Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2008, 09:45 AM   #51
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Here's another thought. Pornonada claims he does not know what is our content as he "lost" it during the transfer. Not all it seems as some is in the affiliates area unlicensed.
You turn it round, forth and back until it fits somehow, right? I could copy and paste about 20 times i posted/messaged it that the whole memberrs areas have been lost and not be absolutly honest i even wasn't aware that there excist FHGs with your comment which is again my vault because i never thought i would have such trouble when buying a whole affilate program. But next time i will for sure ensure the following things:
- that there is no Paul Markham content anywhere
- that i get a full list with when what which content was used

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So is this content in the affiliates area, I have downloaded a lot of what I found, and not in the site? Which screws the affiliates and leads to charge backs.
So, you write all the time you found a lot but never post the URL's, so why don't you share with us what means a lot? I'am more than curious to see which are the "Lots" of FHGs made with your content? So far you only claim whatever not. While you are mostly right and i don't realy doubt it, it would be nice to point us to exact the things that you think and can proof are yours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Also how many other producers content is in the affiliates area without a license. Just ours or lots?
After it seems you have a lot of spare time why don't you just check? The fact that NONE of the other content providers used had any problems to help restoring the content that was bought from them let me believe that everything is ok with them or we wouldn't have got the content again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Just ours would mean it would be easy to identify and remove, lots of others leads to the question "How much of it is licensed for affiliates distribution?"
Not sure if it's common, but for sure i won't buy again everything that has a paul markham pic, gallery or even link on it. I realy bought a lot of sites, only 1 affilate program so far, but for sure i won't go again through that shit-throwing another time and avoid your time, content, links and everything related to you like a hot potatao for sure.
I wonder how many other affilate programs are there with his content. Everybody reading that all should think about if there are not easier and cheaper solutions for content .....
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:45 AM   #52
LiveDose
Show Yer Tits!
 
LiveDose's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere Out there...
Posts: 25,792
Funny ass thread...
__________________

Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal
LiveDose is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 09:57 AM   #53
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
I tried to reach a price with them for the transfer and the re supply. If we can't reach a price agreement he takes the content down, not keep using it. But anyone thinking that's what he was always going to do?
You blackmailed us exactly 3 times. 2 times you requested to have your program removed from the public shitlist and 1 time today you said that if i don't pay 3 or 5 times the full price you will post it all over the boards. 1 Time you requested the exact full price for the whole sets, means 2.200 US$ which i refused indeed. As i explained already in one of the other previous posts, all your so called re-supply offers have been knowling made a way you knew we could not agree. Furthermore you refused over weeks now to tell us what exactly is your content so it can be removed easyly and fast.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
However it's all negated by the fact they are breaking the license terms anyway. He knew he did not have the license, he kept using it, he knew it was not licensed for affiliate use, he kept using it.
I didn't even now that there are FHGs with your content, was the very least thing i had awaited, but ok, bad luck and my mistake, no doubt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
He keeps saying he has sold the program on again, but refuses to give me the name of the new owners. So he sold content he does not own a license for and using against the terms of that license. Are you this lenient?
Yes, i refused to tell you the new owner as the program itself isn't transfered completly yet neither i wanted that the new owners are confronted personally with that shit throwing they have no vault in. Meanwhile you know them anway ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Usually I will transfer a license with no fuss, it's my job to transfer it not for the original buyer to sell it. In this case I was ignored by the original buyer and Pornonada who just used it. But I'm the bad guy.

For sticking to the terms of my license. Anyone thought I just don't want someone who clearly ignores licenses to have the license?
You have your tems and due your terms i admit there is a license problem that has to be solved, best with removing your content which will happen asap. IF you had us directed the last weeks as asked to the exact content it had for sure been managed already.
However, i'am not happy with your terms and i think it's not fair that you want to charge someone exactly 3 times for the same content on the very same domain on the very same affilate program. It might be your right due your terms, but i realy hope that people buying content are now aware of the way you handle such issues ...

So yes, i'am NOT willing to pay 2 times for the owner transfer to the new owner and i'am not willing to pay 5 times the full price for the use in the affilates area which i wasn't aware, that's why your content will get simply removed as soon as i know what exactly is yours....
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 10:01 AM   #54
Brujah
Beer Money Baron
 
Brujah's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brujah / gmail
Posts: 22,157
Paul has stated many times in many threads here on GFY, that he gives his content away to almost anyone that wants it. Just look around, you might be able to legitimately use all of it, plus much more. FREE!
__________________
Brujah is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 10:03 AM   #55
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebestamateur View Post
Only in PM little own world will that make sence. Why in hell buy content for a site/domain if you down the road cant sell the whole site. It`s not like selling the content itself, just a part of a site package. but no no lol
Has to be the most stupid biz move ever

He should write on his site: If you are having any plans what so ever to make your site a success and maybe sell it later you should NOT buy content from me.
yes, that was the thread about he got that upset, lol, if we had agreed to his dictated offers we had paid so far 3 times for the same content + 5 times the price for the use on the affilates area, means about if my calculations is right 33.000 US$ for some fucking sets, lol.

