The future of Paul Markham. Discuss. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

JFK · 07-19-2011, 12:06 PM

Fitty predictions for Paul

The Porn Nerd · 07-19-2011, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

Fitty predictions for Paul

DAMN YOU JFK!!! I call it the "Paul Markham Effect" - the hoodoo voodoo JFK puts on peeps to always get to the actual FIDDY.

MY "fiddy" is only "fiddy" in number only, grrr.....

07-19-2011, 12:46 PM

paul markham v2.0 he shall pervail!

mamaliga · 07-19-2011, 06:33 PM

Paul Markham has no future.

marlboroack · 07-19-2011, 06:50 PM

This was stupid. I want a refund.

The Porn Nerd · 07-19-2011, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marlboroack

This was stupid. I want a refund.

No one ever returned porn and asked for a refund back in the magazine days. back then, people would come to the store, buy the magazine, take it home, masturbate by pretending they were the guy getting the blowjob from the girl, or if the scene was shot properly (in the Paul Markham style, of course) then perhaps he would fantasize he was the person shooting the scene....

Anyway, the person would masturbate, that's my point here. Back when people bought real porn people really masturbated, not like today...

But I digress. So when that person was finished masturbating to the superior product that was magazine porn, they would not go back to the store and ask for a refund and, if they did, would be beaten mercilessly by a giant asian "security man".

Another reason online porn is failing: refunds. Right Paul?

Paul Markham · 07-20-2011, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash

There's many thinking outside the box, nobody is going to spoon feed you new and innovative ideas just so you can tag along. Sure the easy route is to wait for that next great product/site that is refreshingly new and converts great, however this isn't 2005 where a new sponsor program opened up every 2 weeks, it might never come along. So instead of waiting, use the sponsors we have to work with as affiliates and work on creative ways to generate and filter traffic and improve conversions all while minimizing expenses.

Are these out of the box thinkers the people driving traffic or the people supplying the product? If it's the driving traffic people, how much relies on free content. If it's the product people, examples please.

On driving traffic I agree we have been very innovative, on product don't see it so much.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

If adult webmasters went along the same route and fined anyone who shows nudity or more outside of paysites then it would be a winner, but it would require a lot of organisation and a bit of corruption to make it happen. The corruption bit is pretending we're bringing in the laws to protect children from seeing what they shouldn't and that sign-ups are for age verification

The organisation bit was the block.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mountainmiester

Markham as with many here, are content people. The unfortunate truth about today's adult site is that is content is not the king as it was. It takes much more to convert your audience and to keep it.

Unfortunately, when one only sees what they see through the lens of a camera, they tend to miss the truck about to run them over.

I have no opinion of Markham one way or the other, I've never met him and I don't judge people by their board entries however, to be successful today, you need a lot more than just content as I had stated in my article for AVN last summer. ( http://business.avn.com/articles/tec...ry-406234.html ).
:

Agreed. I've always been into producing the best product to fit my market that I was capable of. For a long time it made us a lot of money. We sold it to the publishers who appreciated the value of a good product for it's retention and conversion abilities and paid a good price for it.

The online porn guys never appreciated the value of the product, until very recently. So it became a traffic game. They were converting poorly, retaining poorly and the competition between sites, because putting one up was relatively easy, was immense. Then traffic was king and the affiliates was the President. Affiliates needs were always more free content, more tools to get free content online and more money.

Custom content was saturated on TGP sites. Very few sites could afford good content, so the prices paid meant shooters who couldn't command a good price didn't work for custom. This effected conversions and retention. The solution was more traffic. To get more traffic people gave away more free porn. Escalation was inevitable.

Quote:

It takes much more to convert your audience and to keep it.

Agree 100%. And just throwing traffic at it isn't enough. What does it take?

Paul Markham · 07-20-2011, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

No one ever returned porn and asked for a refund back in the magazine days. back then, people would come to the store, buy the magazine, take it home, masturbate by pretending they were the guy getting the blowjob from the girl, or if the scene was shot properly (in the Paul Markham style, of course) then perhaps he would fantasize he was the person shooting the scene....

Anyway, the person would masturbate, that's my point here. Back when people bought real porn people really masturbated, not like today...

But I digress. So when that person was finished masturbating to the superior product that was magazine porn, they would not go back to the store and ask for a refund and, if they did, would be beaten mercilessly by a giant asian "security man".

Another reason online porn is failing: refunds. Right Paul?

No they didn't ask for a refund, they just never bought that product again. And sales went down and down. The chances of getting it onto new retailers shelves became less and less and the product/brand suffered.

