SexEducation.com - Page 12 - GoFuckYourself.com

drops · 07-09-2003, 09:54 PM

on top again.. hehe

since this guy is scum..

check out our new site that will be announced tomorrow..

http://assgate.com

MattO · 07-09-2003, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

I have no idea

Idiot

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by malakajoe

Bubba fuckin what? You getting people confused again?

You did a shitty job explaining yourself. Ok..you call it an advanced section. In your "advanced" section, do you charge access for this? In your "advanced" section, do you own or have the copyright to all images?

The website is broken. It is broken because I had spent more time with Google.com alogorithms and the homepage then with fixing the code of the "advanced section" and with fixing the code of the "file server/graphic filter".

I have changed and rechanged the website numerous times in an attempt to solidify a constant AVS or CC processor. The "advanced" section and the "file" section have been broken for several months - maybe even - six months.

The advanced section tends to contain the more "controversial" articles like ...
"Die - Faggot - Die" which discusses the ecologoy of AIDS in bathhouses. This article is extremely upsetting to young promiscuous gay men. It was written to be that way.

"Google Gag Gah" contains a censored graphic of a "first page results" link of the search term "bondage". The graphic of the female with her lips sewn shut was captured from the "tour" area of a paid Google.com advertising customer. Because I called this graphic "rape & torture" and NOT "bondage" my advertising campaign with Google.com was terminated. Same graphic - different view of it. It doesn't matter that the website displaying the graphic ALSO used "torture" as a word when describing the event.

"Let Teens Have Sex" contains, what I believe is a very kewl and very unique "lesson/discussion" of all the arguements presented to me over the years for allowing teenagers to have sex. It has a unique ending that "nails" the reader - and promotes abstinence as a mature decision.

the advanced section contains ...

discussion of G-spot stimulation and real female ejaculation discussions.

I have tried NUMEROUS, NUMEROUS marketing methods and was currently in the process of having just the homepage, the tour, "Dad's Desk", a sample Table of Contents and to see the rest you would require AVS access or a paid membership.

I have tried all graphics & video off if you do not have a paid membership.

I have tried showing graphics as thumbnails (really an attempt to comply with AVS site requirements like "30 thumb pictures minimum" ) and requiring an AVS or paid membership to view video.

I have tried not being allowed to save your "viewing preferences" as a manner in which to entice AVS or paid memberships.

I have tried "guaranteed reply" to emails ...

And I have tried combinations of all the above.

I do not "own" Pepsi.com but I do talk about one of their commercials.

I do not "own" Cosmopolitan magazine or "O" Oprahs magazine but I do discuss those magazine and contain samples of the advertising.

I do not "own" Admiral Krags graphics but do present opinions about his graphics (which most have his name on).

I do not "own" Playboy - but will discuss the evolution of Playboy graphics and how Playboy has stayed more "main stream". Usually no close up "vaginal" shots.

I do not "own" Penthouse.com but I have a right to discuss the photograph techniques which seem to be used over and over - like the shining/reflecting of a light on a the females vagina.

I do not "own" Hustler.com but I have a right to discuss the more bizzare graphics like "urination" and "golden showers".

The advanced section contains "The only known cure for premature ejaculation" a link to "http://www.DrMirkin.com"

Currently - I am unsure how I will market SexEducation.com.

Now if you think about it - is there really an "Advanced" section. I don't think so - the whole word "advanced" plays on "I want the one sentence answer to sex. Just give me the good stuff." Is my advanced section really more advanced? Yes - and - no. It's just more discussion - to me. I am not the only online newspaper struggling with how to entice readers to get an online membership.

Do I own the buildings of the photographs I take (for example) of the City of Calgary - no?

Jakke PNG · 07-10-2003, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Do I own the buildings of the photographs I take (for example) of the City of Calgary - no?

Yes. But did you take those pictures on your site?
Fucktard.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by drops
on top again.. hehe

since this guy is scum..

check out our new site that will be announced tomorrow..

http://assgate.com

Your website is an example of what must be changed.
No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name.

A typo/mistake of forgetting to put in the "P" to the URL - "www.Passgate.com - the world's safest online payment technology." immediately presents your website "assgate.com" which immediately shows aroused genitals and reproductive bodily fluids.

This needs to stop and the majority of adults agree.

May I suggest you rate your page with ICRA.org so 90% + of todays browser can block your website if so set.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather

Yes. But did you take those pictures on your site?
Fucktard.

Huh?
No - I do not own the buildings in the photographs I take of the City of Calgary.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fluid of Fuck Me
Here's my take on things.

From what I've seen, he's trying a different twist on the teen's as art thing. Sick and grey line legal due to the stupidity of judges who can't seem to write a line to define artistic value well enough in the law, I digress.

Why is he here. Well two reasons.

