

Neither of those codes are laws requiring anyone to pay anything...

Now.. go find the title or regulation that actually requires a wage earner to file and pay taxes on those wages...

They work with the knowledge that they have all the money in the world to fight, where the average Joe Citizen can't afford the battle..

Vote Ron Paul and hope to say bye bye to the IRS. If we were to stop taking income taxes right now, that would bring the total money that the US gov has to spend back to the year 2000 amount. Are we saying that we can not make changes and spend less? I think we could find a way without stealing everyones incomes.
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 02:07 PM   #69
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by juz View Post
The 16th amendment -
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
That amendment is limited by article I.. and it didn't give congress any new taxing powers...


The Supreme Court, in a decision written by Chief Justice White, first noted that the Sixteenth Amendment did not authorize any new type of tax, nor did it repeal or revoke the tax clauses of Article I of the Constitution? Direct taxes were, notwithstanding the advent of the Sixteenth Amendment, still subject to the rule of apportionment and indirect taxes were still subject to the rule of uniformity.
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 02:14 PM   #70
SexualDragon
Confirmed User
 
SexualDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,038
How long is this intro.?
__________________
Make 2009 a great year with Tiffany Preston
436-127-934
SexualDragon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 02:58 PM   #71
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
Again... doesn't say who is required...

Neither of those codes are laws requiring anyone to pay anything...
The question was what law required people to pay, that law is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
Now.. go find the title or regulation that actually requires a wage earner to file and pay taxes on those wages...
Since you asked, it's section 6012 which goes into great detail on who is required to pay.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/irc6012.pdf
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 04:11 PM   #72
Phoenix
BACON BACON BACON
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet
Posts: 35,457
back to the top
__________________
Skype Phoenixskype1
Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Phoenix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 04:51 PM   #73
Porn Farmer
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz View Post
Well I can name one big one off the top of my head. C.S. Lewis.
I'm not talking about atheists who converted to Christianity and then became theologians. I'm talking about actual atheists who became theologians because they wanted to study theology.
Porn Farmer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:00 PM   #74
DavieVegas
Confirmed User
 
DavieVegas's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,117
K i watched this whole fucking thing and what intrigued me the most was from 1:39 min into the movie till the end. It talks about the one world goverment and the money. Its scary to even watch this part of this movie to me. I Advise everyone to watch this movie from an hour 39 min on till the end. Only 20 min or so. PLEASE
__________________
SKYPE#: davievegas - email: ddmedia702[at]mail[.]com
DavieVegas is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:07 PM   #75
yahoo-xxx-girls.com
Confirmed User
 
yahoo-xxx-girls.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,143
Fun with logic... Dogs are so playful ... ^^

My general rule is:

I don't believe any conspiracy that I'm not a part of... ^^

As soon a you deny the existence of a plausible group... then you become part of the conspiracy if you side with or against such an entity ...

Simple logic... I'll quit my day job and walk dogs... if I'm wrong !!!

Don't believe me... ^^

.
yahoo-xxx-girls.com is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:20 PM   #76
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
Since you asked, it's section 6012 which goes into great detail on who is required to pay.
Actually 6012 tries to say who is required to file returns... not pay taxes.. and is an enforcement code.. not an imposing code.....

You have to establish who is required to actually pay before any return requirement can apply...

The privacy act states that you must file a return or statement with us for any tax you are liable for.

The only code that shows who is liable is 3403..
Only employers and withholding agents are liable...
Now who are withholding agents? 7701 (a) (16)

(16) Withholding agent. The term ''withholding agent'' means any person required to deduct and withhold any tax under the provisions of sections
1441 - Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens
1442 - Withholding of tax on foreign corporations
1443 - Foreign tax-exempt organizations
1461 - Liability for withheld tax

Sooo.. citizens aren't liable for taxes on U.S. wages.

Now.. the form required to be filled out pertinent to 6012 has an OMB number of 1545-0067.. This is form 2555 - Foreign Earned Income
1.6012-0................................ 1545-0067

Form 1040 is used if there are refunds, deductions, etc for what taxes that are required, but not for a requirement to pay..

This could go on forever....
What the law says and what the courts do can be two totally different things because of the confusions and gray areas of the code...