Today look at it like affiliates, try a program, if it doesn't perform they move on. surfers try a site, if the like the tour they might buy, if they like the members area they stay, if it's nothing special they do neither.

Is the main solution to drive more traffic to the site or convert more of the traffic you have?

What would affiliates like. More affiliates driving traffic to the site or more of their traffic converted? Silly question, so think about this. How does a site get more traffic easiest.

It takes much more to convert your audience and to keep it.

SallyRand · 07-20-2011, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

No they didn't ask for a refund, they just never bought that product again. And sales went down and down. The chances of getting it onto new retailers shelves became less and less and the product/brand suffered.

Today look at it like affiliates, try a program, if it doesn't perform they move on. surfers try a site, if the like the tour they might buy, if they like the members area they stay, if it's nothing special they do neither.

Is the main solution to drive more traffic to the site or convert more of the traffic you have?

What would affiliates like. More affiliates driving traffic to the site or more of their traffic converted? Silly question, so think about this. How does a site get more traffic easiest.

It takes much more to convert your audience and to keep it.

The situation around here seems to be something like this:

Most of the webmasters here simply cannot get past the traditional methods of relying on search engine results to gain visitors to their sites and are still hung up in the Google Dance, which dance changes its tunes and steps almost weekly. The Panda thing literally killed thousands of websites, movoing them from high PR to like page 647 so that all those meta tags, keywords and all that Google fol-de-rol proved to have gotten the webmasters noplace.

Driving traffic through any of the various means of automation; double-opt-in emailing and auto-poster porograms are regarded by those same webmasters as "spamming" and they feel themselves above them. Of course every mainstream company on the planet engages in at least opt-in mailing; each and every time you register a product, sign up for anything free or agree to receive a newsletter, you have signed up to receive *commercial* emails from not only the company with which you signed up but their friends and buddies as well.

And you know what?

It works for them even though many people forget they sign up, didn't read the privacy policy or TOS and then howl about being "spammed" which of course they were not within the definition of the CAN-SPAM Acat of 2003.

Is it better to dirve traffic or try to improve the so-called *quality* of visitors in order to get more signups?

To me the asnwer seems to be obvious!

IMing is a number game. I'd rather have a larger number of views, which will generate a larger number of signups than sitting around trying to convert more of the much smaller amount of traffic already coming in.

More views = more signups = more $.

There is also the fact that most people who sign up for trials don't cancel for a couple of months, so you've got some guarranteed residuals based on the fact that cancellation requires cancelling witin the TOS which normally requires compliance with the TOS, so you've often got another month built in.

I do so love recurring billing!

Far as forum auto-posters go, I'm fine with them and use them. Forum mods don't want open posting they can require manual approval and when they do so, they find out how many real signups they are getting for their silly-assed forums and blogs anyway and ignore the fact that the more posts they get, regardless of the source or linking involved, the posts and signups actually help them with their precious Google Dance.

Short version, it boils down to this:

Are you a starving scavenger waiting for something to die or are you a predator, headed out to kill something to keep from starving?

Are you this?:

Or this?:

Well, which are you, punks?

Paul Markham · 07-20-2011, 04:06 AM

Actually that's not such a bad way to look at it. Except I think it's not 100% right in the comparison.

Most webmasters and sponsors rely on the marketing technique of a sandwich board man.

Except it was also more like this.

They were handing out free bowls of soup to those who needed it. hoping a small % would buy.

The big difference was the cost. It costs little to put out a cheap advert on a high street with loads of passers by. Not a massive billboard on Time Square of course. It costs little to give free soup away to those who needed it. Online porn paid far far too much for it's "marketing".

The cartel example is good. The cartel was on the affiliates side. Give us 50% minimum, all the content we need, every tool we ask for and every possible support possible. If those at the beginning had kicked off with 10% and none to little support, the profits would of been immense. If anyone tried to get in on the act and go the route we did go with marketing. The profit margins would of been able to be adjusted so fast and customers would soon learn that a $30 site offered no more than a $20 site.

a few affiliates would of survived, those who couldn't survive unless spoon fed and attached by an umbilical cord to the sponsors, would never of got off the ground. Is it even conceivable that dating and cams would of priced themselves to suit the route I suggest and Tubes would never of ever got off the ground?

The only reason a porn Tube site can exist is the massive payments it gets to make a sale.

Or is that too far out of the box thinking?

SallyRand · 07-20-2011, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Actually that's not such a bad way to look at it. Except I think it's not 100% right in the comparison.

Most webmasters and sponsors rely on the marketing technique of a sandwich board man.

Except it was also more like this.

They were handing out free bowls of soup to those who needed it. hoping a small % would buy.

