No charges for Clinton after second round of emails reviewed - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

BitcoinConsultant · 11-06-2016, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

non American or American...they're only informed by fake news, which makes them uninformed.

God damn those Russian hackers and their doctored emails.

Vendot · 11-06-2016, 07:48 PM

Quote:

a very brisk job indeed with 650 000 emails on the computer in question

As someone else put it:

"They went through 650k emails in 8 days. That's one email per second - highly plausible."

It looks to me like they were pressured to give her the all clear so that she would be free of that and they will wait until the election is over before they continue, if they will continue to investigate her which is highly unlikely if she gets into office.

Grapesoda · 11-06-2016, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arock10

U mad
FBI Completes Review of Newly Revealed Hillary Clinton Emails, Finds No Evidence of Criminality - NBC News

can't be much fun with health issues and then being hounded with bull shit.

Rochard · 11-06-2016, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

The guy I posted about took selfies inside a sub and told on himself. If you can't see the difference you're a fucking retard.

You are right. If you cannot see the difference... Well, you said it yourself.

One of them was doing their job, which includes handling, discussing, and disseminating classified information on a daily basis. The other one took pictures of classified information for no reason after after being told it was against the law to do so.

How can you not see the difference between the two?

Coup · 11-06-2016, 09:34 PM

I have a confession to make. It was me that reviewed all 650,000 emails. I wore out like 5 rubber ''O.K." stamps and went through gallons of green ink.

I'll let nothing stop Hillary. NOTHING.

Phoenix · 11-06-2016, 09:35 PM

So we can give the emails a break for now.

Game time in 2 days

Rochard · 11-06-2016, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendot

As someone else put it:

"They went through 650k emails in 8 days. That's one email per second - highly plausible."

It looks to me like they were pressured to give her the all clear so that she would be free of that and they will wait until the election is over before they continue, if they will continue to investigate her which is highly unlikely if she gets into office.

I would guess it's not difficult at all. A little bit of sorting and then comparing meta data and it should be an easy task.

Sort the emails by date to locate the ones sent while Clinton was Secretary of State. Take those and see which ones were sent from Secretary of State Clinton. Then compare those to the emails they have already looked over. If there are any from that date range that was sent from Clinton they can review them for classified information.

They had one hundred officers involved in the original case reviewing emails, so it doesn't sound unresonable at all that they would be able to sort through the information quickly.

BitcoinConsultant · 11-06-2016, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I would guess it's not difficult at all. A little bit of sorting and then comparing meta data and it should be an easy task.

Sort the emails by date to locate the ones sent while Clinton was Secretary of State. Take those and see which ones were sent from Secretary of State Clinton. Then compare those to the emails they have already looked over. If there are any from that date range that was sent from Clinton they can review them for classified information.

They had one hundred officers involved in the original case reviewing emails, so it doesn't sound unresonable at all that they would be able to sort through the information quickly.

They also said they were using analysis software searching for specific keywords, so really no surprise it went so quickly.

Bladewire · 11-06-2016, 09:39 PM

Just for the record:

The crooked FBI leaker in NY said there were 650k emails. Comey, nor anyone else, has ever said how many state.gov emails were on that computer, which was the scope of the renewed investigation.

Axeman · 11-06-2016, 09:44 PM

Can't wait for this to be over. Then dread when it all starts up again in 2 years....

Barry-xlovecam · 11-06-2016, 10:21 PM

It is so fucking easy to search 650K emails -- it's a joke to think otherwise. Just have to know what terms to look for

WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one?

kane · 11-06-2016, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

It is so fucking easy to search 650K emails -- it's a joke to think otherwise. Just have to know what terms to look for

WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one?

Even if they did open and read/skim each one, a team of 20-25 people could easily go through that many emails in 8 days. People are acting like it was just one person manually flipping through all these emails.

onwebcam · 11-06-2016, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

It is so fucking easy to search 650K emails -- it's a joke to think otherwise. Just have to know what terms to look for

WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one?

It is, is it? Ok here's a test. Go to https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/

Find the email where someone is discussing how personal it is to make a tough choice

You get back when you find the exact email ID I'm referring to. Post the ID here. I will PM it to an agreeable 3rd party on the board right now. You have 9 days starting now to find it in less than 10% of the emails they had to search.

The point here is unless every single email is read there's no way to know the content. You will not find the specific email I'm referring to based on what I've said.

marcop · 11-06-2016, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one?

Apparently the Dunning-Kruger cohort here on GFY thinks that's exactly what the FBI did.

flashfire · 11-06-2016, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendot

As someone else put it:

"They went through 650k emails in 8 days. That's one email per second - highly plausible."