All i want is to remove his content asap and to get the Chapter: "Paul Markham" closed.
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 10:10 AM   #56
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebestamateur View Post
Only in PM little own world will that make sence. Why in hell buy content for a site/domain if you down the road cant sell the whole site. It`s not like selling the content itself, just a part of a site package. but no no lol
Has to be the most stupid biz move ever

He should write on his site: If you are having any plans what so ever to make your site a success and maybe sell it later you should NOT buy content from me.
Before giving Paul shit think about giving shit to whoever purchased a license agreement under those conditions. No one forced these terms on the initial buyer.

Everything is negotiable during the initial purchase transaction. Renegotiating after the fact is a totally different matter.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:25 AM   #57
PornDiscounts-R
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
Before giving Paul shit think about giving shit to whoever purchased a license agreement under those conditions. No one forced these terms on the initial buyer.

Everything is negotiable during the initial purchase transaction. Renegotiating after the fact is a totally different matter.
That is so true. Paul can make any license he wants too. I wont argue on that. And all that buys from him need to be damn sure they understand that license.

But with the stand paul has made lately, it is pretty hard not to give him a big fuck you when he comes and speaks about right and wrong when he openly supports theft himself.
I have some PM content myself and i gotta say it wasent till very recent i found out the license was to the person and NOT the domain it is used on. Even if you still need to list the domain name the content will be used on when you buy.

And i`m not alone on that understanding. I havent seen that in ANY other license ever. that the content is sold to a person and not the domain name and cant follow a sale of a site.
That is of course 100% my fault as i havent read the license close enoughf.

But that was not even the point of my post.
Yes, paul is in his good right in this case, just makes me sick with that form of double standard.
__________________
Email# rasmus(you*know)porndiscounts.com
PornDiscounts-R is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:39 AM   #58
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Paul's tube site stance is pathetic ..... no argument there.

When the website in question was sold was there no "due diligence" done? Content and traffic are the obvious assets being purchased. For the buyer to pay for content that wasn't transferrable is a bad investment. For the seller to sell something not his, over-stating assets, might be something to ask an attorney about.

To call Paul after a server crash and expect his cooperation is wishful thinking and foolish.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:54 AM   #59
Quickdraw
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: → → →
Posts: 1,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink View Post
Paul's tube site stance is pathetic ..... no argument there.

When the website in question was sold was there no "due diligence" done? Content and traffic are the obvious assets being purchased. For the buyer to pay for content that wasn't transferrable is a bad investment. For the seller to sell something not his, over-stating assets, might be something to ask an attorney about.

To call Paul after a server crash and expect his cooperation is wishful thinking and foolish.
Whatever the case with the buying and selling of the sites in question, is irrelevant at this stage in this matter.

Sure, Pornonada should/could have been more careful with his purchase, and he readily admits that. As they could not come to terms when trying to get the 'license' straightened out, Pornonada decided they should remove the content. At least this is the way I see that it went down.

Technically, Paul is right in this matter, but his handling of the situation was completely out of line. (Note that NONE of the other content providers for the sites in question had any problem restoring content, etc.)

Paul was unreasonable with his request to be removed from the shitlist. If all it takes is a little bit of trading/cash to get removed from a shitlist, then the shitlist means nothing.

Calling the guy a scammer and pirate was completely unfounded and a blatant lie, as the details have been discussed publicly for some time.

With as many prices and wants that Paul has requested concerning this it just shows that he is quite selective for who and how his 'license' is applied.
Quickdraw is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:59 AM   #60
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quickdraw View Post
Whatever the case with the buying and selling of the sites in question, is irrelevant at this stage in this matter.

Sure, Pornonada should/could have been more careful with his purchase, and he readily admits that. As they could not come to terms when trying to get the 'license' straightened out, Pornonada decided they should remove the content. At least this is the way I see that it went down.

Technically, Paul is right in this matter, but his handling of the situation was completely out of line. (Note that NONE of the other content providers for the sites in question had any problem restoring content, etc.)

Paul was unreasonable with his request to be removed from the shitlist. If all it takes is a little bit of trading/cash to get removed from a shitlist, then the shitlist means nothing.

Calling the guy a scammer and pirate was completely unfounded and a blatant lie, as the details have been discussed publicly for some time.

With as many prices and wants that Paul has requested concerning this it just shows that he is quite selective for who and how his 'license' is applied.