1. He thought we were stupid enough to not actually check out who he is. What good is getting away with something when you only fool the general public? That's no test, now fooling the pros is a bit tougher. But he thought he could. He might have too, but some people posted about some pages within his site and I had the forethought to look and capture the contents of those pages. (don't ask to see, or me to prove, it's a felony for me to send them out. I'm collecting them for law enforcement, they're burned to CD and in a courier pouch and deleted from my PC-couriered to myself the same night they were downloaded so nobody can say I kept a copy for any sick uses or downloaded them with any other intent.-not that anyone other then this "dad" ~a term that makes me shudder for his children ~ would claim that.)

2. Money. Yup. From us..he needs sponsors like swoit (who he's been reported to, don't think they'd like seeing his name as a top referrer in there) and of course, if you have the google page rank bar installed (and what good webmaster doesn't) you'll notice, every board he brings his "crusade" to has a google page rank of 5 or better. Shit..I should go on a crusade of my own heheh.

Notice how he mentions his domain in EVERY post? If it's not in the body it's in the sig..often times 2-3 times a post, along with his email address. Think it's cause he's a meglomaniac? Possibly..hell..he likely is, fits the profile. But my guess is it's more that he wants massive link pop cause he has that site listed for sale. Cherry domain name with tonnes of link pop, and cops closing in on him, he needs money to run on likely. HA!

Do a link popularity search in google, look at all the domain sales sites he's got that puppy listed on if you need more proof.

He's actually rather transparent. Maybe the board mods should change every link he posts to point to GFI's own page..or better yet, a REAL LEGIT sex education service. One that could and should benifit from the name.

And hey SE..if you're not the scum bag we think you are. (we're sure you are..but hey..I'm talking shits and giggles here) Then why not donate that domain name to a legitmate registered sexual education organization? Maybe something that the world health organization could do with it. In fact, you seem to want to win our respects, change our minds, donate it. I dare ya.

#1) You can not describe or present a heavily censored graphic either - right?

#2) Absolutely. My homepage is not written for Google.com any more. I understand Google alogorithms I was forced to - when they terminated an advertising campaign. I make no appologies for doing my job as a Webmaster - increasing traffic.

It is also HIGHLY recommended that you put your DOMAINS up for sale by searching for "free classifieds", making a list of those services ranked high in Google.com - and then go and make an advertisement with those websites - of any kind - and do not forget to mention your domain name.

QUOTE:" ... why not donate that domain name to a legitmate registered sexual education organization? Maybe something that the world health organization could do with it. In fact, you seem to want to win our respects, change our minds, donate it. I dare ya. "
Why don't you donate all your porn profits to the starving and tortured children by AIDS - in Africa? I dare ya.

rowan · 07-10-2003, 06:40 AM

Just stepping aside for a moment... GFY threads will never be seen by well behaved SE bots.

http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/robots.txt

<font face="Courier">User-agent: *
Disallow: /
</font>

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 06:50 AM

Well ...
My primary domain SexEducation.com is still not working.

Although most of my other domains are and I could re-open the website under one of those other domains - in seconds.

I am waiting to find out what the SPECIFIC problem is ... to have it solved and move on.

My [email protected] email address is still not behaving correctly. That email address controls all my domains.

Something was done - by someone - however I have still NOT been contacted in any manner about my website.

Will keep you informed.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

PPS: Usually - at my location - DNS updates happen around 9:00 AM my time. [fingers crossed] ...
Hopefully - everything just fixes itself and I can move on - but I promise some of the issues discussed here - will be addressed in the most expeditious manner. Which with my schedule is like - 90 days. Sorry - I can not fix the issues addressed faster then that. I have job too ... one that is quite relaxing actually ... and is just as fun as SexEducation.com.

It's all good ... bring it on ...bring it on ...life that is.
Pretty kewl stuff ... : )

DJRCyberAVS · 07-10-2003, 07:01 AM

Sexeducation

Quote:

Google Gag Gah" contains a censored graphic of a "first page results" link of the search term "bondage". The graphic of the female with her lips sewn shut was captured from the "tour" area of a paid Google.com advertising customer. Because I called this graphic "rape & torture" and NOT "bondage" my advertising campaign with Google.com was terminated.

LOL - you obivously can't read Google's rules as well as the info in this thread.... fucking clueless.

BTW - You are now saying you have taken images from Playboy and Hustler without permission? LOL... dickhead!

Oh and one point.... IF YOU are not into CP... where did you get the nude minors pictures from that you have already admitted to putting on your site? Seems like you would to be actively browsing for that stuff..... You TRULLY are FUCKED IN THE HEAD!

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DJRCyberAVS
Sexeducation

LOL - you obivously can't read Google's rules as well as the info in this thread.... fucking clueless.

BTW - You are now saying you have taken images from Playboy and Hustler without permission? LOL... dickhead!

Oh and one point.... IF YOU are not into CP... where did you get the nude minors pictures from that you have already admitted to putting on your site? Seems like you would to be actively browsing for that stuff..... You TRULLY are FUCKED IN THE HEAD!

Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture".

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

They have also fought and defended - for years - free speech, and have had a direct benefit to the protection of an individuals right to such.