It looks to me like they were pressured to give her the all clear so that she would be free of that and they will wait until the election is over before they continue, if they will continue to investigate her which is highly unlikely if she gets into office.

assuming one person was doing it

use your heads guys the election is over...if the republicans want to win one try and find a candidate that does well in more demographics than uneducated white guy

"where my cuntry gone?"

marcop · 11-06-2016, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

It is, is it? Ok here's a test. Go to https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/

Find the email where someone is discussing how personal it is to make a tough choice

You get back when you find the exact email ID I'm referring to. Post the ID here. I will PM it to an agreeable 3rd party on the board right now. You have 9 days starting now to find it in less than 10% of the emails they had to search.

The point here is unless every single email is read there's no way to know the content. You will not find the specific email I'm referring to based on what I've said.

Perhaps you're not aware of how digital storage systems such as emails can be searched by software tools... actually, from your idiotic challenge it's obvious you don't. For example, the whole mass of emails can be searched for specific keywords such as "classified" or "top secret" or "BENGHAZI" or whatever and then that subset of emails can be flagged for closer inspection. And you can bet the FBI has some cutting edge software tools to do that kind of work.

But don't take my word for it, here's Wired.com's take on this subject: https://www.wired.com/2016/11/yes-do...ls-eight-days/

Duh!

onwebcam · 11-06-2016, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marcop

Perhaps you're not aware of how digital storage systems such as emails can be searched by software tools... actually, from your idiotic challenge it's obvious you don't. For example, the whole mass of emails can be searched for specific keywords such as "classified" or "top secret" or "BENGHAZI" or whatever and then that subset of emails can be flagged for closer inspection. And you can bet the FBI has some cutting edge software tools to do that kind of work.

But don't take my word for it, here's Wired.com's take on this subject: https://www.wired.com/2016/11/yes-do...ls-eight-days/

Duh!

So prove it. Find the email. There is one word in the english dictionary that will narrow it down to 314 results. That's the only hint you get. Maybe you can find a script that will count the entire english dictionary word frequency. To save you some time the word has nothing to do with anything I've mentioned. Nothing to do with anything really. Have at it. Time is ticking.

Who wants to be pm'ed the email ID?

CarlosTheGaucho · 11-07-2016, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BitcoinConsultant

Got a link to this? Genuinely curious.

I saw that first from a direct link in comments on a news site yesterday

now the only link available I found today is this - posted on Saturday:

FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide

today the Google news search doesn't return anything at all related to this apart from several conspiracy blogs that obviously reposted this article. Very hard to verify that information unless someone would get a direct confirmation from the police. May be a hoax, may be not. Mass media won't touch it anyway.

The foundation investigation continues although it will be probably swept under the carpet should HRC be elected as planned.

CarlosTheGaucho · 11-07-2016, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

Even if they did open and read/skim each one, a team of 20-25 people could easily go through that many emails in 8 days. People are acting like it was just one person manually flipping through all these emails.

The point is considering the same email team worked on the follow up emails, and only worked on those not identified as duplicates to make the process efficient. It's still very hard to imagine this would be a matter of somebody asking "did you find anything?" and getting an answer "no" then to immediately run to the press and claim that "nothing was found".

Anybody remotely familiar with the FBI investigation process would confirm there's a rigorous procedure to be followed not to mention the approval process in order to conclude / document all the findings.

Plus there's the basic fact that all these government documents were found on the laptop that actually belongs to Weiner, and were there likely stored by Huma Abedin. That itself is already an undisputable proof of actually leaking the government documents.

The fact that this has happened on Sunday before the elections may hint at two things:

1) it was a charade from the start to give HRC a glimpse of "credibility" shortly before the election
2) the intention was genuine but the political pressure too strong so Corney eventually surrendered

Anyway this will likely do little to satisfy the public unless one is a die hard pro-HRC partisan.

kane · 11-07-2016, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho

The point is considering the same email team worked on the follow up emails, and only worked on those not identified as duplicates to make the process efficient. It's still very hard to imagine this would be a matter of somebody asking "did you find anything?" and getting an answer "no" then to immediately run to the press and claim that "nothing was found".

Anybody remotely familiar with the FBI investigation process would confirm there's a rigorous procedure to be followed not to mention the approval process in order to conclude / document all the findings.

Plus there's the basic fact that all these government documents were found on the laptop that actually belongs to Weiner, and were there likely stored by Huma Abedin. That itself is already an undisputable proof of actually leaking the government documents.

The fact that this has happened on Sunday before the elections may hint at two things:

1) it was a charade from the start to give HRC a glimpse of "credibility" shortly before the election
2) the intention was genuine but the political pressure too strong so Corney eventually surrendered

Anyway this will likely do little to satisfy the public unless one is a die hard pro-HRC partisan.