The big difference was the cost. It costs little to put out a cheap advert on a high street with loads of passers by. Not a massive billboard on Time Square of course. It costs little to give free soup away to those who needed it. Online porn paid far far too much for it's "marketing".

The cartel example is good. The cartel was on the affiliates side. Give us 50% minimum, all the content we need, every tool we ask for and every possible support possible. If those at the beginning had kicked off with 10% and none to little support, the profits would of been immense. If anyone tried to get in on the act and go the route we did go with marketing. The profit margins would of been able to be adjusted so fast and customers would soon learn that a $30 site offered no more than a $20 site.

a few affiliates would of survived, those who couldn't survive unless spoon fed and attached by an umbilical cord to the sponsors, would never of got off the ground. Is it even conceivable that dating and cams would of priced themselves to suit the route I suggest and Tubes would never of ever got off the ground?

The only reason a porn Tube site can exist is the massive payments it gets to make a sale.

Or is that too far out of the box thinking?

I think you are right on!

Look at it this way............................................... ......................

...niche-oriented double-opt-in list of 100K addys and you wirte up a nice offer and push the button, by the sheer numbers you are virtually guarranteed a 1 1/2% click-through rate or 1500 dignups. The number will actually be higher but we'll go with the minimum.

If you have mailed for a $25 payout per signup at the 1 1/2% rate, you just made $37,500.00.

Yep.

$37,500.00.

And you only pushed a button!

It's like fighting a war with drones. You sit in your bunker at home and blow up the bad guys by remote control!

Oh and by the way, to the Noobs out there, anyone who offers to sell you an "opt-in" list is trying to cheat you. No mailer will even let anyone SEE his/her opt-in lists, so don't beleive the shit the eamil list scammers will tellyou. Any such list being sold isold and out of date, made up, harvested, full of honey pots and spam traps or simply mailed to death.

Don't fall for it.

CaptainHowdy · 07-20-2011, 04:53 AM

Whatever ...

Sid70 · 07-20-2011, 05:02 AM

There is no love in this thread.

Agent 488 · 07-20-2011, 09:05 AM

thread is filled with lame ...

The Porn Nerd · 07-20-2011, 09:09 AM

Sally Rand and Paul Markham discussing traffic, sales, numbers, $.....this thread delivers. LOL

DamianJ · 07-20-2011, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

Sally Rand and Paul Markham discussing traffic, sales, numbers, $.....this thread delivers. LOL

It's hilarious. They should invite them to do a panel at the september shows.

u-Bob · 07-20-2011, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

“The light bulb conspiracy” is a documentary about the negative effects of consumerism and planned obsolescence. The light bulb conspiracy is a theory that the leading manufacturers of incandescent light bulbs have conspired to keep the lifetime of their bulbs far below their real technological capabilities. This way, they ensure the continuous demand for more bulbs and hence, long-term profit for themselves.

Interesting video. It shows the problems with things like panned obsolescence and consumerism (the waste, the credit bubble etc) but fails to identify the real problems and instead results in a mix of pro central planning communist and environmentalist propaganda.

Keynesians claim that consumption drives the economy and that there is such as thing as underconsumption (a theory that is closely related to the Marxist idea of overproduction). The Keynesian wants to stimulate and encourage consumption by whatever means possible to 'keep the economy going'.

This theory has already been totally destroyed by the pro free market Austrian school yet the video keeps blaming the problem of consumerism (and the resulting waste) on the free market. It even goes as far as recommending a central planned Soviet style economy as an alternative.

There's 3 types of planned obsolescence:
- design: A company that sells widgets, might design this years new widgets to look totally different from last years widgets. The result is that some people will want to buy a new widget for no other reason than that they don't want to be seen using an obviously old widget.
There is nothing wrong with this. No one is being forced to buy a new widget and dump his old still functioning widget.

- planned technical failure: The cartels and the planned failures of for example printers are only possible because of government intervention in the economy. The manufacturers of printers are only able to use those counting chips in their printers because they are able to use the power of the state (through patent laws etc) to shutdown people who produce software to reset those chips.

- perceived planned obsolescence: Some product failures that are being attributed to planned obsolescence by the consumer are actually results of government regulations.
example: dishwashers:
http://blog.mises.org/15594/blaming-...ts-once-again/
http://blog.mises.org/16643/my-year-long-hell-is-over/
http://mises.org/daily/5267/Why-Everything-Is-Dirtier

The Porn Nerd · 07-20-2011, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob

Interesting video. It shows the problems with things like panned obsolescence and consumerism (the waste, the credit bubble etc) but fails to identify the real problems and instead results in a mix of pro central planning communist and environmentalist propaganda.