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do. Draw attention to the issue. Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The problem with child pornography is that it takes seconds to find it. I get unsolicited emails everyday pushing child porn and beastiality and ... even ... "teen" type sites which fringe on child pornography really.

Yes - I have done research on Child Pornography.
The source of the most controversial graphic on my website was
posted into a "fetish" newsgroup .. and was automatically downloaded by QuadSucker. It is one of 16 graphics - I deleted the other graphics .... and I censored her image.

Many people are accidentally downloading CP when they go into usenet or use P2P software like FileTopia.com or iMesh.com or whatever flavour is most popular today. I wrote that article when it happened to me.

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Your website is an example of what must be changed.
No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name.

A typo/mistake of forgetting to put in the "P" to the URL - "www.Passgate.com - the world's safest online payment technology." immediately presents your website "assgate.com" which immediately shows aroused genitals and reproductive bodily fluids.

This needs to stop and the majority of adults agree.

May I suggest you rate your page with ICRA.org so 90% + of todays browser can block your website if so set.

YOu are so full of shit you stink.. You can have women bathing in cum and 50 hard dicks in a "directly accessed domain name". IF YOU HAVE DOCUMENTATION FOR IT. And if it's behind a warning that informed people there is sexual content in the site... You have NO clue on the law to stop talking like you do. We've explained it to you until we're blue in the face, and your'e still hung up on that.. Mister I can't afford a lawyer. Well how about this, I have THREE lawyers, and they all tell me you're full of shit. Stick that in your crack pipe and smoke it, idiotstick.

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture".

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

They have also fought and defended - for years - free speech, and have had a direct benefit to the protection of an individuals right to such.

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do. Draw attention to the issue. Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The problem with child pornography is that it takes seconds to find it. I get unsolicited emails everyday pushing child porn and beastiality and ... even ... "teen" type sites which fringe on child pornography really.

Yes - I have done research on Child Pornography.
The source of the most controversial graphic on my website was
posted into a "fetish" newsgroup .. and was automatically downloaded by QuadSucker. It is one of 16 graphics - I deleted the other graphics .... and I censored her image.

Many people are accidentally downloading CP when they go into usenet or use P2P software like FileTopia.com or iMesh.com or whatever flavour is most popular today. I wrote that article when it happened to me.

I still haven't heard how and why it is ok to use others pictures and make money of it? Why you feel it is ok to use other content without there permission?

Why does a CP article need a picture or pictures of CP? Does a newspaper that writes about a CP that is caught or a news channel that talks about a CP ring that is busted show the actual pictures or videos? No. You are attracting people looking for CP if you use CP pictures in any type of CP article, for or against. Again, why do you need pictures of it to write about it?

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Huh?
No - I do not own the buildings in the photographs I take of the City of Calgary.

If you don't own the images you have on your site, you must have a LEGAL LICENSE TO DISPLAY THOSE IMAGES ON YOUR SITE. You do not. You must have PROPER CUSTODIAL INFORMATION FOR ALL SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL. You do not. YOU MUST HAVE PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER OF THE IMAGE FOR USE (or a license). You do not. Your site is not going to get magically "fixed" bub.. You broke the law, it got pulled down. Stop living in denial and deal with it.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rowan
Just stepping aside for a moment... GFY threads will never be seen by well behaved SE bots.

http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/robots.txt

<font face="Courier">User-agent: *
Disallow: /
</font>

My long term goals with GFY are not Google.com algorithm related ...

[PLUG]
Feed the world and you feed peace. How many do you want to feed?

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Well ...
My primary domain SexEducation.com is still not working.

Although most of my other domains are and I could re-open the website under one of those other domains - in seconds.

I am waiting to find out what the SPECIFIC problem is ... to have it solved and move on.

My [email protected] email address is still not behaving correctly. That email address controls all my domains.

Something was done - by someone - however I have still NOT been contacted in any manner about my website.

Will keep you informed.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

PPS: Usually - at my location - DNS updates happen around 9:00 AM my time. [fingers crossed] ...
Hopefully - everything just fixes itself and I can move on - but I promise some of the issues discussed here - will be addressed in the most expeditious manner. Which with my schedule is like - 90 days. Sorry - I can not fix the issues addressed faster then that. I have job too ... one that is quite relaxing actually ... and is just as fun as SexEducation.com.

It's all good ... bring it on ...bring it on ...life that is.
Pretty kewl stuff ... : )

Open it somewhere else, I dare you, watch it get pulled just as fast.. You still think it's some error? THEY DELETED YOUR SITE, YOU IDIOT. It's GONE. You have ILLEGAL MATERIAL and were in breach of SEVERAL LEGAL COPYRIGHTS. It's not coming back.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:43 AM

Gotta go to work.
Have a great day everyone.

Cya - tonight or tomorrow.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

POOF

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture".

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

They have also fought and defended - for years - free speech, and have had a direct benefit to the protection of an individuals right to such.