I don't, for a second, doubt that this report came out so quickly because of intense political pressure. I remember when the first letter from Comey went public there were many experts saying it could take months to sift through these emails. That it happened so fast is no doubt political. I wouldn't be shocked if they were ordered to put hundreds of agents on this in order to either come up with some kind of chargeable evidence or come up with nothing before the election.

Horatio Caine · 11-07-2016, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

Have you reached your 1 million yet for month of November with $800 whole dollars as processing fees?

I thought you've been around adult biz for a while and know the difference between processing fee and authorization fee?

Oh wait, hand submitting galleries don't need any of that

NewNick · 11-07-2016, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendot

As someone else put it:

"They went through 650k emails in 8 days. That's one email per second - highly plausible."

It looks to me like they were pressured to give her the all clear so that she would be free of that and they will wait until the election is over before they continue, if they will continue to investigate her which is highly unlikely if she gets into office.

650,000 emails on the machine - a small fraction of them from Clinton, so actually very easy to resolve.

No drama, no conspiracy.

Unless you believe of course that the whole thing was a political move by the FBI because she pissed them off. After all they could have just looked at the emails first before they decided to throw a fucking big spanner in the Clinton campaign.

So it all depends who you want to win - you can dress this up either way - you can massage your prejudices with the "facts".

Personally I think that that Comey guy is thoroughly regretting getting involved - his career is fucked now whoever wins.

I also think that we should have a level playing field here, not only should Mr Fart publish his tax returns, he should also hand over every email he has sent or received for the last 10 years to wikileaks to be published on the internet, and to the FBI for their brand of scrutiny.

MaDalton · 11-07-2016, 05:30 AM

poncabare · 11-07-2016, 05:51 AM

shes not crooked

Vendot · 11-07-2016, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

OK, good enough for me.

I still think something will come out it later...

Barry-xlovecam · 11-07-2016, 06:08 AM

Quote:

?You can?t review 650,000 emails in eight days,? Trump

Either Trump thinks his Trumpsters will believe anything he says; or,
Donald Trump is really that digitally lame.

Grapesoda · 11-07-2016, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

Even if they did open and read/skim each one, a team of 20-25 people could easily go through that many emails in 8 days. People are acting like it was just one person manually flipping through all these emails.

Vendot · 11-07-2016, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick

Personally I think that that Comey guy is thoroughly regretting getting involved - his career is fucked now whoever wins.

Or the other possibility is that he did so for a good reason but was pressured to back down and don't forget, he would have the entire establishment against him.

Vendot · 11-07-2016, 09:11 AM

US election 2016: How to review 650,000 emails in eight days - BBC News

From above URL:

For Steven Murdoch, a research fellow at the University of London, the key word is "review".

"It doesn't mean they have been read," he said, adding that privacy considerations and the sheer volume of data would have been prohibitive.

Rochard · 11-07-2016, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

It is, is it? Ok here's a test. Go to https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/

Find the email where someone is discussing how personal it is to make a tough choice

You get back when you find the exact email ID I'm referring to. Post the ID here. I will PM it to an agreeable 3rd party on the board right now. You have 9 days starting now to find it in less than 10% of the emails they had to search.

The point here is unless every single email is read there's no way to know the content. You will not find the specific email I'm referring to based on what I've said.

You are comparing oranges to sneakers.

The system on Wikileaks seems to be an HTML search with limited ability.

On the other hand, the FBI has complete access to the hard drive itself. I am guessing they aren't using Microsoft Outlook to do these searches. They are using metadata. They narrow down the search parameters by the dates Clinton was Secretary of State, then from the results pull all emails that involved Clinton herself. From there they compare the emails to the emails they have already reviewed in the original investigation. At this point, they haven't even physically looked over a single email yet - all of this was sorting using metadata. Once they have everything narrowed down (which most likely took them only a few minutes) they can review what is left by hand. They used over one hundred agents before, and the most likely used how every many they needed to.

Rochard · 11-07-2016, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendot

Or the other possibility is that he did so for a good reason but was pressured to back down and don't forget, he would have the entire establishment against him.

I don't know who you are, you don't list any contact information, and you don't list who you work for.

I think you are Vendzilla.

JFK · 11-07-2016, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

plaster · 11-07-2016, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine

I thought you've been around adult biz for a while and know the difference between processing fee and authorization fee?

Oh wait, hand submitting galleries don't need any of that

I'm going to explain the relevance of your $800 claimed transaction fees and how it proves you are lying.... to everyone else but you.

When processing you have failures and you have success transactions. Failures out weigh success by about 3:1. That means, every 4 transactions has 1 success. You said $800 is your transaction fees meaning you have 800 transactions at 25 cents each... your words.

