![]() |
|
Quote:
You do realize that there is more spots on googles front page then just 1st correct? And everyone of those spots can send sales right? If nobody but you is allowed to go after those spots, where do the other 7-8 spots go to? Would you prefer a competitor taking them? Seems pretty logical that you would encourage affiliates to fill up that 1st page, whichever way they know how. |
Not reading the whole thread and wading in with an aggressive post basically calling everybody who supported Shoehorn an idiot damaged your rep far more than having a Honda Civic does..... even if it is pink and spray painted with the words "I am an asshole" on the side.
|
Quote:
If I think of PR_Dave of Pimproll, $750 and/or $350 is NOTHING to him! Hell! $3,500 shouldn'e be shit to him! He wipes his ass with that chump change everyday... No way can I believe he doesnt have the money to pay that lil ol $350... I've been hanging on to this thread since the 1st page... I'm in suspense at how its gonna end? I don't know why but I still hav this image of Dirty D tooting coke while cussing out folks for disagreeing wit him... That youtube vid that mutt posted summs up that image... LOL, BigUps Shoehorn! It's Monday, somethings gonna give! Cuz we jus gonna keep on bumpin this thread! Loose! :pimp |
Quote:
Nobody else. I'm not squatting the name. The brand simply didn't exist before I bought it. Now, it does. Now it's a fucking BRAND. Do you understand what I'm saying? In the first 3 weeks of that domains life, it did not receive any searches for the term "ghetto thugs", but regardless I had the #1 spot for that term. Now, after I began promoting it... the searches started increasing rapidly. Do you think the brand built itself? You're an idiot. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
You should check the earnings from PPC of companies that allow it, and check the earnings of companies that 'protect' it.
Any guesses which ones make more off PPC? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The debate is not about which companies that allow PPC. They all do. The debate is if Ebay will allow you to send them PPC traffic using the keyword "Ebay". I'm just using that as an example for illustrative purposes. Here is a fine example of a company that is protecting itself in a reasonable way that a lot of affiliates here are seeing fit to exploit. Quoted from Ebay Affiliate Program TOS. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
thousand fiddy with interest.
|
Quote:
Road to nowhere? Two of us riding nowhere?!? ADG |
Quote:
|
I read the thread. Pretty fucking unbelievable. Here's a bump for ya. Nice to see so many coming together to help out a fellow webmaster who's owed money.
This year has been a bad one for non-paying/late-paying, shady programs. http://i48.tinypic.com/t0l0fs.jpg |
So if one can't buy the exact domain name spelling and promote crackwhore confessions then I assume the affiliate that runs http://crackwhoreconfessions.dk/ isn't getting anything either.
|
lol.. wow 22 pages? jeez
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
. |
Shoehorn, send your sig in form of an avatar and I'll put it up in support: [email protected] ...
|
Quote:
|
bump for the honest, creative webmaster.
|
I am swimming in a sea of RETARD.
Facts: PPC is not mentioned as an acceptable method of traffic in my TOS. The acceptable methods are listed. Cyber Squatting describes the Shady Shoehorn technique that is forbidden. Shoehorn the CyberSquatter knows that affiliate programs don't allow this, so he lied to me about his traffic sources. I tried to work with Shoehorn the CyberSquatter to improve his campaign and offered $100PPS instead of killing his account. Shoehorn or anyone else, will NEVER be paid for searches that ONLY contain the exact spelling of my own domain. Figure it out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
cybersquatting is buying similar domains to profit of it, example buying Googol.com and placing ads on it and banking off googles traffic, thats not what shoe horn did.. heck HE even sent traffic to you.. google wont complain if i sent all my gogol.com traffic straight to Google.com you are the retard.. your brain cells have been fried by public masturbation and coke |
I have also solved the Mystery of why this whole non-payment thing is going on. It is all right here:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...%20Confessions You see he's site is actually real with real crack whores, so all the money is spent on their drugs :-\ It is ok to cash in on desperate crack whores for porn, but Google PPC campaigns are just out of order :) |
Quote:
But, that's different than simply buying a spot above me to purposely siphon some of my own traffic that was coming to me anyway. |
Would sending the traffic here be wrong?
http://www.hotmovies.com/search.php?...+conf essions ...or how about here? http://www.hotmovies.com/search.php?...ds=crack+whore |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
wait wait wait..
now hes a cyber squatter lol. dude are you featured on your site? put down the pipe dude.. srsly. |
Quote:
|
yeah i LOLed on the cyber squatter accusation too.lol
|
Cybersquatting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Cybersquatting (also known as domain squatting), according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price. The term is derived from "squatting," which is the act of occupying an abandoned or unoccupied space or building that the squatter does not own, rent or otherwise have permission to use. Cybersquatting, however, is a bit different in that the domain names that are being "squatted" are (sometimes but not always) being paid for through the registration process by the cybersquatters. Cybersquatters usually ask for prices far greater than that at which they purchased it. Some cybersquatters put up derogatory remarks about the person or company the domain is meant to represent in an effort to encourage the subject to buy the domain from them.[citation needed] Others post paid links via Google, Yahoo, Ask.com and other paid advertising networks to the actual site that the user likely wanted, thus monetizing their squatting. As with many controversial issues, some argue that the dividing line of cybersquatting is difficult to draw, or that the practice is consistent with a capitalistic and free market ethos. Cybersquatting is one of the most loosely used terms related to domain name intellectual property law and is often incorrectly used to refer to the sale or purchase of generic domain names. --- Otherwise known as a Shady Shoehorn - lol |
If redtennisshoes.com doesnt want me bidding for "red tennis shoes", then redtennisshoes.com has to tell me. Because guess what is the most logical, targetted, relevant advertising term you could use for "red tennis shoes"? red tennis shoes.
That'll be all. |
I smell trouble in bromerica.
|
Does D even own a trademark for his sites?
|
|
|
Quote:
If you're not my affiliate, then how can I police it? But, that's the complete opposite of what's happened here. The fact is, if someone bids on my exact domain spelling to try and siphon traffic away from me and to their own site, do you really think it will work to their advantage? If someone types in "naughtyalysha", you have to agree that they are specifically looking for her website, or something that has to do with her website (review site, free content, etc.), right? So, what good would it do to have a link to a completely different site. In my own example, do you really believe that DenniO.com is going to benefit from having a paid link to our site? |
Now that I think of it, it must be someway somehow "a rush" to promote a program with invisible TOS violations...
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:00 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc