Eric removed a photograph that contained images of persons other than the target, however made it quite clear that all of the other information would remain, which it has.

This is a ridiculous claim, you can be sure that we will be working to have payment processing terminated, hosting shut down, domains seized, assets confiscated, persons prosecuted and many other forms of mitigation take place however to suggest we are doing this to continue piracy ourselves is both wrong and ridiculous.

Firstly this is not a witch hunt, this is a anti-piracy campaign chasing down copyright infringers. We wouldn't have to go after anyone if they weren't acting illegally.

Secondly we operate on a cost recovery basis and we are a long way from recovering costs. Copy Control was formed very early on, it was documented publicly, it's been referred to in this and other threads.

We've clearly laid out what we do, however I am glad to repeat it

1. Issue written correspondence to third parties (?Infringers?) who are infringing the Owner?s IP, including but not limited to, DMCA take down notices, infringement notices and/or cease and desist letters;

2. Request that third parties, including without limitation, payment processors, web hosting companies, ISPs, DNS server providers and domain registrars (?Service Providers?), take necessary steps to prevent infringement of the rights embodied in the Owner?s IP, including without limitation shutting down Infringers? websites or merchant facilities on Infringers? websites;

3. Make complaints to and liaise with law enforcement bodies with regard to infringement of the rights embodied in the Owner?s IP;

4. Generally represent the Owner to commercial, non profit and government bodies with respect to the ownership and protection of the Owner?s IP;

5. Undertake other reasonable steps as Copy Control considers necessary to prevent or cease infringement of the rights embodied in the Owner?s IP.

What we do is entirely legal, we have our own legal team, we have forensic accounting services, we comply with the letter of the law. Our representation agreement was formulated by one of the best boutique IP law firms in Australia.

We also have very good established ongoing dialogue with several law enforcement agencies around the world and an excellent working relationship with several payment processing companies.


I'd expect Crocko will not have Paypal much longer. You may have noticed that Rapidshare recently made a substantive change to their operation by limiting public access to files by bandwidth restriction. What you do not see is what is going on behind the scenes that is forcing companies like Rapidshare to re-think their strategy.

Which graph are you talking about ? I haven't posted any graph to show a 1% decrease of piracy. The most recent graphical image I posted showed that tubes do not rank in the top piracy sites as per the Google Transparency Report.

We are currently expanding the scope of our operations, you will see us targeting much more than just file lockers as time goes on. We are working to get rights holders represented right now, as we build representation we will have the ability to go after more forms of piracy.

Nobody is running ads and we do not operate for profit, we also operate for the benefit of the whole community here, so I do not see what your problem is with that ?

What you're saying is laughable, we barely make it from one month to the next, where exactly is the chase for profit ? The first official decision of Copy Control was that if there is an operating surplus it will go back into furthering the anti piracy effort.

It seems to be in the interests of those involved with piracy to smear us. The fact is that nobody has been paid other than the lawyers, accountants and service providers. We have several people who volunteer large amounts of their time into this effort and I for one have worked around the clock pretty much since late June when this started without receiving one cent.

To say that we are clearing the way for a bigger piracy player is ridiculous, it just shows the length to which those opposed to our effort will go to tarnish our work.

:1orglaugh Oh look, another newly registered pirate shit stain. I'm honored to have your 2nd post. Your comments on this new nick about me are as boring as the same exact comments on the old one.

I would love to give you my address, but we both know you're not man enough to visit me. However, I'll make a deal with you. If you make it to Bangkok, hit me up and I'll meet you. Looking forward to it. Let me know when you're here.

AK, you're being baited again. This is one of the usual guys, you can tell by how he writes and what he says. Don't even waste your time with him.

even if he was doing this for profit, i don't see how what he does could be negative?

"oh no, making money trying to rescue our industry? i rather watch it burn and get a mcD application!"

the absolute best is actually to ignore, that itches even worse! :P

:2 cents::2 cents:

Freakfiles, you are a fucking dumbass ... AdultKing ROCK ON !!!

:2 cents:

Even if he was making insane amounts of money doing this, who cares so long as he's making progress?

People cry about piracy then cry about someone who is trying to do something about it and actually making progress. Typical of porn idiots.