Average transaction is maybe, maybe $30 if you are lucky. 30 X 800 does not equal 250K. And you are saying 250K is your cascade biller...

.....

You are lying about your billing and I would be surprised if you made $100 in a month. You have such an erroneous grasp on how to lie effectively about what you make and I've clearly shown why, what you have claimed in past, is nothing but a lie.

P.s. trump will win tomorrow and then off to jail goes hillary and the world will be a better place without that greedy stank ass cunt who has been selling out the US since her husband l e ft office in 2000.

Bladewire · 11-07-2016, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

So prove it. Find the email. There is one word in the english dictionary that will narrow it down to 314 results. That's the only hint you get. Maybe you can find a script that will count the entire english dictionary word frequency. To save you some time the word has nothing to do with anything I've mentioned. Nothing to do with anything really. Have at it. Time is ticking.

Who wants to be pm'ed the email ID?

YOU PROVE IT!

All you do on here is post drive by Putin propaganda lies and when called on it you slither away and make a new thread with a new lie!

You even think there were 650k Hillary emails when the FBI NEVER SAID THAT.

You think, believe & post SHIT that isn't based on fact and already debunked.

You waste the time of so many people on here for nothing because whenever you post you're disproved and people take you less seriously to the point you have no respect here anymore by Trump supporters

plaster · 11-07-2016, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

I'm going to explain the relevance of your $800 claimed transaction fees and how it proves you are lying.... to everyone else but you.

When processing you have failures and you have success transactions. Failures out weigh success by about 3:1. That means, every 4 transactions has 1 success. You said $800 is your transaction fees meaning you have 800 transactions at 25 cents each... your words.

Average transaction is maybe, maybe $30 if you are lucky. 30 X 800 does not equal 250K. And you are saying 250K is your cascade biller...

.....

You are lying about your billing and I would be surprised if you made $100 in a month. You have such an erroneous grasp on how to lie effectively about what you make and I've clearly shown why, what you have claimed in past, is nothing but a lie.

P.s. trump will win tomorrow and then off to jail goes hillary and the world will be a better place without that greedy stank ass cunt who has been selling out the US since her husband l e ft office in 2000.

Bump for all kinds of awareness

Fuck you lib stealing sign fuckers!

Hannes · 11-07-2016, 10:03 PM

the system is rigged towards her

badgirlfilms · 11-08-2016, 01:55 AM

Relic · 11-12-2016, 08:22 PM

Looking forward to seeing the results of an impartial investigation conducted at the behest of President Trump.

Paul Markham · 11-13-2016, 03:57 AM

The FBI are going to be told to crawl up her ass and make sure they come back with something concrete.

11-06-2016, 09:35 PM	#56
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	So we can give the emails a break for now. Game time in 2 days __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

11-06-2016, 09:44 PM	#60
Axeman Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Swamp Posts: 5,201	Can't wait for this to be over. Then dread when it all starts up again in 2 years.... __________________ XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.com

11-07-2016, 05:30 AM	#73
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,822	__________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

11-07-2016, 09:11 AM	#79
Vendot Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Malaysia Posts: 3,376	US election 2016: How to review 650,000 emails in eight days - BBC News From above URL: For Steven Murdoch, a research fellow at the University of London, the key word is "review". "It doesn't mean they have been read," he said, adding that privacy considerations and the sheer volume of data would have been prohibitive. __________________ "In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George Orwell

11-07-2016, 10:03 PM	#86
Hannes Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 1,594	the system is rigged towards her __________________ Skype: gallag97 Email: [U]comingsoon/U]

11-06-2016, 09:34 PM	#55
Coup 🚨 PBBC International 🚨 Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: /👁\ Posts: 9,931	I have a confession to make. It was me that reviewed all 650,000 emails. I wore out like 5 rubber ''O.K." stamps and went through gallons of green ink. I'll let nothing stop Hillary. NOTHING.

11-06-2016, 09:39 PM	#59
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	Just for the record: The crooked FBI leaker in NY said there were 650k emails. Comey, nor anyone else, has ever said how many state.gov emails were on that computer, which was the scope of the renewed investigation.

11-06-2016, 10:21 PM	#61
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	It is so fucking easy to search 650K emails -- it's a joke to think otherwise. Just have to know what terms to look for WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one?

11-07-2016, 05:51 AM	#74
poncabare Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: carmel Posts: 2,553	shes not crooked

11-08-2016, 01:55 AM	#87
badgirlfilms Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 1,054

11-12-2016, 08:22 PM	#88
Relic So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 10,300	Looking forward to seeing the results of an impartial investigation conducted at the behest of President Trump.

11-13-2016, 03:57 AM	#89
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	The FBI are going to be told to crawl up her ass and make sure they come back with something concrete. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70