If you want to get to the guts of it all and like to read alot, it's all here with the codes references and the whole speal.....
Not a conspiracy site... just all the guts...
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:26 PM   #77
Phoenix
BACON BACON BACON
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet
Posts: 35,457
wheres franck calling everyone an idiot who watched this?

wheres 12 clicks sticking up for his republican party?

wheres stickeyfingerz?

nothing to say? man these three are sheep..they are the ones holding the doors open for fellow prisoners and claiming that there looks to be good food up a head in the holding cells....dont worry they'd say this is for our own good


Sheep....and i mean in the worst way possible
__________________
Skype Phoenixskype1
Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Phoenix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:47 PM   #78
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
wheres franck calling everyone an idiot who watched this?

wheres 12 clicks sticking up for his republican party?

wheres stickeyfingerz?

nothing to say? man these three are sheep..they are the ones holding the doors open for fellow prisoners and claiming that there looks to be good food up a head in the holding cells....dont worry they'd say this is for our own good


Sheep....and i mean in the worst way possible
They are too busy wondering how Ron Paul a free thinker is the best choice for president
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:47 PM   #79
Mr Steele
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
wheres franck calling everyone an idiot who watched this?

wheres 12 clicks sticking up for his republican party?

wheres stickeyfingerz?

nothing to say? man these three are sheep..they are the ones holding the doors open for fellow prisoners and claiming that there looks to be good food up a head in the holding cells....dont worry they'd say this is for our own good


Sheep....and i mean in the worst way possible
You forgot that they'd actually have to watch it 1st...not very likely
And the fact that the director's not overweight seems to throw them off...there goes 1/2 of their arguments against it right there :
__________________
www.memberchannels.com

New Full length DVD's in Flash and Window Media formats
RSS tool to let your members know when we add new content

Get in touch with me for great deals!
ICQ: 304-216-163
Mr Steele is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 05:59 PM   #80
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
Actually 6012 tries to say who is required to file returns... not pay taxes.. and is an enforcement code.. not an imposing code.....
I know, 6151 is the code that requires you to pay it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
You have to establish who is required to actually pay before any return requirement can apply...
Those required to pay are those who are required to file. It states so in 6151.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
The privacy act states that you must file a return or statement with us for any tax you are liable for.

The only code that shows who is liable is 3403..
Only employers and withholding agents are liable...
Now who are withholding agents? 7701 (a) (16)

(16) Withholding agent. The term ''withholding agent'' means any person required to deduct and withhold any tax under the provisions of sections
1441 - Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens
1442 - Withholding of tax on foreign corporations
1443 - Foreign tax-exempt organizations
1461 - Liability for withheld tax

Sooo.. citizens aren't liable for taxes on U.S. wages.

Now.. the form required to be filled out pertinent to 6012 has an OMB number of 1545-0067.. This is form 2555 - Foreign Earned Income
1.6012-0................................ 1545-0067

Form 1040 is used if there are refunds, deductions, etc for what taxes that are required, but not for a requirement to pay..

This could go on forever....
What the law says and what the courts do can be two totally different things because of the confusions and gray areas of the code...

If you want to get to the guts of it all and like to read alot, it's all here with the codes references and the whole speal.....
Not a conspiracy site... just all the guts...
The Privacy Act thing is one of the weakest arguments made by these sites. There's a ton of court cases that have rejected every one of these arguments from US vs Wunder, Salberg vs US, US vs Holden, Lonsdale vs US, US vs Neff, and US vs Hicks.

You can argue that the courts are all wrong, but the judicial branch has the job of interpreting law. If they say the law stands and rejects the case, then it stands. Are you saying that the courts are all wrong? The only argument you can make is based on that, since every issue you brought up has been ruled on by our courts over many decades.

And I've read through sites like that. They have interesting interpretations of our laws. But it doesn't matter what they think, it matters what a court says about it.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 06:02 PM   #81
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
best designer on GFY
 
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384
Posts: 30,307
Zeitgeist [(tseyt-geyst, zeyt-geyst)]


The general moral, intellectual, and cultural climate of an era; Zeitgeist is German for ?time-spirit.? For example, the Zeitgeist of England in the Victorian period included a belief in industrial progress, and the Zeitgeist of the 1980s in the United States was a belief in the power of money and the many ways in which to spend it.
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 06:04 PM   #82
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
I know, 6151 is the code that requires you to pay it.


Those required to pay are those who are required to file. It states so in 6151.


The Privacy Act thing is one of the weakest arguments made by these sites. There's a ton of court cases that have rejected every one of these arguments from US vs Wunder, Salberg vs US, US vs Holden, Lonsdale vs US, US vs Neff, and US vs Hicks.

You can argue that the courts are all wrong, but the judicial branch has the job of interpreting law. If they say the law stands and rejects the case, then it stands. Are you saying that the courts are all wrong? The only argument you can make is based on that, since every issue you brought up has been ruled on by our courts over many decades.

