Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

I did steal your content

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Without provocation you bring up you stealing my content at least 3 times a week since you got out of the loony bin, multiple times today, for no reason, it's like you're bragging. Shady

Is the banned member asking for proof or ban?

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

OK - Yes, you accused me - Proof or ban - It feels like being back at school but this is gfy...

Theo is around - Shall we do this now?....

Originally Posted by Bladewire

You have been banned twice and are posting on your third fake nic!

If you didn't violate your ban you wouldn't be here wasting my time, or Theo's time

Tip: you should adjust your meds

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

You attacked me not the other way - I'm not going to bother Theo - You have multiple fake nics and I am too old to get into crap with some troll like you...

My meds are fine - Thanks for your concern.....

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10

Originally Posted by Bladewire

You we're viciously attacked & you're only trying to defend your good name and spotless reputation of your 2 banned nics & current fake nic. Suck it

Originally Posted by vano

That's the problem, they never gave me any info. I didn't even know which gallery URL was infringing. I asked for a copy of the DMCA report many times but never received one.


Yes, i did get owned. By fucking thieves.

I hope other people don't make same mistake. Because by their logic (and terms) even using a MrSkin banner to promote their site is grounds for account termination for "trademark infringement". (when it suits them)

And if by site you mean the gallery, i guess it does suck, it been made 10 years ago or so.

Originally Posted by vano

More lies from Mrshitskin scumbags.

You told me it was a DMCA report. Here's a screenshot. (and after numerous requests you never showed me a copy of it.





I didn't insinuate anything. Any webmaster promoting celebrity niche is using celebrity photos from various sources from the internet. Everyone knows this. You didn't have problems with it for years while i was sending traffic your way. And you don't have problems with obviously dubious content on high traffic websites and tubes when you spam them to promote you. I already posted a photo of you soliciting it.



So you are "borrowing" someone else's work/content to promote your website. How is it any different from what i did? Double standard hypocrites.


Of course i was using your "trademarks" to promote YOUR program EXCLUSIVELY. That's the whole point, to make a gallery look similar to the paysite that you promote. What planet are you from?



Again, this only became a problem when i stopped sending you traffic. You didn't give a shit about this for years. And the domains had exclusively MrSkn galleries, which promote only your website. Terminating an account because of that is stupid. You could have just asked to transfer the domain (which we did same day after your requested it).

You aslo gave false hope (hinted) that transferring the domains to you would solve account lock problem. And after i promtly pushed the domains same day you just left me standing with my dick in my hand:





How could I remove all content? I have hundreds of galleries built over the years. I removed the one with the name mentioned. I couldn't remove the other one because i didn't know what it was. I asked you numerous times to send me the copy of DMCA report so that i would know the URL and which content exactly was in violation. Every request got conveniently ignored by you. You weren;t interested in fixing anything, just wanted a reason to can the account and keep the rebills.




I used your promo tools to exclusively promote YOUR FUCKING SITE, FOR YOUR PROFIT.

I removed the only instance of the mentioned celeb name i was able to find the moment i received your first email. You never even mentioned an infringing URL until in this thread. I asked for a copy of DMCA to know better what to look for, so that i could remove it. I cooperated fully and pushed the domains to you the same day. I promty did EVERYTHING to rectify the problem. You just werent interested in rectifying it.


Hopefully people make a good note on your "policies" and how you are able to terminate an account and keep all the money with any made up reason. Nice Terms & Conditions you have to fully protect yourself in any situation and fuck over any affiliate at a drop of a hat.

God damn scumbags

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Looks like an honest guy, but fair play for knowing how to make $600+ per month from them

Originally Posted by celandina

We shoot the content, run the site where it is sold from and the ONLY people who peddle our shit are thieves, pirates and those like you who think that they are entitled to make money of others people creativity ......and that DOES include Mr.Skin.

Originally Posted by Bladewire

You we're viciously attacked & you're only trying to defend your good name and spotless reputation of your 2 banned nics & current fake nic. Suck it

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Banned user Beaner drunk again posting as Plaster following me through every thread daily *yawn*

I've had him blocked forever but you know he's drunk because like clockwork 9-10pm Eastern time he starts up. Sad

He's obsessed with me.

Originally Posted by kane

Two quick thoughts

1. You should be able to remove content on all URLs. You should know what is on every URL of your sites. It is called doing business and being responsible. If you don't know what is on every URL on your sites you should take a little time to go through your server and document this stuff so you do know. Ignorance is not an excuse.

2. You are knowingly using content you don't own and admitting to doing so. That makes you a thief.

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

They gave you the name of the complainant, the original copyright holder. Why don't you contact the photographer whose work you used without permission

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

and, unlike Mr. Skin, without promoting him?

Originally Posted by vano

1. I have THOUSANDS of galleries from the TGP days. If they don't even tell me the URL, I can't know where the problem is. When someone sends you a DMCA report, one of the requirements is to describe which work is in violation and where it is located. Skin never showed me the complaint (i wonder if it even exists).

2. Skin uses content they dont own. What does that make them?

At least I have contact info for dmca reports on my websites to quickly remove content if someone complains, and i don't pocket other people's money because i'm a greedy asshole.

Originally Posted by vano

Why should I contact anyone? I'm not violating any copyrights as far as i know. I never received any notifications. Just because Skin says so doesn't make it true. Why wouldn't skin show me that notification?