Those saying that file lockers are not a huge problem should be aware of these figures:

According to the Google Transparency report:

filestube.com, the file locker search engine, ranks number one amongst all websites for takedown notices this week.

File Lockers:

Rapidgator ranks 14th.
Zippyshare ranks 17th.

ExtaBit, RYUShare, Uploaded follow not long after.

We still have a lot of cleaning up to do to finally get rid of these sites.

I guess that spam in your book is legit.. what a joke.

That made a lot of sense.

I suspect Yigal is upset that we're targeting his mate Simon.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=651440

Got news for you sport, it's only going to get more and more difficult for these guys as time goes on and we broaden our efforts.

Try Hebrew, your English is shyte.

Piracy on forums connected to the Simon Leht, Simon Vega, Simon Key piracy ring accounts for a huge number of links to file lockers and supplies traffic to a wide range of sites from ad spots they sell right here on GFY

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1089068

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1083895

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1081847

We will soon be contacting every site linked to or advertised from all sites connected to the Simon Leht/Simon Vega/Simon Key piracy network, those that do not terminate their association with these piracy sites will be listed in this thread.

We'd warn people not to deal with trademeister or kaktuz for risk of being associated with piracy.

Some of the sites connected to this piracy ring are:


1800freecams.com
4greedy.com
adultcashier.com
adultdesigncontest.com
commentswow.com
datefree.com
dnswin.com
fritchy.com
fvx.com
gamesdr.com
glam0ur.com
hdv19.com
hdvboobs.com
hdvteenz.com
layoutswow.com
libertyofmind.com
massdestraction.com
myspacenotifier.com
myspacetweaks.com
nudecelebforum.com
pimpandhost.com
planetsuzy.com
plsthx.com
potornot.com
profiletweaks.com
revilio.com
ringosaur.com
sexymette.com
siteownersforums.com
smilesofortune.com
stonerarcade.com
ufobe.com
unhealthy.com
vamateur.com
vintage-erotica-forum.com
ycum.com
yoozah.com
fu.net
planetsuzy.net
sexthe.net
disloyal.org
gayheaven.org
planetsuzy.org
camleak.com
filesor.com
filezdb.com
forumsigmaker.com
kaktuz.com
kaktuz.net
adyea.com
albumwash.com
babeforums.org
disloyal.org
donogo.com
doolls.org
IQ69.com
kaktuz.com
linkmafia.com
myfreeholidaycards.com
plsthx.com
TASTEFULCELEBS.COM
yoursexgames.com
iq69.com
wjunction.com

It's easy to inadvertently deal with pirates, so we will be stepping up our efforts to educate site owners about the bad actors in this industry and helping people avoid piracy.

Why do you keep answering me DWEEB, I don't care what you have to say. :1orglaugh

Sure, "Ata ben zona hara mechuar", that works for you?

Maybe you could explain what you're unhappy about rather than swanning into the thread telling people to go to hell.

Did you take a minute to think about the consequence of your crusade?
In the past 12 years I've seen that free and more free porn grew up to be the tubes we know today with major players, I have no doubt that the file share sites will grow up to be huge with major players, imho you will not stop this and no one will, they will just get better and better.

Hell I have 100's of my own exclusive videos spread around the web in all tube sites and file share sites, thing is I don't care anymore.

And sure Simon is my "mate" I know him for 10+ years.

Please tell me why don't you do anything with xhamster.com xvideos.com pornhub.com?
Are they not "Pirates" in your book?

What makes you think I'm unhappy? I'm very happy people take the time to comment to my posts, saying "try english please" "that didn't make sense", I'm waiting for the "jew" part to kick in.

Just leave...

You mean aside from the fact that asshats like you and Simon Leht give Jews everywhere a bad name?

Other than that, it's not especially relevant to this discussion.

Next.
.

Great, debate. I am happy to debate this.

Of course and I continue to re-asses the consequences. I have spent countless hours modelling the impact and outcome of what we are doing. Every week I plug new data into the models that I have created to develop an in depth understanding of the impact and outcomes of what we are doing.

The over-riding objective that I have and the people involved in our project share is to bring about a climate where commercial copyright infringement becomes entirely unacceptable and not tolerated.