Keynesians claim that consumption drives the economy and that there is such as thing as underconsumption (a theory that is closely related to the Marxist idea of overproduction). The Keynesian wants to stimulate and encourage consumption by whatever means possible to 'keep the economy going'.

This theory has already been totally destroyed by the pro free market Austrian school yet the video keeps blaming the problem of consumerism (and the resulting waste) on the free market. It even goes as far as recommending a central planned Soviet style economy as an alternative.

There's 3 types of planned obsolescence:
- design: A company that sells widgets, might design this years new widgets to look totally different from last years widgets. The result is that some people will want to buy a new widget for no other reason than that they don't want to be seen using an obviously old widget.
There is nothing wrong with this. No one is being forced to buy a new widget and dump his old still functioning widget.

- planned technical failure: The cartels and the planned failures of for example printers are only possible because of government intervention in the economy. The manufacturers of printers are only able to use those counting chips in their printers because they are able to use the power of the state (through patent laws etc) to shutdown people who produce software to reset those chips.

- perceived planned obsolescence: Some product failures that are being attributed to planned obsolescence by the consumer are actually results of government regulations.
example: dishwashers:
http://blog.mises.org/15594/blaming-...ts-once-again/
http://blog.mises.org/16643/my-year-long-hell-is-over/
http://mises.org/daily/5267/Why-Everything-Is-Dirtier

Interesting theory. So you're saying that Paul Markham has planned obsolence for himself? Very interesting...

Paul Markham · 07-20-2011, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand

I think you are right on!

Look at it this way............................................... ......................

...niche-oriented double-opt-in list of 100K addys and you wirte up a nice offer and push the button, by the sheer numbers you are virtually guarranteed a 1 1/2% click-through rate or 1500 dignups. The number will actually be higher but we'll go with the minimum.

If you have mailed for a $25 payout per signup at the 1 1/2% rate, you just made $37,500.00.

Yep.

$37,500.00.

And you only pushed a button!

It's like fighting a war with drones. You sit in your bunker at home and blow up the bad guys by remote control!

Oh and by the way, to the Noobs out there, anyone who offers to sell you an "opt-in" list is trying to cheat you. No mailer will even let anyone SEE his/her opt-in lists, so don't beleive the shit the eamil list scammers will tellyou. Any such list being sold isold and out of date, made up, harvested, full of honey pots and spam traps or simply mailed to death.

Don't fall for it.

How do you get niche-oriented double-opt-in list of 100K addys? Find that, the rest is easy.

It's like the days I was shooting for mags.

Few could do it and the money was great. Anyone can drive traffic, nearly anyone can put up a site. It's all about how well they can do it.

And before trolls bounce in, anyone can point a camera at a girl and shoot her naked. Shooting porn that is really good is either very hard or there's a lot of shooters who lost money.

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

Sally Rand and Paul Markham discussing traffic, sales, numbers, $.....this thread delivers. LOL

LOL I'd love to be in a room with Markham and Rand. I think.

Got a ring to it. markhamrand.com

Paul, generally I agree with you except there is still some stuff that sells at a decent ratio. Not much but some. Agreed you cant just throw a ton of hits at a mediocre tour or product anymore.

Sally, You spend too much time on Obama. You got some talent but you have long spent too much time getting everyone to hate you.

Who cares if you wear a lil lace once in a while. Who doesnt. LOL j/k Maybe all we midwesterners are crazy.

MP, How's it going

Bit frustrating lately with me. Couple late checks getting squared around. Selling some domains tho. Praying for NO chargebacks this period with AFF.

KNOCK ON WOOD! Knocking on my old 1885 table.

Doing that adult webmastering thing in all its glory. Got reps on ICQ, dudes on the email.

Getting my money for nothing and my chicks for free. LOL

Rock on GFY.

You were right MP in one of your posts.. Chargebacks..

Never would I dare in my wildest dreams in 1979 to bring a pervy mag (too pervy even to mention on an adult wm board hehe) back to "The Adult Bookstore" to get a refund.

That shit was like dope in 79. You put your head down and got the hell out of there.

Had one f'n guy charge back 4 months with aff, that fucken kills ya. But aff is still one of the best progs bottom line. They still convert plus they pay like NOW. One of the BEST payers in the game.

Anyhow back to Markham and Rand. I could read them for hours.

hashbury · 07-20-2011, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand

The situation around here seems to be something like this:

Most of the webmasters here simply cannot get past the traditional methods of relying on search engine results to gain visitors to their sites and are still hung up in the Google Dance, which dance changes its tunes and steps almost weekly. The Panda thing literally killed thousands of websites, movoing them from high PR to like page 647 so that all those meta tags, keywords and all that Google fol-de-rol proved to have gotten the webmasters noplace.