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do. Draw attention to the issue. Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The problem with child pornography is that it takes seconds to find it. I get unsolicited emails everyday pushing child porn and beastiality and ... even ... "teen" type sites which fringe on child pornography really.

Yes - I have done research on Child Pornography.
The source of the most controversial graphic on my website was
posted into a "fetish" newsgroup .. and was automatically downloaded by QuadSucker. It is one of 16 graphics - I deleted the other graphics .... and I censored her image.

Many people are accidentally downloading CP when they go into usenet or use P2P software like FileTopia.com or iMesh.com or whatever flavour is most popular today. I wrote that article when it happened to me.

SO now you ADMIT to having child pornography on your website? So the truth finally comes out.. You have glossed over and downplayed everything else.. tell everyone about the REST of it.. and for your information, even your "censored" crap is ILLEGAL....

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture".

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

They have also fought and defended - for years - free speech, and have had a direct benefit to the protection of an individuals right to such.

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do. Draw attention to the issue. Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The problem with child pornography is that it takes seconds to find it. I get unsolicited emails everyday pushing child porn and beastiality and ... even ... "teen" type sites which fringe on child pornography really.

Yes - I have done research on Child Pornography.
The source of the most controversial graphic on my website was
posted into a "fetish" newsgroup .. and was automatically downloaded by QuadSucker. It is one of 16 graphics - I deleted the other graphics .... and I censored her image.

Many people are accidentally downloading CP when they go into usenet or use P2P software like FileTopia.com or iMesh.com or whatever flavour is most popular today. I wrote that article when it happened to me.

I am glad Google took down your advertisement. You were using stolen content, by your own admission since you said you used there pictures on your site. If the pictures you stole were real and not doctored in Photoshop, then that site is sick, too.

Didn't anyone teach you that 2 wrongs don't make a right?

gothweb · 07-10-2003, 08:44 AM

"Dad"-- You still seem to be missing a basic point. For your use of unlicensed images and text to be legal, they need to be used in line with fair use laws for the press. This often means you need to be a registered press agency. It also means that you can only use them when you give appropriate credit, *and* when you are reviewing the image/etc. You have many images that are placed on the tour of your site with no commentary, news, or sourcing. That is copyright infringement.

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

My long term goals with GFY are not Google.com algorithm related ...

[PLUG]
Feed the world and you feed peace. How many do you want to feed?

This by the same guy who thinks you have to pay Google to get yoursitename.com listed on Google. Doesn't realize that it is all a matter of configuration of your site on if it is listed as www.yoursitename.com or yoursitename.com.

Even stated that he hopes everyone has stock in Google since sites are paying to be listed this way. When did Google go public?

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb
"Dad"-- You still seem to be missing a basic point. For your use of unlicensed images and text to be legal, they need to be used in line with fair use laws for the press. This often means you need to be a registered press agency. It also means that you can only use them when you give appropriate credit, *and* when you are reviewing the image/etc. You have many images that are placed on the tour of your site with no commentary, news, or sourcing. That is copyright infringement.

Very well stated. But he won't get it.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb
"Dad"-- You still seem to be missing a basic point. For your use of unlicensed images and text to be legal, they need to be used in line with fair use laws for the press. This often means you need to be a registered press agency. It also means that you can only use them when you give appropriate credit, *and* when you are reviewing the image/etc. You have many images that are placed on the tour of your site with no commentary, news, or sourcing. That is copyright infringement.

No - I admit I need to be more diligent with regards to what you are talking about. I will have these issues addressed and fixed as expeditiously as possible.

I was not aware of "fair use" laws - I have followed links to recommended reading of "laws". This issue will be corrected.

However, it must be noted that the constant termination of suppliers is part of the problem of why it has not already fixed. It's a catch 22.

I join an AVS - get permission to use their graphics - then it is revoked and now I have to remove all those graphics too. I have had a problem keeping up.

I am truly trying to adjust the site to fit a more a "global" set of community standards while obeying the laws of various free countires of the world.

I admit to not being perfect - however - to be accepted in this community - perfection is required - and it shall be done.

I will search out links for USA, CANADA and the UNITED KINDOM and read up on "fair use" laws...

And I will post retractions if necessary or requested.

I will continue to do my best.

The first issue is getting my [email protected] email address working which controls all my domains. Otherwise - I would already be working on the things - I learned in this newsgroup.

Dad@

PS: I really got to scoot to work.

swedguy · 07-10-2003, 09:30 AM

Is this guy for real?

DJRCyberAVS · 07-10-2003, 10:10 AM

Sexeducation (u need it)

Thought you had me on ignore fuckwad! People like you are easy to read... so full of shit you need to know what people are saying about you and that's why you keep coming back even though you've not grasped what anyone has said over 12 fucking pages. Most people, even people who can't speak English, would understand within a few posts... You, are a thick twat.

Quote:

Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture". ?

Translation:- you can't read the rules or even comprehend between what's right or wrong.