What we are doing has absolutely zero relationship to the concept of free porn, however what you are talking about is not free porn, it's piracy. Free means a product, digital or otherwise, given away willingly by it's creator. The content shared on sites like PlanetSuzy is not free, it's shared and given away against the terms on which the owner of the content has set for it's sale, distribution and licensing. In short it's theft.

You may not care, that is your pejorative however many rights holders do care and do not want their content shared by people who have no right to distribute it.

I am not surprised, it very well explains your hostile attitude to our project.

The sites you quote carry infringing content but nowhere near as much as your friend's piracy ring deals in.

Let's look at xhamaster.com. Since 2011, Google processed 297 take down requests for indexed content on the site, removing some 6,647 urls.

Now lets look at PlanetSuzy.org. Since 2011, Google processed 5,721 take down requests for indexed content on the site, removing some 51,247 urls.

The extent of the piracy related to xhamster.com in the above example was limited to xhamster.com however the extent of piracy on PanetSuzy.org can be traced to 421 other sites with a combined number of takedowns since 2011 of 1,892,532 urls.

PlanetSuzy.org, since 2011, has been key in the eco system responsible for the copyright infringement of approximately $350 million dollars worth of content. This is based on the average value of each piece of content shared being approximately $19. If you were to translate that into lost revenue for the content owners if even 1/3rd of people consuming the pirate content actually purchased the content rather than obtain it via your friend's website then we have a total loss of approximately $5.7 Billion in lost sales.

So don't try to tell me that xhamster is more of a problem than PlanetSuzy, because PlanetSuzy is responsible for the sharing of an order of magnitude more content than xhamster.com.

Forums and the file locker eco system are devastating for content producers, your friends blatantly involve themselves with the theft of millions of dollars worth of content and make money from doing so. They are criminals.

Now furthering the comparison between xhamster.com and Planetsuzy.org, xhamster complied with 92% of DMCA notices that we have seen since we started collecting data. PlanetSuzy have complied with 0%

Who's the worst pirates, xhamster or PlanetSuzy.com ?

Just leave.

You can say that again.. oh wait, you just did.

Nonetheless that message does bear repeating :)

.

The worst pirate is xhamster pornhub and xvideos, Your numbers are a joke and worthless.

Please PLEASE don't compare xhamster xvideos and pornhub with any other small time site.

Ok, sport, I think it's enough for me, so long and thanks for the fish.

I cannot speak for other people but you will never see me sink to such levels. If you want to debate the facts, the issues, the philosophy or any substantive part of this issue then I am happy to do it.

My numbers are based on fact. Google's transparency report is very clear, our records are also very clear on the issue.

xhamster: 6,647 urls requested for removal.
plansetsuzy: 51,247 urls requested for removal.

Compliance.

xhamster: 92% of DMCA notices complied with.
planetsuzy: 0% of DMCA notices complied with.

You may dismiss what I show you, however you cannot change it.

The RIAA has submitted a new list of ?notorious websites? to the U.S. Government, sites that the labels would like to see disappear . The list includes all major torrent sites, cyberlockers such as RapidShare, and so-called linking sites. The music group acknowledges that most sites respond to takedown requests, but says it?s tired of playing ?cat and mouse? with the site?s users who simply re-upload the infringing files.

In a response to a request from the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) in August, the RIAA has submitted its list of ?notorious markets? for 2012.

The RIAA and other rightsholders compile this list every year and not without success. The music group credits the Government?s efforts as contributing to the demise of BTJunkie, Demonoid, Megaupload and other ?pirate? sites.

?We want to take a moment to reflect on the fact that thanks in large part to the efforts of the US Government in highlighting illicit practices, some of the notorious markets that we identified in last year?s submission no longer feature in this filing,? the RIAA?s Neil Turkewitz begins.

But despite these successes, the piracy problem isn?t going away.

The record labels have therefore compiled a new list of ?notorious? websites which they say profit from direct or indirect copyright infringement. The list zooms in on several file-sharing portals including BitTorrent sites described as ?high priority pirate markets.?

The RIAA admits that many of the popular BitTorrent sites do take links down when they are asked to, but these takedown requests don?t have the desired effect as the content can simply be re-uploaded by the site?s users.

?One of the principal problems with the use of take down notices for BitTorrent indexing sites is that the same infringing material can easily be, and usually is, very quickly reposted to the site,? RIAA writes.