Can't argue with anything you posted.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 12:14 PM   #61
Iron Fist
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,400
And to think Pauls return would involve no drama... okay so i'm naive...
__________________
i like waffles
Iron Fist is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 01:21 PM   #62
»Rob Content«
Confirmed User
 
»Rob Content«'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by KlenTelaris View Post
I suggest buying content at vgcontent,i think he having some specials now
Hey thanks man
__________________

80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds
3 & 5mins FLVs | RSS & Tube Feeds | Matching Thumbs | FLV Browser & Exporter | No Prechecked Xsales
>> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557


ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom
»Rob Content« is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 02:15 PM   #63
papill0n
Unregistered Abuser
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theo The Theologian View Post
papill0n is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 06:08 PM   #64
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
It was Pornonada who first brought it to the public eye on Ask Damage. So not me.


The original buyer asked me if he could sell the content. I told him no for exactly the same reason you don't allow others to sell your program. Then after the original buyer sold it. Yes after being told he could not. Pornonada and/or DamageX later came onto me to tell me they had lost it in the transfer and they wanted to re download it. First I knew the original buyer had ignored my instructions. I tried to reach a price with them for the transfer and the re supply. If we can't reach a price agreement he takes the content down, not keep using it. But anyone thinking that's what he was always going to do?

However it's all negated by the fact they are breaking the license terms anyway. He knew he did not have the license, he kept using it, he knew it was not licensed for affiliate use, he kept using it.

He keeps saying he has sold the program on again, but refuses to give me the name of the new owners. So he sold content he does not own a license for and using against the terms of that license. Are you this lenient?

Usually I will transfer a license with no fuss, it's my job to transfer it not for the original buyer to sell it. In this case I was ignored by the original buyer and Pornonada who just used it. But I'm the bad guy.

For sticking to the terms of my license. Anyone thought I just don't want someone who clearly ignores licenses to have the license?
this may be a really stupid question but when i buy content i always buy as an agent for the corporation, that legal entity owns the content licience not me personally.

IF the corporation is sold then the licience would not have changed hands (corporation 186555 would still be the owner of the liciense)
the owner of the corporation would be the liciencee.

From the sounds of what you are saying, anyone stupid enough to buy from you can never sell their program, never take on partners (since that would change the owners of the corporation) never retire and never go public.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 07:55 PM   #65
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
this may be a really stupid question but when i buy content i always buy as an agent for the corporation, that legal entity owns the content licience not me personally.

IF the corporation is sold then the licience would not have changed hands (corporation 186555 would still be the owner of the liciense)
the owner of the corporation would be the liciencee.

From the sounds of what you are saying, anyone stupid enough to buy from you can never sell their program, never take on partners (since that would change the owners of the corporation) never retire and never go public.
Which pretty much makes...clueless (PM)...a rip off artist...as well as an extortionist...as well as associating his business with content thieves...now doesn't it?
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 08:52 PM   #66
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
Which pretty much makes...clueless (PM)...a rip off artist...as well as an extortionist...as well as associating his business with content thieves...now doesn't it?

look i for one don't fault him for working with the tube sites as long as they comply with DMCA request they are operating within the law

however smokincash is a corporation, it pays it affiliates from a corporate account. that corporation ownes the domains, and the entire program was bought lock stock and barrel

which means the liciencee did not change, it still the same corporation that bought the licience in the first place.

who owns the corporation which owns the licience should not matter, and based on the wording of the contract it does not.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2008, 11:25 PM   #67
bobby666
boots are my religion
 
bobby666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Heart of europe
Posts: 21,765
be careful, the content might be soon on redtube or any similar site !!!!
__________________
bobby666 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 12:09 AM   #68
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
this may be a really stupid question but when i buy content i always buy as an agent for the corporation, that legal entity owns the content licience not me personally.

IF the corporation is sold then the licience would not have changed hands (corporation 186555 would still be the owner of the liciense)
the owner of the corporation would be the liciencee.

From the sounds of what you are saying, anyone stupid enough to buy from you can never sell their program, never take on partners (since that would change the owners of the corporation) never retire and never go public.
You come to me and I ask you to send the new buyers to me so I can get them to sign the transferred license. It's that simple and I do it all the time. I might ask the new buyers of the company to make a purchase of content, often I don't bother.

Make sure when you buy a licenses it's clearly licensed to the company and not you. Make sure you obtain a copy of the license signed by the licensor and make sure you abide by all the terms in the license.

I've seen on Ask Damage some of the mis information being posted here. I will put it right.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 12:23 AM   #69
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
look i for one don't fault him for working with the tube sites as long as they comply with DMCA request they are operating within the law

however smokincash is a corporation, it pays it affiliates from a corporate account. that corporation ownes the domains, and the entire program was bought lock stock and barrel

which means the liciencee did not change, it still the same corporation that bought the licience in the first place.

who owns the corporation which owns the licience should not matter, and based on the wording of the contract it does not.
The original license was never sold to a company, it's to an individual who does not have the license or never showed it to to Pornonada. That license allows the licensee to use it on his domains.