And I've read through sites like that. They have interesting interpretations of our laws. But it doesn't matter what they think, it matters what a court says about it.
The problem comes from the fact that the courts benefit from the law and that puts them in direct conflict to even rule on the law. This law is a catch 22 when it hits the courts.

We would not need an income tax at all if we used tariffs properly and stop hiding behind "free trade" Like our wonderful free trade with China. Our products shipped to China get a 25% while their products shipped here only get a 2.5% tax!
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 06:18 PM   #83
Mr Steele
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 392
Tom Cryer just beat the IRS on Friday

Local attorney acquitted on federal income tax charges
Cryer stopped filing income taxes more than 10 years ago
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/...WS03/707130321


The prosecution could not state any law making the average American liable for the income tax. All the prosecution could point out was rulings by two lower courts. However, as Tom Cryer stated The lower courts cannot overturn the Supreme Court and Tom Cryer stated numerous Supreme Court Ruling that conflicted with the IRS version of the law.

"The court could not find a law that makes me liable or makes my revenues taxable," Cryer said. "The Supreme Court has ruled that the government cannot impose an income tax on anything but the profits and gains. When you work for someone you give your service and labor in exchange for money, so everything you make is not profit or gain. You put something into it."
__________________
www.memberchannels.com

New Full length DVD's in Flash and Window Media formats
RSS tool to let your members know when we add new content

Get in touch with me for great deals!
ICQ: 304-216-163
Mr Steele is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 06:32 PM   #84
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
I know, 6151 is the code that requires you to pay it.
6151. Time and place for paying tax shown on return
(a) General rule
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, when a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall......

Again... where does it require me to pay it... It just says when it's required it must be paid by a certain time and place...

The laws lead straight to the fact that it's all about tax on foreign income... It's the courts that twist the wording, definitions, and intentions of those laws..

The courts, judges, prosecutors, etc. have to win because their client is also their boss... The govt'... Kind of a conflict of interest..

Even some in congress say it's illegal.. It'll blow up one day, then they'll act like they're doing us a favor and implement the 17% across the board tax, or some other remedy to get rid of the irs...

I read a case about a guy who was hauled in for failure to pay.. The code they used against him was 7203 which is a penalty code and not a law that can be violated... When he asked to see the law that he broke before entering a plea, the judge said, "You know what law you broke".. so they never even provided the law that he broke... just the code that provided the penalties if he in fact broke the law...

That's how they work..
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 06:43 PM   #85
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
6151. Time and place for paying tax shown on return
(a) General rule
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, when a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall......

Again... where does it require me to pay it... It just says when it's required it must be paid by a certain time and place...
I don't know how many times we can go in this circle. 6011 and 6012 tells us that we are required to file a return and who is required to do it. 6151 requires that those required to file a return (as determined by 6011 and 6012) pay it.

You can keep posting things off the website, but I, the Constitution, Federal, Apellate and Supreme Courts, IRS tax codes, and almost all accountants and tax attorneys would disagree with you.

I'm not arguing with you on it, just stating what the courts have stated are law. If you don't agree with their decisions, vote them out, vote in people who will appoint ones that agree with your point of view, etc. I don't see how the courts have a conflict of interest considering they are taxpayers themselves. But trying to find little loopholes and plays on words that have been smacked down by every court in the country for decades is not going to change a thing.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 06:57 PM   #86
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
I'll be honest i havent watched the movie but jesus lives down the block from me and is very real..

I dont have to watch the movie to know 9-11 was an "inside job" , problem is that "inside job" is a terrible term to use as it implies some guy sitting behind a desk ordering some "hit" on america , and this couldn't be further from the truth.

in my opinion only a small handfull of people other than those who took part in the attack had ANY information about 9-11 beforhand.. and i don't think 1 person in the american government knew what was going to happen..

That being said i think MANY government officials ignored warnings and helped build a climate of "hate" based on their own financial or political gain

if you stick a lion in a cage and poke it with a stick everyday, you cant predict or know how the attack will take place but you do KNOW that once that lion gets a chance he will fuck some shit up..
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 07:02 PM   #87
techtony
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 668
5:15 is when the intro finishes, just incase any body wants to skip it.
__________________
The Freak and Geek Show
The F&G Network The F&G Shop

ICQ# 486382410
techtony is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 07:29 PM   #88
[db]
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
They work with the knowledge that they have all the money in the world to fight, where the average Joe Citizen can't afford the battle..