This issue is complicated further by the existence of many similar files under different URLs. The RIAA wants to end this ongoing ?cat and mouse? game and would like BitTorrent sites to take proactive measures to ensure that infringing files are not added to their service to begin with.

?As a result, copyright owners are forced into an endless ?cat and mouse? game, which requires considerable resources to be devoted to chasing infringing content, only for that same infringing content to continually reappear.?

?For that reason, BitTorrent site operators should take proactive measures to stop indexing torrents,? RIAA writes, hinting at automatic filters of infringing files.

The worst offending BitTorrent sites according to the RIAA are The Pirate Bay, isoHunt, Torrentz, KickassTorrents, BitSnoop, SumoTorrent, Torrenthound, BTMon, ExtraTorrent, Fenopy, LimeTorrents and TorrentReactor.

The Pirate Bay is reported as particularly problematic, and it?s one of the few sites that does not respond to take down requests from copyright holders. The RIAA further informs the Government that the site continues to operate despite criminal convictions against its former operators.

?Despite the final criminal convictions and successful civil litigation in Sweden, the site is still active and thought to be the most popular BitTorrent site in the world, with nearly 6 million registered users uploading and making content available to over 26 million users. The world?s most popular films and music can be instantly downloaded via the service,? the RIAA writes.

Interestingly, the RIAA also says that it?s monitoring the use of a free VPN service that was supposedly launched by The Pirate Bay earlier this year, not realizing that it was merely an advertisement.

?In August 2012, it was reported that The Pirate Bay had launched a new ad-supported VPN service, PrivitizeVPN, the purpose of which is to enable users to ?cloak? their IP address when using file sharing services to make enforcement more difficult. This service is in its early stage and usage is being monitored.?

Besides BitTorrent sites the RIAA also lists several linking sites and cyberlockers as piracy havens. The appearance of RapidShare is most surprising as the Swiss cyberlocker has undertaken tremendous efforts to curb piracy in recent months.

The RIAA suggests that the owners of cyberlockers should proactively filter infringing files as well, in addition to responding to take down requests. The group points out that some services do this already, naming Hulkshare as an example.

?To a limited extent, rights holders can begin to tackle these infringements through take down notices sent to the locker service provider. However, rights holders cannot locate content stored on a locker service unless and until it is made available to the public ? which is done via a third-party link,? RIAA writes.

?The locker service itself would clearly be better placed to locate infringing content on its own servers (there are technologies available that would assist) and to take appropriate action,? they add.

While not stated specifically, it appears that the RIAA views all file-hosting and sharing sites as piracy havens unless they employ a proactive filtering mechanism. This is in line with the music industry?s global anti-piracy strategy which leaked a few months ago.

In the coming month the Office of the US Trade Representative is expected to publish its own overview of notorious markets. This review is expected to include many of the sites mentioned above.

http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-bittorr...tively-121114/

-> Click here to enter MyFreeCams.com

Butt hurt everywhere.

:1orglaugh :thumbsup

You care what everyone has to say, that is why you're living in this thread trying to tell everyone about the consequences of their actions and blah, blah, blah.

Ahh, it all makes sense now. You're just another shit stain pirate. No wonder you're in tears here. If you're butt hurt now, you haven't seen anything yet.

^^^^^

haw haw haw!

& back to page one where this belongs!



Talking of shit stains, this pirate in the spanking niche is a real pain to many of us hard pressed producers, uses stolen cards to sign up and steal content (had 2 when I traced the movies uploaded this week) and posts images on his own shitty little image site as a base for showing his wares.

http://www.spankpics.info/spankalot/

well known at all the usual places like planetsuzy and extreme board etc

Today we commenced action which we think will see several pre-paid cash card providers fall into line and begin to terminate relationships with piracy sites.

Many pre-paid cash card services are regulated by the very same legislation that regulates Paypal and Credit Cards in several jurisdictions.

Up until now companies like Ukash have operated with impunity, however they're now being asked to act in situations where their service is being utilised by commercial pirates.

I'd also like to remind rights holders to become represented by Copy Control. You can read about how in this thread: https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1089055

As we expand the range of mitigation activities that we are taking against commercial piracy it's imperative that we are representative of a broad group of rights holders.

Seeding chaos and destruction into the piracy realm - this week's terminations log.

