The business of suing porn pirates is spreading.
 

Adult video-sharing list leaked from law firm

It's hitting the mainstream news media already.

Funny twist on this story is hackers, who I assume are pirates, had no hesitation in hacking into the aw firms computers, grabbing the files of those sharing and post the names and addresses on the Internet. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

That will do a lot to make people think about pirating. You might get caught and pirates might expose you to all your neighbors. :thumbsup

Nice to see things finally coming together!

I would bet that most of the people they are targeting are newbie users.

Anyone using torrents with even a shred of knowledge on the subject can take precautions to protect their anonymity.

What companies are not suing for downloading? I'll target them.

the same package of emails also exposed the successful use of the "wasn't me defense"

http://torrentfreak.com/acslaw-gay-p...ed-men-100925/


the law firms lax security allowed the privacy of these individuals to be violated

funny thing is, they will have to publically expose how easy it is to gain access someones network (to download porn on that persons wifi) to successfully argue that it was not their fault.

it not the win your trying to make it out to be.
sort of like your youtube filters porn therefore the dmca doesn't apply bullshit of the past.

it's 4chan old man.

just say you are an 80 year old pensioner who just knows how to use AOL and you are scott free.

Im confused , pirates hacked a lawyer and exposed a big list of other pirates ? seems backwards. Shouldnt the isp be in trouble for giving the list to the lawyers in the first place ?

You think?

OK, so there is no proof at all. Just an IP address. It may or may not have downloaded a file that may or may not be copyrighted material. The wifi could have been open. The wifi could have been hacked. The wifi could have a spoofed IP.

There is no evidence at all.

It's not just newbs that pay up from the blackmail, it's idiot newbs.

Not ONE of these cases has gone to trial that I know of...Wonder why?

What I don't get is how the bros are now using blackmail as a business model and the sheep think that's a good idea.

Paul doesn't understand what 4chan is. He just reads headlines about piracy and thinks it's brilliant. He likes ACTA.

Bless.

once all the tube and torrent sites are shut down and downloaders sued to the poorhouse 80s porn content will sell again and memberships to paysites last updated in 2001 will be selling like hotcakes. can't wait.

Do you have any better ideas on how to turn it around?

So many sitting and flaming about pirates being targeted have nothing better to offer. Come up with a better solution and we will listen.

Sorry if I read these wrong.

Still ironic pirates are outing fellow pirates.

The anti-pirating business is spreading. That is interesting.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/11430299

Claire is a Sky Broadband customer from Shropshire whose name has appeared on one of the lists leaked onto the internet.

She received a letter three weeks ago accusing her of illegally sharing a pornographic film.

The 25-year-old told Newsbeat she's never file-shared pornography in her life.

What exactly did the letter say?

"The film was called Chubby Chasers, which is just awful, and the letter [said] I owed them £495 or they would be taking me to court in a civil law case.

"I burst into tears because I didn't recognise the name of the film, I've never uploaded or downloaded pornography in my life.

"I was distraught, really really upset."

How can you prove that you didn't do it?

"The time that I was accused of downloading the film I was in bed. It was very early morning - on a Tuesday.

"My alarm wouldn't have even gone off yet.

"My partner had been made redundant and I know damn well that he was in bed and hadn't got up and started download pornography.

"I know we didn't do it. There was no way we could have done it."

What do you want to see happen?

"I want the whole operation stopped first of all. There are a lot of innocent people who have received these letters from what I've read on forums and websites.

"I think the Information Commissioner has the power to fine up to £500,000.

"I hold responsible ACS:Law - they are the company sending out these letters.

"They accused me, they've got my data and they shouldn't be sharing it with anybody."

How has the whole thing made you feel?

"I just keep waking up in the middle of the night thinking 'What more can I say to them to prove I am innocent?'

"All I can do is deny it and tell them that I know I didn't do it... It just scares me because I work in a job where I work with vulnerable people.

"I would hate for anyone to link me to that sort of material - it's vile, the whole thing's vile.

"My employer could see it and people could link me to material I've had nothing to do with.

"I feel happy this whole thing is out in the open and people are aware of it. But I want people to realise that some of the people on the list are innocent.

"I want this stopped and I want my details taken off and I want an apology from someone."

That Torrent Freak article shows exactly why it's working.... that's a win-win, exactly what the goal is.

Youtube is still subject to 2257, you can still upload porn on Youtube. If they failed to comply with the removal request (which they wouldn't), you could sue. All the filtering in the world wont change that.

That's pretty stupid for many reasons.

First, they are going against the torrent users and not the torrent OWNERS. Also, after the Viacom-Youtube and other cases, other sites like tubes are inmune.

Second, an historic IP has absolutely no effect. Most broadband isps have Dynamic IP's, which means that if your IP was tracked 2 days ago, you can't trace it anymore, you can't proof that one IP was used by that guy, because that guy has now a different IP, there is no such thing like "tracing history", this IP was in that location at that time. That doesn't exists at all.

Also, the user can say that someone used his wireless router to access the internet.