Especially when they immediately seize all of his property and freeze his bank accounts.
[db] is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 07:35 PM   #89
[db]
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear View Post
I'll be honest i havent watched the movie but jesus lives down the block from me and is very real..

I dont have to watch the movie to know 9-11 was an "inside job" , problem is that "inside job" is a terrible term to use as it implies some guy sitting behind a desk ordering some "hit" on america , and this couldn't be further from the truth.

in my opinion only a small handfull of people other than those who took part in the attack had ANY information about 9-11 beforhand.. and i don't think 1 person in the american government knew what was going to happen..

That being said i think MANY government officials ignored warnings and helped build a climate of "hate" based on their own financial or political gain

if you stick a lion in a cage and poke it with a stick everyday, you cant predict or know how the attack will take place but you do KNOW that once that lion gets a chance he will fuck some shit up..


Someone set up the explosives in building 7, and someone told the 9/11 commission to ignore than demolition completely. I don't think it was any elected official but there had to be someone in the CIA or some military/intelligence black ops division directly and knowingly involved.
[db] is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 07:37 PM   #90
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by [db] View Post
Especially when they immediately seize all of his property and freeze his bank accounts.
That is called guilty before proven innocent Another reason the 16th and IRS are unconstitutional
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 07:38 PM   #91
[db]
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkevlar View Post
So what do people think about the 9/11 section?

The buildings fell demolition style.

The steel all came down with it, and was cut.

There was molten metal burning hotter than jet fuel can.

You can't fly a huge plane into the first floor of the pentagon.

And that other plane that crashed just vaporized?

The military couldn't stop 2 planes headed directly for downtown NY?

They faked a Bin Laden video and lied over and over.

...


It's WAY easier to ignore reality and just watch TV than it is to admit to yourself that we're living in a horrific tyranny and are controlled by fear. 99% of people are weak minded cowards, myself included.
[db] is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 07:42 PM   #92
[db]
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls View Post
That is called guilty before proven innocent Another reason the 16th and IRS are unconstitutional
absofrickenlutely
[db] is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:09 PM   #93
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
I don't know how many times we can go in this circle. 6011 and 6012 tells us that we are required to file a return and who is required to do it. 6151 requires that those required to file a return (as determined by 6011 and 6012) pay it.
Nor am I arguing with you.. I enjoy mature debate..

and as for me grabbing stuff of of a website... I'm just giving you the laws from title 26.. from Cornell U. actually..
and I can dig up supreme court rulings in favor of defendants... but I'm refering to actual law with this stuff..

and again..
6011 says, "any person made liable for any tax...." I showed you the law that states who is liable....
6012 says, "Every individual having for the taxable year gross income..."
A requirement for those who are liable..

It's all about foreign income... Now I'm talking about personal taxes.. not business tax as that does fall under laws that specifically state taxes are required as a right to do business.. Excise taxes and the like.. which is what the 16th amendment was about..

But you won't find any law that specifically states that an individual is required by that law to pay taxes on wages from U.S. sources.. as this is, or is supposed to be protected by the 1st amendment which supercedes any amendment unless repealed.

If you'll think about it... If there was such a law, there wouldn't be near as much controversy over the laws pertaining to 'income tax' .. and this has been going on for years where courts decide in different ways how it's supposed to be a law.. Some win.. some lose..

Why do you think all of the wording is so grey and confusing when it doesn't have to be..

And.. the site I referred you to is offering 10,000 bucks if you can show them an actual requirement law...

So I guess we can shake hands and just agree to disagree..
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:19 PM   #94
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze View Post
Nor am I arguing with you.. I enjoy mature debate..

and as for me grabbing stuff of of a website... I'm just giving you the laws from title 26.. from Cornell U. actually..
and I can dig up supreme court rulings in favor of defendants... but I'm refering to actual law with this stuff..

and again..
6011 says, "any person made liable for any tax...." I showed you the law that states who is liable....
6012 says, "Every individual having for the taxable year gross income..."
A requirement for those who are liable..

It's all about foreign income... Now I'm talking about personal taxes.. not business tax as that does fall under laws that specifically state taxes are required as a right to do business.. Excise taxes and the like.. which is what the 16th amendment was about..

But you won't find any law that specifically states that an individual is required by that law to pay taxes on wages from U.S. sources.. as this is, or is supposed to be protected by the 1st amendment which supercedes any amendment unless repealed.

If you'll think about it... If there was such a law, there wouldn't be near as much controversy over the laws pertaining to 'income tax' .. and this has been going on for years where courts decide in different ways how it's supposed to be a law.. Some win.. some lose..