4up.me (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
4up.im (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
Fileduct.net (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
Thexyz.net (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
Netuploaded.com (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
Neoxfiles.com (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
Bigupload.com (filehost) terminated by Moneybookers
Cramit.in (filehost) terminated by Paypal (again)
Fileupload.pro (filehost) terminated by Paypal (again)
Jpfileshare.com (filehost) terminated by Paypal (again)
Kupload.org (filehost) terminated by Paypal (again)
Kuanime.net (reseller)terminated by Paypal
Filesmelt.com (filehost) terminated by Paypal
Wikiupload.com (filehost) terminated by Paypal
Useupload.com (filehost) terminated by Paypal
Muchshare.net (filehost) terminated by Paypal (again)
Megaload.it (filehost) terminated by Swreg
Filerobo.com (filehost) terminated by HiPay
4up.me (filehost) terminated by HiPay
4up.im (filehost) terminated by HiPay
Sharpfile.com (filehost) terminated by Authorize.net

More dead hosts

http://archiv.to
http://bigshare.eu
http://clickandload.net
http://crazyupload.com
http://dataup.to
http://dualshare.com
http://eeeshare.com
http://evilshare.com
http://fast-load.net
http://fdcupload.com
http://feboshare.com
http://filebase.to
http://filechip.com
http://filegiga.com
http://file-rack.com
http://filescloud.com
http://fileserver.cc
http://filestab.com
http://filezzz.com
http://hamstershare.com
http://hellshare.com
http://hotshare.net
http://kewlshare.com
http://loadfiles.in
http://missupload.com
http://movieshare.in
http://qshare.com
http://sendfile.to
http://sharebomb.com
http://sharedup.com
http://sharedzip.com
http://shareyourfiles.net
http://shragle.com
http://storage.to
http://storewith.com
http://supashare.net
http://upit.to
http://uploadline.com
http://youshare.com

Fantastic.

:thumbsup

4000 pirates

I don't know really. When you just started this it looked like this: gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1072537

Crocko is there, on your list. Still has PayPal. It's just strange that you've apparently managed to strong hand PayPal into dropping such a giant DepositFiles (did you?) and yet Crocko.com and Hotfile are out of your reach?

How come? You can find some good examples of blatant violations with ease: porn-w.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4492518&view=next

All your work did not really change the piracy scene as much as you claim to be hoping to. The major players are out there, continue to have good traffic and I'm sure nice sales too.

Check this out: planetsuzy.org/t625483-missy-dawn.html

Debunks your opinion regarding RapidShare (who in my opinion are simply squeezing more money out of this thing).

It is understandable why you are not touching the Hotfile, because your employers who own sites like Tube8, YouPorn, Extreme Tube, PornHub told you not to, as Tube8 for example was created by the Hotfile founder and of course they are either friends or partners, ain't it so?
Regarding Crocko it actually looks like you might have an interest in that one as they generally have been ignored by you despite anything.

Which one do you own or work for?

IS that the be best you can do? His post was legitimate. Don't be so butt hurt!

I do not believe that Crocko.com will have Paypal for much longer. We are coming to the end of a very long process regarding that site.

Hotfile.com are currently before the courts and we have (a now very large) case file regarding them.

It seems you have not bothered reading this thread, if you had you would know the answer.

The major players are all being squeezed. Larger sites take much longer to build cases against. We have said this in this thread time and time again.

It really debunks nothing, what point are you trying to make ? RapidShare have announced that their new restrictions and changes to their systems roll out on November 27th, we are not there yet.

Nobody tells us what to do. Hotfile is an ongoing issue for us, don't assume that just because we haven't dealt with a site yet that we won't deal with a site.

Let me make this absolutely clear. No site engaged in commercial piracy, big or small, has a right to exist.

As for your other untruth in the above statement, we do not have an employer, we're a completely independent entity.

You don't know what you are talking about.

It is in your interest to try and undermine our work, however since we started more than 600 sites have lost one or more forms of payment processing and more than 100 sites no longer exist with a further 200 - 300 sites probably going to disappear as they run out of money.

Every week more terminations and dead sites are listed in this thread. This will continue, some weeks there will be more terminations and dead sites than others, but nothing will stop the campaign and nothing will stop us attacking piracy at every point we can.