It is not to a corporation, it's not to domains and it clearly states it's not transferable by the licensee. Where did you get that it was sold to a corporation?

So he bought the content he can't buy, as the original buyer does not have "content" to sell, he then uses the content, he still uses the content after he knows it's not licensed to him, he breaks the original terms of the license, he never paid for the extra use of the license.

He then starts a thread to damage my business. He should of called it.

"Don't buy a license from Paul Markham because the old fool will expect you to stick to it."

I know I rub people up the wrong way. I am me take it or leave it. But please don't make posts accusing me of doing something wrong when you clearly do not know the facts. Just to emphasise the facts.

1. The original license is to a person not a company.
2. It's not to be sold or transferred by that person.
3. It was for members are use only, it's being given to affiliates.
4. Pornonada has never seen the license.
5. Pornonada has not obtained a transfer of the license to him.
6. Pornonada continued to use the content.
7. Pornonada claims he sold the company and the content again.

The license has been broken time and time again, yet I'm meant to suck it up and ignore it. And take the flaming for getting pissed off.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 12:36 AM   #70
Sebastian Sands
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ICQ: 211-417-740
Posts: 5,223
he didn't steal the content, so you're already wrong there. He bought a cash program and for some reason there was a misunderstanding if the license was transferable with the domain. Seems it is not, now go work it out.

Seems like you just try to make a few extra bucks real quick. why do you care if a guy named Joe owns the site or a guy named john? Explain that to me.
Sebastian Sands is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:12 AM   #71
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian Sands View Post
he didn't steal the content, so you're already wrong there. He bought a cash program and for some reason there was a misunderstanding if the license was transferable with the domain. Seems it is not, now go work it out.

Seems like you just try to make a few extra bucks real quick. why do you care if a guy named Joe owns the site or a guy named john? Explain that to me.
OK there was misunderstanding. He bought a program and was sold content that the seller did not own to sell. OK accepted at this point.

I told the seller, called Marcel, before the sale he is not allowed to sell the license. Told him on ICQ to send the new buyer to me and not too include the license in the sale. Maybe Marcel is the biggest culprit here.

When Pornonada lost the content, he did not lose it all as he has it in his affiliates are and tour, he asked me to give it to him again and rewrite the license. This was the first I heard of it. I tried to make some extra money. Shoot me down in flames.

All the time Pornonada was using it in his affiliates area which is clearly against the terms of the license and without paying for the extra use. So he was also trying to make some extra money, shoot him down in flames.

If the content is in the affiliates area it's in there in clear breech of our license. That is something I would like to be paid for, do you think that's fair?

However we only have Pornonada word he bought the license to the content and the seller lost it during the transfer, the seller lost it off his computers and the servers? Might of happened.

Maybe the seller is not the guilty party, maybe he did not sell the license on the content and never transfered it to Pornonada, except for the bits he was using in the affiliates area.

Maybe Pornonada can show us he bought the license for the content.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:26 AM   #72
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian Sands View Post
Seems like you just try to make a few extra bucks real quick. why do you care if a guy named Joe owns the site or a guy named john? Explain that to me.
Did not answer this and it a very good question that covers all content providers and their clients..

Because we sell to other people and the idea of a non exclusive license is to make it profitable for us to sell it and profitable for the buyers to buy it. We need to protect our interests and the interests of other buyers.

When Marcel bought the content there never was the provision to use it in the affiliates area that was brought in to make it fair to others as we were using www.paulmarkham.com content to promote www.paulmarkhamteens.com

We did not want every program to be giving the same scenes to all their affiliates, and trust me some would if they could, so we upped the price in the full knowledge that few would pay it.

Why did we do this?

So that sponsors and affiliates are not sold or given saturated content form www.paulmarkham.com

You can't saturate content in a major niche like teens, in a members area without the content provider making a lot of money.

So to just restate. Why do we care who owns the license?

Because we want to know he will stick to it so we protect ourselves and our other clients.

Is that so bad?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:29 AM   #73
»Rob Content«
Confirmed User
 
»Rob Content«'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,348
Why did you ask him for 11k?

I'm kind of missing something here
__________________

80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds
3 & 5mins FLVs | RSS & Tube Feeds | Matching Thumbs | FLV Browser & Exporter | No Prechecked Xsales
>> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557


ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom
»Rob Content« is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:29 AM   #74
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Maybe Pornonada can show us he bought the license for the content.
Now we go over and over again the very same like on the other board.
You NEVER released and signed a license.
Why don't you just show your part of the license that was signed by Marcel??? You can't show the license the same way because you NEVER released one and you know very well that none excists which again doesn't make things any better because nobody realy knows to whom it was licensed, was it smokingcash, was it Marcel, was it Andre the other previous owner or whom? I guess you got paid from the smokincash business account, but that doesn't realy matter as there NEVER was a released license to whomever.
So while you right now claim that it was sold to a personal person and not to smokincash i could right now ask you reverse, show me the license that was signed my the previous owner (marcel) and that it's licensed ONLY to him.
I admit that i can not proof it but now can you proof it, let's say with sreenshot to whom exactly you licensed it??
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:32 AM   #75
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by VG.Content View Post
Why did you ask him for 11k?

I'm kind of missing something here
because some of the content seems to be used on FHGs, the content smokincash has was bought for 2200 US$ than in the past, now he asked 5 times the price for re-licensing it for FHG usage, means 11.000 US$.

He also wants that this got paid by me and the new owners because once i bought the program some months ago and now i'am in the process of selling and transfering it again, means another charge due the calculation he presented me once while dealing.
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:37 AM   #76
»Rob Content«
Confirmed User
 
»Rob Content«'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornonada View Post
Now we go over and over again the very same like on the other board.
You NEVER released and signed a license.
Why don't you just show your part of the license that was signed by Marcel??? You can't show the license the same way because you NEVER released one and you know very well that none excists which again doesn't make things any better because nobody realy knows to whom it was licensed, was it smokingcash, was it Marcel, was it Andre the other previous owner or whom? I guess you got paid from the smokincash business account, but that doesn't realy matter as there NEVER was a released license to whomever.
So while you right now claim that it was sold to a personal person and not to smokincash i could right now ask you reverse, show me the license that was signed my the previous owner (marcel) and that it's licensed ONLY to him.
I admit that i can not proof it but now can you proof it, let's say with sreenshot to whom exactly you licensed it??
Honestly man, I don't want to get in the middle of your battle. But, there does seem to be a lot of question marks here. And there is not solid proof that you "STOLE" anything.

If I was in your position I would stop posting and consult a lawyer as to the best way to handle this process. Paul will need to produce a signed copy of the license from the person you purchased it from, and he would need to prove that you openly stole from him, that the license was indeed made out to the owners name and not the business in itself.

Some things will never find a resolve on the boards.
__________________

80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds
3 & 5mins FLVs | RSS & Tube Feeds | Matching Thumbs | FLV Browser & Exporter | No Prechecked Xsales
>> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557


ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom
»Rob Content« is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:43 AM   #77
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quickdraw View Post
Whatever the case with the buying and selling of the sites in question, is irrelevant at this stage in this matter.

Sure, Pornonada should/could have been more careful with his purchase, and he readily admits that. As they could not come to terms when trying to get the 'license' straightened out, Pornonada decided they should remove the content. At least this is the way I see that it went down.

Technically, Paul is right in this matter, but his handling of the situation was completely out of line. (Note that NONE of the other content providers for the sites in question had any problem restoring content, etc.)

Paul was unreasonable with his request to be removed from the shitlist. If all it takes is a little bit of trading/cash to get removed from a shitlist, then the shitlist means nothing.

Calling the guy a scammer and pirate was completely unfounded and a blatant lie, as the details have been discussed publicly for some time.

With as many prices and wants that Paul has requested concerning this it just shows that he is quite selective for who and how his 'license' is applied.
Sorry this is not right. When Pornonada originally declined all my offers to resupply and re license the content he carried on using it. It's only now after he continues to flame me that I have taken it to the next level, that he decides to remove it. It's still there and for all I know still inside the site.

We always resupply content to a client who has lost it. Pornonada is not a client of ours. He's a client of Marcel who he says sold him the content.

True I tried many prices and even as little as a fee banner on Ask Damage when DamageX came in and asked me. He said he could not do it. Seems I was to do everything for free, because of sales to Marcel.

All the time Pornonada had the content in the affiliates area, it was never licensed for that. What ever the arguments about selling a license with a domain or company the license never covered affiliate use.

If the shit list is to mean something it should include a site giving unlicensed content to affiliates. A site associated with DamageX!!!
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:46 AM   #78
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
look i for one don't fault him for working with the tube sites as long as they comply with DMCA request they are operating within the law

however smokincash is a corporation, it pays it affiliates from a corporate account. that corporation ownes the domains, and the entire program was bought lock stock and barrel

which means the liciencee did not change, it still the same corporation that bought the licience in the first place.

who owns the corporation which owns the licience should not matter, and based on the wording of the contract it does not.
You are fucking clueless.
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 01:58 AM   #79
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by VG.Content View Post
Honestly man, I don't want to get in the middle of your battle. But, there does seem to be a lot of question marks here. And there is not solid proof that you "STOLE" anything.

If I was in your position I would stop posting and consult a lawyer as to the best way to handle this process. Paul will need to produce a signed copy of the license from the person you purchased it from, and he would need to prove that you openly stole from him, that the license was indeed made out to the owners name and not the business in itself.