Most of us have adapted over the past 5 years to include other methods of traffic generation than google. However, due the fact that google provides the best converting porn traffic it is always highly sought after. Those of us who actually had unique content filled sites were favored in the update.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand

Driving traffic through any of the various means of automation; double-opt-in emailing and auto-poster porograms are regarded by those same webmasters as "spamming" and they feel themselves above them. Of course every mainstream company on the planet engages in at least opt-in mailing; each and every time you register a product, sign up for anything free or agree to receive a newsletter, you have signed up to receive *commercial* emails from not only the company with which you signed up but their friends and buddies as well.

So your answer to not relying on the search engines for traffic is to use an opt in or double opt in? Believe it or not it does take traffic (and usually some freebie) to get someone to signup for an opt in list. I mean its not like you can just go to a forum like this
http://www.es5.com/blackhat-seo/emai...k-please-6552/
and just have someone scrape you up some emails right? ;)

BTW: I use double opt-in froms on most of my sites adult and mainstream. The signup rate and conversion with mainstream blows adult out of the water. You probably already know this though because of all the adult sites you run.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand

It works for them even though many people forget they sign up, didn't read the privacy policy or TOS and then howl about being "spammed" which of course they were not within the definition of the CAN-SPAM Acat of 2003.

Is it better to dirve traffic or try to improve the so-called *quality* of visitors in order to get more signups?

To me the asnwer seems to be obvious!

Once again, you can improve the quality of visitors, but you still need the traffic to do this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand

IMing is a number game. I'd rather have a larger number of views, which will generate a larger number of signups than sitting around trying to convert more of the much smaller amount of traffic already coming in.

Contradict yourself much?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand

Far as forum auto-posters go, I'm fine with them and use them. Forum mods don't want open posting they can require manual approval and when they do so, they find out how many real signups they are getting for their silly-assed forums and blogs anyway and ignore the fact that the more posts they get, regardless of the source or linking involved, the posts and signups actually help them with their precious Google Dance.

OK, so you rationalize spamming (by my meaning not by CAN-SPAM meaning) forums and blogs by saying it will help them in the eyes of google?

Knowing this information lets me know that you have no morals or just really really poor judgement in marketing. I would never do business with your company just because of this post, let alone all the other ones circulating saying much harsher stuff.

Paul Markham · 07-20-2011, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ

It's hilarious. They should invite them to do a panel at the september shows.

This was always Damian's problem. Anyone can trip out his level of marketing advice. So his price has to be low and his earnings low.

Very few can work for big offline companies in their marketing divisions and that's why they live in their own 4 bedroom houses.

Sorry darling, couldn't let that one go by.

papill0n · 07-20-2011, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

Sally Rand and Paul Markham discussing traffic, sales, numbers, $.....this thread delivers. LOL

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 12:31 PM

I got a rep on ICQ to ask about a check that was missing. He says no prob check it now. That was THREE HOURS AGO.

Does this mean bad news.

For fucks sake. Such a pain in the ass. This biz has the intellect of an eight grader. WHY do we make a simple biz so fucking hard.

Oh yeah, cause some of you suck at business.

Not all, but we DO have some lamers in our midst dont we.

Not intended to the rep on icq, just EVERYTHING is going haywire lately BUT I am making more money. Maybe this is how it ALWAYS FUCKING goes making more money.

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 12:40 PM

If I dont get paid by every company from here on I do biz with there will be hell to pay. I take stats shots every fucking day.

I let two fuckhead companies around here slide on not paying me (for now) cause I was being Mr nice guy. TWO companies in 14 years. Three counting Pushrod.

I get REAL impatient with shit.

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 01:03 PM

Actually since FOS went belly up they dont convert for shit. LOL But they do recur still.

I cant tell no lies.

Still a good prog tho. Better than most. Not heydays when we had FOS tho.

Really sucks when the porn industry finds a way to make a buck only to have it fall through.

There is VERY fucken little that converts now days at a good ratio.

I better start giving you all my poor man's recipies. You may need them.

Lots of beans, eggs, rump and pork roast.

Actually not that bad. I feel great. LOL

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 01:20 PM

Edited: To protect the innocent.

Just contacted me. Maybe I expect things too quick.

I ALWAYS ASSuME the worst.

Bad character flaw.

SallyRand · 07-20-2011, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hashbury

most of us have adapted over the past 5 years to include other methods of traffic generation than google. However, due the fact that google provides the best converting porn traffic it is always highly sought after. Those of us who actually had unique content filled sites were favored in the update.