Why do you think all of the wording is so grey and confusing when it doesn't have to be..

And.. the site I referred you to is offering 10,000 bucks if you can show them an actual requirement law...

So I guess we can shake hands and just agree to disagree..
I understand what you're saying and I'm sure many people agree with that interpretation of the law. I'm just saying that until a judge says otherwise, the way we have it now is law.

And I'm not for our tax system, I hate it. I pay way too much while a huge percent of the population pays nothing. Money is stolen from me for Social Security and other services I'll never use or get back in value. But sites and movies like that don't do any good for the cause of less taxes or fairer taxes. It just fills heads telling people that they don't have to pay taxes when they do. I think the efforts of people like that would be better spent fixing the problems we have with our tax system instead of trying to find loopholes and bringing up issues that were settled by the courts many times.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:27 PM   #95
Mr Steele
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 392
What do you think of the Tom Cryer ruling this past Friday July 13,2007 I mentioned a few posts up? What impact, if any will come of it?
__________________
www.memberchannels.com

New Full length DVD's in Flash and Window Media formats
RSS tool to let your members know when we add new content

Get in touch with me for great deals!
ICQ: 304-216-163
Mr Steele is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:34 PM   #96
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Steele View Post
What do you think of the Tom Cryer ruling this past Friday July 13,2007 I mentioned a few posts up? What impact, if any will come of it?
I think it will give more people the guts to fight the system. But I still don't think it will do much. It was a regular court and misdemeanor charges that he beat. Someone needs to win a case in the Supreme Court for something to change.

It's also worth noting that his case was more complicated then people see. It involved trusts and other stuff that he didn't file on. But the basis of his argument is that you can't say that someone's own labor is not an expense.

Last edited by pocketkangaroo; 07-15-2007 at 08:36 PM..
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:40 PM   #97
phasic
Confirmed User
 
phasic's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: US
Posts: 2,104
Damn do I really have 2hrs to waste watchin this?
__________________
Brief revisit. (mic drop)
phasic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:44 PM   #98
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
It just fills heads telling people that they don't have to pay taxes when they do. I think the efforts of people like that would be better spent fixing the problems we have with our tax system instead of trying to find loopholes and bringing up issues that were settled by the courts many times.
Well.. the courts settle it in both directions... that's the problem...

And .. it may take more and more people to say, "Enough is enough.."

This could be where it's headed..

Congressman John Linder authored the The FairTax Act, H.R. 25 with these backers as of 2005...

Senator Tom Coburn (Oklahoma)
Congressman Henry Brown (South Carolina)
Congressman Dan Burton (Indiana)
Congressman John Carter (Texas)
Congressman John (Jimmy) Duncan (Tennessee)
Congressman Duncan Hunter (California)
Congressman Tom Tancredo (Colorado)

The Fair Tax Book (Amazon)
In the face of the outlandish American tax burden, talk-radio firebrand Neal Boortz and Congressman John Linder are leading the charge to phase out our current, unfair system and enact the FairTax Plan, replacing the federal income tax and withholding system with a simple 23 percent retail sales tax on new goods and services. This dramatic revision of the current system, which would eliminate the reviled IRS, has already caught fire in the American heartland, with more than six hundred thousand taxpayers signing on in support of the plan.
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 08:45 PM   #99
Spunky
I need a beer
 
Spunky's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠
Posts: 133,940
Blasphemy..repent sinners..Jesus forgives everybody..halleluya
__________________
Spunky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2007, 09:02 PM   #100
yahoo-xxx-girls.com
Confirmed User
 
yahoo-xxx-girls.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,143
More fun with logic...

Ok... well... I did not do it... ^^

There seems to be something missing... for example if such criminal individuals and or groups do exist but are seen as legal entities and they are just a few then I must ask then the question... when these families get introduced to each other and they have children and their children have children then after many generation why would you want to create wars and hardship for their own people... I think the history was described very well... however its hard to describe the future without causing much problems...

It is very normal for money to influence people, however if such people are as influential as being indicated, then money is not a factor... It seems to be a trend for people to think that the US controls everything; however this is not the actual case... There are many governments who have their own "spooks" who are always looking out for trouble... I don't mean going out of their way as to cause problems... so to say only a few individuals and or groups control everything is a bit of a stretch...

In the beginning of the movie they point out a very possible history that effects our day to day lives... however did not go into detail about possible secret groups, but rather just a few individuals...

Is their a secret war ?


.
yahoo-xxx-girls.com is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.