Some things will never find a resolve on the boards.
We work on the removal as there seems to be no chance to get this solved, so i have no other choice than posting, as i'am not a scammer and not a pirate.
I don't see any need for a lawyer, all i want is to fucking remove his content asap, as we get zero help from him pointing us which is his content and where it's used we will hire mostly removeyourcontent.com to fix that asap.

If Paul wants to make finally a reasonable offer, fine, it's all in our interest, but not with blackmailing.
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:03 AM   #80
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
If the shit list is to mean something it should include a site giving unlicensed content to affiliates. A site associated with DamageX!!!
I knew you couldn't resist to finally admit what your real intention is. It's to hurt DamageX because he put your affilate program in the shitlist and me because i'am a mod on this board, ironicly without even a post or comment about the shitlist entry you got than back.

It was clear before, because most of your so called offers contained the need of the "shitlist removal" of your affilate program ....
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:04 AM   #81
Davy
Confirmed User
 
Davy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So if you're and affiliate of www.smokincash.com be warned they may not own the content they are giving to you. Our content is all over their affiliates area.
Thank you for the info, Paul.
__________________
---
ICQ 14-76-98 <-- I don't use this at all
Davy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:07 AM   #82
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornonada View Post
Now we go over and over again the very same like on the other board.
You NEVER released and signed a license.
Why don't you just show your part of the license that was signed by Marcel??? You can't show the license the same way because you NEVER released one and you know very well that none excists which again doesn't make things any better because nobody realy knows to whom it was licensed, was it smokingcash, was it Marcel, was it Andre the other previous owner or whom? I guess you got paid from the smokincash business account, but that doesn't realy matter as there NEVER was a released license to whomever.
So while you right now claim that it was sold to a personal person and not to smokincash i could right now ask you reverse, show me the license that was signed my the previous owner (marcel) and that it's licensed ONLY to him.
I admit that i can not proof it but now can you proof it, let's say with sreenshot to whom exactly you licensed it??
Is that what Marcel told you?

If so he was lying to you. The license is included in the buying process for the buyer to download, keep and print on all sales. It's also in the clients shopping basket area for all time.

Marcel never signed is and sent it to us, if he had he would of got it back signed by one of my staff. It would clearly state the content, price and what the content was licensed for.

Andre never made a purchase on the site according to our data base, are you saying he was an owner of smokincash and sold it to Marcel?

I have the license in the database and can see it. Want to see the proof?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:13 AM   #83
ServerGenius
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 9,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Is that what Marcel told you?

If so he was lying to you. The license is included in the buying process for the buyer to download, keep and print on all sales. It's also in the clients shopping basket area for all time.

Marcel never signed is and sent it to us, if he had he would of got it back signed by one of my staff. It would clearly state the content, price and what the content was licensed for.

Andre never made a purchase on the site according to our data base, are you saying he was an owner of smokincash and sold it to Marcel?

I have the license in the database and can see it. Want to see the proof?
Why don't you just come with an proposal for him to get the whole case
solved or tell him which content is yours that needs to be removed instead
of going back and forth over misunderstandings.
__________________
| http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |
ServerGenius is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:18 AM   #84
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
I have the license in the database and can see it. Want to see the proof?
Yes, i asked about 25 times to see the license but you refused so far all the time, so yes, i'am still interested to see it of course....
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:20 AM   #85
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by ServerGenius View Post
Why don't you just come with an proposal for him to get the whole case
solved or tell him which content is yours that needs to be removed instead
of going back and forth over misunderstandings.
because his intention isn't to solve the problem and issue but revenge for the "shitlist entry" of his affilate program on another forum where i'am a mod.
If he had made a fair prosposal we would have solved already, also the reason why he refuses to tell us exactly what and where his content is, we would have removed it by now x times but he didn't tell us upon all our requests. It's obvious he is not interested in solving the issue the one or other way, at least not so far...
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:21 AM   #86
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
The licenses as on our database. The licenses Marcel could of printed out and kept and got me to sign. The licenses he could of got to sign.

Clearly states the content license is not for affiliate distribution and reselling content to other webmasters.









The domains allowed by Marcel to display the content on.





Want to claim it's a photochop? Other customers will tell you these exist. I will allow a trusted third party to login and see the licenses on the database.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:29 AM   #87
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
The licenses as on our database. The licenses Marcel could of printed out and kept and got me to sign. The licenses he could of got to sign.

Clearly states the content license is not for affiliate distribution and reselling content to other webmasters.
Want to claim it's a photochop? Other customers will tell you these exist. I will allow a trusted third party to login and see the licenses on the database.
No need for a 3rd party, i'am fine with that, i was just curious as i never saw it indeed. Is this the only excisting license or are there more?
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:32 AM   #88
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by ServerGenius View Post
Why don't you just come with an proposal for him to get the whole case solved or tell him which content is yours that needs to be removed instead of going back and forth over misunderstandings.
Because that's where it started. I made countless offers to resolve it, all refused by him.