So your answer to not relying on the search engines for traffic is to use an opt in or double opt in? Believe it or not it does take traffic (and usually some freebie) to get someone to signup for an opt in list. I mean its not like you can just go to a forum like this
http://www.es5.com/blackhat-seo/emai...k-please-6552/
and just have someone scrape you up some emails right? ;)

btw: I use double opt-in froms on most of my sites adult and mainstream. The signup rate and conversion with mainstream blows adult out of the water. You probably already know this though because of all the adult sites you run.

Once again, you can improve the quality of visitors, but you still need the traffic to do this.

Contradict yourself much?

Ok, so you rationalize spamming (by my meaning not by can-spam meaning) forums and blogs by saying it will help them in the eyes of google?

Knowing this information lets me know that you have no morals or just really really poor judgement in marketing. I would never do business with your company just because of this post, let alone all the other ones circulating saying much harsher stuff.

ok.

............

The Porn Nerd · 07-20-2011, 01:34 PM

haha! Hey VJo!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah man, ur making more money so SHUT THE FUCK UP. haha! I mean that in a kind, 'street' kinda way.

Me? I'm making the same money but paying more to make it, if that makes any sense. The benefit is a little more free time - see how I'm using it? hahahaha! Hey-OOOOO indeed!!! Where's my fucking Scotch....:D

Here's my bottom line for everyone (Paul Markham most of all):

more more more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hashbury

Most of us have adapted over the past 5 years to include other methods of traffic generation than google. However, due the fact that google provides the best converting porn traffic it is always highly sought after. Those of us who actually had unique content filled sites were favored in the update.

So your answer to not relying on the search engines for traffic is to use an opt in or double opt in? Believe it or not it does take traffic (and usually some freebie) to get someone to signup for an opt in list. I mean its not like you can just go to a forum like this
http://www.es5.com/blackhat-seo/emai...k-please-6552/
and just have someone scrape you up some emails right? ;)

BTW: I use double opt-in froms on most of my sites adult and mainstream. The signup rate and conversion with mainstream blows adult out of the water. You probably already know this though because of all the adult sites you run.

Once again, you can improve the quality of visitors, but you still need the traffic to do this.

Contradict yourself much?

OK, so you rationalize spamming (by my meaning not by CAN-SPAM meaning) forums and blogs by saying it will help them in the eyes of google?

Knowing this information lets me know that you have no morals or just really really poor judgement in marketing. I would never do business with your company just because of this post, let alone all the other ones circulating saying much harsher stuff.

Nice post.

Carry on.

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

haha! Hey VJo!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah man, ur making more money so SHUT THE FUCK UP. haha! I mean that in a kind, 'street' kinda way.

Me? I'm making the same money but paying more to make it, if that makes any sense. The benefit is a little more free time - see how I'm using it? hahahaha! Hey-OOOOO indeed!!! Where's my fucking Scotch....:D

Here's my bottom line for everyone (Paul Markham most of all):

more more more.

Nice post.

Carry on.

Yeah I am giving these domains away but they are selling. hehe One guy bought the whole shabang for 2 hundie. 18 domains for 2 hundie. 11 dollars a domain.

More... back in a half hour.. I got Paypal..

Best move ever.. he gets good deal.. I am done selling domains and paying reg fees.

u-Bob · 07-20-2011, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

Interesting theory. So you're saying that Paul Markham has planned obsolence for himself? Very interesting...

that would be one way to look at it

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 02:05 PM

Sing it Ethyl:

"Everything's coming up roses!"

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 02:39 PM

I let all my babies go MP but how long can you keep paying reg fees. I really got $400 for them as I dont pay the $9 reg fee with Moniker over the next year or have to spend time selling them individually. Plus I have other plans. Still in Adult. Still in porn. You betcha.

celebritybondage and celebrityfootfetish could be killer tubes. Very untapped espec celebritybondage

girlieboys has potential. Anyhow my best to the new owner if you read this. You got a good deal and it was a pleasure doing biz.

When I look back at my first sale thread in 2009 when I was asking 4 figs each.

Times have changed and I was crazy.

You can tell my interests, foot fetish, celebrity, bondage and hee hooo "i wear lace and i wear black leather" and Nikki LOL j/k about the lace but Nikki is hot. She cant be a tranny is she?

i wear lace and i wear black leather

Actually not all my babies

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 03:07 PM

It's 100 f'n degrees outside. But the rains will come tonight after three days of this. Then 85 tomorrow.

It's hot. How hot is it?

It is so hot that even Sally and Paul would take a chill pill.

