Bumping for the cause

what's the new cause?

Any news on luckyhare?
They are blatantly ignoring all DMCA's.

Luckyshare is where it's at! Everyone moving to it. Re-up with one click

I just shat myself looking at your avatar. :1orglaugh :thumbsup

We know all about Luckyshare, however we have limited resources and demand for action over various sites exceeds the resources available to us.

If you want to help us out, then consider making a contribution to us via Paxum - [email protected]

Would be great if you managed to stop luckyshare.

We know Lucky Share is a problem, however we need to collect more evidence.

Do you have specific instances of issues with Luckyshare that you can provide us ?

Please use the contact form at http://copycontrol.org/contact-us/

More evidence???

We need more sources of evidence in order to pursue a course of action we have planned for the operators of Lucky Share.

This means more rights holders taking the time to contact us so we can collect documentation of ignored DMCA notices and repeat infringement along with some other information relevant to the case.

It's all very well to ask for action in this thread but we need to work on evidence, not forum posts.

bump for AK :)

Lumfile is being targeted at the moment.

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...04/lumfile.jpg

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...lebritysex.jpg

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...e-brazzers.jpg

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...file-snuff.jpg

Read the full story here: http://stopfilelockers.com/lumfile-worst-of-the-worst

This video cannot exist...The movie is in theaters, so a DVD has not even been created. That file could be anything. Did you download the other stuff to see if it was real or just fake titles?

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...ehardmovie.jpg

DVD Screeners are released to the media even while movies are in theatres, people also use cameras in theatres to "cam" a current movie.

It wouldn't be labeled as DVDRip if it was a screener or cam.

DVD copies of movies are sent to reviewers before and while movies are in theatres. These are often released onto torrent sites and file lockers when leaked, shared by recipients. This is nothing new.

People have been using their cellphones to video a movie in a theater for a while now and run home and upload it to the web.

The mindset of some people just blows my mind. I have to wonder what they are thinking when they not only steal...but go out of their way to steal. :(

lol wtf, so a screener is ok, and the problem is with it being labelled a dvdrip? Like it doesn't now count? You think people don't name it a dvdrip if it's a screener/cam? Jesus fucking christ...

In case anyone was curious about Jesse202, he was a former member - now banned - at WJunction

http://www.wjunction.com/member.php?u=4404

He has a vested interest in denouncing our findings because he's a pirate.

Those are called screeners, not DVDRips. DVDRip is the finished copy you can buy in stores.

Read my posts there if you believe me to be into warez. I was merely stating the title on the movie was incorrect lol I've publicly praised the work you've done and never put it down.

We covered pages ago I was a mod there. My fb page is in this thread too if you're looking for more stuff to link to.

Not sure exactly what you're saying. I think you're all taking it wrong. I was saying that file is probably not what it says it is, so makes proof look bad. There are probably 1000's of illegal files on there to pick from that would 100% be illegal and look better for making the case against them.

Do whatever you want though.
The want the web praise or something. Makes them feel big I guess

You're picking out minor discrepancies in a file name. I think the fact that tens of thousands of examples of copyright infringing software, movies, music, tv shows, porn exists on the site outweighs your petty issue with a file name.

Of course I am. Have you not noticed they do the same thing to make them look more legal? Why not go in with 100% proof and not give them the chance to say the file is fake or whatever stupid shit they'd come up with.

That's all I'm saying. Go in with the best case possible. Jesus Christ people.

Pretty much exactly how moogie/krylon acted at the time, said things such as "isn't kinda in the gray area to post file links on your blog" when he ran a file locker himself.

You do realise that what we post on our blog is not our case ?

Our case files run to several volumes, in large binders. We have shelves full of evidence. Our blog posts are just a signal that a site is under scrutiny.

We're not about to begin releasing our documentation to the world. We also don't report all of our ongoing successes.

We're systematically ripping apart the file locker industry, those affected know this.

Of course...it's "your case" to the public though is how I meant it.

I can understand how you would like to steer the debate off course, because as a former member of a warez webmaster community you obviously have a vested interest in doing so.

However, if a DVD released to reviewers is shared, then leaked then ripped then uploaded then it's still a DVD Rip.

You're either being thick, obtuse or both.

Why do you continue to try to make others think I was a warez supporter because I made a suggestion to use files you are 100% cretin are illegal?

Can you even find one post I made that was in support of file hosts and not completely making fun of people using them to share illegal files?

Are you honestly going to try to destroy my character for making a simple suggestion I thought could help you?