Originally Posted by kane

I won't comment on what they have or have not given you and just take your word that you didn't know what content they were speaking of. That said, They did provide a URL in their reply

Originally Posted by kane

and, well, you still have illegal content on there as of my typing this

Originally Posted by kane

The difference between what you are doing and what they are doing is simple. It is called Fair Use. You see you are taking content you do not own in order to make money. You haven't changed it in any way or done anything that would alter it from it original format (other than maybe size and compression ratio etc.). Mr. Skin provide commentary and reviews about the movies, the scenes, and the people in them.

Originally Posted by kane

Did you shoot the pictures?

Did you pay someone a licensing fee for the pictures?

Unless you answered yes to one of those you are violating the copyright on every one of those pictures.

Originally Posted by RandazzoXXX

The "celeb" niche in porn is and always has been shady. MrSkin is no exception. The affiliates promoting celeb content AND the sponsors are using content they don't own. That's the nature of the game.

It's pretty obvious what happened here. They were taking heat, decided to look through your account and realized that you were making money from rebills while sending very little new sales so they said fuck that... cancelled your account and will keep all the money to themselves. Pretty common practice in the industry.

Originally Posted by vano

Yeah they did. In this thread. 3 weeks after terminating my account. And only because I created this thread. The conveniently ignore all my request to point out the content in question.

According to who? You? Or Skin, who also dont own the copyright? You can't pass that judgment. What if I had a deal with the photog and he let me use his content?



So they found a loophole in the law and are exploiting it. By same token I could write a line of text next to my gallery and claim it as fair use. But that still would be profiting from someone else's work. How is it any different from tubes who are also using stolen content and are hiding behind legal loopholes?



Can you answer yes to all these question regarding a photo in your sig?



Anyway, the legality of content or fair use is not the point of the thread. The point is that MrSkin will gladly take all your traffic, not matter how clean or dirty it is. But they will fuck you over when they are not profiting from it anymore (i.e., when you stop sending them traffic and just collecting rebills money). It's a question of affiliate program's integrity. MrSkin has none - they will throw you under the bus at a drop of a hat.

Originally Posted by vano

Why should I contact anyone? I'm not violating any copyrights as far as i know. I never received any notifications. Just because Skin says so doesn't make it true. Why wouldn't skin show me that notification?



Oh, this is comedy gold. Now Skin is promoting him? The copyright holder? In what way?

Do you just make shit up on the go, no matter how dumb it sounds, just to support Skin? Did they buy you a drink at one of the conventions?

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

Mr. Skin is presumably not promoting this photographer because his work does not appear on their site. I believe they do promote the work of people whose copyrighted material does appear on their site. Are you disagreeing with that?

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

OP got paid or what??

Originally Posted by vano

Yes, I am.

Here is just one of MrSkin's websites full of stolen, i mean "borrowed" content: Dakota Johnson Topless During Filming 'Fifty Shades Darker'

- they didn't pay for this content
- they didn't get permission to use that content
- they don't have a license to use this content

And they sure as hell aren't promoting anyone else but themselves.

Look, celebrity niche is tricky and hi-risk. I'm not trying to change anyone's mind here or set anyone straight. All i'm saying is that you can't trust MrSkin. Instead of working with together with you to solve things, they will jump at first opportunity to fuck you over and steal money from you.

I've learned the lesson and moved on elsewhere from their shitty, non-converting revshare program.

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10

proof of what? the site is pack full of stolen movie stills scenes clips. are you fucking drunk or high?

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

You used content unrelated to Mr. Skin.

Originally Posted by vano

MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Seriously, stick to something you have a clue about or STFU.

Originally Posted by JFK

Stolen ?

Originally Posted by vano

MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Seriously, stick to something you have a clue about or STFU.

Originally Posted by AmeliaG

You lost your domains. You lost your rebills. And you won't do a thing to help yourself.

I'd ask you where you think I said anything about what Mr. Skin owns and I'd ask you again why you ask strangers on GFY and give away your domains before you contact the owner of the work to make things right ... but I'm putting you on ignore, so there would be no point, as I will not see you failing to answer.

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Mr. Skin owns the trademark you violated.

You violating their trademark caused them problems with a copyright owner.

Violating trademarks can be costly. You're lucky to get off so easy.

Either you're clueless about affiliate marketing or you purposely violated Mr. Skins trademark in your domain to gain SEO rankings for people searching for their site/brand.

Originally Posted by xxxtesy10

fuck off old man. They not make those films asshole

Originally Posted by JFK

Look in the mirror, if you want to see an asshole ! I am sure you are privi to all their agreements with various studios ?

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10

you forget geritol again? how owner's cum taste? there many indie film there, bet ass no permission.

Originally Posted by vano

MrSkin DOES NOT own any content. They steal everything and profit from it under the pretense of "of fair use" loophole. Just like tubes use the "user submitted content" loophole.

Originally Posted by xXXtesy10

Originally Posted by Speigelau

Is this Eddythedog?

Originally Posted by Speigelau

Is this Eddythedog?

Originally Posted by babeterminal

yes thats one of the croydon massive, but you have to understand there are a few like her on that id eddythebullshiter

Originally Posted by babeterminal

yes thats one of the croydon massive, but you have to understand there are a few like her on that id eddythebullshiter