Quote:

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

Translation:- You've stolen their pics and put them on your site and think it's ok. Whatever role they have played - YOU have no right to use their pics without prior permission, license and documention. Copyright infringement... GET IT!

Quote:

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

Translation:- You are very crap in bed.... If you have never given your wife/ex-wife/gf a 'vaginal' orgasm.... don't think about teaching Sex Education. Your research seems to be your pitiful attempt at boosting your sexual ego back up after you realised that you just can't cut it. You are warped and need help.

Quote:

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Why would they want anonymity? Surely they would love the free advertising - afterall you are still leaving their watermarks on the images? You are full of shit..

Quote:

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

And of course they gave you permission to use their images right....

Quote:

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do.

You have broke the law by distributing child pornography which is a serious offence and it should't take 12 pages for you to grasp that. You are a CP peddler.... and that's not what GFY or the ADULT industry is about... RIGHT!

Quote:

Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The ASACP have more sense than to put child porn pics on their site in the fight against CP... and they do actively shut CP sites down. You are now distributing it... with dicks like you, it's not surprising it's on the increase.

You are fucking unreal...

gothweb · 07-10-2003, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

No - I admit I need to be more diligent with regards to what you are talking about. I will have these issues addressed and fixed as expeditiously as possible.

It is good to see you admitting your mistakes, and promising to fix them. It is a big step up from blindly denying everything. However, you still don't seem to understand the seriousness of what you are doing. I will believe your promises to come in line with the law when I see it. And remember, the cops won't take "I was going to fix it, honest" as an answer.

afrocreep · 07-10-2003, 07:51 PM

http://web.archive.org/web/200206011...education.com/

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb

It is good to see you admitting your mistakes, and promising to fix them. It is a big step up from blindly denying everything. However, you still don't seem to understand the seriousness of what you are doing. I will believe your promises to come in line with the law when I see it. And remember, the cops won't take "I was going to fix it, honest" as an answer.

I've never blindly denied everything - reread the posts ...lol

I think - because of the community I am currently in - that your perspective of SexEducation.com is one of a "porn" site.

SexEducation.com is not a porn site.

It is a global magazine of sexual intercourse.

Always - has been - always will be.

I still have not found info on this "fair use" stuff though.

And I do have a question ...

Lets say - well actually - it is occuring in a thread here on GFY.
"Anal Sex is it for every girl."

Someone posted a horrific graphic of a females vagina in that thread.
The translation of the french (it's been awhile) contained in the graphic is
"Raped - she has finally received bullets in her vagina."

So here - in this newsgroup a REAL rape graphic as it appears ... has been posted.

Is anyone shutting down GFY - besides Deepsy1?

Now if I want to discuss that graphic ....
How would I according to "fair use" quote it's source?

Do I say I got it from GFY - that would not be fair to GFY?
Do I have a right to discuss that graphic at all?
Or - should no magazine or newspaper be able to discuss that graphic?

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by afrocreep
http://web.archive.org/web/200206011...education.com/

Yep - that's me.
What year was that - do you know?

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

I've never blindly denied everything - reread the posts ...lol

I think - because of the community I am currently in - that your perspective of SexEducation.com is one of a "porn" site.

SexEducation.com is not a porn site.

It is a global magazine of sexual intercourse.

Always - has been - always will be.

I still have not found info on this "fair use" stuff though.

And I do have a question ...

Lets say - well actually - it is occuring in a thread here on GFY.
"Anal Sex is it for every girl."

Someone posted a horrific graphic of a females vagina in that thread.
The translation of the french (it's been awhile) contained in the graphic is
"Raped - she has finally received bullets in her vagina."

So here - in this newsgroup a REAL rape graphic as it appears ... has been posted.

Is anyone shutting down GFY - besides Deepsy1?

Now if I want to discuss that graphic ....
How would I according to "fair use" quote it's source?

Do I say I got it from GFY - that would not be fair to GFY?
Do I have a right to discuss that graphic at all?
Or - should no magazine or newspaper be able to discuss that graphic?

You can write about anything you want. You can link to anything you want.

BUT if you show a picture, you have to have permission to use it, and you have to give credit for who took the picture.

Easy enough?

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DJRCyberAVS
Sexeducation (u need it)

Thought you had me on ignore fuckwad! People like you are easy to read... so full of shit you need to know what people are saying about you and that's why you keep coming back even though you've not grasped what anyone has said over 12 fucking pages. Most people, even people who can't speak English, would understand within a few posts... You, are a thick twat.

The ASACP have more sense than to put child porn pics on their site in the fight against CP... and they do actively shut CP sites down. You are now distributing it... with dicks like you, it's not surprising it's on the increase.

You are fucking unreal...

fluff & fodder ...
all these have been previously answered.
you add nothing of value to this discussion.

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

fluff & fodder ...
all these have been previously answered.
you add nothing of value to this discussion.

Neither do you.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by malakajoe

You can write about anything you want. You can link to anything you want.

BUT if you show a picture, you have to have permission to use it, and you have to give credit for who took the picture.

Easy enough?