For me now..

couple Coronas, couple egg rolls, lil hot mustard

few jalapano chips, another Corona, and down..

Vjo · 07-20-2011, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

I'm making the same money but paying more to make it

Let me decipher..

buying traffic can be a bitch.

You usually have to try 3 sources to find one good one. I'd def use Adwords if I owned paysites. Yahoo too. Yahoo doesnt allow affils but allows owners I think.

Last time I checked Yahoo allows no affils. Not sure if they allow porn, just know no affils.

Sure wish Bing or MSN would allow adult PPC and start a new Bing for porn ads revolution circa Adwords 2004. That would be sweet. But they still dont allow porn. Bill says no porn.

Bing has a nice style where you can mouseout and expand the site in the listings. Like to see them continue to close the gap on ultra picky Google.

Hope I see the day when they lose that pickyness.

Send your Exit links to Yahoo or Bing. Close the gap some more.

xholly · 07-20-2011, 08:02 PM

i think sally would make a great wife for paul if his marriage goes south

Paul Markham · 07-21-2011, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vjo

Paul, generally I agree with you except there is still some stuff that sells at a decent ratio. Not much but some. Agreed you cant just throw a ton of hits at a mediocre tour or product anymore.

Agreed and my comments are in no way directed at them. The good thing would be to look at those who do still make good money and ask why. Then how can it be duplicated?

The problem with so many online guys is they think inside their box and anyone who thinks in a different box is wrong.

Bangbus did great numbers at the beginning. Because they took an idea from mainstream, adapted it and were the first to bring it online. They produced for what was then a good product, the only criticism I have of them is it became a bit repetitive. How many time can you watch the same scene shot with the same guys or/and by the same guys before it gets boring?

However still a good site.

Partyhardcore is the same. It looks like it's now been taken over by Evil Angel. Perfect Gonzo, FTV girls, Alsscan and more. But no where near enough. And how many affiliates were promoting them. Were they saturated programs? Saturated with affiliates.

How did they pay for their good to great content? Not by throwing masses of traffic. By converting and retaining better. They got masses of traffic by the good affiliates because they worked well.

Then how many sites were thrown up, cheap content, good design and massive traffic?

The problem was all those cheap sites were put up and promoted by people who thought inside their box and anyone offering something different to think about was ridiculed. Those who thought the same as them were made into "Bros".

Vjo · 07-21-2011, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

The problem was all those cheap sites were put up and promoted by people who thought inside their box and anyone offering something different to think about was ridiculed. Those who thought the same as them were made into "Bros".

Yep. The stuff that still sells is the stuff that brings something new or better. This can take many forms.

I agree with you that giving away content is what hurt this ind the most as a whole. But that is now how it's done. Content has become the loss leader to get surfers and then upsell them something else. Not saying nothing new here.

Soon as these new content laws went through where you are "innocent until proven guilty" and "user uploaded", guys said fuck it and thru everyone's full vids up. Happened around the same time as YouTube took off. Coincidence? Or lobbying?

So it's the govt passing those new laws that made it difficult to persue infringers and really set the whole thing on a downward slope to disaster. Think it was around 2006-7 when these laws changed.

---

But there is always a way to make a few $$. Work smarter not harder has always been and still is the best advice.

The secrets guys have are not that complicated but they had to try maybe 5 things to find one that works for THEM. This is not a get rich quick biz anymore for the most part.

The guys with solid longterm plans, who build something good, who work at them everyday, will emerge as the next moneymakers.

Adult WM is dead. Doorway pages, consoles, repetiton, ect ect is dead or dieing. It is building QUALITY sites, that meet a demand, where the future is.

07-19-2011, 12:06 PM	#51
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,374	Fitty predictions for Paul __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

07-20-2011, 04:06 AM	#60
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Actually that's not such a bad way to look at it. Except I think it's not 100% right in the comparison. Most webmasters and sponsors rely on the marketing technique of a sandwich board man. Except it was also more like this. They were handing out free bowls of soup to those who needed it. hoping a small % would buy. The big difference was the cost. It costs little to put out a cheap advert on a high street with loads of passers by. Not a massive billboard on Time Square of course. It costs little to give free soup away to those who needed it. Online porn paid far far too much for it's "marketing". The cartel example is good. The cartel was on the affiliates side. Give us 50% minimum, all the content we need, every tool we ask for and every possible support possible. If those at the beginning had kicked off with 10% and none to little support, the profits would of been immense. If anyone tried to get in on the act and go the route we did go with marketing. The profit margins would of been able to be adjusted so fast and customers would soon learn that a $30 site offered no more than a $20 site. a few affiliates would of survived, those who couldn't survive unless spoon fed and attached by an umbilical cord to the sponsors, would never of got off the ground. Is it even conceivable that dating and cams would of priced themselves to suit the route I suggest and Tubes would never of ever got off the ground? The only reason a porn Tube site can exist is the massive payments it gets to make a sale. Or is that too far out of the box thinking? __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70 Last edited by Paul Markham; 07-20-2011 at 04:10 AM..