He knows this URL has our content, I told him yesterday on Ask Damage. http://www.smokinaccess.com/ Do you still see our content on that page?

OK here's an offer again.

Take down the content you don't own NOW. Or pay for it. Including the affiliates use license. Pornonada can make a public offer here and now.

Pornonada has had countless offers from me, from $2,000 down to a free banner on AD. All refused. Content still used. And probably still inside the site. We only have his word it's not and it's on the tour, on the affiliates side and given out on http://www.smokinaccess.com/

So all this content is NOT in the members area?

Maybe Pornonada would like to give me a login to the members area. He kicked me out of the affiliates area when he knew I had caught him out. Maybe someone else would like to look.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:36 AM   #89
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornonada View Post
No need for a 3rd party, i'am fine with that, i was just curious as i never saw it indeed. Is this the only excisting license or are there more?
He made 5 purchases under the name of Marcel, all with it's own license. He could of grabbed a license at anytime and shown it to you. Any client will tell you they are all on the site to see. So is the invoice and the ability to add domains to the license.

There might be others purchases he made under different names. Andre never bought.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:00 AM   #90
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Because that's where it started. I made countless offers to resolve it, all refused by him.
Most have been bound with things we can't give or do

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Take down the content you don't own NOW.
Very funny, hard task if someone is NOT aware what exactly is your content and where exactly it's all displayed, means which FHGs, which pic exactly on a tour or design.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Or pay for it. Including the affiliates use license. Pornonada can make a public offer here and now.
You sell the licenses, you make the price. All i can say is that we will not pay 5 times the price or US$ 11.000 for the affilate usage but prefer to remove it of course and replace this content from producers and brokers that cover such usage as well for a fair price.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Pornonada has had countless offers from me, from $2,000 down to a free banner on AD. All refused.
As said again 100 times, your countless offers have been bound to things we can't do. We can't give you a free banner because your program is shitlisted. Your next offer was to remove you from the shitlist + US$ 200, while there is no problem with US$ 200, i can't remove you from the shitlist to make such deal. The other offer for US$ 2.200 for buying the content at exactly the same price again wasn't realy an offer or proposal because for that price we would have bought the content again, lol. Now your last blackmail offer yesterday was the full price x 5 for the affilate usage which we refused of course but prefer to remove the content if that's your last word

[QUOTE=Paul Markham;13824250]
Content still used. And probably still inside the site. We only have his word it's not and it's on the tour, on the affiliates side and given out on http://www.smokinaccess.com/

Yes, it's still there on the tour i guess and yes, it's on the affilates area which i got aware yesterday, but i take the full vault for that as well as i don't await that anybody believes me that i wasn't aware that some content was/is used on some FHGs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So all this content is NOT in the members area?
ALL the members area have been lost completly due the bad server move.
They are being restored step by step by the new owners with the content we got back from the other content providers. And yes, i realy hope there is NO content from you there

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Maybe Pornonada would like to give me a login to the members area. He kicked me out of the affiliates area when he knew I had caught him out. Maybe someone else would like to look.
That's another blantant lie, i NEVER kicked you out, i'am even not aware you joined. I never had to hide anything. It's a public issue for some weeks now and i don't think someone is able to hide FHGs that have been up for months before i bought the program. The whole fact alone that not one single piece has of content has been removed so far should tell you that i don't hide anything.
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:04 AM   #91
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
He made 5 purchases under the name of Marcel, all with it's own license. He could of grabbed a license at anytime and shown it to you. Any client will tell you they are all on the site to see. So is the invoice and the ability to add domains to the license.

There might be others purchases he made under different names. Andre never bought.
Send me these 5 licenses please, they aren't anyway valid for me but would help to find your content much faster after we know what to search and look for exactly. You have sent you my email yesterday about 5 times so you have it i guess.

Or make a final public offer to get this resolved, because we are already in contact with removeyourcontent.com and i want hesitate to pay him to remove your content from allover smokincash to have this unlucky chapter finally closed. It's all up to you as i admit ALL my mistakes and it's more than obvious that i try to solve the situation one or the other way....
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:09 AM   #92
L-Pink
working on my tan
 
L-Pink's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida/Kentucky
Posts: 39,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornonada View Post
It's all up to you as i admit ALL my mistakes and it's more than obvious that i try to solve the situation one or the other way....
Good man .....
L-Pink is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:21 AM   #93
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Some clarification for readers who don't know what "the shitlist" is: it is a forum on another board where shady sponsors are listed.