It's practically impossible to prove something like that.

.

Torrent owners are mostly protected, the technology itself is legal. The person using technology for illegal activities, is on the persons fault. Tubes are not immune, once they fail to comply you can sue. You could sue before hand to make them prove they're user uploads too, but that is risky.

ISP's have laws to record the IP's dished out and to who. Anti-terrorism laws did it. You subpoena the ISP and get the info you need.

Most single home PC setups aren't on wireless. Claiming your wireless was hacked with no proof, is no different than claiming someone broke into your house (with no proof) and used your PC directly. It won't go far in court.

All that will end up happening is that the real violators will begin 'sharing' on connections other than their own. Technology adapts...always.

In the area that I live, I can pick up a minimum of 4 wifi access points that are wide open. A few others are WEP encrypted (which can be hacked in less than 5 minutes) and the rest are WPA/WPA2 encrypted (which can also be hacked, but it's easy to socially engineer ways to get the key in any event).

And then there is IP address spoofing and botnet control - no Wifi needed.

The process being touted to identify these persons also makes it quite easy for them to be set up.

Like I alluded to before in another debate we had about this issue, the tactics that are being used may appear to be productive, but will backfire eventually.

It's only a matter of time before the names of a few judges/lawyers/politicians start popping up on that "porn pirate" list and then they will become quite aware of how easy it is to spoof an IP or get into a wifi network.

Cases after that point will not go very far.

Anyone doing anything advanced to 'mask' themselves, aren't out getting porn from Torrents. Far better sources than Torrents. Nobody is hacking home wifi's to download porn from Torrents. The extreme few that do, will be exactly that - the extreme few, who's IP's probably don't work out anyway.

99% of the people they have, downloaded porn... they didn't get tricked, hacked, used, etc. Same bullshit we hear with cards. We got the guys IP, the guy used his name, address, etc. But swears his wifi/house/home, kid, etc someone else other than his spanky ass did it. It's complete bullshit.

actually read the article the old man was accused of downloading gay porn because his wifi was not secured to military grade basically

now his private information was released to the public because law firm didn't have military grade security on their network.

that 10k per person released

if they are to argue it not our fault our network got hacked, and successfully make that arguement

every pirate can make the same claim
if they fail it 10k per name that was released.


oh btw the youtube thing was paul claiming that viacomm was going to own youtube ass in the lawsuit because they were able to tell the difference between porn and non porn

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=845258

paul robbie and kane basically argued all tried to argue that viacomm was going to lose because they filtered porn. And i argued that would not work because of fair use.

Youtube won as i predicted

The very thought that unless one can solve an impossible problem (piracy) they are not allowed to comment on blackmail being bad is ridiculous Paul.

You won't stop piracy and I've posted many, many ways for people to limit the damage.

You didn't read it wrong. You just didn't read it.

a) it is not irony
b) 4chan is not a piracy board, but no one is surprised you don't get that

I 100% agree with you on this. What's worse is people read an article and then make their own minds up, instead of getting in to what the fuss is all about and looking for themselves and then making their mind up.

My eyes were wide opened today and my nose doesn't like the smell :2 cents:

The "It won't work" crowd again.

Wonder what their agenda is?

"Technology will adapt...blah-blah-blah" You damn straight it will and it DID! And we're using it to drill the fuck out of surfers on pirate sites. It's profitable and it's starting a NEW word of mouth.
This time the word of mouth isn't "porn is free" it's "don't go to those sites"

Sorry if that's something that scumbags don't like. But as for those of us who are actually in the porn business (I know, there apparently aren't very many here on GFY judging from the reaction of my suggestion a couple of weeks ago to make GFY 'industry only') this is great news.

And it doesn't cost me a penny. The lawyers work on percentage of money won only.

Fuck you pirates. You're going down.

Paul Markham thinks this is good.

OK, so what's your take on this (and you have to think outside of the box)...

In continental Europe, things are done a lot differently from the UK, US, Canada and probably many others. But here's how internet works (at least in the country I'm in, but I know Germany and Holland ISPs do the same):

You have a WiFi modem - on that is an external link and an internal, WEP et al protected internal link.

On the external link, the WiFi is wide open - you can connect to any open WiFi and you open up a navigator and any page you browse you are presented a default ISP-given page asking for your login/pass (if you are with that ISP). If you are with that ISP, you enter your details and can surf the net as if you were in your own home.

It's called roaming and it works - you can have "free" internet anywhere in your country, so long as you connect to a router that is connected with your ISP you use at your home. And as there are like 2 or 3 major ISPs, more often than not, you can find one.

Nothing wrong here - you're connected with your details so the ISP can track your connection back to your home address.

What's wrong, is that if someone hacked your account, or guessed your password, you are fucked - this will be passed around the password sharing sites and everyone will be connecting to wifi's up and down the country using your details and you have no idea about it. They do stuff illegal, you are the one that gets landed with the problem, even though it occurred 500km from your home when you were home.

See the problem???

This thing is far more than your IP, your problem.