07-20-2011, 04:53 AM	#62
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,123	Whatever ... __________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

07-20-2011, 05:02 AM	#63
Sid70 Downshifter Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Road trip Posts: 16,413	There is no love in this thread. __________________ Русня, идите нахуй!

07-20-2011, 09:09 AM	#65
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,525	Sally Rand and Paul Markham discussing traffic, sales, numbers, $.....this thread delivers. LOL __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

07-19-2011, 12:46 PM	#53
Altwebdesign Guest Posts: n/a	paul markham v2.0 he shall pervail!

07-19-2011, 06:33 PM	#54
mamaliga la gente está muy loca Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: 1Gbps Posts: 1,322	Paul Markham has no future.

07-19-2011, 06:50 PM	#55
marlboroack So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: ☣ Posts: 9,327	This was stupid. I want a refund.

07-20-2011, 09:05 AM	#64
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	thread is filled with lame ...

07-20-2011, 12:31 PM	#74
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	I got a rep on ICQ to ask about a check that was missing. He says no prob check it now. That was THREE HOURS AGO. Does this mean bad news. For fucks sake. Such a pain in the ass. This biz has the intellect of an eight grader. WHY do we make a simple biz so fucking hard. Oh yeah, cause some of you suck at business. Not all, but we DO have some lamers in our midst dont we. Not intended to the rep on icq, just EVERYTHING is going haywire lately BUT I am making more money. Maybe this is how it ALWAYS FUCKING goes making more money. Last edited by Vjo; 07-20-2011 at 12:35 PM..

07-20-2011, 12:40 PM	#75
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	If I dont get paid by every company from here on I do biz with there will be hell to pay. I take stats shots every fucking day. I let two fuckhead companies around here slide on not paying me (for now) cause I was being Mr nice guy. TWO companies in 14 years. Three counting Pushrod. I get REAL impatient with shit. Last edited by Vjo; 07-20-2011 at 12:42 PM..

07-20-2011, 01:03 PM	#76
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	Actually since FOS went belly up they dont convert for shit. LOL But they do recur still. I cant tell no lies. Still a good prog tho. Better than most. Not heydays when we had FOS tho. Really sucks when the porn industry finds a way to make a buck only to have it fall through. There is VERY fucken little that converts now days at a good ratio. I better start giving you all my poor man's recipies. You may need them. Lots of beans, eggs, rump and pork roast. Actually not that bad. I feel great. LOL

07-20-2011, 01:20 PM	#77
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	Edited: To protect the innocent. Just contacted me. Maybe I expect things too quick. I ALWAYS ASSuME the worst. Bad character flaw. Last edited by Vjo; 07-20-2011 at 01:28 PM..

07-20-2011, 02:05 PM	#82
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	Sing it Ethyl: "Everything's coming up roses!"

07-20-2011, 02:39 PM	#83
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	I let all my babies go MP but how long can you keep paying reg fees. I really got $400 for them as I dont pay the $9 reg fee with Moniker over the next year or have to spend time selling them individually. Plus I have other plans. Still in Adult. Still in porn. You betcha. celebritybondage and celebrityfootfetish could be killer tubes. Very untapped espec celebritybondage girlieboys has potential. Anyhow my best to the new owner if you read this. You got a good deal and it was a pleasure doing biz. When I look back at my first sale thread in 2009 when I was asking 4 figs each. Times have changed and I was crazy. You can tell my interests, foot fetish, celebrity, bondage and hee hooo "i wear lace and i wear black leather" and Nikki LOL j/k about the lace but Nikki is hot. She cant be a tranny is she? i wear lace and i wear black leather Actually not all my babies Last edited by Vjo; 07-20-2011 at 02:51 PM..

07-20-2011, 03:07 PM	#84
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	It's 100 f'n degrees outside. But the rains will come tonight after three days of this. Then 85 tomorrow. It's hot. How hot is it? It is so hot that even Sally and Paul would take a chill pill. For me now.. couple Coronas, couple egg rolls, lil hot mustard few jalapano chips, another Corona, and down.. Last edited by Vjo; 07-20-2011 at 03:18 PM..

07-20-2011, 08:02 PM	#86
xholly Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 817	i think sally would make a great wife for paul if his marriage goes south