Pornonada is a moderator on that board, not an owner, so I'm not sure why or how Paul thought he could action the removal of the thread shitlisting him. Ditto with banner ads on that forum.
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:28 AM   #94
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornonada View Post
Send me these 5 licenses please, they aren't anyway valid for me but would help to find your content much faster after we know what to search and look for exactly. You have sent you my email yesterday about 5 times so you have it i guess.

Or make a final public offer to get this resolved, because we are already in contact with removeyourcontent.com and i want hesitate to pay him to remove your content from allover smokincash to have this unlucky chapter finally closed. It's all up to you as i admit ALL my mistakes and it's more than obvious that i try to solve the situation one or the other way....
To transfer the 5 licenses to you for the PAYSITE use only $250.

We will supply you with a new FTP for the content and new licenses.

Content use in the affiliates area is, 3 times the original purchase price to give it to affiliates and 5 times the original price to put it in FHGs and give it to affiliates. Less the original purchase price paid by Marcel. So 2 and 4 times.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:28 AM   #95
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowan View Post
Some clarification for readers who don't know what "the shitlist" is: it is a forum on another board where shady sponsors are listed.

Pornonada is a moderator on that board, not an owner, so I'm not sure why or how Paul thought he could action the removal of the thread shitlisting him. Ditto with banner ads on that forum.
Because when i bought the program we have been 3 people that wanted to run the program together, me financing it and the other 2 managing different tasks. Than back askdamagex was one of them but right after the buying of the program the idea was no longer an option for reasons i don't want to comment here. However, i was left alone and that's one of the reasons i sold the program again as it was obvious to me immediatly i can't run it alone...
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:32 AM   #96
Ryan St. Germain
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,269
Wait, am I following this right: he
a. Never saw the license
BUT
b. clearly violated the license

How would he know he violated the license if he has never seen it?
Ryan St. Germain is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 03:46 AM   #97
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkCircus View Post
Wait, am I following this right: he
a. Never saw the license
BUT
b. clearly violated the license

How would he know he violated the license if he has never seen it?
I never said he knew he was doing it.

He said he had looked at the licenses on our site and said he thought they were made out to a domain. He must of seen we do not license for affiliate use. Does that clear up that one?

Pornonada if you are selling the site I think you had best take all our content down. Don't want this all over again.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 04:04 AM   #98
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowan View Post
Some clarification for readers who don't know what "the shitlist" is: it is a forum on another board where shady sponsors are listed.

Pornonada is a moderator on that board, not an owner, so I'm not sure why or how Paul thought he could action the removal of the thread shitlisting him. Ditto with banner ads on that forum.
Because I was talking to DamageX who I believe has the power. I asked for a free ad, he said that would mean him taking me off the shit list so I said that as well.

I was put on the shit list when I refused to give affiliates un watermarked content. Seems DamageX thinks we should and to disagree with him is good enough to get you shit listed.

Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 04:07 AM   #99
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
To transfer the 5 licenses to you for the PAYSITE use only $250.

We will supply you with a new FTP for the content and new licenses.

Content use in the affiliates area is, 3 times the original purchase price to give it to affiliates and 5 times the original price to put it in FHGs and give it to affiliates. Less the original purchase price paid by Marcel. So 2 and 4 times.
So it would be, $250 + 4 x $2.200 = $9.050

reading your next post it seems you would like to have that whole thing taxed another time when the program is finally transfered to the new owners. But anyway, that offer isn't of any interest for me neither i want to deal in some days again with the transfer to the new owner again so i will stick with the removal.
Send me please the 5 issued licenses so we can lookup your content and forward them to removeyourcontent so he can go through everything way faster and more easy or send them just directly to him if you feel more comfortable that way, there is actually no need for me. So in some time your content will be removed from all smokincash sites, fhgs and tours, i hope you are satisfied now.

Now the final question, as the content would get lost that way i at very least would prefer that the previous owner and original buyer of the content could use the content than. How much will it cost to add an additionally doman to the license agreement? From what i see the license is for 10 domains, but only used on 3 domains, so is there a fee to have the 3 removed and add other domains to the previous owner so at very least he can use the content?! Just a thought so the money paid once isn't lost totally.
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 04:09 AM   #100
pornonada
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
I was put on the shit list when I refused to give affiliates un watermarked content. Seems DamageX thinks we should and to disagree with him is good enough to get you shit listed.
I didn't make any comments on the thread you are talking about which lead to a shitlist entry, but if i remember right it was more of the sort that you admited to give shit about your affilates, but i could be wrong.

As i said, i didn't comment anything in the thread you mention, so i will have to look it up when i have some spare time...
__________________
Biggest NOskim Network open for Trades/Linkexchanges
500+ Text, TGP, MGP and Link Sites for Trade!
All Linkexchanges are autoapproved!
Linkexchanges here - Traffic Trades Soon!
pornonada is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.