In reading what LadyMischief aske me to ...
from my understanding ...
I can still use the PUBLICLY POSTED picture - but must state it source when it comes publicly known.

Lets assume (I have no intention - but lets assume) ...
I want that picture presented with the discussion of it and the thread it is contained in. The thread is a valid topic.

So you are saying - I can not protect the identity of the person who POSTED IT?
It appears the graphic is one of an unknown source.
Are you saying - I can not use the graphic AT ALL ?

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

In reading what LadyMischief aske me to ...
from my understanding ...
I can still use the PUBLICLY POSTED picture - but must state it source when it comes publicly known.

Lets assume (I have no intention - but lets assume) ...
I want that picture presented with the discussion of it and the thread it is contained in. The thread is a valid topic.

So you are saying - I can not protect the identity of the person who POSTED IT?
It appears the graphic is one of an unknown source.
Are you saying - I can not use the graphic AT ALL ?

Yes, I am stating you can't use it.

People used to think they could download tons of content from newsgroups and use those pictures to make adult websites. There defense was they got the pictures from a public location.

Well, doesn't hold up...and as I am sure many content providers and webmasters can tell you...they will win in court.

If you don't have direct permission from the person who owns the pictures, you cannot use them even if you got them from a newsgroup, a forum, etc....

Your brain getting this yet?

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:20 PM

This is where we have a fundamental difference of opinion.

If the graphic is unknown, and it is potentially "harmful" to t he person - or the subjects - and I ensure that their identities are protected ... I feel in this case - for this graphic - as a magazine I do not have to reveal my sources ... because it could be harmful to those involved.

And the law LADYMISCHIEF sent me to - states the author may request anonymity and be expected to have it.

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

In reading what LadyMischief aske me to ...
from my understanding ...
I can still use the PUBLICLY POSTED picture - but must state it source when it comes publicly known.

Lets assume (I have no intention - but lets assume) ...
I want that picture presented with the discussion of it and the thread it is contained in. The thread is a valid topic.

So you are saying - I can not protect the identity of the person who POSTED IT?
It appears the graphic is one of an unknown source.
Are you saying - I can not use the graphic AT ALL ?

If you do not know the source, you should not use it. If it is ADULT related material, you require FULL custodial infromation and it's NOT press material under fair use. It is goverened by obscenity laws, not fair use laws. That requires model releases, ids, or at least some form of custodial information.... and if you didn't take the image, it requires that you have a LICENSE from the ORIGINAL PRODUCER or his AGENT OR BROKER to use the image... AND you have to have a proper 2257 disclosure on your site.. You have NONE of this. See that advice I give can actually be USEFUL?

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
This is where we have a fundamental difference of opinion.

If the graphic is unknown, and it is potentially "harmful" to t he person - or the subjects - and I ensure that their identities are protected ... I feel in this case - for this graphic - as a magazine I do not have to reveal my sources ... because it could be harmful to those involved.

And the law LADYMISCHIEF sent me to - states the author may request anonymity and be expected to have it.

You are not a registered news media source, therefore fair use laws DO NOT APPLY to you, you are in violation of copyright unless you go legit and register, and then you are still answerable to the law.

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:25 PM

Someone smart just posted this elsewhere.. I suggest you use it to your advantage (not that that forgives your OTHER crimes, but you're seeing some clarity to let's work with this)
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief

You are not a registered news media source, therefore fair use laws DO NOT APPLY to you, you are in violation of copyright unless you go legit and register, and then you are still answerable to the law.

I will look up this "news media source" ...

However - I can tell you - that in Calgary there is no license requirement for a "magazine". The reason for this is the cost of the license could be used to prohibit free speech. This sounds like something similar - if there is a "registration fee" for where you are saying I should register.

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
This is where we have a fundamental difference of opinion.

If the graphic is unknown, and it is potentially "harmful" to t he person - or the subjects - and I ensure that their identities are protected ... I feel in this case - for this graphic - as a magazine I do not have to reveal my sources ... because it could be harmful to those involved.

And the law LADYMISCHIEF sent me to - states the author may request anonymity and be expected to have it.

You fuckin idiot...what you said is the author GAVE you permission to use it, but stay anonymous.

If you just a picture from a forum or newsgroup, who gave you permission?

I swear, my girlfriends little sister would understand copyright infringement better than you.

sexeducation · 07-10-2003, 08:27 PM

Good link ...
cya - tomorrow.
I'm exhausted.

LadyMischief · 07-10-2003, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

I will look up this "news media source" ...

However - I can tell you - that in Calgary there is no license requirement for a "magazine". The reason for this is the cost of the license could be used to prohibit free speech. This sounds like something similar - if there is a "registration fee" for where you are saying I should register.

If you are hosting your website in the united states, you have to obey THEIR laws as well. Start doing your research instead of wasting your time here... This place is doing you no good.. you have NO fucking clue, you don't even know where to start.. I have 5 different friends in Calgary, ALL with their own magazines, mainstream. They ALL contacted LAWYERS before going to print, and I highly suggest you work double time at McDonalds and scrape up the coin to hire one for yourself, because you are floundering worse than ANYONE I've ever seen. You don't even know the laws of your own country, let alone the country where you want to host.

afrocreep · 07-10-2003, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation

Yep - that's me.
What year was that - do you know?

Considering it says 2002 in the url.. my first guess would be.. well 2002

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Good link ...
cya - tomorrow.
I'm exhausted.

We were telling you the same shit asshole.

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by afrocreep

Considering it says 2002 in the url.. my first guess would be.. well 2002

You can't really expect a guy with such low intelligence that he cant' even start to grasp copywrite infringement even in the the least bit to be able to figure that out, did you?

Xstr8guy · 07-10-2003, 08:38 PM

I think I know why he is posting on GFY! See #9 on the list below:

Top Ten Sig Cash Referrers Today! Username Impressions
eiht98 2101
masochist 1549
reakwon 1293
profxx 1101
pimpex 1012
maxjohan 962
silvertab 850
ngndcom 820
sexeducation 600
savas72 578

malakajoe · 07-10-2003, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Xstr8guy
I think I know why he is posting on GFY! See #9 on the list below:

Top Ten Sig Cash Referrers Today! Username Impressions
eiht98 2101
masochist 1549
reakwon 1293
profxx 1101
pimpex 1012
maxjohan 962
silvertab 850
ngndcom 820
sexeducation 600
savas72 578

Lets hope Swoit doesn't pay him his $50 a month or whatever % he gets out of the $1000. I believe a few have notified them about what he is like.

venturi · 07-10-2003, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by l33t h4x0r

1st fuckface, teen is a legal niche everywhere but saudi arabia

2nd im not defending a pedophile im telling you idiots that you are handling this like children, you dont have 100% proof, dont accuse me of defending a pedophile you fucking worthless peicce of shit, ill rip your fucking head off

you have no proof, if this guy was a pedophile i dont think he would sit here and defend himself against the mob of fucking children (you)

i hate pedophiles, like almost every decent person, but you need rock solid proof before you destroy someones life, now he says the site was at a perants discretion for their kids to view, now even though i dont wholy agree with that, some peoples views in differant countrys arnt the same as ours. and im sure the parens wouldnt put their kids in harms way. that does not make him a pedophile you shitty litle fag

1) Don't even try and think that what this asshat (apologies to the deserving asshats I may have offended) has been providing even comes close to "teen".
2) Whoever your are, you either 1. never went to his site before this entire situation started, or 2. you are a mentally retarded assfuck that fingers 8yo girls. In either case you have no opinion of merit here. Go Fuck Yourself.
3) Actually there are many indications, while not publically known turths that he IS in FACT a pedophile and has been procecuted.
4) Try not interpretting the law(s) that you in fact do not understand fully. AVS sites, ALL OF THEM, forbid this kind of content. EVERY image, quote, etc. is copyrighted as soon as it is made by the originator. Shut the Fuck up! (oops, sorry - wrong board...)
5) Never, ever, ever, call anyone a FAG. If they are straight they will kick your ass. If they are a homosexual man, they will kick your ass then dress your bloody corpse in a nice pink gown and hang you from the nearest flagpole with a sign that says "I'm a FAG".

Webby · 07-10-2003, 09:07 PM

sexeducation:

What "magazine" do you claim to publish??? You don't have any "magazine". You operate an illegal ... (careful with words here because what you have/had, can hardly be called a "website").. website on the basis of:

(a) IMAGES CONTAINING SEXUAL ACTS WITH CHILDREN including sex acts with men and young boys ad nausea. There is NO debate on this - it is clearly "child porn".

(b) FURTHER ILLEGAL IMAGES FOR WHICH YOU HAVE NO PERMISSION TO PUBLISH. ie Time Magazine cover. There are NO discretionary rights to do as you see fit - these are illegal images, pure and simple, as defined by international copyright agreements.

If you doubt any of this.. I will give you a password to a domain where you can see ALL content you "published", - images and html pages, which constituted your supposed "magazine". If you don't understand this, I better explain fully... your "website" has been recorded by me and also by, I understand, more than one law enforcement agency now and is available for review.

So meantime.. fuck off and try to avoid molesting any more children and save up for some legal activity....

venturi · 07-10-2003, 09:22 PM

I quit reading all the replies to this thread because it all entails nothing but everyone on the mentally clued planet telling SE just how fucked he is and him replying with "fluff and fodder". I merely hope that one day soon this asshat, fucktard, wannabe, dillweed, child molesting, piece of trash, BARBARA STREISAND! (whew) gets his ass handed right back to him.