Let the lawsuits continue to be publicized and there will be programs, add-ons and websites that will make it easier for the "average user" to mask their identity.

Adaptability is the name of the game with technology. I can assure you that at this very minute someone is most likely coding means of improving anonymity AND they will give that solution out for free or make it available transparently (along with the latest galleries, etc.)

I do agree with the anti-piracy concept in principle (content should be respected), but anyone worth their salt in tech knows that these lawsuits will come back eventually to bite a few people in the butt. Any attempts to escalate the legal ramifications of such will end up backfiring.

I still maintain that even though the initial efforts that were made to reach out to torrent owners failed miserably, the adult industry needs to figure out a better way in terms of harnessing torrent tech and the millions of users who use it.

Oh, are you doing the blackmail thing too now?

I'm amazed with your l33t haxx0r protection that your content is even ON the torrent sites, but heck if you make 50% of 500 bucks from the blackmail letters that is great.

Jails are full of "innocent" people.

Just knowing human nature...I'd say her "partner" (boyfriend) likes chubby bitches and surfs porn behind his girlfriends back.
Reading her sad little bullshit story, she is "sure" that her boyfriend didn't do it.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Can't tell you how many times I've heard that fucking bullshit as a paysite owner.

"Oh, someone must have used our credit card...or Junior must have gotten my credit card because my husband would NEVER buy a porn site membership"

Wake the fuck up...

The guys wifi wasn't hacked, that's called a bullshit excuse.

The Law firm isn't going to get fined, its limited info and they will get off. The difference between the pirate and the hackers? The hackers didn't download porn, they hacked them, probably because hackers don't care about porn.


Google uses digital finger printing to identify movies and other technology to identify skin. The digital finger print technology is what will save Google's ass. With Viacomm it will be proving VC uploaded then complained. User uploaded, fair use - isn't what is saving them.

Technically you can upload whatever you want to Google, legally though Google has to remove it anytime they're notified about it. Fair use BECAUSE of user uploads is what keeps them from getting sued before they're notified.

I've really tried to like you Damian. But it's fucking obvious you don't know a goddamn thing about this business. So fuck off.

You don't do anything in the real porn business. So I don't give a shit what you think. You're no more than a gideongallery wannabe.

You are now my first person ever on "ignore"

Holy shit! The "ignore" thing is fucking awesome!

Hehe, that is out of the Box.

That would be easy to prove though, but a pain either way... You're at work, downloading from two locations at once, or moved from side of town/country/world to the other in minutes. Straight up impossible and easy to prove with ISP records.

What you described is an extreme minority as well.... it may happen but they only deal with that, if it comes up.

No matter how pissed other opinions might make a person, we have to learn to listen to each other.

Everyone in this industry has a part to play and simply shutting one ears to contrary ideas is not conducive to overall growth.

Piracy affects every single one of us here - from content owners and distributors, to affiliates/marketing reps to surfers.

Debate is good, even when it gets heated. Those who feel passionate about this piracy situation need to remember that there are always other viewpoints that should be considered.

No one here has said anything seriously inflammatory, so why are persons being put on ignore?

You are very wrong - the hackers brought down their site and the law firm brought the site back online from a backup - the major FUCKUP, was they brought the site back online with directory listing enabled, leaving the entire tgz tar file of the drive in the web root directory.

It didn't take long at all for someone to see it and download it, extract the qmail directory and seed it to the torrents.

Their server was not hacked at all. They brought this on themselves

This was a fuckup of data protection to the biggest degree.

in other news, full bank details of ACS:Law's clients are readily available in those emails...

It's not an extreme minority at all. The ISPs sell this thing on that point - broadband everywhere. Kids at college, on the road, all use your connection.

The ISP account holder though gets taken to court.

If my kids were at college using my internet account as touted by the ISPs, then fine. If they do something illegal, they are accountable, not me. But this tactic holds me responsible - similar to the "partner downloading porn at home" scenario, but more extreme as this is a selling point of the ISPs - I can control what goes in and out of my home firewall, but not elsewhere.

Not a minority at all.

Guilty until proven innocent. No, that is not what the laws of my land state.

Quite a lot of the UK ones have static IPs.

If the hackers brought the site down, then they were hacked...the issue happened as a result of a hack.

The issue the law firm would have is not encrypting the data. And not all the emails have peoples info on them, some do.

I don't think they'll get fined, they take this court and show malicious activity did it & someone else shared it, thus the hackers are responsible.

You would be accused of downloading porn, using a defense with no proof. No alibi does not make you innocent.

You control access through the password. So go get the money from your kids/spouse, etc, then educate them on why it's illegal.

I have an 18 year old.
The stupid law says that an adult 18 year old can NOT drink. (dumb)
If I go out on a Friday night, and she goes in and drinks my beer out of the refrigerator...
I am legally at fault.

There are tons of laws like that (your kid driving your car, etc.)

We better all tell our kids to NOT go to pirate sites. All the better as that will be the new generation learning that you DO have to pay for things online, and we don't get in trouble for them doing it. Win/win