PS: A dvd cannot be ripped that does not exist. A screener is not a dvdrip regardless if it was copied dvd. It's still a screener. That file is probably something else labeled as a dvdrip to get downloads.

yes - a screener

Probably. Could be a fucking 650mb text file for all we know. My only suggestion was screenshot something that actually exists. Live free or die hard DVDRip exists. I'm sure they have that on their servers 10,000 times.

ok going on this post, I did take what you meant wrong - kinda. It's only 'bad proof' in the same way if eg a snuff movie is labelled as a cp movie. No-one is going to go "hey, this one doesn't count. Yes, it's illegal, and yes it's the movie, but they labelled it incorrectly as a dvdrip rather than a screener. you guys suck, we are throwing this evidence out"

I'm sure all the copies of Adobe Photoshop, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office, The Sims, Grand Theft Auto, Brazzers DVD's, Big Bang Theory, Breaking Bad, Games of Thrones are all text files too.

Not to mention all of the files labeled as child pornography, snuff films, rape films, bestiality films - all text files also.

Lumfile.com is a file host full of text files. That's how they have so many paying members, because all those paying members love downloading text files.

Yes exactly lol I wasn't disputing them hosting anything illegal. It was only meant to be a one post, post. This is a whole big page thing now for some reason.

omg....what is it you think I'm trying to say here?

The Stop File Lockers project has now been running for 280 days.

If you support what we are doing and want to help ensure the future of the project we would appreciate contributions.

We can accept contributions via Paxum at [email protected]
or Paypal at [email protected]

I'd like to thank everyone who has contributed thus far. We only exist with the support of the industry.

AK, you clown, you have just proven to be one stupid motherfucker. You have lost all credibility. You prove that yourself by deleting your own post containing that image, so I just quote Jesse202 instead.

I am pissing myself laughing. :1orglaugh We all know what that evidence look like now. It's just like the 'evidence' that you posted and quickly removed after it turned out to be fake, nothing more than a password protected compressed file containing a useless avi file that nobody will ever be able to watch because the uploader obviously added an unguessable password for that reason, because his upload is useless and fake. But you fell for it. Guess what! These are the other movies he uploaded, all 633.9 MB. Coincidence? Ofcourse not. It's the same useless file uploaded multiple times.

So thank you for giving us an insight in how you put together your so-called 'evidence'. You have just proven yourself that your claims against Lumfile are worth shit. Because you didn't even download the file to check the content. I bet you never do. If you have shelves of this evidence you may as well start all over again because it isn't worth shit. And guess what, Mega, Kim Dotcom's file locker you mentioned in your last blog post now has PayPal as a payment processor directly, not just through resellers. This just proves your claims are worthless and your efforts are useless.

Not sure what you are talking about, we haven't deleted anything.

So what you're saying is that Lumfile.com is full of mislabeled files. Ok, well Lumfile is selling access to download these files. People are being charged money to download these files - so Lumfile is fraudulently billing people for access to non-existent content. However, that's fine in your world - as long as Lumfile can keep billing people for access to content that it does not have any right to distribute or content which is misleadingly labeled then everything is ok.

If you sell copies of Windows on eBay and send blank disks then thats fraud. So what you're saying is that Lumfile is committing fraud.

If content on Lumfile is labeled as bestiality, rape, child pornography, incest or other illegal content then this is sufficient for the credit card associations to force their merchant acquirers to terminate their merchant accounts.

The very fact that Lumfile carries files which purport to contain illegal content is enough evidence - there is no need to download anything. The mere suggestion of this content being made available and billed by credit card is enough to seal the fate of the merchant.

In the past month we have collected tens of thousands of urls in DMCA complaints made by rights holders against Lumfile. None of these DMCA complaints have been complied with.

All of these have been sorted, catalogued and filed along with evidence that the files still exist one , two, three and more weeks after the DMCA was issued.

At the moment Mega is complying with the law, it is removing files that are the subject of DMCA notices, it is not rewarding uploaders of content and is doing nothing for which it should lose it's Paypal account. Paypal placed Mega through the very same stringent compliance checks that it allows any file host to go through in order to become a pre-approved merchant.

Our initial opposition to Mega resellers having Paypal is that they had NOT gone through the necessary pre-approval process thus the required oversight of the operations of Mega had not taken place.

Until Mega stops complying with the law and with Paypal's policies then it's fully entitled to have a Paypal account.

some Paypal terminations today:

Filezy.net
Sanshare.com
http://www.descargopremium.com/tienda/,
http://www.alldebridchile.com/en/5-c...-de-servidores

Holy shit Lars is alive! Did his account get compromised?

Compromised by someone who doesn't have the balls to stand behind what he says, so he posts from other peoples accounts.