07-09-2003, 09:54 PM	#551
drops Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: So. Cal. Posts: 1,116	on top again.. hehe since this guy is scum.. check out our new site that will be announced tomorrow.. http://assgate.com __________________ <img src=http://porndollar.com/webmasters/banners/porndollar/120x60_25_pd.gif border=0><br>$84 Per Signup \| $25 Per Free Signup \| $20 Per Cross Sales \| Credits On Exits \| Paid Weekly <br>Contact Info. http://porndollar.com/support.html

07-10-2003, 08:44 AM	#570
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	"Dad"-- You still seem to be missing a basic point. For your use of unlicensed images and text to be legal, they need to be used in line with fair use laws for the press. This often means you need to be a registered press agency. It also means that you can only use them when you give appropriate credit, and when you are reviewing the image/etc. You have many images that are placed on the tour of your site with no commentary, news, or sourcing. That is copyright infringement. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

07-10-2003, 08:25 PM	#588
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	Someone smart just posted this elsewhere.. I suggest you use it to your advantage (not that that forgives your OTHER crimes, but you're seeing some clarity to let's work with this) http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

07-10-2003, 09:22 PM	#600
venturi Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: An Oasis atop a High Desert Mesa Posts: 386	I quit reading all the replies to this thread because it all entails nothing but everyone on the mentally clued planet telling SE just how fucked he is and him replying with "fluff and fodder". I merely hope that one day soon this asshat, fucktard, wannabe, dillweed, child molesting, piece of trash, BARBARA STREISAND! (whew) gets his ass handed right back to him. __________________ I'm not a porn monger. I'm a porn ... STYLIST! Buildit Cheap, build it Fast, Build it Right. - Pick Two.

07-10-2003, 06:40 AM	#558
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	Just stepping aside for a moment... GFY threads will never be seen by well behaved SE bots. http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/robots.txt <font face="Courier">User-agent: * Disallow: / </font>

07-10-2003, 06:50 AM	#559
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Well ... My primary domain SexEducation.com is still not working. Although most of my other domains are and I could re-open the website under one of those other domains - in seconds. I am waiting to find out what the SPECIFIC problem is ... to have it solved and move on. My [email protected] email address is still not behaving correctly. That email address controls all my domains. Something was done - by someone - however I have still NOT been contacted in any manner about my website. Will keep you informed. John E. Beacock [email protected] [email protected] 1-403-619-2739 PPS: Usually - at my location - DNS updates happen around 9:00 AM my time. [fingers crossed] ... Hopefully - everything just fixes itself and I can move on - but I promise some of the issues discussed here - will be addressed in the most expeditious manner. Which with my schedule is like - 90 days. Sorry - I can not fix the issues addressed faster then that. I have job too ... one that is quite relaxing actually ... and is just as fun as SexEducation.com. It's all good ... bring it on ...bring it on ...life that is. Pretty kewl stuff ... : )

07-10-2003, 08:43 AM	#567
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Gotta go to work. Have a great day everyone. Cya - tonight or tomorrow. John E. Beacock [email protected] 1-403-619-2739 POOF

07-10-2003, 09:30 AM	#574
swedguy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 7,981	Is this guy for real?

07-10-2003, 07:51 PM	#577
afrocreep Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: ON, Canada Posts: 1,074	http://web.archive.org/web/200206011...education.com/

07-10-2003, 08:20 PM	#585
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	This is where we have a fundamental difference of opinion. If the graphic is unknown, and it is potentially "harmful" to t he person - or the subjects - and I ensure that their identities are protected ... I feel in this case - for this graphic - as a magazine I do not have to reveal my sources ... because it could be harmful to those involved. And the law LADYMISCHIEF sent me to - states the author may request anonymity and be expected to have it.

07-10-2003, 08:27 PM	#591
sexeducation So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Calgary - Alberta - Canada Posts: 7,315	Good link ... cya - tomorrow. I'm exhausted.

07-10-2003, 08:38 PM	#596
Xstr8guy Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 29	I think I know why he is posting on GFY! See #9 on the list below: Top Ten Sig Cash Referrers Today! Username Impressions eiht98 2101 masochist 1549 reakwon 1293 profxx 1101 pimpex 1012 maxjohan 962 silvertab 850 ngndcom 820 sexeducation 600 savas72 578

07-10-2003, 09:07 PM	#599
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	sexeducation: What "magazine" do you claim to publish??? You don't have any "magazine". You operate an illegal ... (careful with words here because what you have/had, can hardly be called a "website").. website on the basis of: (a) IMAGES CONTAINING SEXUAL ACTS WITH CHILDREN including sex acts with men and young boys ad nausea. There is NO debate on this - it is clearly "child porn". (b) FURTHER ILLEGAL IMAGES FOR WHICH YOU HAVE NO PERMISSION TO PUBLISH. ie Time Magazine cover. There are NO discretionary rights to do as you see fit - these are illegal images, pure and simple, as defined by international copyright agreements. If you doubt any of this.. I will give you a password to a domain where you can see ALL content you "published", - images and html pages, which constituted your supposed "magazine". If you don't understand this, I better explain fully... your "website" has been recorded by me and also by, I understand, more than one law enforcement agency now and is available for review. So meantime.. fuck off and try to avoid molesting any more children and save up for some legal activity....